“Doomsday” Cover-Up: BP Official Admits to Damage BENEATH THE SEA FLOOR! (SCARY VIDEOS)

Many things happen in the Fall, not just a temperature swap-inversion of lake water. Jesus was born in the Fall because shepherds had not yet put their sheep inside for the winter. I came across Tesla's last papers online in the Fall of 2007 and figured out that same day several plausible solutions to his remaining engine systems. One was anti-Gravity flight (aka "flying cars"), the other was wireless transmission of large amounts of electricity. Then I added to that some systems of my own for cleaning ocean water into potable drinking water for the whole world.

Which I consider possibly inspired to me to understand since I lack any schooling after high school (1970). But the important thing here is it appears that God, perhaps out of respect for when His son was born has a special place for the Fall... which could mean the end of this world will come in the Fall also. The northern hemisphere Fall.

The way things are going this Fall is starting to raise my eyebrows, without setting any strict "day or hour" we are given many clues in real life and also clues in the Bible to know we are in that time. Am I using these ideas to scare anybody? Have I ever suggested burning forever in flames of hell? No.

Great things are due to come to every person God deems acceptable, but the other side of the coin isn't burning but the destruction that comes from burning. There's a big difference.

You're ignoring something. Older politicians, many of them are religious and so maybe they have a deep held belief they need to cause a major failure. Younger politicians may not believe much of anything there's a higher power what's that?! Their stand-in higher power says the strong will survive and the rest of us are white trash.

Neither group will feel inclined to stop anything. Gridlock.

anything from the kremlin is questionable to me.

hahahaha OIL has been called the lifeblood of America, so maybe "blood" there in the Bible symbolizes OUR BLOOD?

"btw i am typin with one arm and a shit load of dilaudid on board"

was the occasion for this mishap pre or post using that nasty four-letter word to describe Ms. Palin?

tsk tsk

we are the disease.

Don't worry. The Earth is just healing itself.

Once there is tons of oil is on the ocean surface and a lightning strike puts a match to it the elements being intensely hot will melt (2 Peter 3 vs 10-13). But that's a GOOD THING see, because the intense heat will cause lots of ocean water to be evaporated up into the atmosphere => which gives us more land to build condominiums on where ocean water used to be! It's Al Gore's plan to increase Real Estate?

No, it's God's Plans being worked out towards His purpose (the "re-Creation" happening a 2nd time y'all:Matthew 19 vs 28) => by moving ocean water into the upper atmosphere will be putting it back where it was before the "Flood of Noah's day", where it came from when it rained so it will be returned. And by putting all that REFLECTIVE WATER back around the planet the solar rays that now age us too fast will be gone.

People will once again be able to live thousands of years just like Adam & Eve and their children lived til after the Flood [and all that protective layer of "waters above the expanse" were gone (Genesis 1 vs 7)].

The BP oil spill was caused by god and it's gonna cure global warming and make us live longer? wat is this i dont even

No. God isn't causing it, people are. God knew from the very start of sin that men would destroy the planet. It wasn't rocket science. The destruction in the Gulf is ALL US IN OUR MAGNIFICENCE.

Not to be confused with Armageddon, which is to involve Jesus and angels. They are coming to save some of us; otherwise these greed-driven maniacs would finish off the entire human race.

Mkay. I disagree. However, there's really no way to prove you wrong or right. Enjoy your faith. At least you seem like a nice guy. If you're right, I'll see you when we fight against the antichrist together.

Exactly what is it you think we're all losing against now? Chopped liver? The Spaghetti Monster? We seem to be very much outmatched.

I don't think we're losing anything. I think the world tension and the collapse of the economy is due to a natural restructuring of society. We are experiencing growing pains, you could say.

We lose plenty. If the purpose is to go forward. Of course we might disagree on just what going forward means. Looks like your idea is to accept certain losses that include a continuation of the system we have and live under now. A great majority of the world's population does not enjoy what we have, and what we have is losing ground.

It's good to be an optimist. I'm one myself to the extent of being called a dreamer. I am however also a realist. Is your optimism based on the real or is it just a psychological wall you set up to explain away as acceptable other people's diseases, misery and death?

If it was you would deny it because you know people frown on people like that, and you want to avoid being frowned on. Or found out.

However, if you want to call the Bible Armageddon a restructuring of society and growing pains of the human race we could be very much in agreement. Only you want to think it's us pushing all the buttons. So far, humanity has pushed many wrong buttons. I'll throw in with Heavenly Forces and Heavenly Intelligence.

I'm hardly for a continuation of the system we have now. I support a New World Order. As for my response to the rest, I think I can do that best with a quote:

Woe to those who live without suffering. Stagnation and death is the future of all that vegetates without a change. And how can there be any change for the better without proportionate suffering during the preceding stage? Is it not those only who have learnt the deceptive value of earthly hopes and the illusive allurements of eternal nature who are destined to solve the great problems of life, pain, and death? --- The Secret Doctrine, II, 475

I've had more suffering than many so I must be very happy according to that. But I have a rather stagnant existence and a disability check that never increases. There seems to be an exception to your quote.

It is true I have solved many earthly problems of life too, but they have not the power to stop world pain much less DEATH. If you actually subscribe to sing songy crap like spills from a radio preacher's Sunday speech you're really messed up my friend. I'll tell you what you just told me, and it's the same message Obama says and the same message the Sunday preacher on the radio says, and it's this => WE CAN DO IT.

Much the same message I saw through on Ouija boards => WE JAH sound it out. The demons are behind your message & the Ouija board message too saying we can do it all without God or Jesus or God's Kingdom. It is the same message the serpent stated to Eve => eat this fruit deary and be like God, so ever since then ~all this time of our being like God~ we are now trashing the planet we're so smart.

You should have many followers. People love hearing the piper singing their song that tells them how great they are.

What? I think you have me mistaken for a christian. And what's this nonsense about ouija boards and demons? This conversation has downgraded immensely.

Is that Masonic teaching? Sorry, being lazy, I'll google your reference.

Helena Bravatsky? Surely you're not a Satanist? Never met one before. I'm safe, got my cross on.

He is saying you subscribe to the theology that Satan was good and Christianity perverted the teachings of Satan. Your quote is from Helena Bravatsky, a Satanist and teacher that we are all gods. We create our own reality and are gods of our own world and can do anything by believing we are the creators. Thus, the Ouija board and demon references. Demons are Satan's army.

Your brainwashing is complete, young Ucandoit.

thanks for clearing that up.

oic. I read demons and ouija and started spacing on it. I'm not a satanist. Neither was blavatsky. Theosophy. Also, lol at a christian convinced that the BP oil spill is the herald of the second coming telling me I'm the one who's brainwashed.

Blavatsky was a Satanist and believes that Satan is misunderstood and good. You quoted her and the Secret Doctrine as an overview of what you believe.

“Dignities” (gods) are called “filthy dreamers” by Jude (8). For even Michael the Archangel durst not bring against him (the devil) a railing accusation, but said: “The Lord rebuke thee” (ibid 9). Finally the same is repeated in the Talmud.* “Satan appeared one day to a man who used to curse him daily, and said to him: ‘Why dost thou this?’ Consider that God himself would not curse me, but merely said: ‘The Lord rebuke thee, Satan.’ ”†

This bit of Talmudic information shows plainly two things: (a) that St. Michael is called “God” in the Talmud, and somebody else “the Lord”; and (b) that Satan is a God, of whom even the “Lord” is in fear. All we read in the Zohar and other Kabalistic works on Satan shows plainly that this “personage” is simply the personification of the abstract evil, which is the weapon of Karmic law and Karma. It is our human nature and man himself, as it is said that “Satan is always near and inextricably interwoven with man.” It is only a question of that Power being latent or active in us.

It is a well-known fact — to learned Symbologists at all events — that in every great religion of antiquity, it is the Logos Demiurge (the second logos), or the first emanation from the mind (Mahat), who is made to strike, so to say, the key-note of that which may be called the correlation of individuality and personality in the subsequent scheme of evolution. The Logos it is, who is shown in the mystic symbolism of cosmogony, theogony, and anthropogony, playing two parts in the drama of Creation and Being, i.e., that of the purely human personality and the divine impersonality of the so-called Avatars, or divine incarnations, and of the universal Spirit, called Christos by the Gnostics, and the Farvarshi (or Ferouer) of Ahura Mazda in the Mazdean philosophy. On the lower rungs of theogony the celestial Beings of lower Hierarchies had each a Farvarshi, or a celestial “Double.” It is the same, only a still more mystic, reassertion of the Kabalistic axiom, “Deus est Demon inversus”; the word “demon,” however, as in the case of Socrates, and in the spirit of the meaning given to it by the whole of antiquity, standing for the guardian Spirit, an “Angel,” not a devil of Satanic descent, as theology will have it. The Roman Catholic Church shows its usual logic and consistency by accepting, as the ferouer of Christ, St. Michael, who was “his Angel Guardian,” as proved by St. Thomas,‡ while he calls the prototypes of Michael and his synonyms, such as Mercury, for example, devils.

As well she believes in Giants, Dragons and more. You hardly have room to criticize Christianity.

As a symbol, the Serpent had as many aspects and occult meanings as the Tree itself; the “Tree of Life,” with which it was emblematically and almost indissolubly connected. Whether viewed as a metaphysical or a physical symbol, the Tree and Serpent, jointly, or separately, have never been so degraded by antiquity as they are now, in this our age of the breaking of idols, not for truth’s sake, but to glorify the more gross matter. The revelations and interpretations in “The Rivers of Life” would have astounded the worshippers of the Tree and Serpent in the days of archaic Chaldean and Egyptian wisdom; and even the early Saivas would have recoiled in horror at the theories and suggestions of the author of the said work. “The notion of Payne Knight and Inman that the cross or Tau is simply a copy of the male organs in a triadic form is radically false,” writes Mr. G. Massey, who proves what he says. But this is a statement that could be as justly applied to almost all the modern interpretations of ancient symbols. “The Natural Genesis,” a monumental work of research and thought, the most complete on that subject that has ever been published, covering as it does a wider field, and explaining much more than all the symbologists who have hitherto written, does not yet go beyond the “psycho-theistic” stage of ancient thought. Nor were Payne Knight and Inman altogether wrong; except in entirely failing to see that their interpretations of the “Tree of Life,” as the cross and phallus, fitted the symbol, and approximated it, only on the lowest and last stage of the evolutionary development of the idea of the Giver of Life. It was the last and the grossest physical transformation of nature, in animal, insect, bird, and even plant; for biune, creative magnetism, in the form of the attraction of the contraries, or sexual polarization, acts in the constitution of reptile and bird as it does in that of man. Moreover, the modern symbologists and Orientalists — from first to last —

And the serpent is the tree of life. Serpent worship.

This is all very interesting, but pretty irrelevant. I know what Helena believed (one would hope, at least); the Atlanteans and the Lemurians, theurgy and alchemy and all that good stuff. But the Secret Doctrine and her other works were the basis of the founding of Theosophy, which is most definitely distinct from any form of satanism. Your studies of religions of antiquity are interesting, but don't really hold much weight. You cannot say "this is what was written and this is what it means" or "the Tree of Life is a phallical symbol" or "the serpent is the Tree of Life" since these statements are merely your own interpretation of ancient text - or others' interpretations that you are simply parroting. Furthermore, unless you consider the late 1800's to be antiquity, those studies don't necessarily apply to Theosophy. And again, I must state that Theosophy is wholly different from satanism, either the classic idea of pentagrams and sacrifices or the more recent LeVeyan Satanism. Calling me a satanist or trying to compare me to one is completely off the mark.

"As to the allegations made by some that Madam Blavatsky was a "Satanist" these are most often made by dogmatic church people who view Theosophy as a threat.. Studying Theosophy is a complex endeavor and not so simply resolved into simple name calling.."

You also can't tell me that because Helena believed in the giants of lemuria or the people of atlantis that I have no room to criticize christianity. I certainly don't believe in magical lands or miracles or magic. Nor did I criticize christianity in general. I criticized the belief of literal demons and the idea that the BP oil spill is a sign of the coming apocalypse.

"idea that the BP oil spill is a sign of the coming apocalypse" Who said that?!?! I didn't. Did anybody?!

I have a great many more and better ways to know we are near the Apocalypse that I have no need for an oil spill to claim it's near. I would say however that sloppiness of employees or not properly training employees that contributed to the whole disaster to unfold could probably be included under Jesus' statement the "love of the greater number would cool off".(Matthew 24 vs 12, Matthew 24 being the End Times & Last Days chapter in the Bible).

I only use my best arguments. An indirect application to employees not exercising love towards the people of the United States is straining gnats.

OUCH!

just to suggest some reasonable doubt, it could be one of those dispersant pipes.

I'm not arguing the fact that this fault zone produces earthquakes. What I disagree with is the statement that the oil reservoir can increase the Seismic activity of this region.

Well that and I believe the wording for rearrangement of the mantel is inappropriate, but that is really more of a minor issue and can be overlooked as I do understand the sentiment while still disagreeing with the wording.

A vertical inversion swap of oil and solid matter is occurring all around the world is minor? Resulting in the planet growing possibly smaller causing mantel sliding, so the ground under our feet [and buildings and bridges and cars] slip sliding away is "minor".

Not if you're standing on it when it happens.

So are you referring to this one incidence? Are you referring to the damage of the process collectively?

As for the planet growing smaller, that on seems off base. Sinkholes. Yes. Sinkholes causing a lot of damage. Yes. Sinkholes causing localized Seismic activity. Yes. Sinkholes causing tidal waves. Yes. Making the planet smaller. No.

No not this one time. I'm talking global, and the upward pressure the oil is down there providing our upper world to remain our upward world. When we suck OUT the lower world contents -crude oil- we not only lose the displacement we also lose the upward pressure.

I can claim the world above is getting closer to the possibly-nuclear earth's core and you can't prove me wrong.

So what we are doing -globally- is creating a lake inversion that happens every Fall. We're swapping out the bottom with the top. I happen to think that's rather STUPID thing ta do, especially since I designed a tornadic dynamo of a natural engine using steam heat and super cold compressed air to be 1500% more powerful than combustion engines.

The only thing I really disagree with, is the usage; specifically stating the world is getting smaller. I completely agree with the argument that the areas that are drilled will collapse over time, I just don't feel that stating the world is getting smaller because of that is accurate.

Just because I disagree with aspects (specifically the wording) of a statement does not mean I disagree with the idea being expressed. The wording of a statement is very important, because if done incorrectly it can lead to false assumptions about reality that have a way of taking off like wildfire.

I agree with your feelings about the stupidity of humanity, in this folly of a process That I like to term "The Petro-Industrial Complex".

Although I can not say anything towards the nature of devices I have not seen or been more informed of. Though I must say after giving time to congeal on what you have stated about your devices, it does seem as though I have heard about it before. I just can't place when or where. Deja vu.

Well, your disagreement is based on an assumption that the oil drillers have also made, that the oil underneath us is in separate caverns that aren't connected, therefore drilling and pumping oil in one place is not possibly having an effect anyplace else. I'm not that super intelligent that I can make that assumption.

I believe if a person errs they should err on the side of safety, so I assume they are connected moreso than we want to think. I think your assumption is the one that is more likely to be false than mine. If I am wrong => no harm is done; if you and the oil driller money-driven selves are wrong we have a problem on Planet Houston.

I try to look at the big picture and I like the word SURVIVAL written all over it. My personal belief is that God has a plan to cause a replay of Creation. I get that from Jesus' quote at Matthew 19 vs 28. If such a re-Creation is in his pipeline then the sky is the limit what is about to happen. Draining an exaggerated amount of oil from under the ground well, we were already facing Peak Oil...

Which I understand is being contested but let's say the oil total (ind'g this spill) is lessening the upward pressure holding our world UP and STABLE, ok? Then the world, if it is to be restored to what it was in the beginning (Genesis), then a great amount of the ocean water has to be returned into the Earth's upper atmosphere.

And the atmosphere goes HIGHER if we drop LOWER. My opinion is we are barely at the beginning of this ride. It will take a great deal of heat to evaporate water back into the condition back then as stated at Genesis 1 vs 7 (waters above the expanse). Of course to people who don't believe as I do they would see these expenditures of energy as a disaster. It's a course correction that has to be made to restore to us our inheritance of everlasting life that was lost.

My engines? They are rather unique combinations & synergies of Physics Laws. I say they run on "Physics Fuel". No fuels are combusted. Just as Sweet as real sugar but no calories.

:(

we might as well all get high on weed, and watch while the rats eat the rest of the food.

please provide reference. they did not follow regulations cuz most of the oil men are drunken lazy, and tweaking, idiots.

FOX news - on Democrats objection to Bush lifting ban of deepwater drilling
Circa 2008
Democrats contend that oil interest-tied Republicans are only seeking to expand oil companies' territory, and are ignoring land already available for oil exploration.

And Democrats are pointing to 68 MILLION ACRES of federal land, to which they say oil companies hold leases allowing them to explore but are GOING UNUSED
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,368221,00.html
.

but .. if there's not oil there why would they be leasing the land?
you think big oil is Leasing 68 Million acres for no reason ?

Gigantic gas reserves have recently been found in Central Louisiana (Haynesville Trend) and Pennsylvania and New York State( Marcellus Trend), some of the greatest in the World. However, recovery requires masssive hydraulic (sp) fracturing of the formation, with fluid returns that do not meet all of the environmental concerns. Yet this still gives us some hope for relieving the U.S. from from deepwater or foreign oil dependence.

Just how retarded are you exactly?

Liberal people call for an END TO DRILLING ENTIRELY last time I checked....

Also last time I checked they can drill sideways under the shallower shoreline. HENCE THE ENTIRE PLOT OF THAT FUCKING SHITTY MOVIE 'There Will Be Blood'!

"I'll drink your milkshake!"

YET, Deepwater Horizon was a VERTICAL well. Straight up and down. Your logic fails in more ways than one.

your talking about BP, drilling sideways at an angle cost BP MORE, we know they are cheap assholes. Why would they do that

They don't drill in places they own land in order to keep the price of oil up. When they get low in other places they can then start on the land they own. If you get too much oil available at once the prices would bottom out and the profits would suffer.

why do we come here?

Ouch, that was a little harsh. I'm not supporting her or her ideas. Quite the opposite.

Perhaps the handling of raw crude oil molecules does something to their brain... ingested by breathing the smell, the nostrils being the entry point straight in to their brain.

did you ever get one of those "does not play well with others" check marks on your report card in grade school?

part of your charm... ; - )

Agreed there, and PO'd.

rearrangement of the mantel is a serious over statement. As for your further speculations... well they are unfounded.

BS verssrev, did you read up to find out if what I said was true? Why not? I did before stating it.

Google: New Madrid Faul, the previous was the largest earthquake ever on this continent, the next will be worse. The Mississippi River reversed its flow the last time this fault went off. Geesh, people, read and then read some more.

The only thing I could alter would be the word 'rearrangement' and replace it with slipping of the mantel but 'rearrangement' is just another word for slipping or moving.

Aaaargh...lack of information while still giving an opinion is annoying.

for a bit of basic info

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/states/events/1811-1812.php#december_16

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Madrid_Seismic_Zone

First off your statement that the Mississippi flowed backwards is incorrect. It is not possible with out a dramatic shift in elevation along the entire length of the river. Second the New Madrid fault line does not rest near this oil reservoir. Third, the exact nature of the reservoir would have to be known to confirm such wild accusations, which it is not.
Fourth, I find unproven hypothesizes touted as a likely occurrence to be laughable. Thus why it is unfounded.

Yes the New Madrid fault has caused problems in the past, but at best what is being presented is a chain reaction scenario that would require thousands of possibilities to line up for it to occur. It is highly unlikely that if the reservoir where to collapse it would create little more than local oil contamination, seismic activity, and maybe tidal waves. All of these possibilities suck to say the least, however that does not support your claims. Your claims amount to the H1N1 hype, a lot of worrying with no real evidence to support the fears.

Oh, and just to be clear on something; the burden of proof is always on those that make claims for the existence of a phenomenon, possible occurrence, or predictions to the way the world works or will behave, and not those that deny claims without evidence.

Now, after you lick your wounds pussy cat, I'll return later to prove how the Gulf Oil reservoir collapse could set this puppy off. You could have done this research on your own, your belief that it's up to the person posting just shows that you want information spoon fed to you. The only way to truly absorb the information is to make a concerted effort to obtain it on your own. You should use the posts as a way to pique your curiosity on a subject and then go hunt down the information. Instead, you don't bother to qualify yourself with research before calling something BS. All this does is confuse the issue and cause yourself and the rest of us to expend more time seeking the truth.

That article specifically states that ripple patterns made it APPEAR that the river flowed backwards, it never actually did flow backwards. You have clearly illustrated your ineptitude with reading comprehension, thus proving that every thing you post, write, or say should be handled with a great deal of skepticism. You clearly do not possess the cognitive skills to make judgments for yourself about the nature of reality, what constitutes evidence, and how to create a coherent, consistent, and testable hypothesis on natural phenomenon.

Your statements hold no cognitive, scientific, logical, or even empirical validity. Thus leaving only two clear possibilities.

1. Your ignorant.

2. Your a troll

I'm putting my money on number 2.