Sex education teacher admits to double life as porn star

The simple fact that he is a porn star and a teacher is extremely controversial and sends a silent but strong message of encouragement to young and vulnerable minds.

Honestly, I think that just having access to the internet does more damage to young and vulnerable minds than this guy ever has or could.

we'll take your advice under consideration, would you like to be the first to volunteer your own daughter?

Good point.

I disagree, the teacher is a authority figure and often a role model.

First off, I have yet to have any kids. It has something to do with not wanting them at this point in my life. Second, if a teacher managed to keep their second life separate from their primary life for that long and no one was the wiser, I don't think I'd have a problem with it. Just because people suddenly are aware that the person is a porn star they does not mean that the person is going to change. If the guy's still allowed to teach, he's probably going to be the same teacher that he was before.

This is high school we're talking about. Not middle school or earlier. Yes, kids are impressionable, but not so much by teachers as you might think. If he hasn't tried to get kids into porn before his secret identity was known, he's most likely not going to now that it is. Point in case, I had teachers who were hunters and would go out hunting a few times each season. I can't think of any student who was impressed enough by that or was left with a great enough impression to pick up hunting because of it. Then again, a part of the problem is that sex is a taboo subject, and therefor is a lot more interesting. Perhaps we should deal with our issues about being such a frigid society so that the high schoolers won't feel so influenced by something that is so taboo.

Sexual experience is only a small part of our life yet for hight school students sexuality and self identity are extremely important. There is no comparison between a teacher who likes to hunt and a "hot" teacher who managed to be a porn star. There is no doubt in my mind the second will leave strong and lasting impression.

If it's on internet then I am sure they know.

The reason why there is no comparison is because one is a cultural taboo and the other is not. Guess which is the taboo in our culture, sex or hunting? The sad fact that all teenagers go through puberty and are hyper-sexually charged really isn't that big of an issue, if it was then damn near every kid would be seeing things online and trying them just to satisfy their own lust.

No my children do not watch porn on the internet. That is exactly my point; "teaching" provided by the porn star teacher can not be censored. Allowing porn star's "values" become "approved by school" values would be another disservice to our children best interest.

I disagree.

And you have the right to disagree. Two questions though. One, roughly how old are your children? Two, how do you know that the teacher who is a porn star is teaching porn star values in the class. There are science teachers who are religious, does that mean we should fire the teachers because they might teach the kids that creationism is a scientifically legitimate theory?

wheres your manners varex? oh yeah never mind. you should never under any circumstances ask a woman her age

It is simply human nature to believe in their own value system and undoubtedly approve their own choices. This core values are impossible to suppress in the classroom or out.

I'll assume that you're comment on my manners is in reference to my asking how old the children are. Asking how old her children are is not asking how old the woman is. Make sure you understand what you are writing about before you comment on how I'm insulting people by asking for personal information that is not relevant tot he discussion.

The point in case, if they're small children then it's kind of a no brainer that they've never looked up internet porn. If they are male and mid to late teenagers, then it's highly unlikely that they have not seen it.

So, it's impossible for a guy who works in porn to not teach a basic sex ed class that informs kids of the basic mechanics, how people get pregnant, and what birth control is because his moral values that allow him to work in the porn industry will corrupt our children, even though to our knowledge this guy has been in porn and has not managed to infect any of the kids he teaches with his pornographic morals or ideology?

How do you know that he "has not managed to infect any of the kids he teaches with his pornographic morals or ideology"?

So I don't know that he hasn't and you don't know that he has. So innocent until proven guilty applies, or it doesn't? The point of something being to our knowledge is that it could have happened, but if it did it hasn't come up yet and it is still quite possible and/or likely that it has not. Now I know from the news that there have been quite a few teachers who have no pornographic background who have been having affairs with students, but I don't know of too many people in professional porn who make it a habit to have sex with underaged youth. Underaged youth varies from nation to nation as the minimum age for consent seems to be different in other countries. And unless I am mistaken, it is not legal in this nation to view pornographic material of what our nation considers a minor.

This is not a two-dimensional issue as you have defined it, and it is not simply did he or not have sex with his students. There are many angles which you will understand when you become a parent.

Seriously, where is the problem? Is he teaching an extra racy sex ed class that the school did not endorse? Is he telling kids that it's alright to sleep with multiple people and to be promiscuous? What is he doing inside of the classroom that has you freaked out about this? It's almost akin to a person who is homophobic preaching that we should remove a teacher from the rosters because he/she is a homosexual and might infect the kids with their homosexual-ness. I've actually met porn actors before. If someone doesn't tell you that the person acts in porn, it's really not easy to tell that they do act in porn. And after you find out a person acts in porn, you usually don't see or notice anything about their behavior that you didn't notice before. They're the same person that they were before.

It is true that any teacher may have values that are not appropriate for teaching at school. The casual "there is nothing wrong with it" attitude is concern many parents would have with a porn star for a teacher.

Yes his actions are telling kids that it is ok as you put it "to sleep with multiple people and be promiscuous". The fact that kids know their teacher is a porn star sends a strong silent message.

It's likely that it is only going to send that message to kids who already think that in the first place.

As far as with the, "there's nothing wrong with it," attitude, there is nothing wrong with a career in pornography. It's a job, it pays the bills, and if someone enjoys it all the more power to them. Personally, I think it makes sense. A physics teacher can moonlight as an engineer, and english teacher can moonlight as an author, a coach can moonlight as a player of a sport, but a sex ed teacher can't moonlight as a porn star?

We know what downsides there could be to this kind of matchup, so what are some of the potential benefits? Could he be more knowledgable about contraceptives? Could he be more informative about STD's? I'm certain that at the very least he could bring up the fact that pornography is a fantasy, not how sex really works, and therefor relying on it for any informative purposes is completely idiotic.

I like your sarcasm.

The first question you should be asking yourself is where were these kids parents while they were surfing for porn to find this guy. There was no promotion of his private life by him to his students. You even went so far as to assume he filled his classes with innuendos when you clear have no idea what his classes where actually filled with.

Why do we, as a society, obsess with the private sexual lives of people around us. Until there is some evidence of abuse involving this man then let him have his job. The parents of these kids are the ones you should be focusing you ranger at.

you are wrong, fire the creep

Absolutely I suspect that a porn start in a position teaching sex ed will fill his class with "innuendo", I have NO problem making that assumption.

I've personally seen sex ed teachers making these kinds of innuendo--and they weren't porn stars.

It's none of my business to know "where the parents were", that's between them and their kids. The FACT is that they DID discover who he was, and it is now widely known.

I wouldnt' even doubt there are some girls and boys now asking him private questions about how to get into the industry. I remember a student (a senior) once celebrating that she had been approached to dance nude to pay for her college after she had gone to Florida University to tour the school, something she broadcast publicly in the classroom.

Why am I to think this guy is not possibly "scouting for talent" among the girls?

You assume him to be innocent of all wrong doing, I don't assume he has done anything wrong but it's NOT illogical to be concerned, and his mere presence in the classroom will now be risky.

ESPECIALLY since we know he is supposed to be teaching the proper use of condoms and here he is making stupid STUPID excuses for the fact he does not use them as he screws other porn stars, even though reports over the past years has shown an increase in AIDS among those very same stars.

if not a regular fucker, who else to speak from an authorative position?

Why is his profession in any way not "wholesome"?

Let's say that there was a teacher who moonlights as an actor in B-movie horror flicks.
Movies where he plays a serial killer chopping up teenagers in a summer camp, or other crap like that.

Would that be acceptable?

He's not a murderer, he's just an actor.

Porn is a form of entertainment; entertainment for adults, not for kids, and he is an adult.

While I don't like his attitude about not using condoms, the fact that he does porn is irrelevant.

Your whole analysis is based on the antiquated notion that sex is something evil, nasty, dirty and disgusting.

So what that he does porn, so what if his students want to get into the industry when they are adults, so what if some girl wants to pole dance to earn her tuition.

The only thing that makes any of this wrong is the puritanical notion that it's wrong.

(I will concede the point on the condom issue- the guy is stupid for not using condoms.)

we have been getting along nicely as of late huh, dont worry hamas will do some shit that will have us at odds soon enough.

Not while he is teaching my kids.

if he was a pedophile rapist he would be "cool" in Cali--as long as he's an "artist"...a la Roman Polanski

mmhm, i like you curtisreed

Can you tell me how what this teacher does is even REMOTELY like what Polanski did and PROBABLY still does? I mean one Involves CONSENSUAL sex with other ADULTS the other is raping CHILDREN.

I did not say he DID or DOES anything like Roman Polanski. Read my sarcastic post, it was a swipe at Californicators (and Liberals in general), not the teacher in particular.

I am sure you can take a reading comprehension course at your local community college. It should be cheap considering the value you'd get out of it.

the power of blind association.

practical experience? who doesn't?

but you can't effectively teach that unprotected sex is dangerous and then have videos of yourself all over the internet screwing hos without a condom.

what would we say of a driver's ed teacher who had videos of himself racing his car on public streets?

http://www.queerty.com/exodus-internationals-randy-thomas-hasnt-had-sex-in-18-ye...

This guy

Truth be told if the kids are watching his Videos I think they are a little beyond doing as the teacher says any way. That being said I am SURE this teacher and his co-stars are regularly tested for STD's this is why in "some" of his videos he does not use prophylactics.. I am not defending what this teacher does, but when you start comparing him to Roman Polanski give me a break!

still stuck on the gay sex?

ha ha that's funny, but your response is a bit goofy. He HAS sexual experience, he has chosen to be celibate since he was 24.

Not the same thing as the "40 year old virgin", is it?

I did NOT compare him to RP, caca brains. Read what I said.

Your assumption is ASSinine. Emphasis on ASS.
It matters not one whit if the kids had seen his videos, they should still be using condoms, and if he had used them strictly in his vids, his advice in class might be more believable and authoritative.

He is an idiot, as are you for defending him, for saying that he doesn't really need to use a condom because he's fucking other "professionals", who in turn are fucking other profesionals...and amateurs.

AIDS instances began to increase among California porn models in the past years exactly because they were not taking precautions. Go google it, genius.

the avatar says it all, congo

"but you can't effectively teach that unprotected sex is dangerous and then have videos of yourself all over the internet screwing hos without a condom."

Well you can as long as the kids dont know about it, but its a bit late for that now isnt it.

like the porn industry isnt concerned about std's?
its like the retards who think wrestling is real.as a promoter you dont want your guys getting hurt as they equal money.the more you get to use them the more your business succeeds.every porn star you have that has vd, is another piece of your business crumbling.
if any industry insures safe sex it is porn.jenna jameson 5 thousand cocks later no vd.

kind of like priests preaching no sex before marraige, but blowing alter boys huh?

Well, this guy wasn't saying no sex without a condom then screwing children.

im afraid to reply man, after watching you respond to yourself, wich is ok cuz sometimes you werent done despite clicking on submit.but you were countering yourself.
kinda scary
ya know what i think im gunna do that later.pick a topic, post a story,and just battle myself and see how it goes before i brand you crazy.maybe you are more balanced than all of us with our one sided narratives.

yeah but its such a non issue to me that i wasnt compelled to think of a worthy analogy.
in a world where woman give up theyre kids for adoption only to find them and later fuck them, this is like wading in the morality kiddie pool, just a whole lot of nothing.

here this better?
its like sarah palin running on an abstinence only sex ed platform while her underaged daughter unaware of condoms (apparently) is preggers.

I replied to myself?

on another post
unless im confusing you with some one else wich is entirely possible.

cannabis side effect

bullshit. I'm sure he's paid what he's worth. teachers these days can earn a good salary, especially if they have advanced degrees. teachers in some districts are earning well above $70K.

besides, you actually think if he was receiving $70K per year he'd give up his porn career? get a flipping clue. he's a porn star because he gets lots of p*$$~

I live in South Texas a Teacher with a Masters degree and "20" years experience make $48,000 a year in my school district. My Niece just graduated from Texas A&M with a degree in Electrical Engineering and will be starting at AEP in August @ $60,000 a year. I mean fresh out of College with a BS she is making $12,000 more than a teacher with a Masters and "20" years experience.

and some teachers are paid way too much, teachers unions should be fired and teacher salary should be based on merit

that's Texas. In Denver the average salary is MUCH higher, those with masters and doctorates are in the upper 70s to 80s with experience of course.

I was a teacher once too, started in P'Cola Fl for $22,000 per year.

I would never have turned to porn to make some extra bucks.

Cali teachers are also paid MUCH more than you Texas teachers. And there is nothing wrong with professionals earning more than teachers. they actually work a full year. My wife is a teacher with 3 months a year vacation. That's 1/4 of the year off, dude. Let's compensate that by adding the 25% of $60,000 to the salary to get $75,000. And that's a TEXAS salary. Teaching salaries elsewhere are even higher.

That's an average wage for a technical job such as Business Analyst, QA engineer, software development engineer, project manager, etc. with years of experience and post-grad degrees/certifications. So cry me a fucking river.

And the skillset for an engineer is MUCH higher than a bullshit English teacher, and the contribution to society is greater too.

Far too many people are teaching because of the vacation time and so they can coast through college and get psych or english degrees because math/science is just too damn hard for them.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/03/state-regulators-agree-to-explore-...

State regulators voted Thursday to establish a committee to explore the possibility of requiring porn industry performers to use condoms and to take other safety measures.

The six-member California Division of Occupational Safety and Health standards board voted unanimously on the advice of staff to create an advisory committee to report back on whether to change state law to require safe-sex protections for adult-film actors and actresses.

The decision was greeted with applause from the crowd of about 40 people, including current and former adult-film performers, at Costa Mesa City Hall.

Board member Guy Prescott, director of safety for Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3, said he had planned to vote against the measure but changed his mind after hearing from performers and other members of the industry.

“The question is the particular acts and exposures to the workers and what are we doing to prevent that,” said board member Jonathan Frisch, principal risk manager at PG&E Corp. "I found it extremely interesting to hear from members of the industry here this morning. It’s going to be very, very important that we do have them at the table.”

The board, appointed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, had up to six months to act on a Dec. 17, 2009 petition filed by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation to change state law and require mandatory condom use for adult-film workers and more stringent safety training and testing for sexually transmitted diseases.

“We believe the state of California has a responsibility to regulate these workplaces as they do every other workplace,” AIDS Healthcare Foundation President Michael Weinstein told the board.

The foundation has been pushing regulators and porn industry leaders to better safeguard the health of adult-film performers since an HIV outbreak among porn performers in the San Fernando Valley in 2004.

More than a dozen speakers addressed the board before the vote, including Los Angeles County public health experts and several current and former adult-film workers.

Dr. Robert Kim-Farley, director of communicable disease control and prevention at the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, recommended mandatory condom use and increased, free STD screening for adult-film performers.

Rates of STDs such as chlamydia and gonorrhea are seven times higher in the adult-film industry than in the general population, he said, and up to a quarter of performers are diagnosed with an STD in a given year.

Former porn actor Darren James, who tested HIV-positive during a 2004 outbreak, called current industry STD testing practices a security blanket that actors mistakenly believe protects them from infection.

“You think you’re safe but you’re not; in between scenes, you don’t know what other actors are doing,” James told the board.

I agree that his non use of protection sets a poor example but it is only a bad example if his students are watching the stuff in the first place. As a parent I am outraged that these kids had access to this stuff in the first place. Someone is not doing their job and this teacher is not it.

and how do you know that the dipshit is not also making statements in the classroom that there are times when it's "OK" not to use a condom, since he obviously believes that.

i dunno man
you got like a dozen or so chicks who are gang bang champs with i think the record being 750 guys.statisticaly they should be vd machines but they arent.

NOT

I wonder if those who posted comments of approval even have children?