Ron Paul: Most Powerful Army Fighting War Against People Who Have NO Tanks! NO Planes! NO Ships!

I'll wager it was the Corporate Invasion of Iraq & Afghanistan Hitler Bush/Cheny
engineered ( via the 9/11 WTC Holocost they permitted to exploit their false flag )
that inspired James Cameron's 3D movie Avatar. The News came out of Canada
in early 2004 that Bush/Cheny schemed from the late 90s to invade Afghanistan.Iraq,Iran. And that their purpose is two fold. Michael Moore's
Documentary Fahrenheit 9/11 exposed the direct connection between Hitler
Bush as an unregistered foreign agent for the Bin Ladens who are a Multi
Billionaire Saudi Arabian Oil Magnate family. Obviously Bush wanted to double
the price which the Saudi Arabians he worked for would get for their oil once
Iraq their competitor was put out of commission. But the world Big Oil Monopoly
needed all 3 countries in tow as their " client States " so that Bush/Cheny
could secure them to have new Oil & natural gas pipelines built to replace
the ailing Alaskan oil pipeline. That was built in 1975, and wasn't intended to
last this long. Nor can it. The global warming caused by fossil fuel burning
has melted the perma frost on which the pipeline is founded. Watch the
Documentary which Al Gore produced: An Inconvenient Truth sometime
and see sagging trees, sinkholes, cracks in the pipeline. Bush/Cheny
stood to become Billionaires if their ambitious scheme worked. It hasn't
yet. But that's the real reason why the U.S. military is in those 2 countries.
Monsanto is there for its own sinister purposes, as is DuPont.

You can listen to the idiot shits of this world who swallow the propaganda
the Gummint wants to sell the Corporate cover up story with. Like parrots
they talk their talk. But it's MONEY that walks the walk. No Corporation would
piss on Afghanistan if it were on fire unlesst tons of money were to be
made from Afgthanistan's strategic value. They eyed Cuba & Hawaii
the same way in the late 1800s. Bush Jr. openly admitted to admiring
the tactics of Adolph Hitler who also knew the only way you can steal
a country's resources is to first steal their real estate. " Hearts & minds "
is right. Too bad the ones that uttered that weren't the ones who originated
that idea. That statement derived from a statement first uttered by the senior
Rothschild whose decendants form the cornerstone owners of the Federal
Reserve. The Banksters of the NWO needed that fiat money printing press
to fuel the Corporations operations in the same way 18 wheelers need the
oil to derive diesel fuel from to deliver the products you buy at Wally World.

http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Ron_Paul_Energy_+_Oil.htm

Ron Paul on Energy & Oil
Republican Representative (TX-14); previously Libertarian for President

Big Oil profits ok; Big Oil subsidies are not
Q: Bush’s energy bill provided billions of dollars in tax breaks & subsidies to the oil companies with the goal of boosting domestic production at a time of record profits. Do you support that?

A: I don’t think the profits is the issue. The profits are okay if they’re legitimately earned in a free market. What I object to are subsidies to big corporations when we subsidize them and give them R&D money. I don’t think that should be that way. They should take it out of the funds that they earn.
Source: 2007 GOP debate at Saint Anselm College Jun 3, 2007

Voted NO on removing oil & gas exploration subsidies.
Creating Long-term Energy Alternatives for the Nation (CLEAN) Act

* Title I: Ending Subsidies for Big Oil Act--denying a deduction for income attributable to domestic production of oil, natural gas, or their related primary products.
* Title II: Royalty Relief for American Consumers Act--to incorporate specified price thresholds for royalties on oil & gas leases in the Gulf of Mexico.
* Title III: Strategic Energy Efficiency And Renewables Reserve--makes the Reserve available to accelerate the use of clean domestic renewable energy resources and alternative fuels.

Proponents support voting YES because:

This legislation seeks to end the unwarranted tax breaks & subsidies which have been lavished on Big Oil over the last several years, at a time of record prices at the gas pump and record oil industry profits. Big Oil is hitting the American taxpayer not once, not twice, but three times. They are hitting them at the pump, they are hitting them through the Tax Code, and they are hitting them with royalty holidays put into oil in 1995 and again in 2005.

It is time to vote for the integrity of America's resources, to vote for the end of corporate welfare, to vote for a new era in the management of our public energy resources.

RON PAUL IS A HYPOCRITE

hypocrite

Main Entry: hyp·o·crite
Pronunciation: \ˈhi-pə-ˌkrit\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English ypocrite, from Anglo-French, from Late Latin hypocrita, from Greek hypokritēs actor, hypocrite, from hypokrinesthai
Date: 13th century

1 : a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion
2 : a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings

— hypocrite adjective

war is profit to corporations. they have no soul, yet they have the right as any human being?

War is a racket! General Smedley Butler said that over 60 years ago and it's still
worth mentioning. Profit over death!

is he just now asking these questions?

Oh Ron.....

Normally , I think he is a quack , but that is a valid question , worth a real answer .

It was Ron Pauls Party that engauged Iraq, we are currently drawing down forces there, after August the only troops left should be at the Air base, which I can sadly say is too bad.

http://www.democracynow.org/2010/7/1/fmr_marine_state_department_official_matthe...

Matthew Hoh resigning over the Afghanistan war.

"MATTHEW HOH: Well thanks for having me on Amy. you know, I think the question that should be first and foremost in every American’s mind is those 102 NATO troops, 59 I believe for Americans who were killed this month, how does that affect Al Qaeda? How did those deaths make this country safer? How did those deaths improve our national security? I think that should be the first question people ask, what are we out of this war, what are the benefits of spending $150 billion a year and losing 50, 60 good young men and women of every month?

AMY GOODMAN: I wanted to ask about the comparisons between Vietnam and Afghanistan. In a recent speech of yours, you quoted the following passage of Robert McNamara who served as defense secretary during the escalation of the Vietnam war. This is McNamara speaking in 1995, 20 years after the Vietnam War ended.

ROBERT MCNAMARA: We were fighting, and we didn’t realize it, a civil war. Now, true, there were some obviously Soviet and Chinese influence and support and no question the communists were trying to control South Vietnam, but it was basically a civil war. And one thing we should learn is you can’t fight and win the civil war without side troops. Particularly not when the political structure in the country is dissolved. So it wasn’t the press that was the problem, the problem was that we were in the wrong place with the wrong tactics.

AMY GOODMAN: Let me put that question and McNamara’s comments to Matthew Hoh, former State Department official in Afghanistan.

MATTHEW HOH: Very haunting comments. As you look at these two wars and compare them and you see the nature of the government, you see the nature of the countries, the way the population lives, the differences among the population, the natural schisms in the population and the history of those countries, the modern history of those countries, there are a lot of comparisons. I’m hesitant to say it is Vietnam over again, but there are some good comparisons, particularly in the fact we’re backing a corrupt and illegitimate government that is opposed by a good portion of the population, particularly in eastern and southern Afghanistan. The rural Pashtun population is excluded from that Afghan central government and there’s a rebellion against it and that’s where you do see the similarities between Vietnam and Afghanistan. I’ll also say you referenced Dan Ellsberg earlier and if your audience has not seen the Dan Ellsberg documentary, I recommend it. He talks about being on an airplane in Vietnam with Secretary McNamara and briefing him that they’ve gone and seen all the different provinces and they’ve not seen anything good or anything positive. As soon as they get off the airplane, McNamara tells the press corps that things are going well in Vietnam. You have the same experiences here. I was aghast when I heard Senator McCain when in his opening statements to General Petraeus the other day saying that it’s going well in Helmand province, that the military has cleared Marjah of Taliban. Which is completely untrue. You see some of those parallels too with our political leadership in terms of whether or not what they’re saying actually reflects the reality of the situation in Afghanistan."

http://www.democracynow.org/2010/7/1/conyers

A savings of $33 billion here.

"JUAN GONZALEZ: We’re joined by Democratic Congressman John Conyers. He’s the chair of the House Judiciary Committee and the co-chair of the "Out of Afghanistan" caucus. He’s speaking today at a press conference with other lawmakers opposed to the $33 billion earmarked for the escalation of the war in Afghanistan. The funding is contained in the supplemental Appropriations Act of 2010. The press conference is being held one day after the end of the bloodiest month for international troops in Afghanistan. Congressman Conyers, welcome to DEMOCRACY NOW!

REP. JOHN CONYERS: What a pleasure to be on the show. Top of the morning to both of you.

JUAN GONZALEZ: Can you tell us in terms of your efforts now to oppose this increase in funding, why you’re doing it and what do you see, especially after this conversation we’ve been having here on the sacking of General McChrystal, as to what the future holds for our nation in Afghanistan?

REP. JOHN CONYERS: Well, it’s never been clear to me that through war we can bring peace, especially when we’re the invaders, we’re the ones using drones. We’re causing civilian deaths to many people who would otherwise be more friendly to us. We’re creating the terrorists. This is not being lost on most of the people in the country now. Our constituents now want us out of both Afghanistan and Iraq, and what we’re doing now is forming a way to discuss this with our president in an effort to make him more comfortable with doing what most people want him to do and what we thought he was going to do in the first place, namely, to clearly disengage from the military, increase the diplomatic activity, and bring in some help in terms of food supplies, aid, and positive build up of these countries and to make as many friends as we can over there rather than this ninth year of what has now become a debacle in every respect.

AMY GOODMAN:Congressman Conyers, what is the War is Making Your Poor Act?

REP: JOHN CONYERS: The War is Making You Poor is a brilliant device by Grayson, my colleague Alan Grayson, in which we’re doing just three things. One, we limit the amount of funding of the wars in both countries. We eliminate the federal tax on all Americans that make less than $35,000 a year. And as a result, and this has been confirmed by the Joint Committee on taxation, we reduce the debt by almost $16 billion. Our debt. So it’s a combination of things that are happening now, Amy, that make it clear to more and more members of Congress that you can’t keep a straight face on all of this incredible indebtedness, talk about all of the money that we have shovelled out to Wall Street and credit isn’t loosening up, unemployment is still at all-time highs. We’re projected in Detroit to have more foreclosures on homes than last year. So we’ve got to turn with especially all of the shouts about being fiscally conservative, the way to climb out of this is to reduce the obligations of our government. Here we are in hundreds of billions of dollars of war debt and our President is saying we now have to have an emergency funding which is merely another way of saying we’re going to specially fund the Afghanistan surge. It makes no sensee and I thing militarily it is not logical and of course morally, I can’t remember anything like this since Korea and Vietnam, to be honest with you."

Sense? In CONGRESS?! How come no one listens to him? It's as if we have a chance to save ourselves from ourselves and no one wants to.

We will fall much like the Romans if this continues... And we repeat history... again and again, because no one cares.