Eight-Year-Old Says She Lied About Being Raped
source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1278119/Girl-8-tells-court-lied-raped-year-old-boys....
-
-
- MotherForTruth
- added this
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1278119/Girl-8-tells-court-li...
A girl of eight yesterday said she had lied about being raped by two ten-year-olds.The youngster told the Old Bailey she had wanted to play with the boys because she thought it would be 'fun'.
She said she made up the rape claim because she was worried she wouldn't get any sweets if her mother found out she had been 'a bit naughty'.
The boys, now aged ten and 11, are believed to be the youngest ever in Britain to face trial for rape.
Evidence: The alleged victim today told the court she had not been raped and had removed her underwear herself
They are alleged to have dragged the victim around a block of flats and bin sheds hunting for a secluded spot before they took turns to rape her in a playing field.
But yesterday, in an extraordinary twist, the girl said neither boy had raped her. She did however say one of the boys made her touch his penis as they played in a field.
In cross-examination by defence counsel, the girl admitted she had wanted to play with the boys and had pulled down her own underwear while the boys exposed themselves.
Linda Strudwick, defending one of the boys, asked her: 'You told her (your Mum) that it was the boys because you did not want your Mum to think you had been naughty, is that right?'
The girl, giving evidence via videolink, replied: 'Yeah.'
The judge, Mr Justice Saunders, asked what the girl had been worried about. She replied: 'No sweets if she found out I had been naughty.'
A court sketch from the Old Bailey features the two boys facing a TV screen as the eight-year-old girl gives evidence holding a teddy
The jury heard the girl had been playing near her home in Hayes, West London during the school half term on October 27 last year when the alleged attack happened.
The girl told the jury she had 'been a tiny bit' naughty when she took down her knickers to show the boys several times.
Miss Strudwick asked her: 'You found it quite fun to play with the boys? No one dragged you to the bin sheds, no one held or forced you or pushed you in there?'
She added: 'You were all giggling, it was just silly wasn't it?' The girl replied: 'Yeah'.
In a series of questions, the girl was asked if any parts of her body had been penetrated by the boys. She replied each time: 'No.'
After she finished her evidence Mr Justice Saunders told her: 'No one is suggesting you have done anything wrong.
'I am the judge and I don't suggest you have done anything wrong. Remember that.'
Cuddling her teddy Mr Happy, a girl of 8 tells court how two boys aged 10 took it in turns to rape her
When the group of children were found by their mothers minutes after the alleged attack, they all denied doing anything.
It was only when the girl got home she told her mother she had been raped.
She was later taken to hospital to be examined after complaining of stomach pains, where doctors found a number of scratches and grazes.
Earlier, the girl had agreed with Miss Strudwick that scratches she had on parts of her body may have been caused when the younger boy was trying to help her over a fence.
The boys, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, deny two charges of rape and two charges of attempted rape.
Yesterday the girl bit her fingers nervously as she was asked questions.
Sitting in an annexe to the court, she covered her face with her hands and tugged at her hair as she spoke about how she was 'naughty' with the boys.
Previously the court had been shown a video of her being interviewed by police about the alleged rape.
Tightly clutching a teddy to her chest, she told how the boys forced her to pull down her pants before taking it in turns to do something to her that made her bow her head and wipe her eyes.
She said the boys had 'showed me their willies' and demanded to see her ' minnie', flushing red with embarrassment as she was asked to point at what she meant.
The trial continues.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1278119/Girl-8-tells-court-lied-raped-ye...
-
-
chinese_democracy
-
I thought you couldn't sustain an erection until puberty?
- 3 years ago
-
chinese_democracy
-
-
curtisreed
-
"Mr Justice Saunders told her: 'No one is suggesting you have done anything wrong. 'I am the judge and I don't suggest you have done anything wrong. Remember that.' "
Say fucking WHAT? The little girl KNEW she had been "naughty"--that is, she had done something she knew her grandmother would not approve--and then she LIED about rape and nearly got two boys jailed so she could experiment with sex without consequences to herself, and the JUDGE tells her she "did nothing wrong"?
And you wonder why so much WRONG is being done! Liberals. They will NEVER get it.
- 3 years ago
-
curtisreed
-
-
FoosMaster
-
curtisreed:
Liberal has nothing to do with it, and most certainly Liberals are strongly against this type of injustice to others. I am a Liberal and proud of it but I still see the inadequacies and injustices of the Legal system, just read some of my comments.
- 3 years ago
-
FoosMaster
-
-
December_07
-
I guess whoever taught her the meaning of rape should have also taught her that a lie can destroy someone's life in this case two young boys.
- 3 years ago
-
December_07
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
December_07:
"Victim" coaching does "wonders" to send innocent to prison. Our corrupt judicial system is nothing but a profitable enterprise where federal funds are used to coach victims, prosecute regardless of the truth, and incarcerate in private prisons. Who will be the next victim of this justice system?
- 3 years ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
masterzip
-
i guess children are not educated anymore about the boy who cried wolf....
- 3 years ago
-
masterzip
-
-
FoosMaster
-
We ALWAYS take the word of a Child in a criminal case because they would NEVER Lie about something that would get someone else in trouble like that, right, and nobody would ever influence a child to say something that was not true, right, and the child Always knows not to Lie just because someone tries to get them to, right, and they would Never Lie just to protect themselves from any perceived punishment for doing something wrong, right?
It is nearly impossible to protect yourself in court these days from a child's testimony even if there is No physical evidence, just the child’s word. Unless you can PROVE your innocence then the jury will ALWAYS take the word of a child!
We obviously never learned Anything from the Salem Witch Trials!
I feel Great empathy for children that have been abused but Nobody should have to go to prison just on a child’s word without Any physical evidence but it happens regularly in the court systems of the world because people feel so much emotion about the case that they want to do Something and they let their emotions make the decision for them.
- 3 years ago
-
FoosMaster
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
FoosMaster:
Exactly!
- 3 years ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
bailey78
-
I may be wrong as i am not a child psychologist but the child may have coached a little.
- 3 years ago
-
bailey78
-
-
device80
-
how the hell does an 8 year old know what rape is? and also how did she know to concoct an entire story of how it happened? what are kids watching these days, wow.
- 3 years ago
-
device80
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
device80:
"Victim" coaching does "wonders" to send innocent to prison.
- 3 years ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
curtisreed
-
device80:
I have two kids ages 8 to 10 and they know what rape is because schools and parents teach about "good touch bad touch", and their own natural curiosity makes them ask questions about sex at that age, how its done, etc. And of course this leads to the conversation about anyone trying to have sex with them, what rape is, etc.
It's also all over the news, so all a kid has to do is be nearby when parents are listening to the news and they pick up bits of information.
So no, it's not really unheard of for an 8 year old to know a little about rape.
- 3 years ago
-
curtisreed
-
-
covertops
-
wow. i was molested at 3....didnt want to play with boys again until 13.
i dont know what to say.... - 3 years ago
-
covertops
-
-
zichi [removed]
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
zichi [removed]
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
zichi:
Once the police report is made and the charges are brought up it is now up to the prosecution even if the "victim" recants the story prosecution may choose to ignore it.
- 3 years ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
bailey78
-
zichi:
If the vase won't hold water the Judge can throw it out. I do believe thats what should be done in this vase of course I'm not an intellectual so I may be wrong in my Theory.
- 3 years ago
-
bailey78
-
-
curtisreed
-
bailey78:
it's funny you replied sarcastically mocking the typo ("case" to "vase") but then you revealed you don't know the difference between "throw" and "through".
Tsk tsk tsk. What's the saying about rocks and glass houses?
- 3 years ago
-
curtisreed
-
-
bailey78
-
curtisreed:
words confuse me. like i said I'm not an intellectual. I am human and i make human mistakes.
- 3 years ago
-
bailey78
