Obama Drug Policy calls for drugged driving charges for unimpaired marijuana users
source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/russ-belville/obama-drug-policy-calls-f_b_574483.html
-
-
- Conniepae
- added this
Encourage States To Adopt Per Se Drug Impairment Laws [ONDCP]
State laws regarding impaired driving are varied, but most State codes do not contain a separate offense for driving under the influence of drugs (DUID). Therefore, few drivers are identified, prosecuted, or convicted for DUID. Law enforcement personnel usually cite individuals with the easier to prove driving while intoxicated (DWI) alcohol charges. Unclear laws provide vague signals both to drivers and to law enforcement, thereby minimizing the possible preventive benefit of DUID statutes. Fifteen states have passed laws clarifying that the presence of any illegal drug in a driver's body is per se evidence of impaired driving. ONDCP will work to expand the use of this standard to other states and explore other ways to increase the enforcement of existing DUID laws.
Here are the states President Obama would like the others to emulate:
1. Arizona: Zero tolerance for cannabis metabolites, mandatory 24 hours jail, up to 6 months upon conviction.
2. Delaware: Zero tolerance for cannabis metabolites.
3. Georgia: Zero tolerance for cannabis metabolites, mandatory 24 hours jail, up to 12 months upon conviction.
4. Illinois: Zero tolerance for cannabis metabolites, up to 12 months upon conviction.
5. Indiana: Zero tolerance for cannabis metabolites, up to 60 days upon conviction.
6. Michigan: Zero tolerance for cannabis metabolites, up to 93 days upon conviction, vehicle immobilization for up to 180 days.
7. Nevada: 15 ng/ml for cannabis metabolites.
8. Ohio: 15 ng/ml for cannabis metabolites, mandatory 72 hours in jail, up to 6 months upon conviction, 6 month to 3 year license suspension.
9. Pennsylvania: DUID for cannabis metabolites, amount unclear.
10. South Dakota: Zero tolerance for cannabis metabolites for persons under the age of 21.
11. Utah: Zero tolerance for cannabis metabolites, mandatory 48 hours jail, up to 6 months upon conviction.
-
-
Andrew_Koziol
-
A month after smokin a joint in MI will give you a positive drug screening, thus a DUID. Per Se? So the LEO can say to anyone who might of smoked canna or just stayed up all day workin the Census... "piss in this cup or you will go to jail you damned red-eyed hippie"
- 2 years ago
-
Andrew_Koziol
-
-
Andrea_Munn
-
Americans need to wake up and quit hiding their heads in the sand. Too many people have believed the governments lies about cannibus being "dangerous and the need to ban its use." Is it going to take another revolution for the public to see how we are being manipulated.? Ask yourself---Are we REALLY free! President Reagan's argument against cannibus was "Citizens smoke pot,read and talk" as if educating ourselves and thinking for ourselves was a bad thing. Read,get involved and take back our rights. Government was created by the people,for the people and should reflect the will of the people.
- 2 years ago
-
Andrea_Munn
-
-
UtopianSky
-
While the "Zero tolerance for cannabis metabolites" sounds too strict, there should be a strong nationwide definition of DUID just like for DWI. DWI has a minimum blood alcohol level, so a similar level should be found for marijuana.
I consider this a step in the right direction- treat pot just like alcohol. If people want to smoke, fine, smoke. Just don't do something irresponsible while impaired.
And tax it too.
- 2 years ago
-
UtopianSky
-
-
treewolf39
-
UtopianSky:
Marijuana does not cause the same impairment as alcohol. First a risk must be proven than a level for metabolite's can be found. Problem is, at this point, the only test is a blood test which could end up being a real strain on hospitals; with over zealous police in some parts of the country.
Fine, tax my medicine. I really think a hard look should be taken at people driving on their prescription drugs. More people are dying from legal drugs than illegal ones.
- 2 years ago
-
treewolf39
-
-
Omnomynous
-
Hmmm, what does your drug policy say about you?
I think the under lying goals of the drug war are; legalized slavery, successful class warfare, making tons of "easy" money, and removing minorities from the rest of the population.
Very few things illustrate the magnitude of racism in this country, (simply by the disproportionate incarceration of minorities,) better than the "drug war"...
Mr. "Change We Can Believe in", this glimmering hope of a brighter day, is using the same racist policies we've been using for decades only pushing the envelope on enforcement....
- 2 years ago
-
Omnomynous
-
-
noxidereus
-
America has more prisoners (actual numbers as well as per capita) than any other country on the planet - including China. So the thought of the day is: Is America actually free or were we all brainwashed to think it's free because it has been repeated to us so often while uncle sam force deep throated us with his massive dick called nationalism while the statue of liberty sodomized us with the torch of patriotism. America is fooling itself. We need to wake the fuck up or we're going to end up just like the move Idiocracy. Sometimes it feels like we are already there.
The lyrics "Proud to be an American where at least I know I'm free" makes me want to hang myself. It reminds me how frigging ignorant our fellow Americans are. It is macabre just how many of us love to demonize a particular group of people, for asinine superficial reasons and see them punished. Oh my ex wife loved to see people punished! It really pisses me off to have to share the world with cruel ignorant people.
It really is all about money. We let the corporations/big-business take over. They rule our politicians. they ARE our politicians. They make our laws. They (indirectly) collect our taxes, while they find ways to avoid paying theirs. Corporations are the single worst thing about this fucking corny, steamy, hot, sticky turd we call a country. I want our country back. I want it to be free. I want to love America again, but I'm just fuming pissed off right now at how fucking stupid everything is. That's why I rarely come on current anymore. It just pisses me off hearing all the stupid shit going on...
Yeah that was a rant. Sorry, it is what it is. I'm done with current for the day. I've reached my frustration limit. Good luck surviving the upcoming police state crack down on American "freedom". Bah!
- 2 years ago
-
noxidereus
-
-
pmurph364
-
In a country nearly bankrupt from all the waste, with 5 million locked up more than Russia or China, we cannot afford continued war against the people. In Minnesota where black families are broken up 9 times as often as white where there are blood test for moms,not dads though, when baby is born.
Who will bear the brunt of the new law? My guess will be the young black male who already has a task cut out trying to make a living and feed a family.
OK I got over giving away 700Billion to the banks under a shady quick deal.
If the policy is accurate then it gets harder to see where change is for the people.
In that event it would seem the solution is to vote out Every one that was involved in the Great 700 Billion Treasury Heist.To vote out all who make war on the people and to get some true change. With all the problems we have another tool to use against the people is sad.The President should have said no to the banks.To preach even more about what people do when one has taken part in the Great Heist is so dishonest.We are no longer a nation of laws but a nation where might and money rule where the banks in effect print money and dissension is crushed. What a shame, what a sham , a great crime has taken place and old people are being robbed by 0% interest that are more gifts to banks. The lesson seems to be lie cheat and steal.Mr President the people are hoping for better and you might consider what the results of such policy will be. A more hopeless youth? More expense for Courts ? More people redefined as criminal. Big Business gets a pass.
What a country. - 2 years ago
-
pmurph364
-
-
hunzedog
-
gotta fill up them shiney new jails......gotta get em all...
- 2 years ago
-
hunzedog
-
-
dariusvons
-
I'm all for criminal charges for driving while on MJ... but there's one problem... MJ 'metabolites' are detectable for nearly a MONTH after use... so that's NOT a qualification for evidence.
- 2 years ago
-
dariusvons
-
-
dariusvons
-
unimpaired?
- 2 years ago
-
dariusvons
-
-
cadsuch
-
An unimpaired drug user? Whats-a-matter-you?
- 2 years ago
-
cadsuch
-
-
curtisreed
-
makes sense to me. this will be the first time I agree with Obama.
- 2 years ago
-
curtisreed
-
-
mojojuju
-
I do believe this qualifies as CHANGE.
- 2 years ago
-
mojojuju
-
-
fun_size
-
mojojuju:
Change in the wrong direction but yes it is change
- 2 years ago
-
fun_size
-
-
Omnomynous
-
this article right here;
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100513/ap_on_re_us/failed_drug_war
it has the drug czar saying the drug war is a failure....
"In the grand scheme, it has not been successful,"
- 2 years ago
-
Omnomynous
-
-
Omnomynous
-
Obama is exactly while I'll be voting for Ron Paul in 2012.
- 2 years ago
-
Omnomynous
-
-
dariusvons
-
Omnomynous:
why not every year you vote?
- 2 years ago
-
dariusvons
-
-
Omnomynous
-
dariusvons:
if somebody better would come along that stands a chance I'm there.... my support of Paul is directly related to his drug policy, and the fact he would have a shot against Obama....
- 2 years ago
-
Omnomynous
-
-
nursediesel
-
Anyone that has tried driving while stoned out of their mind know they are impaired. But some of these guidelines are rough. The testing is questionable...
I'm torn about this because I believe cannabis should be legal, definitely for medicinal purposes.
But not driving while stoned.....
Yet the court system is so unbalanced in many cases, the punishment for marijauna use is so broad and over done, yet we let child molesters and murderers free...Violent people! It's confusing.... - 2 years ago
-
nursediesel
-
-
FoosMaster
-
nursediesel:
And if you have enough Money (Influence) then you don't get charged with Driving while stoned. "It's about the MONEY!"
No matter if you are talking about Drugs, Murder, Sex Crimes, etc... It is still about the MONEY! You get the justice you can afford, (With the exception of a few rare cases), hey, anything can happen. - 2 years ago
-
FoosMaster
-
-
jonber
-
nursediesel:
Driving while stoned out of ones mind, is silly and dangerous indeed. But how about a nice little hit for the road? We people of peace. Compromise. A parked car with Cheech and Chong.
- 2 years ago
-
jonber
-
-
Conniepae
-
FoosMaster:
Even if cannabis were reclassified, it would not mean people should not be held accountable for their actions. I do not support people driving impaired. People who commit crimes, while driving, walking, or talking should be held accountable, regardless of what they have consumed.
- 2 years ago
-
Conniepae
-
-
nursediesel
-
jonber:
Cheech and Chong in my back yard with some good munchies, something cool to drink and a comfortable chair(for everyone)..maybe even some good TV or a good flick, or some smooth music...John Coltrane, or Willie Dixon....
- 2 years ago
-
nursediesel
-
-
nursediesel
-
FoosMaster:
I agree.
- 2 years ago
-
nursediesel
-
-
FoosMaster
-
Conniepae:
I do agree about accountability. My point was that Some people with Money or Influence are Often Not held accountable and others with nothing are sometimes wrongly prosecuted. It is the way our current system works and it needs to change.
- 2 years ago
-
FoosMaster
-
-
Conniepae
-
FoosMaster:
I was actually responding to nursediesel, but when I hit 'click' it showed up as a response to you. I was really just talking, so I left it where it ended up. Sorry if it came across as though I didn't understand, or agree with you. I totally agree with you. I appreciate the dialog. Thanks for participating. Peace!
- 2 years ago
-
Conniepae
-
-
dariusvons
-
nursediesel:
ah driving stoned... I once crashed while doing that... I forgot to open the garage door, then went back into the house to play videogames. what a threat to society huh?
- 2 years ago
-
dariusvons
-
-
dariusvons
-
Conniepae:
agreed!
- 2 years ago
-
dariusvons
-
-
nursediesel
-
dariusvons:
...and get something to eat?
- 2 years ago
-
nursediesel
-
-
treewolf39
-
Conniepae:
Walking and talking crimes?
- 2 years ago
-
treewolf39
-
-
pmurph364
-
nursediesel:
It is not confusing it is a use of the legal system to break any dissent.The laws are not applied equally nor will they be. People are targeted, others are ignored.The persons directing each so called investigation decide who to go after. It is purely a matter of political and social control.
- 2 years ago
-
pmurph364
-
-
nursediesel
-
pmurph364:
I agree that does occur in many places and for many reasons. The importance is staying up to date with your area and families learning the law and following it. If your loved one is involved in a situation that is decidedly one sided against them with little or no cause for the prejudice the person and family must learn the rights and fight to get the fair treatment so it DOES change. Yes, slowly, but surely!
I live in a town that ignores things certain people do or allows certain families the "benefit of the doubt" just because they are related to someone 'special' or a certain group of citizens that have always ruled this town since the fifties. It must be changed step by step because it's ingrained, unfortunately.
I will say that my experience with the judicial system as a juror and as a family member of a victim of crime have noted the importance of you, yourself and your family being very involved with the process as well as very respectful of the restrictions the written laws/rules cause on the accused and the prosecutors. Being honest and truly earnest in the situation has good results. Being respectful (using honey instead of vinegar) always helps. - 2 years ago
-
nursediesel
-
-
pmurph364
-
treewolf39:
They are thinking about it.
- 2 years ago
-
pmurph364
-
-
ezrierin
-
THE DRUG WAR IS THE NEW SLAVE TRADE! I have to point out that half of all cases that enter a Lawyers office involve drugs. It‘s the Lawyers, aka Politicians, that make the laws. Do you really think they are going to cut their paychecks? Most prisons are build in Podunk Flats USA. The locals in these nowhere lands can find work in the prisons. Do you think they are for or against the war on drugs? Corporations supply billions of dollars in services to jails and prisons. They use their profits to lobby congress and keep their profits, while politicians get paybacks for their votes. All this makes human beings the other profitable commodity of the drug war, besides the drugs. We, THE PEOPLE, have become the product, we are the merchandise, we are the bread which they sell and from which they profit. The “Drug War” is a SLAVE TRADE. So much Pot, for so many people, for so many years in prison, for so much profit for so many of the ruling elites, the new slave traders, politicians, corporations, and dispirit workers. Once, if your skin was black, you could be a slave, now it’s if you come up dirty on a drug test, you loose your rights and they enslave you into their system. There is absolutely no difference. In each case, you are made a slave because of who you are. The 13th Amendment freed all the slaves in the USA. The 14th Amendment made the freed slaves US citizens. The 15th Amendment let all freed slaves vote in the US. The drug war takes all these rights away from the convicted. Hence, THE NEW SLAVE TRADE! There is a certain irony that a Black man, Oh’Bummer, would now become a willing participant in the new slave trade. Shame.
- 2 years ago
-
ezrierin
-
-
FoosMaster
-
ezrierin:
Very well put.
And as I will continue to say: "It's about the MONEY!!!" - 2 years ago
-
FoosMaster
-
-
HsIV
-
ezrierin:
i don't know about slave trade but by golly you do have a valid argument. and the APA has known for years. that addiction as a impulse control disorder like OCD. any addicts brain has an imbalance between the frontal- striatal circuits. making it not a weakness thing, but a mental disorder. jail time for a meth addict is not a help thats like locking up diabetics for Glucose resistance.
- 2 years ago
-
HsIV
-
-
ezrierin
-
HsIV:
Good point!
- 2 years ago
-
ezrierin
-
-
Conniepae
-
ezrierin:
Excellent analogy.
- 2 years ago
-
Conniepae
-
-
PressCore
-
FoosMaster:
Have to agree with you unconditionaly there. The ship was torpedoed
in 1913, like the Lusitania, and has been sinking for so long that the
auto pilot the Corporations have set for it has it going around in circles.
There are no lifeboats for the women & children. Only military service
for the poor/ uneducated as Michael Moore might comment. The only
thing that bails the sinking ship and prevents it from submerging
altogether is collecting devalued currency by any means necessary.When a nation is doing well the prison industry is depressed. When a
nation is doing badly, it's booming as it is now. I'm naturaly an optimist.
But I've survived against overwhelming odds because I'm a realist. The
best thing that can happen to this country is that Mexico legalizes
Cannabis. And that there are so many law abiding hispanic people in
power and numbers throughout the Southwest that they legalize it as
California will no doubt do this year, and have the SCOTUS flush the
1937/1972 Nixon Prohibition down the toilet where it truely belongs.
Instutionalized parasites like Big Pharma fluorishing under Prohibition
will contract and fade. And the ship will stop sinking and start to float again. - 2 years ago
-
PressCore
-
-
PressCore
-
ezrierin:
Brilliantly stated, and entirely true. Thank you. This nation from
1607 through 1937 was founded and flourished with Industrial
hemp and Cannabis. Once the totalitarians subverted it through
Hearst, Dupont et al, it's been sinking like a torpedoed ship ever since.
We have antiConstitutional Statutes on the books that need to be
struck down, their legal force & effect made null and void. That
one SCOTUS decision will pop the balooning evil pattern you described. - 2 years ago
-
PressCore
-
-
treewolf39
-
ezrierin:
Great comment ezrierin! +^'d
- 2 years ago
-
treewolf39
-
-
remanns
-
HsIV:
+^d
- 2 years ago
-
remanns
-
-
pmurph364
-
ezrierin:
You are 100% correct, while segments of the American people are played against each other and some die as a result, a variety of groups such as Blackwater,Agencies ,Diplomats and other officials get a pass to have resources to import large shipments with no one to able to ask a question.So while some are enslaved others reap huge riches.
- 2 years ago
-
pmurph364
-
-
trut
-
Obama, what a hypocrite that guy is. Build some more prisons i guess.
What a police state hell hole the US is becoming. - 2 years ago
-
trut
-
-
HsIV
-
trut:
what, did you really expect? because he is black he would be different? he is in the pocket to interest groups just like every other politician. why did his two face manor surprise anyone thats what they do!
- 2 years ago
-
HsIV
-
-
ezrierin
-
THIS IS NOT A STEP FORWARD, IT”S A STEP BACK! Alcohol metabolites can be detected in your blood up to 3 days after drinking. They will not test to see if you drank 3 days ago, because they figure your not drunk anymore. BUT, THC metabolites can be detected up to a month after smoking. They WILL bust you for getting stoned a month ago. Thanks Oh'Bummer, for the continued war on drugs. And people call this guy a liberal. Believe me he’s not, he‘s just another Corporate shill. Democrats are better then Republicans because Democrats will give us more bread and circuses. BUT, we are still only getting the scraps. “CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN.” That’s true, because I can believe there has been no change.
- 2 years ago
-
ezrierin
-
-
HsIV
-
ezrierin:
don't forget the half life of THC so to be technical. its 30 days than 15 days after could randomly be reintroduced by way of adipose cells (fat).
- 2 years ago
-
HsIV
-
-
Conniepae
-
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tony-newman/ap-bombshell-us-drug-war_b_575587.html
Tony Newman is the director of media relations at the Drug Policy Alliance (www.drugpolicy.org)
Yes, Mr. Walters, the tanks, bullets, prison bars and "reefer madness" have been misguided. Prohibition didn't work with alcohol in the '30s, it didn't work in our 40-year War on Drugs, and it never will.
It is time for an exit strategy from this failed War on Drugs. Let's make sure that it doesn't take another 40 years, millions more lives ruined, and billions of wasted tax dollars before we accept the obvious solution -- ending prohibition. It's up to us - as people who care about science, compassion, health, and human rights -- to make sure that the time comes as soon as possible.
- 2 years ago
-
Conniepae
-
-
dwb2585
-
If you get pulled over ( and you have smoked recently) Don't admit to anything. Call a lawyer. If you have smoked in the last FOUR hours, do NOT agree to a blood test. Your license will be taken away[1-2 years] if you refuse but it is way better than a DUI.
- 2 years ago
-
dwb2585
-
-
Animal_Chin
-
This will begin to further tear apart the fabric of society. Notice there is no concern from the government (or admission for that matter) that they are spraying toxic chemicals over our landscape, or that the C.I.A. is importing the drugs that our soldiers are tasked to defend in Afghanistan.
- 2 years ago
-
Animal_Chin
-
-
Xenzaka
-
Yeah, smoke bowls in the car all day.
- 2 years ago
-
Xenzaka
-
-
mitekillem
-
So the thing about some drugs are that they trigger chemicals in the brain.
There are some natural phenomenon which can cause drug-like effects, when no substance has been taken. How long until they start limiting your daily activities before you drive? i.e. driving after running = driving while on adrenaline high, driving while depressed, driving after sex, etc. - 2 years ago
-
mitekillem
-
-
Conniepae
-
mitekillem:
I don't think they will go after people who are driving on an adrenaline high, because no one's profits are affected from people running. If cannabis were reclassified, it would put a dent in the profits of the pharmaceutical companies, as well as the alcoholic beverage companies profits. Too many industries profits would be affected by the reclassification of cannabis.
There have been many studies about cannabis and it's affects on society. The majority of Americans know the 'war on cannabis' is more detrimental to society than the plant it's self.
They tried limiting the use of cannabis by workplace drug testing and that hasn't worked, so now they are moving on to driving privileges. Cannabis is the number one cash crop in America. Many Americans consume cannabis. So, many Americans can now be guilty while driving even if they consumed cannabis over a week ago. I truly believe they are trying to eliminate a natural competitor to corporate profits. Money, money, money.
- 2 years ago
-
Conniepae
-
-
FoosMaster
-
Conniepae:
As I keep saying: IT'S ABOUT THE MONEY!!!
- 2 years ago
-
FoosMaster
-
-
nursediesel
-
mitekillem:
I love your reply....
- 2 years ago
-
nursediesel
-
-
remanns
-
FoosMaster:
I tend to agree,....though there is a great deal of sheer cultural inertia behind it [ prohibition ] as well.
- 2 years ago
-
remanns
-
-
wally60
-
its the same old war on drugs.although i believe we shouldnt drive while
stoned.pot stays in thes system so how do they test for it. - 2 years ago
-
wally60
-
-
Jake_Allen
-
This seems like a step toward legalizing pot if anything... Putting zero tolerance while operating a car is a requirement if weed is ever legalized.
- 2 years ago
-
Jake_Allen
-
-
FoosMaster
-
Jake_Allen:
So, if you happen to go into some area full of pot smoke for a short time through no fault of your own but you happen to be piss tested shortly afterwards you feel you should loose your license, be charged with a Felony, go to jail, and pay Huge amounts of money to the courts and lawyers because you tested positive?
Even if someone actually smoked a joint couple weeks ago, do you think they should not be allowed to drive and should go thru the criminal justice system if they do drive a couple weeks later?
Do you see the illogical reasoning of your logic? - 2 years ago
-
FoosMaster
-
-
Conniepae
-
Richard Nixon knew cannabis was not dangerous,yet he used it for political gain anyway. President Obama has smoke cannabis. He can't even claim he didn't know.
http://www.csdp.org/publicservice/nixon06.pdf
After Richard Nixon flattened the Democrats as soft on crime in the '68 election, the President-elect faced a dilemma. There's not much the White House can do to impact crime. The thugs people are afraid of — burglars, robbers, rapists, murderers — are the business of state courts. Then somebody mentioned drugs.In a textbook example of fear manipulation, Nixon warned the country that a plague of unimaginable proportions was about to engulf the nation. “The problem has assumed the dimensions of a national emergency,” he said. To fight the pushers on their own terms, he would need emergency powers — preventive detention, unorthodox strike forces, more freedom to search, wire tap, and arrest.
For scientific support, he appointed former Republican Pennsylvania Governor Ray Shafer to head a National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse. He told Gov. Shafer to treat marijuana just like heroin despite the "obvious differences between marijuana and other drugs." He was even more direct withchief of staff Bob Haldeman. "I want a Goddamn strong statement about marijuana...that just tears the ass out of them."
But after months of testimony from academics, medical experts, lawmen and health professionals, the facts overwhelmed the myths. The report was devastating:“Marijuana use, in and of itself, is neither causative of, nor directly associated with crime...” It found no basis for the gateway theory. Alcohol, it said, was probably a greater danger, and the report concluded that personal use of marijuana should no longer be a crime.
The President hit the roof. He complained to Haldeman, "...every one of the bastards that are out for legalizing marijuana is Jewish." In the face of the shooting war in Vietnam the Shafer Commission was quickly forgotten but the consequences of that cover-up are with us still. Since the 1972 release of that official report recommending legalization, we have arrested more than 14 million Americans8 at a cost of over $100 billion and the use of marijuana is undiminished.
- 2 years ago
-
Conniepae
-
-
jrszpak
-
the only good I see in this is a lot more people will be biking!
though I agree with most of the negative criticism- I just had to give some positive...(but thats probably the cannabis talking)!
- 2 years ago
-
jrszpak
-
-
FoosMaster
-
jrszpak:
I don't know about other states but you can go to jail for riding a bicycle while intoxicated in South Carolina.
- 2 years ago
-
FoosMaster
-
-
jubal
-
Obama will not be getting my vote if he follows through with this that is for sure. I am so sick of the crap coming out of his Whitehouse lately.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
jubal
-
This is complete and utter bull shit. Obama is making a very stupid move here, unless he is giving way to the "STEP UP THE WAR ON DRUGS" crowd. The war on drugs has been an utter failure and has given rise to the drug cartels that now threaten our southern border with Mexico.
OBAMA you need to wake the fuck up.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
noxidereus
-
jubal:
I agree completely
- 2 years ago
-
noxidereus
-
-
zichi [removed]
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
zichi [removed]
-
-
jubal
-
zichi:
They are talking about zero tolerance for cannabis metabolites. That means if you smoked a joint a week ago, and you aren't actually stoned, you could be prosecuted just because there are cannibanoids in your blood. That is complete bullshit. Cannabis can stay in your system for up to a month.
Just like alcohol you have to blow a .08, if they are going to do this, there has to be a limit set on what is an acceptable level of cannibanoids.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
Conniepae
-
zichi:
Jubal is right. This is not about driving under the influence. People who support reclassifying cannabis are not speaking up to be able to drive impaired. We aren't calling for irresponsibility.
All the problems in America and the 'cannabis consumers' are the ones they choose to hold accountable? That's just more madness for political gain.
Don't talk about the benefits of cannabis for health. Don't talk about hemp for industry and environment. Follow the madness of Richard Nixon? Talk about more ways to incarcerate more Americans for a substance, which has been proven to be less harmful than many pharmaceutical drugs being prescribed daily. Follow the money. Who benefits from these new measures? It certainly isn't 'we the people'.
- 2 years ago
-
Conniepae
-
-
AaliasChrisCarter
-
Stoned people drive slow, polite, and cautious. If they can't legally drive then why can the elderly?
- 2 years ago
-
AaliasChrisCarter
-
-
NaCl
-
why make illegal weed smoking while driving a DUI, which virtually never winds up with someone dead, when the regular legal alcohol drinking while driving DUI kills hundreds of people daily?
- 2 years ago
-
NaCl
-
-
dooder
-
they should screen for viagra.. Nothing worse then driving behind a huge dick...
- 2 years ago
-
dooder
-
-
WrittenWithWit
-
dooder:
good stuff
- 2 years ago
-
WrittenWithWit
-
-
HsIV
-
dooder:
hands free shifting?
- 2 years ago
-
HsIV
-
-
randallr01
-
I guess that once a man officially becomes POTUS, he gives up all rational or independent thought & transforms into nothing but a puppet for Big Government.
- 2 years ago
-
randallr01
-
-
jubal
-
randallr01:
You got that right randall. He is not just a POTUS but also a PUTZ.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
kulahptik
-
Oh I have an idea, how about we administer the swab test. Much safer than drawing blood, and more cost effective than hair or urine testing, and IT ONLY HAS A WINDOW OF 12 HOURS so you could actually tell if someone smoked recently enough to impair driving. Or do they just want the money?
- 2 years ago
-
kulahptik
-
-
FoosMaster
-
kulahptik:
It is Always about the Money.
- 2 years ago
-
FoosMaster
-
-
noxidereus
-
kulahptik:
It's still no good. The high lasts only a few hours. It is unfair for the punishment of these 2 people to be the same:
Person A: Smoked a fatty at his friend's house and immediately went driving home while very stoned.
Person B: Smoked a fatty at his friend's house and decided to wait it out for a couple of hours until he was no longer stoned, and then drove home.
If it is not possible to accurately assess that someone is driving under the influence of pot, then we cannot enforce it. That's all there is to it. Putting innocent people in jail just so we catch the few guilty ones is not worth it. Especially since the punishments for marijuana are barbaric. We think we are a highly advanced species, but look at how frigging nonsensical and cruel we are to each other?
- 2 years ago
-
noxidereus
-
-
GeorgeCarlin77
-
Funny story, driving blazed is not even close to driving drunk! Politics suck and this is what our system produces, flawed system=flawed results!
- 2 years ago
-
GeorgeCarlin77
-
-
cclark_productions
-
what the hell obama!
- 2 years ago
-
cclark_productions
-
-
s_peak
-
cclark_productions:
He works for the same companies that Bush does. Why are people so surprised about this stuff? Every president says exactly what they have to to get elected and then... like clockwork... they continue to protect big business instead of fulfilling their promises.
Color me not surprised.
- 2 years ago
-
s_peak
-
-
samantha420 [removed]
- This comment was removed by its owner.
-
samantha420 [removed]
-
-
kulahptik
-
samantha420:
huh, thats funny when I was in rehab i was informed you could test positive with blood and urine for up to 90 days.
- 2 years ago
-
kulahptik
-
-
jubal
-
samantha420:
Great information Samantha420 thank you for bringing a reasonable discussion to this issue.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
ayashe
-
If the police mysteriously pull you over and you've been using marijuana then you probably weren't driving unimpaired, unless you have a giant "I do drugs" sticker on your car. You're not as unimpaired as you think you are druggies.
- 2 years ago
-
ayashe
-
-
danyfell
-
ayashe:
no bias. LOLER
- 2 years ago
-
danyfell
-
-
motief1386
-
I live in Indiana right on the border of chicago and have two OWI's (operating while intoxicated). Both occered after i had passed both field sobriety tests and breathalizer but refused to submit to a blood screen. Indiana is the worst possible place to live for this kind of crap. How many tests do they feel the need to implement?
- 2 years ago
-
motief1386
-
-
glestoler
-
I can't wait to see how they try and enforce this. Piss test? thc stays in you for a week or more. I dont see the point other than just throwing people in jail and collecting money.
- 2 years ago
-
glestoler
-
-
FoosMaster
-
glestoler:
That is the point!
- 2 years ago
-
FoosMaster
-
-
jubal
-
glestoler:
Its called privatized prisons and law enforcement, they need to make more money and create more victims.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
MYkEv
-
Damn the man! They should just legalize it everywhere if there putting it un a D.U.I law... government needs to stop bullshitting with the people and concentrate on the human race progressing.
- 2 years ago
-
MYkEv
-
-
Charlie_Marze
-
Government will be government... Government exist mainly to to one thing, Make laws.... laws... laws... and more laws.
Really, it's only a matter of time until each and every action (except shopping for cheap Chinese slave goods) is a criminal offense.
Besides, criminalizing freedom creates jobs... jobs and more jobs.
For people who work in industries that benefit from the elimination of freedom.
Those people really do hate freedom and the American dream of liberty.
Just look at the stupid religion/MLM scams these people who hate freedom buy into... They sure love their cult leader worship, and will eliminate ALL freedoms in accordance with their idol worshiping leaders COMMANDS them.
I would bet to say that 99% of people who hate freedom are involved in some of brainwashing freedom hating dogma programming... aka Jesus worshippin' braindeads (people who believe everything they are forced to)
Like just because their cult leader was an alcoholic, that crap is in anyway good.
No, alcohol is poison... don't care who's cult leader used it.
- 2 years ago
-
Charlie_Marze
-
-
s_peak
-
Big fucking surprise. Before you know it... cops will be allowed to take your blood on the scene for testing. Police state, here we come!
- 2 years ago
-
s_peak
-
-
ryan8566
-
s_peak:
i don't live in one of the above listed states...how do the cops make a determination that a person is 'driving impaired'...under what drug? are people required to give a urine/blood sample? WTF!
- 2 years ago
-
ryan8566
-
-
EmperorThan
-
Ha! I knew this was coming eventually, surprised it took so long really. I tried to explain to my mom once that driving while high wasn't illegal in almost all of the United States and she was like "NO ITS A DUI JUST LIKE ALCOHOL! ARGH" I was all "No, it's called Drugged Driving and its only illegal in like 14 states. The owning of marijuana itself is the crime they get you for." etc
- 2 years ago
-
EmperorThan
-
-
Robotic091
-
EmperorThan:
which states?
- 2 years ago
-
Robotic091
-
-
EmperorThan
-
Robotic091:
All the ones with a little car on the map:
- 2 years ago
-
EmperorThan
-
-
Robotic091
-
but then again my father made a point if a Head wanted to he can take eye drops, play it cool, and fight the ticket. he could get away
- 2 years ago
-
Robotic091
