Mass. Supreme Court Rules Police Need Reasonable Suspicion for Frisks
"throwing out two unrelated cases, the highest court ruled that police may not frisk someone during a routine encounter unless they have reasonable suspicion to believe that the person is BOTH involved in criminal activity AND is armed and dangerous...that police may not escalate a consensual encounter into a protective frisk..."
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2010/05/28/sjc-rules
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2010/05/28/sjc-rules
-
- groups:
- Community, Crime, Law and Justice
-
-
artemis6
-
Now , define "reasonable suspicion " .
- 1 year ago
-
artemis6
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
artemis6:
I was under impression the law enforcement defines it.
- 1 year ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
This will not stop police they simply will make sure there IS probable cause.
- 1 year ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
Progresshiv
-
Thank you, Massachusetts, where the original American patriots fought for liberty.
- 1 year ago
-
Progresshiv
