President Obama to Launch Ocean Initiative | Will Create National Stewardship Policy for the United States' Oceans and the Great Lakes
source: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-obama-ocean-20100719,0,1686762.story
-
-
- EthicalVegan
- added this
Obama to launch ocean initiative
The stewardship policy embraces a controversial zoning practice that could change how the U.S. regulates drilling, fishing and other maritime activities.
By Jim Tankersley, Tribune Washington Bureau
July 19, 2010
Reporting from Washington
President Obama on Monday is set to create a national stewardship policy for America's oceans and Great Lakes, including a type of zoning that could dramatically rebalance the way government regulates offshore drilling, fishing and other marine activities.
The policy would not create new regulations or immediately alter drilling plans or fisheries management. But White House documents and senior administration officials suggest it would strengthen conservation and ecosystem protection.
The initiative culminates more than a year of work by a federal Ocean Policy Task Force, which Obama established last year. After the task force releases its final recommendations, the president is expected to sign an executive order directing federal agencies to adopt and implement them.
Calling the BP oil spill ravaging the Gulf of Mexico a "stark reminder of how vulnerable our marine environments are," the recommendations center on creating a National Ocean Council to coordinate regulation of oceans and the Great Lakes, and on a principle of "ecosystem-based management" for marine areas.
The council would include top federal scientists and officials from a variety of agencies, including national security experts, environmental regulators and managers of ocean commerce.
The recommendations embrace a controversial practice called marine spatial planning, a zoning process of sorts that seeks to manage waters in the way some cities manage factories and strip malls. The process could result in confining activities such as drilling, shipping and conservation to areas the planners deem best-suited to each use.
Nine regional groups — consisting of state, federal and tribal officials — would draft plans for conservation and use of ocean resources that would have to be approved by the National Ocean Council. Federal agencies have agreed to abide by the plans.
If the Great Lakes regional body designated certain lake areas for offshore wind farms, for example, the Interior Department would agree to approve wind farms only within those areas.
The same would be true for any new offshore drilling projects. Currently, Interior officials develop drilling plans under a public comment process within their department.
In Southern California, the heavy focus on "ecosystem-based management" could cause the U.S. Navy to retool its fleet deployment, with an eye on how its operations affect water quality or whales.
The recommendations do not specify their effect on offshore drilling. Administration officials said the new policy would not prejudge or conflict with future findings of the bipartisan commission Obama had charged with investigating the oil gusher.
But the administration says coordinated, stewardship-heavy ocean management is likely to "really change" practices in nearly every marine activity, drilling included. The final task force report predicts that the changes would help restore fish populations, protect human health and "rationally allow" for ocean uses such as energy production.
"This sets the nation on a path toward much more comprehensive planning to both conservation and sustainable use of [ocean] resources," said a senior administration official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the policy had not been officially announced.
The first draft of the policy, released in September, drew heavy criticism from some quarters, including industry and recreational anglers concerned that sport fishing might be restricted or banned.
After a deluge of criticism and meetings with fishing and boating groups, the administration modified the recommendations to emphasize the importance of fishing and ocean recreation, calling them "critical to the economic, social and cultural fabric of our country."
The recommendations do not include curbs on recreational fishing. But the mere prospect of marine spatial planning has drawn skepticism from ocean users.
Oil and gas officials are concerned too. They have repeatedly urged the administration not to adopt any planning process that could restrict offshore drilling.
Last fall, for example, a representative of the American Petroleum Institute testified at a task force field hearing, "The oil and natural gas industry's presence in the Gulf [of Mexico] has successfully coexisted with other ocean uses like tourism, fishing, the U.S. military and shipping for many years, demonstrating that the current system of governance works well."
The new plan would emphasize nine areas under the broad banner of marine stewardship and conservation, including improved scientific research and mapping; helping coastal communities adapt to climate change and ocean acidification, particularly in the Arctic; and enhancing water quality on land to boost ocean water quality.
jtankersley@latimes.com
Copyright © 2010, The Los Angeles Times
-
- groups:
- Community, Green, Current Tonight, Earth and Science, 15 more
-
- tags:
- Environment, President Obama, Oceans, Gulf of Mexico, 36 more
-
-
ReverandG
-
The pen is itching his fingers again, has to sign another executive order bypassing congress.
- 1 year ago
-
ReverandG
-
-
Wetdog
-
ReverandG:
You sure are anxious to destroy America and Americans to feed your racist hate aren't you?
If Obama bothers you that much---you can always go live somewhere else.
The Taliban are looking for recruits---and the way you talk, it sounds like you'd really get along well with them.
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
ReverandG
-
Wetdog:
Ok Wetdog, put the pipe away and take a deep breath. Care to explain how I am a racist in your opinion? Considering the fact that I am american indian and I know racism first hand explain your comment to me.
- 1 year ago
-
ReverandG
-
-
Wetdog
-
ReverandG:
I don't care what your background is, you can still be racist. You are spouting right wing conservative jingoism, meant to incite and inspire racist hatred.
The fact is, if you are Native American, and had any knowledge and respect for your ancestors at all, you should be delighted that there is renewed interest in conserving and protecting the natural environment from wreckless and wanton destruction. It is part of our religion.
If what you say is true,(which I doubt), you are not only supporting a political agenda that tries to appeal to racist hate to try to manipulate public support----you are also a traitor to your own heritage, culture and ancestors.
You are also a traitor to the rest of us who love America and want to her protected and preserved from destruction for no other reason than greed and the private profit of a few.
This land belongs to all of us----this land and these waters are mine. I do not agree to renting it out to oil companies to destroy the land and waters for private profit.
Just because you have some Indian blood in your family tree does not make you Indian. If you were what you say you are, you'd have some respect the natural world around us.
A true warrior wears a red shirt.
The spirits of all the dead people, fish, birds, turtles and whales will follow you where ever you go----and cry out to the skies and waters for justice.
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
ReverandG
-
Wetdog:
I am totally independant and not aligned with any political party. I vote for the best candidate regardless of which party they represent. I trusted Obama and he has proven himself to speak with half truths.
I Am Blackfeet. I am proud of my heritage and my people.
You get all excited from my post that he is ready to use his pen again?
Good luck with that. I'll pray for you. - 1 year ago
-
ReverandG
-
-
Dagum
-
have the sneaking suspicion that "eminent domain" is going to become a watchword for this administration
- 1 year ago
-
Dagum
-
-
Peloquin
-
"Interior officials develop drilling plans under a public comment process within their department". -We the comment processors. I want this for every government entity.
I don't know if they mean comments from us.
I love the idea though - too many jellyfish. I don't want to eat jellyfish. Fish prices will go up, but at least there will be fish.
Do they mean "regulating", or "not allowing" when it comes to offshore drilling?
The big problem is international waters will be taken advantage of by non-US citizens. They will over-fish, and we will have a clear conscience.
I'm not 100% on this, but if it means we will actively prevent non-US entities as well as US fishers, from over-fishing the oceans, I'm good with it. It could start a war though. The fish are dying! You can smell it.
- 1 year ago
-
Peloquin
-
-
TomTucker
-
Cool, will he still allow people to dump Corexit in the Ocean.
- 1 year ago
-
TomTucker
-
-
EtVoila
-
Okay, Obama. You go ahead and do that, then. I just hope it actually happens.
- 1 year ago
-
EtVoila
-
-
Pollo_Loco_
-
Ocean Initiative? This sounds like a job for... Aquaman!
- 1 year ago
-
Pollo_Loco_
-
-
dozegotcha
-

-
Pollo_Loco_:
idk, i think aquaman has met his match.............................................
- 1 year ago
-
dozegotcha
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
Pollo_Loco_:
Pretty much the only job for Aquaman!
- 1 year ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
Einsam_Data_Old [removed]
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
Einsam_Data_Old [removed]
-
-
nursediesel
-
Ok, so it's made up of government scientists. Ho Hum!
Are the Tribal officials receiving any Government money? Can they, also, be controled by funding and power? - 1 year ago
-
nursediesel
-
-
Wetdog
-
nursediesel:
Yes.
That is why I was telling you about ethanol.
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
JanforGore
-
WIll it stop Nestle from taking the water out of the Great Lakes?
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
timetide
-
I like this idea but I have one question? how did it get to the number seven spot without a comment?
on a second note, how long until this tops the tea party crazy government theories list?
- 1 year ago
-
timetide
