Should you vote tactically this election?

One of today's big election stories concerns "tactical voting" - excellent, something else to make the election seem even more X Factory. The Mail reports that Children's Secretary Ed Balls and Welsh Secretary Peter Hain have suggested that "party supporters in some marginal seats should back the Liberal Democrats to stop the Conservatives winning the General Election." Wow. Labour MP's suggesting people don't vote Labour? Well, yes.
In the article, which sadly doesn't have the headline "Balls To The Wall!", it says that Ed et al. suggest voting for Clegg in Lib Dem-Tory marginal constituencies would increase the chance of the Conservatives falling short of an overall majority, and give Labour the chance to form a coalition with the Lib Dems in a hung parliament. Or as the Telegraph puts it "that nasty little game that the Eastern European countries employ to ensure that one of their number wins the Eurovision Song Contest."
So now it's not just about voting for the local MP or party you agree with most, it's also about keeping parties you don't like out of parliament. Check and mate. Excuse me while I lie down in a dark room and think about this. Thankfully, luddites like me don't have to think too much about it, becuase the Mirror have conveniently made a print-out-and-keep tactical voting guide (it'll go on the wall next to my Sun World Cup wallchart and that massive poster of dinosaurs I got from the Guardian ages ago).
At the top, the guide lists constituencies that Lib Dem voters should vote for Labour in, at the bottom it lists places Labour supporters should vote Lib Dem in. And in case you were wondering which way the ever-subtle Mirror was going in the election, the line "Smug David Cameron faces defeat if people vote with their heads and not their hearts on Thursday" might give you a clue.
So how does everyone feel about the election being turned into a big game of Risk? None of the other parties seem to be suggesting voters should tactically vote. Former Lib-Dem leader Paddy/Lord Ashdown/Pantsdown said during a Radio 4 interview that the call was "patronising" and that the public "were quite intelligent enough" to work out how to vote. Even Gordon Brown himself has played down the tactical voting message, telling GMTV that "I want people to vote Labour and I want a majority Labour government." The Conservatives say that the call showed "utter desperation" and stood in stark contrast to Mr Cameron's "positive campaigning". Are we sure about that?
-
- groups:
- Community, News and Politics, Election 2010
-
- tags:
- Conservatives, Labour, Election 2010, Liberal Democrats, 2 more
-
-
sophosthegreat
-
I think it would be great if more people voted at all, every election relatively few people actually choose to use their vote, perhaps as they feel their vote is worthless. If tactical voting is the only way to convince people that it is worth voting, then so be it.
- 2 years ago
-
sophosthegreat
-
-
BCDel89
-
Voting tactically would only matter if 1) their wasn't a bunch of d-bags running for office and 2) if our elections weren't just a bunch of huge popularity contests where your not actually obligated to follow through with anything you say during elections. In my personal opinion parties should be done away with along with ANY form of extremism bc people are no longer worried about the views of the people theyre electing they're more worried about the party they represent and keeping the opposing party out of office...
- 2 years ago
-
BCDel89
-
-
Pardon
-
Personally I think that there is nothing wrong with voting like this. I have traditionally nearly always voted tactically because I am from an area where my party has almost no chance of success. In fact I think I have voted for a party other than the one i support more often than i have voted for my favorite candidate because it was the best chance of keeping the party I disliked the most out of power. However I am glad that at the moment I live in a place where I can vote for who I want to win knowing it can make a difference.
- 2 years ago
-
Pardon
-
-
bailey78
-
I always vote straight democratic.
- 2 years ago
-
bailey78
-
-
smurph25
-

-
There is a good reason why I don't trust newspapers for their election support, and the front page of the Daily Mirror says it all. Media bias in the making.
- 2 years ago
-
smurph25
-
-
Pardon
-
smurph25:
I don't see why this is a problem. Newspapers have always had clear political allegiances its not something that they try to disguise. You buy the paper with an editorial that suits your own ideology. This is no worse than the Brown bashing that Murdoch's fleet of publications have been engaged in for the last year.
- 2 years ago
-
Pardon
-
-
OrbViper
-
I'm against tactical voting really, sort of turns our democracy into even more of a charade. And with PR really being considered, comparing seat distribution with vote percentage is going to give them a big boost when it comes to putting PR forward. Your vote does count, perhaps not directly for your MP always, but it will when trying to push forward PR. And once we have that, we can hopefully be done with this tactical voting once and for all.
- 2 years ago
-
OrbViper