Here are Some Drawings of the Prophet Muhammed

another great Guffaw-hahahahahaa

come get some from where?
you're an anonymous poster on the internet...

South Park is dragging an entire corporation and its employees into a holy war they didn't ask for.

Why should Comedy Central put it's employee's lives at risk just because South Park wants to make fun of a religion?

Comedy Central isn't doing it - it is the writers of each show who are taking this on.

btw... why does every topic about Religion have to turn into whether Atheism is right or not... it's boring.

if drawing muhammad picture is allowed, everyone will draw their own version of muhammad..and they might use the picture to insult muhammad.. so it is better that no one know how muhammad really looks like...

Guess what... Drawing a picture of Muhammed IS allowed. It's protected in the US by something called Free Speech. Because the idea that you aren't allowed to draw a picture of Muhammed is much worse than the idea of insulting Muhammed.

You atheists are so adorable when you think you're right.

the burden of proof is with the believer....when you can accomplish this please let me know.

so by definition an atheist is correct....or right as you phrased it.

It is the 21 century, people need to realize that religion isn't anything but fairytale.

Atheists are right-- there is no scientific proof of God.

But they forget that Theology is outside of the realm of Science. Science doesn't tell us what is moral, or ethical, or anything else that may happen to be outside the realm of what science is capable of telling us.

Science is a philosophy of skepticism and empirical evidence, and as such has no ability to explore metaphysical questions, which have nothing to do with skepticism or empirical evidence, and everything to do with subjective experience.

They are simply two different, separate, and exclusive realms of knowledge and thought.

I respect the reasoning behind the ban on graven images in Islam (and Judaism).

I also respect the freedom of speech. Those that practice Islam can impose on themselves whatever rules they want. But not on other people.

What makes you so sure Jesus wasn't a real person? Surely, much of what's written about him is parable and fiction.

But what makes you so sure that there WASN'T a Rabbi who taught in Jerusalem named Jesus of Nazareth, who was killed by Romans fearful of insurrection?

As someone who has studied Islam... Muhammad is more likely a real person than Jesus, simply because the Qur'an was right after Muhammad's death by people who knew him; the Bible was written centuries after Jesus had died.

Images of Muhammad are banned in Islam to prevent the worship of "false idols." It's God who is supposed to be worshiped, not His prophet.

well guess what... us athiests are right because we use things like science and math to solve our problems!

and the cow jumped over the moon... "wow grandpa, now can you read the king james version" rofl

right a rule to follow when attempting to live a muslum life, not for jews christians or whatever. its like jews sending death threats to ball park franks for not being kosher.its not the rules for them to live by. keeping kosher is for jews.

I guess I should go down the line here:

Earl: How did you come to the conclusion that the burden of proof is on theists? By what definition are atheists correct? That you cannot see God? Can you see gravity? How about happiness, sadness, or any other emotion?

Asherp: There is no scientific evidence that explains where the materials that existed before the Big Bang came from either. Neither is there any evidence that explains why we dream, sleep, or die.

CalgarC: Doctors once used science to justify transfusing milk to patients instead of blood. It didn't work. The Earth was once the center of the universe, or at least, that's what science said. Imagine what science will open our eyes to tomorrow..

Ha Ha!! I can see gravity!!!! PWNED...Foookin Noob.

I didn't post this to be offensive or mean. I posted it because there's this idea that I can't. And I don't like that idea.

I empathize with your concern, but you have to recognize the gap here. South Park has been making fun of Christianity for years. It might be somewhat offensive to Christians, but it's a joke. For crying out loud, it's a cartoon!

The reason people are so upset with these radical Muslim groups is that they are completely overreacting to this joke. Remember when you were little, and your friend/brother/whatever would do something, and it would make you mad, so they would just keep doing it? That's the issue here. Nobody is attacking Islam except a handful of radical, and publicized, Muslims.

if the radical muslim is the issue here why didnt they make jokes about them..?? why it has to be Muhammad..?? me myself despise those radical, extremist muslim because being extremist is not part of islamic teaching...

in islam. making joke is fine as long as it doesnt hurt anyone's feeling... just because you do not take jokes seriously, it doesnt mean that everyone do the same...

yes i remember when i was little there were some of my friends made jokes that annoying me.. but they never crossed the line.... but this... insulting our beloved prophet is way cross over the line... you know..? in some countries, if you said that their country or people stupid, they will just kill you... everyone has their own part of sensitivity...

How is this post I made insulting Muhammed? I posted a link to other peoples drawings of him. Then I commented that the picture I used made him look like an actor. There's no insult there.

i am totally aware of that... what i refer to to 'you' is not specifically to the people who post it.. its for people wrote drew the picture above and other pictures or cartoon of Muhammad... i am sorry if there are any misunderstanding...

I will never respect a mass murdering Jew hating pedophile

me too... but what makes you think muslim do that..??

I'm talking about Mohammed

Given the history of Islam you have the audacity to ask such a facetious question as that? . . indeed, common sense is not common anymore.

and you think that what the Jewish are doing to Palestinians is not mass murder..??

about the qurayza tribe that you mentioned earlier... there were a lot of tribes in arab on that time.. even Jewish had a lot of tribes other than qurayza.. so the reason of mohammad beheaded qurayza people not because they are Jewish.. there is something you need to know about arabian tribes on that time(Jewish and non jewish).. they have this over-obsession for they own tribe(its called assabiyah) that thay are willing to kill any other people from tribe beside them.. almost all of the tribes have this kind of obsession... so when mohammad open a new country. he made a contitution.. one of the 47 agreements in the contitution is the the in order to maintain peace between tribe, qurayza tribe must not help the enemy of nazir tribe in war and vice versa.. but qurayza tribes broke the treaty... they support the war against nazir tribe... they trying to start a war.. tribes war.. so, to prevent any bigger conflict mohammad had to take action and kill the man power of soldiers of qurayza were almost all killed.. yes the qurayza women were enslaved but they were given correct guide of islam and get islamized.. and then they were released... that was it.. the qurayza tribe was a trouble maker.. they didnt keep their word and they willing to start a big conflict...

there.. you understand that..?? its not because they are jewish.. its because they are trouble maker... words do not work with them... just because you know one fact of mohammad, you had the right to say he is a rapist..?? a slaves owner..?? whut about you read alquran.. you will know the whole story of mohammad...

what you said about muhammad is mostly untrue... he's no rapist.. what is the girl's name he raped..?? yes he was a slave owner.. he owned them and release them from slavery... he bought the slaves then released them... you think why the slaves or ex-slaves liked him very much..?? you know what..?? one of the group of people who firstly go to him to learn about islam were slaves, poor people and women...
if he is such what you said(rapist, liar, bandit, slave owner) how do you think he can influence people to transfer from their feudal religion to islam and build first islamic country(Madinah&Mecca)...?? and if he hated Jewish that much, why did he gave citizenship and right in politics to Jewish when the country had been built, plus he gave protection to them from muslim who hated them on that time..??

reading your text i found that most of your content was only your own opinion...

You say, "yes the qurayza women were enslaved but they were given correct guide of islam and get islamized.. and then they were released" - why is it that because they were "given correct guide of islam and get islamized" that they were released? I say this because I was always surprised that hostages taken by radical Muslims are often "given the opportunity to convert to Islam" and, thereby, saved from execution. This is, I think, the cruxt of the problem - their tribe was decimated and they were taken as slaves - how "islamized" do you think they really were?? There is a reason common law says that contracts signed under distress are not valid - there is not true agreement because the only reason someone would agree under duress is not because they agree, but because they fear for their life! That is not true devotion or belief - it is self-preservation, and do you really think Allah would want people saying the believed in Islam just because they are afraid of losing their lives or because they truly believe in his teachings? Scaring people into the religion does not serve the religion well - the rest of the world are waiting for radical Muslims to realize this.

I'm not a Muslim, but I can respect the reasoning behind the ban on graven images.

I agree that for a person to show pictures of the prophet Mohammad just for the sake of pissing people off is incredibly disrespectful.

However, until Muslims stop killing people for violating religious rules, which they only have the right to impose on themselves (many of which I think are good rules to self-impose), people will continue to be disrespectful for the sake of eliciting a reaction.

I also find it incredibly disrespectful, but I think its even more disrespectful that there are death threats against those who made the drawings.

Peace will not be had through violence, nor disrespect. Both sides need to learn humility and grace.

yawn

Here is the hatred towards jews in the Koran. Enough of your pernicious taquiya!

Qur'an 2:61 "Humiliation and wretchedness were stamped on the Jews and they were visited with Allah's wrath."
Qur'an 4:44 "Have you not considered those to whom a portion of the Book has been given? They traffic in error and desire that you should go astray. But Allah has full knowledge of your enemies. Of the Jews there are those who displace words from their (right) places, saying, 'We hear and we disobey' with a twist of their tongues they slander Faith.... Allah has cursed them for disbelief."
Qur'an 4:47 "O you People of the Book to whom the Scripture has been given, believe in what We have (now) revealed, confirming and verifying what was possessed by you, before We destroy your faces beyond all recognition, turning you on your backs, and curse you as We cursed the Sabbath-breakers, for the decision of Allah Must be executed."
Qur'an 4:160 "For the iniquity of the Jews We made unlawful for them certain (foods) in that they hindered many from Allah's Way, that they took usury, though they were forbidden, and that they devoured men's wealth on false pretenses, We have prepared for those among them who reject [Islamic] Faith a painful doom."
Qur'an 5:59 "Say: 'People of the Book! Do you disapprove of us for no other reason than that we believe in Allah, and the revelation that has come to us and that which came before?' Say: 'Shall I point out to you something much worse than this by the treatment it received from Allah? Those who incurred the curse of Allah and His wrath, those of whom He transformed into apes and swine."
Qur'an 2:64 "But you [Jews] went back on your word and were lost losers. So become apes, despised and hated. We made an example out of you."
Ishaq:240 "The Jews are a nation of liars.... The Jews are a treacherous, lying, and evil people."
Qur'an 33:26 "Allah made the Jews leave their homes by terrorizing them so that you killed some and made many captive. And He made you inherit their lands, their homes, and their wealth. He gave you a country you had not traversed before."
Ishaq:250 "The bestial transformation occurred when Allah turned Jews into apes, despised."
Qur'an 59:14 "The Jews are devoid of sense. There is a grievous punishment awaiting them. Satan tells them not to believe so they will end up in Hell."
Ishaq:254
Qur'an 2:96 "We will not remove a Jew from the punishment. They know the shameful thing that awaits them."
Qur'an 4:55 "Sufficient for the Jew is the Flaming Fire!"

yes.. i agreed every word you said.. but you have to know that there are 1 billion people of muslim.. even i dont agree with any extreme action but in 1 billion people, there is almost impossible that none of us is extremist... however majority of muslim despise the act of killing recklessly by extremists... self bombing, head slaughtering... that was not the jihad in islam.. people who did that had just misunderstood the true meaning of jihad...

then i dare you to look what they did to palestinians and say that they are good people... if you do so, i have no words for you...

I do say they are good people and if you have no words for me, then that's great. Oh and I've got news for you....the so-called palestinians do not exist.

being enslaved doesnt mean that their life was threatened... after given the whole picture of islam, they given the right to make the decision themselves.. transfer to islam is not the condition of them to be released... mohammad almost never hold a slave for a long time.. he will just release them whether they are muslim or not...

regardless of how the master treats the slave(field hand versus house help) it doesnt negate the removal of the slaves humanity.

really, the palastinian issue really? cristian society hits mohamed not even islam as a faith and with almost no provocation you default to the israeli/palastinian conflict?really?wtf?
iran needs nukes cuz of the palastinians.
terrorism at munich because of the palastinians.
muslums in new jersey celebrating 9-11 cuz of the palastinians.
yet no meaningfull effort to help the palastinians, cuz then what would be your excuse for any and every trespass?
not to mention you dont acknowledge it takes two to tango
did the muslum arabs in 1948 not refuse a coallition government?
did they not slay jews at will for hundreds of years in the name of dhimi law?
in 67 did they say to jordan,egypt,and syria no war lets try peacefull methods?
why is how israelis treat them bad but suicide bombings are ok?
how is random rocket launchings towards civilians any better or worse than israel targeting hamas leaders.
exactly how does finger pointing help resolve anything?

its against the tenants of judaism to create the image of god yet michealangelo and davinci werent subject to death or even the threat of death as a result

thats the point is it not to respect peoples opinion, like say the opinion to draw mohomed.
his protection of jews and christians isnt without exceptions. jewish woman and children are protected (cuz they are seen as property and can be forced to live according to islam) but men are the enemy.a muslum man can marry a jewish woman but a jewish man is not allowed to marry a muslum woman. its a method of out breeding not true tolerance

yet after david no jewish civil wars between tribes. tribal warfare is an issue that plagues islam to a far greater extent than judaism.even in the war of independance for israel the palmach,irgun,and haganah leaders ordered thier troops to kill the competing jewish military forces but the soldiers refused because they couldnt understand the benefit of jews killing other jews.its not as much an arab issue in the region as it is a muslum one.

1400 yrs of documented history.

but should any people sacrifice thier personal freedom to the will of another?
in a polite world we may choose to do so but any reasonable person cant be expected to be made to

the religious world fails to recognize its trespasses on everyone else. the need to do this is a reaction to the religious behavior.
evangelicals take money from thier followers in the name of god
south park gives them jesus with a commercial idealogy
mormons restrict freedom based on joseph smiths teachings
they mock joseph smith
islam claims to be supreme yet has all the problems all religions have
south parks points out no one is above ridicule
if anything you should be honored to be in the lexicon of shit that matters

we are talking about 1400 years ago where slavery was an acceptable, legitimate trade not only in arab.. but in all over the world... owning a slave wasnt considered a sin until mohammad appeared.. mohammad was the first arabian who was determined to ban slavery but its can not be done in just a second... he need to set a good example to his brothers(muslim) by releasing his own... and the idea of all human are equal was slowly accepted in arab.. arab was on of the early countries that banned slavery... and mohammad spreaded the idea of slavery banning at the same time as islam spreaded...

the religious doesnt failed.. the people who practise the religilous is failed.. they learnt something about their religious but they think they are right in whatever they do.. some muslim are not excluded...

why not..?? why not we restraint our freedom to talk whatever we want just to prevent a fight with other..?? just because your community believe in freedom of speech, you can not expect people who doesnt, to behave like they do.... you can not apply the 'i said you are fat and i have the right to say so' rule to the people who doesnt accept the idea of freedom of speech...

Any "Man"(Woman) should be able to command the SAME respect from their fellows,... that would be due to an UNFAMILIAR,....UNFETTERED dog of their equivalent body mass.. Any individual who for any reason,...CAN NOT command such respect,...is not worthy of respect AS A HUMAN.

We are LETHAL man. This is what MAN is.

note---that is not to say,... that such unfortunates are not worthy of note,...or compassion,...or care. But HUMAN society is based on the consensus and the balance of wills amongst [SCARY>>>WARRIOR>>equals]. (If its not,.....then why do those with REAL BALLS bother to engage in the discourse)?

my rule of thumb

i think i get what you were sayin but i wasnt stating personal philosiphy but a religious ruling

does the reverse not apply?why must the secular moniter thier beliefs and values in accordance to the values of the religious.why is it impossible for the religious to accept others beliefs aswell?no one is asking any muslum to be any less of a muslum. nobody is attemting to touch,corrupt,alter,or even threaten the institution of islam (im sure you recognize the difference between the crusades and modern western culture) then how is it acceptable for islam to demand we change our beliefs?

http://on.th

why does the opposite not apply?why is it incumbent on the secular world to behave in a manor that is suitable to the islamic world?just as crusading is disgusting the idea that islam can impose its will on us is the same crime.while the offenses may differ the crime being committed is the same, spanish inquasition and so on.this islamic idea and freedom of speech can and has happily coexisted without either side having to give up anything.peace is available but not opted for. the important question is if this peace that existed before is now broken who is the aggressor. and it doesnt matter what you say or do a picture can never possess the aggression greater than the threat of death

of course individual people dont represent the entirety of a religion, cuz theres a nut in ever bunch.but one of the many points of living according to a religion is because we are fallable so we look to the ideas(god)that are infalable to live our lifes as best we can.(if we were perfect religion wouldnt exist)so if a system(religion) has multiple identical failures it is evidence of that systems flaws. just as prius's had that brake issue. you cant say its not toyota its the individual cars, those cars functioned as toyota dictated. you cant expect any reasonable logical person to say that the overwhelming amount of terrorism in contemperary history commited by muslums are isolated incidences of sick people who all happen to be muslum.
i personaly believe islam is a religion of peace but it isnt as perfect as muslums find it to be and as a result of being blind to the flaw you disable the collective islamic communities ability to adress and fix it. what if nobody ever thought the crusaders were wrong in thier endevours.they would still be slaughtering arabs in the streets.

how come how "jews" treat palastinians defines wether or not they are good as a "people" but 9-11,spain,london,mumbai,russia,munich olympics,and so on dont represent wether or not muslums are good as a "people"?

i agree but feel this thread isnt the place to debate the validity of the palastinians as a culture

I didn't bring it up.....I was just responding to the Muslim du jour and the usual lies.

when individual people do dumb shit as a one off they get nailed for it. thier is a great volume of terrorist mockery but after a while you cant help but notice islam being a part of the thing your mocking.
of course every priest isnt a pedophile.in actuality of the pedophelia in the world the church is a tiny fraction of a percent but the repeated occurances of priests peepee touching makes the churchs association unavoidable.
despite salmon being enjoyed by billions of people across the planet a salmon on a sandwich is somehow jewish.
thats why mohomed gets associated, its not a lack of understanding on our part but jihadist after jihadist telling us they do as they do for islam.its muslums defendng jihadists.its the people of edison new jersey dancing in he streets as the towers fell, thats where the association comes from.dont get mad at judeo-christian society when you cant tend your own backyard

I understand that. But the Muslim Community on the whole needs to start getting better at self-policing.

Civil Rights Leaders had to do so here in America during the Civil Rights movement. There were those who advocated taking up guns, and burning down buildings, and shooting racist cops.

Gandhi had to do so during his various campaigns. Many of his followers advocated violence, it he called for non-violent actions.

Muslim leaders need to start getting serious about denouncing violence as a means to an end.

A slave, by definition, is not "free" to make such a decision. Anyone who saw their tribe murdered by their captors and enslaved by those captors would be fearful, even if their captors told them their lives weren't threatened if they didn't convert to Islam. I've read an article by a female journalist who was taken hostage by radical Muslims who discussed the absurdity of her captors trying to convert her to Islam. She felt that, after everything she had seen up to this point (journalists having their heads chopped off on camera), she had no choice but to act as if she had converted and I think they either let her go or she was rescued, but either way, she never truly converted and only acted as if she did to save her own life. She didn't know if her captors would or would not kill her, but she knew she needed to do whatever they told her and that she had to lead them to believe she wanted to convert to Islam.

God must have been mad at the Jews when he sent Gabriel to dictate the Qur'an.

Let's get one thing straight here and it's the only issue worth considering. Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer (he personally helped to behead all 900 members of the Jewish Banu Qurayza tribe in one day), a psychotic liar, a bandit, a plunderer, a pedophile, a rapist, a slave owner. He was a 7th century Hitler, Himmler, Attila, Stalin and Mao all wrapped up in one package of psychopathic hatred and murderousness. It's all in the Sira, the OFFICIAL Muslim biography of Mohammed by Ibn Ishaq. Read it and learn. Then you will see that the only response to this repugnant scumbag is ridicule and satire.

OK. Jesus was a socialist, a cult leader, a criminal, a zombie, possibly a pedophile I don't know I wasn't there but I've heard, a blasphemer, etc.

You know damned well he wasn't. Cut the bullshit.

Really? I wasn't there. Were you? I dont' know that and neither do you. Just like you don't know if the crap you spewed about Muhammed is true or not. You just said it to be obnoxious.

don't forget he was bi and slept with a hooker

Well,.......you soft peddled that.

= (

Your mean.

oh I suppose you think mohammed was a model of conduct...al insan al kamil....do you?

Dont feed the troll! : D

what is wrong with you?

Why is everything you post meant to offend people?

Did you not get breastfed when you were a kid? Mommy didn't give you enough attention?

I can totally see this happening. LMAO =D

I picture you sitting in a trailer park in Arkansas in a ketchup stained wifebeater and shit stained boxer shorts with 17 cats and 4 empty cases of Busch beer with cans all over the place.

do you have any backing to this?

no you can't

you just like to hear yourself speak

Notice when the truth of Islam and it's demented prophet "Mo-hound" (btw the nick-name IS derogatory, and meant to be so) is exposed for what it really is, the p/c multi-culturist and Muslim apologist crawl out of the wood work like the ideologue cockroaches that they are, attempting to portray Islam as the "religion of peace" when it is exactly the opposite, which any rational person with common sense can easily perceive. . . clearly showing that common sense is all too uncommon anymore.

Er.....wrong. You are so far from reality, it hurts to witness it. And the next one please!

Ah it's so good to hear a rational voice in this murky den of morons