Study: White and Black Children Biased Toward Lighter Skin
source: http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/05/13/doll.study/index.html?hpt=C1
-
-
- EthicalVegan
- added this
May 14, 2010 4:24 p.m. EDT
[See the results of the CNN-commissioned study on children's racial beliefs, attitudes and preferences, and see the children as they take the test on a special "AC360°" in front of a live studio audience, tonight at 10pm ET[
(CNN) -- A white child looks at a picture of a black child and says she's bad because she's black. A black child says a white child is ugly because he's white. A white child says a black child is dumb because she has dark skin.
This isn't a schoolyard fight that takes a racial turn, not a vestige of the "Jim Crow" South; these are American schoolchildren in 2010.
Nearly 60 years after American schools were desegregated by the landmark Brown v. Board of Education ruling, and more than a year after the election of the country's first black president, white children have an overwhelming white bias, and black children also have a bias toward white, according to a new study commissioned by CNN.
Renowned child psychologist and University of Chicago professor Margaret Beale Spencer, a leading researcher in the field of child development, led the study. She designed the pilot study and led a team of three psychologists: two testers to execute the study and a statistician to help analyze the results.
Her team tested 133 children from schools that met very specific economic and demographic requirements. In total, eight schools participated: four in the greater New York City area and four in Georgia.
Full doll study results
In each school, Spencer tested children from two age groups: 4 to 5 and 9 to 10.
Since this is a pilot study and not a fully funded scientific study, the sample size and race selection were limited. But according to Spencer, it was satisfactory to yield conclusive results. A pilot study is normally the first step in creating a larger scientific study and often speaks to overall trends that require more research.
Spencer's test aimed to re-create the landmark Doll Test from the 1940s. Those tests, conducted by psychologists Kenneth and Mamie Clark, were designed to measure how segregation affected African-American children.
The Clarks asked black children to choose between a white doll and -- because at the time, no brown dolls were available -- a white doll painted brown. They asked black children a series of questions and found they overwhelmingly preferred white over brown. The study and its conclusions were used in the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education case, which led to the desegregation of American schools.
1947 Doll Test results
In the new study, Spencer's researchers asked the younger children a series of questions and had them answer by pointing to one of five cartoon pictures that varied in skin color from light to dark. The older children were asked the same questions using the same cartoon pictures, and were then asked a series of questions about a color bar chart that showed light to dark skin tones.
The tests showed that white children, as a whole, responded with a high rate of what researchers call "white bias," identifying the color of their own skin with positive attributes and darker skin with negative attributes. Spencer said even black children, as a whole, have some bias toward whiteness, but far less than white children.
"All kids on the one hand are exposed to the stereotypes" she said. "What's really significant here is that white children are learning or maintaining those stereotypes much more strongly than the African-American children. Therefore, the white youngsters are even more stereotypic in their responses concerning attitudes, beliefs and attitudes and preferences than the African-American children."
Spencer says this may be happening because "parents of color in particular had the extra burden of helping to function as an interpretative wedge for their children. Parents have to reframe what children experience ... and the fact that white children and families don't have to engage in that level of parenting, I think, does suggest a level of entitlement. You can spend more time on spelling, math and reading, because you don't have that extra task of basically reframing messages that children get from society."
Spencer was also surprised that children's ideas about race, for the most part, don't evolve as they get older. The study showed that children's ideas about race change little from age 5 to age 10.
"The fact that there were no differences between younger children, who are very spontaneous because of where they are developmentally, versus older children, who are more thoughtful, given where they are in their thinking, I was a little surprised that we did not find differences."
Spencer said the study points to major trends but is not the definitive word on children and race. It does lead her to conclude that even in 2010, "we are still living in a society where dark things are devalued and white things are valued."
CNN's Jill Billante and Chuck Hadad contributed to this report.
-
- groups:
- Community, Culture, Current Tonight, Webmash, 11 more
-
- tags:
- Prejudice, Anderson Cooper, Bias, child development, 8 more
-
-
donkeyfly69
-
lighter skin and straight hair
this racism spans beyond just blacks in america. my chinese "mother-in-law" tells me how good i look because i'm not one of the "ugly dark ones".
- 2 years ago
-
donkeyfly69
-
-
Blkwdw
-
we don't need a study to tell us this some people experience these biases everyday! Just one symptom of an unnatural world.
- 2 years ago
-
Blkwdw
-
-
Amanda_Jackson
-
It is not a BS study. There has been continuous research on the subconscious effects of racial judgement, including the IAT test. https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/
Feel free to try it. - 2 years ago
-
Amanda_Jackson
-
-
EmperorThan
-
This is a bullshit experiment. They lead the children into the assumption that one color is "bad" the child isn't going to say "None of them are bad" and they're also not going to say "I don't know." because they're being asked by an adult, they don't want to feel stupid not knowing the answer. Our minds are hardwired to know light is good and dark is not good. Hence why EVERY FUCKING THING IN OUR SOCIETY REFLECTS IT THAT WAY. It say NOTHING about black people, it says nothing about ARE OUR RACIST CHILDREN RACISTS?!?!?!?
Children have to be raised racist to become racists, the fact that dark is an evolutionary mental response to a myriad of things that are dark and bad (NOT BLACK PEOPLE) does not say anything more than that itself.
The only thing black people's skin says about themselves is that their body doesn't produce enough Vitamin D, they can't get Malaria, and they can get Sickle-cell anemia. THAT'S ALL! That's all we should teach the children. We shouldn't be asking them "which is the bad child?" implying one is bad. Children LEARN from what we teach them. If you ask them to pick before they've learned then their evolutionary instinct kicks in, that's all that's happening in this stupid fucking CNN bullshit study.
- 2 years ago
-
EmperorThan
-
-
chinese_democracy
-
Not an effective study without a control group. Show me the unintentionally bigoted children that were not raised in a racially biased society.
Still, it is interesting but somewhat unsurprising. It takes many years to break away from your parents train of thought and obtain a true self identity and your own awareness of your environment. Kids this young are basically exact copies of their parents beliefs and prejudices. - 2 years ago
-
chinese_democracy
-
-
keithponder
-
chinese_democracy:
no . this kids are copies of what has been ingrained into their minds by society, the media and their own downtrodden cultures that they been living in since birth. This is so much more than a case study.. I grew up fighting this type in house racism as a child. I can recall being ridiculed by my own simply for being dark.
If you've never experienced this yourself, your comments are just a moot opinion because they are void of any and all fact.
- 2 years ago
-
keithponder
-
-
chinese_democracy
-
keithponder:
These children are aged 5-10. I want you to think about the type of media this demographic would watch for entertainment.
I would seriously doubt that Nickelodeon is transmitting subliminal messages to create racial strife within the kindergarten community.
Maybe there are a few exceptions, but your parents are the most influential people in your life at that age and will absorb all your mannerisms.
Even if a kid grows up watching television all day and applying any racist sentiment they learn from watching it on the TV; that is still technically the fault of the parent.As for my experience, I am of mixed race. It wasn't until I got to middle school that I noticed the effects of my bigoted peers.
Growing up, I had no idea that I was any different than anyone else because that is how I was treated as a child by my parents.
As I became more knowledgeable, I started to realize and remember all the things the other students in class had done to me, but because I never thought of myself as being different, they hadn't affected me at the time. - 2 years ago
-
chinese_democracy
-
-
donkeyfly69
-
chinese_democracy:
have you watched nickelodeon lately? while babysitting i get to watch way too many hours of nick, disney, and cartoon network. almost every main (human) character in these shows is white
- 2 years ago
-
donkeyfly69
-
-
chinese_democracy
-
donkeyfly69:
Isn't that paramount to my original hypothesis that television is not the cause of this adolescent black/white rivalry?
"A black child says a white child is ugly because he's white. A white child says a black child is dumb because she has dark skin."
If these shows favor white people more than black people, wouldn't it make sense that both black and white children would prefer only white characters in this test? The results prove opposite of what you are trying to say.
- 2 years ago
-
chinese_democracy
-
-
IndustryRule
-
Just proves we have along way to go...
- 2 years ago
-
IndustryRule
-
-
RaceBannon
-
it does reflect the culture we perpetuate. It'll pass but not without a trillion billboards of blonde hair/blue eyed selling machines defining beauty through adverts.
Ahh man its crazy but sometimes Rome was far more culturally progressive than America. - 2 years ago
-
RaceBannon
-
-
thedez
-
A high school student did a similar study about 5 or 6 years ago, with similar results.
- 2 years ago
-
thedez
-
-
nanac
-
American society is directly responsible for the biases exhibited by our children...Children have an extreme sense of perception, and they are constantly exposed to negative racial stereotypes in their environment....The media is mostly at fault for always portraying Black Americans as the low-life's in society...White Americans sent a clear message when they protested President Obama's motivational speech for school age children..Politicians and numerous Americans are openly racist against Obama..Parents must make a conscious effort to teach tolerance, and diversity to their children..
- 2 years ago
-
nanac
-
-
freecrack
-
settles the art imitate life question.
- 2 years ago
-
freecrack
