Community | June 21, 2010 | 221 comments

Non-threatening dog shot by COWARD Police!

KSirys
What a F******* Disgrace, poor sack of SH*T, LESS THAN A HUMAN BEING A**HOLE!!!!

to shoot a dog because he couldn't handle him?? and because he couldn't wait for the people with expertise?????

http://www.machovideo.com/video/Nonthreatening_dog_shot_19170/
  1. groups:
    Community,   Animal Videos and News,   Actual News,   Veganism,   8 more
  2. tags:
    News Police Brutality Animal Protection animal cruelty 13 more
  3. recommended by:
    Monkey_Films,
    julesrs007
  4.     
    |

221 comments // Non-threatening dog shot by COWARD Police! // Video

  • Chris_Fletcher
  • dooder
  • existentialist
    • 0
      existentialist  
    • It is sad that this dog was killed out of ignorance. The cop should be disciplined. Hopefully the officer is remorseful of his actions and he will not fall prey to the same human weaknesses again.

    • 1 year ago
  • MoonLoon
  • remanns
  • Monkey_Films
    • +4
      Monkey_Films  
    • Image
    • I gave my dog a human name just for the purpose of eliminating the ownership taglines. Everyone that knows me asks about, talks to and refers to him as Llloyd. He even loves to take a seat at the table and listen in on poker night.
      He's a bonafide family member and I would defend him as such and he would do the same in return.

    • 1 year ago
  • KSirys
  • remanns
  • remanns
  • EthicalVegan
  • Dejan_Croatia
  • cclark_productions
  • lifestudentno83
    • +1
      lifestudentno83  
    • Why didn't they just let animal control handle it? Never send a cop to do a man's job; apparently the only two commands they know are taze and shoot.

    • 1 year ago
  • antoine_99
  • alexandrek
  • EthicalVegan
  • observer2121
  • Buddha2112
    • -1
      Buddha2112  
    • Way to keep giving cops a good name.

      How fucking lazy and incompetent is that bastard?

      We should chop his balls off, strangle him with that pole stick, and then shoot him in every joint starting from the ankle up. I bet his tail will wag the whole time.

      utterly disgraceful. There are many other ways to deal with such a situation. Why wasn't animal control called?

    • 1 year ago
  • existentialist
  • freecrack
  • existentialist
  • udt101
    • +2
      udt101  
    • It's unfortunate. Maybe there were some other options they could have exercised. However, it's not normal for police to simply go catch a dog and shoot it. I'm sure there is a back story that wasn't posted.

    • 1 year ago
  • linzerd
    • +2
      linzerd  
    • I don't know why I watched this as now I am traumatized and crying. What is truly so sad about this is that this dog was nothing but scared, which is the way every dog is when authorities come at them with those catching collar things. I don't understand what the point of chasing him around with that thing was if he was just going to shoot him. That looked like someone's pet. It is so disgusting the way people treat animals it makes me literally sick.

    • 1 year ago
  • freecrack
    • +3
      freecrack  
    • linzerd:

      yeah i guess this cop thinks a wagging tail is aggressive, or that strays often have leashes.
      at least i know im not the only one whos heart broke to the point of tears

    • 1 year ago
  • cclark_productions
  • mcoel002
    • 0
      mcoel002  
    • Everyone is complaining, as they should, but is there anything that can be done about this? Does anyone know where this happened, the officer's name, etc? What's the origin of the video? Let's file complaints, people!

    • 1 year ago
  • freecrack
  • KSirys
  • existentialist
  • KSirys
  • Econmst4peace
    • +1
      Econmst4peace  
    • okay i finally got to see the video and am i mistaken or is this dog chained up as well....okay nevermind this is just straight up cruelty and laziness....this guy is a cat person for sure...

    • 1 year ago
  • Econmst4peace
    • +2
      Econmst4peace  
    • police have pepper spray, and tazers and this guy shoots the dog...what an ass all he probably had to do is through his baton and the dog would of went after it....definitly a cat person...

    • 1 year ago
  • TypeMemeHere
  • remanns
  • KSirys
  • MsGo
    • -2
      MsGo  
    • Context is lacking here.
      For all we know, he was radioed with confirmation that the dog was rabid. I hate to see people get judged based on partial information.

    • 1 year ago
  • dragon1984
  • ZOMGod
    • +1
      ZOMGod  
    • MsGo:

      If the dog was rabid, it wouldn't have been acting as docile as it was. And idk about police procedure, but why would they try to catch it if the plan was to shoot it all along? It was already on a chain, ready to be shot in that case.

    • 1 year ago
  • MsGo
  • freecrack
  • KSirys
  • MsGo
  • MrMxyzptlk
  • MsGo
  • Incredulous
  • Darevalo
  • existentialist
    • -6
      existentialist  
    • Judging from some of the comments here, many of you make yourselves seem worse than these cops. The video has no sound or context and the dog clearly got angry at one point. I don't know if the cop made the correct choice, but I don't feel he needs to be demonized. The title of this article paints, with all caps, the cops as a "COWARD." I am sure Ksirys meant this as an insult to the police officer, but I see it as attacking the cop for having a universal human weakness. Whether he acted out of fear or insecurity (with his own manliness) I do not wish harm upon him. To do so would be to damn all those who are afflicted by the human condition.

    • 1 year ago
  • Colin_McCabe
  • Econmst4peace
  • KSirys
    • +1
      KSirys  
    • existentialist:

      sorry, but no matter what I do in life, I, myself, will never be as low as that FUCKING COWARD!!

      That dog was only looking to get out of the that rope that was choking him. He wasn't attacking anyone and at one point, in the video with no sound, you can see him just sit there peacefully and doing nothing.

      You might not want to attack or call that COWARD anything, or wish him ill.. BUT I DO... because I HAVE DOGS and if that piece of shit would have been near my dog, I would have broke his ass in two.

    • 1 year ago
  • Sumkrazyguy55
    • +1
      Sumkrazyguy55  
    • existentialist:

      The dog never tried to attack the police officers. It was chained up and docile. He had the dog in his control and shot it, twice. For no good reason. That's disgusting and cowardly. There was no excuse for it, that man should be stripped from his ranks and confined

    • 1 year ago
  • freecrack
  • KSirys
  • EthicalVegan
  • EthicalVegan
  • existentialist
    • -1
      existentialist  
    • freecrack:

      I am sick because I wish no harm upon this man? I am not the one, like many on here wanting to do violent things to people. I never said I agreed with what the cop did, I am just saying that he acted human. We all make horrible mistakes one time or another. I have realized that hate gets one nowhere and that is the message I am trying to spread.

    • 1 year ago
  • existentialist
    • -1
      existentialist  
    • KSirys:

      I am a vegetarian and a pet owner. This video made me sad too. I just refuse to let anger take over me. I am trying to show people that hate will only give birth to more hate. You get get angry at the cops, in turn they get angry at you, then your friends get angry at the cops for being angry at you, then the cops friends get angry at your friends and your friend's friends get angry at the cops and their friends and the cycle continues...

    • 1 year ago
  • existentialist
  • EthicalVegan
  • existentialist
  • freecrack
  • EthicalVegan
    • +3
      EthicalVegan  
    • existentialist:

      First off, that in no way implies "advocating VIOLENCE," for god's sake.

      Second, you bloody well knew that was meant slightly tongue-in-cheek -- you're just picking around to find anything you can contradict.

      Third, my "agreement" referred back to a different comment of his than the one to which you've chosen to connect it.

      Fourth, and most important of all, TNR is not -- let me repeat, NOT -- "violence!" Not in the least. I work for an animal rescue group, and we're constantly TNR'ing, and there's not a moment's violence involved. We use humane traps, and then we see to it that these animals are spayed or neutered, and then returned. As for the neutering -- and this is only if you're considering THAT to be the "violence" part -- this is a non-invasive, topical surgery that's practiced on many types of animals, including and especially the human male species... where it's referred to as a vasectomy. There is NO violence involved.

    • 1 year ago
  • existentialist
    • +1
      existentialist  
    • EthicalVegan:

      both of his comments seemed to be violent...of course you could have only agreed to the nonviolent parts of his first comment. Which if this is the case, sorry about that. Current should fix it so you can tell exactly which comment a person is replying to. In my opinion forcing capturing someone and performing an unwanted surgery could be considered violent, but many people probably don't agree with me..so sorry that I irrelevantly accused you promoting violence.

    • 1 year ago
  • existentialist
    • 0
      existentialist  
    • freecrack:

      I am not sure whether to be offended or honored as I have never read any of this jj's comments, though he was all the rave when I first joined one year ago. I only hope that my ideas remain as ingrained in many as his apparently have.

    • 1 year ago
  • MrMxyzptlk
  • EthicalVegan
    • -1
      EthicalVegan  
    • existentialist:

      Apology gratefully accepted and, yes, I agree with you that -- when someone clicks on reply to a specific comment -- there should be a way to identify the connection. I've oftentimes seen a reply of mine wayyyy down amongst a list of, say, eight or nine replies, and it's just pretty much "dangling" there, making little or no sense.

    • 1 year ago
  • EthicalVegan
    • -1
      EthicalVegan  
    • MrMxyzptlk:

      Oh, for god's sake, what a wimp!

      A human male's testicles are not cut off. Jeez. After just a local anesthetic to the scrotum, a teensy incision is made so that the vas deferens in each testicle can be snipped and tied or cauterized. It takes little time, and I know of so many men who've had vasectomies, and said it was far less "dramatic" than they'd feared.

    • 1 year ago
  • Hoofinit
    • +2
      Hoofinit  
    • I am a law abiding person with no outward hatred of the police but this is beyond my sense of reason. How can we allow individuals of such low intellect to have this type of authority over society? This individual should be removed from the police force. You can not fix stupid.

    • 1 year ago
  • Varex_Sythe
    • +1
      Varex_Sythe  
    • So they shoot a dog that is obviously harmless because they viewed it as a threat? Fucking hell, can anyone imagine what these 'tards would do to a harmless kid if they thought it was a threat?

    • 1 year ago
  • Colin_McCabe
    • +6
      Colin_McCabe  
    • In my hometown owning more than one pit-bull was illegal and the police department had a standing order to shoot all dogs that were threatening

      what makes it worse is that cops would show up to a scene and enter a house and as soon as the dog barked it bit the dust.

      cops truly are out of control

      I don't get why he didn't just lift the damn dog into the truck, no need to kill it

    • 1 year ago
  • TENBENT
    • +5
      TENBENT  
    • worthless PIECE OF SHIT skank cops! Canicide by police officer happens all too often in this country. Most of the time while serving a warrant for drugs, the cops shoot any dog that approaches them, be it a pitbull or poodle. It doesn't matter if the dog is even a threat to anyone, just so long as they get to use their gun and act like a toughguy. And guess what, if you even so much as pet a police drugdog the wrong way you'll be slapped with a Felony charge Assaulting an Officer! The 'war on drugs' has been one of the biggest, most costly social failures in this nation's history, second only to Slavery. 'Protect and serve' deez nutz.

    • 1 year ago
  • TmuNee
  • jrchel
  • Monkey_Films
  • existentialist
    • -2
      existentialist  
    • Monkey_Films:

      How does wishing death and suffering upon these cops as you and others have solve anything? Shouldn't we give them our sympathy and understanding? If you believe this cop erred, isn't the correct action to teach them to avoid such mistakes in the future rather than punish them? It has been my experience that violence begets violence.

    • 1 year ago
  • freecrack
    • 0
      freecrack  
    • existentialist:

      because humam beings posses higher functions, thus creating a greater responsability in regards to our actions.
      you cant blame an animal for its violence, you can blame a human.
      he is wrong, and any human being who is willing to hurt the defenseless should be removed for the sake of all of us.
      like being able to go back in time and killing baby hitler, the ends justify the means

    • 1 year ago
  • existentialist
    • -2
      existentialist  
    • freecrack:

      I agree that as a human we are moral agents, where as the dog is not. Both the dog and the cop are worth moral consideration, I think the cop should take personal responsibility for his most likely (because this video lacks context) ignorant and emotional action. I agree that it is wrong to harm this dog for no reason. I disagree with the idea that this man should be tortured, killed, or abused in anyway for his action. I am for a compassionate resolution where knowledge is used to correct the problem. I think this cop should be disciplined, but not punished. You say the ends justify the means, but what if their is an alternate means. To use your ridiculous Hitler example, would it not be a better action to teach young Hitler the benefits of peace and diversity, rather than kill him as a youth? Both would achieve the same end (preventing a war and the holocaust is the end I perceive you are going for) yet the latter does not seem as morally appalling.

    • 1 year ago
  • Kaveh_Kompani
  • alexandrek
  • existentialist
    • 0
      existentialist  
    • alexandrek:

      Cunt, idiot, COWARD, pussy, nerd, PIECE OF SHIT, worthless motherfucker, and douche-patrol are just some of the names people on this thread are calling these guys. Does this name calling somehow rise you guys to higher moral ground? Hostile name calling does not solve anything.

    • 1 year ago
  • remanns
  • existentialist
    • -1
      existentialist  
    • remanns:

      I don't believe in this eye for an eye bullshit. This cop is a person and he is likely upset that he shot this poor animal. I am not excusing his actions, but rather trying to get people to understand that cops are people too. If you make a mistake do you want people to to attack you and threaten you? How do you know the dog did not just attack and possible kill a child? Then would it deserve to be killed? It is unsettling how quickly people are to assault their fellow human beings. As, I stated in a previous comment, in my experience violence only begets more violence. I expect the world would be a much more peaceful place if people did not try to change things with threats and intimidation. This goes for the police and for everybody who responds to them with name calling and hostility.

    • 1 year ago
  • freecrack
  • freecrack
    • 0
      freecrack  
    • existentialist:

      upset he shot this animal?
      if he was attacked its one thing, kill or be killed, nothing in this situation warrented a NEED to shoot this dog.it was a want action.he knew what he was doing, he even paused before doing it as to suppose thought.
      you dont see the sickness within you that peoples hearts are breaking and the response is name calling,your callused ass is more bothered by the name calling than the murder?

    • 1 year ago
  • KSirys
  • existentialist
    • -3
      existentialist  
    • freecrack:

      Just so you know I am a vegetarian and a pet owner. I have more compassion for animals than most people. It is really really sad that this animal had to die. Instead of turning my sadness into anger and violence I choose the compassionate path and believe that people can be cured from their ignorance. I have seen the cyclical pattern of hate and suffering. Nothing good can come from hostility.

    • 1 year ago
  • EthicalVegan
    • 0
      EthicalVegan  
    • existentialist:

      Tiny, polite comment: But we don't OWN our "pets." We provide our animal companions with a home, food and water, medical care, and lots and lots of love. We cannot "own" another living being.

      And, hopefully, those animal companions are all adopted rescues, and not purchases made directly or indirectly from breeders.

    • 1 year ago
  • existentialist
    • 0
      existentialist  
    • freecrack:

      I understand their anger, my heart hurt too watching that dog die. I am just trying to show people that their are other ways to respond to this situation other than hate. I also wish people to understand that as humans we all make mistakes and are at one time or another blinded by fear or the need to impress others. Nobody here knows what the cop is going through internally. He could be tore up by his decision to shoot the dog and I think that he probably is. Showing compassion to this cop would have a more positive effect than verbally or physically attacking him.

    • 1 year ago
  • existentialist
  • existentialist
    • -1
      existentialist  
    • EthicalVegan:

      Sometimes it is easier say "pet owner" than to jump through semantic hoops to find a way to say animal companion that does not imply possession. How do you refer to the animals that live in your house? How do you differentiate between animals that live in another person's house? Even the words "our" and "my" imply ownership.

      No, my pets were not adopted rescues, they were given to my when my friends cat had kittens. :)

    • 1 year ago
  • EthicalVegan
    • 0
      EthicalVegan  
    • existentialist:

      Then your friend didn't have the common sense or intelligence or COMPASSION to spay/neuter any and all cats/kittens living inside or outside her/his home.

      Here, in the State of California, it is now the LAW to spay/neuter all kittens and cats. And I advocate TNR, which means "trap, neuter, return," and that means that any and all feral or stray or dumped/abandoned kittens and cats should be humanely trapped, then spayed or neutered (and ear-tipped), and then returned to where they were.

    • 1 year ago
  • EthicalVegan
  • KSirys
    • -1
      KSirys  
    • existentialist:

      break his ass in two.... i hate him already... there's no love from me when you kill. If he would have hurt the dog, tazed him, pepper sprayed him or even hit him with the baton, I would have been able to forgive him and start all over... but he decided to kill the dog because it was easy....

      So he gets NO SECOND CHANCE!! FUCK HIM!!

    • 1 year ago
  • existentialist
  • EthicalVegan
    • -1
      EthicalVegan  
    • existentialist:

      Oh, of course, that's lovely! And I can just picture it, and wish I were there. But for much of the world -- not all of it, by any means -- feral and stray cats are a really serious problem.

      Back when I lived in the country, there were kittens and cats around, but not an over-abundance.

    • 1 year ago
  • Colin_McCabe
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • These were two nerds in uniform. Any fool could see that the dog was not aggressive, but these two idots obviously had no experience with dogs. I could have walked right up and put the dog wherever they needed it. They probably spent their youth playing video games while dreaming of being warriors. Everyone be warned, if approached by these two idiots in uniform, do not give them a reason to shoot!

    • 1 year ago
  • existentialist
    • -1
      existentialist  
    • MoonLoon:

      So the appropriate response to this incident would be to train the cops how to handle animals correctly. Am I right? I don't think it is fair to call them idiots for not being adept in animal handling, which most of the population is poor at.

    • 1 year ago
  • Sumkrazyguy55
1 - 100 of 221
more from Community:

top videos