Eric Boehlert: Glenn Beck's Incendiary Angst Is Dangerously Close to Having a Body Count
source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-boehlert/glenn-becks-incendiary-an_b_660429.htm
-
-
- wayseeker
- added this
Indeed, for more than a year Beck has been portraying the progressive organization as a central player in a larger, nefarious cabal of Marxist/socialist/Nazi Obama-loving outlets determined to destroy democracy in America. Beck has routinely smeared the low-profile entity for being staffed by "thugs" and "bullies" and involved in "the nasty of the nastiest," like indoctrinating schoolchildren and creating a "mass organization to seize power."
As Media Matters reported, the conspiratorial host had mentioned (read: attacked) the little-known progressive organization nearly 30 times on his Fox program alone since it premiered in 2009, including several mentions in the last month. (Beck's the only TV talker who regularly references the foundation, according to our Nexis searches.)
So yes, Beck has done all he can to scare the hell out of people about the Tides Foundation and "turn the light of day" onto an organization that actually facilitates non-profit giving.
And guess what? Everybody in America would have found out about the Tides Foundation last week if Byron Williams had had his way. He's the right-wing, government-hating, gun-toting nut who strapped on his body armor, stocked a pickup truck with guns and ammo, and set off up the California coast to San Francisco in order to start killing employees at the previously obscure Tides Foundation in hopes of sparking a political revolution.
Thankfully, the planned domestic terrorist attack never came to pass because California Highway Patrol officers pulled Williams over for drunk driving on his way to his killing spree. Williams quickly opened fire, wounding two officers during a lengthy shootout. Luckily, Williams wasn't able to act out the ultimate goal of his dark anger -- fueled by the TV news he watched -- about how "Congress was railroading through all these left-wing agenda items," as his mother put it. Williams wasn't able to open fire inside the offices of the Tides Foundation, an organization "nobody knew" about until Glenn Beck started targeting it.
And thankfully, Williams wasn't able to take his place alongside a growing list of domestic, anti-government terrorists, such as the recent Pentagon shooter, the Holocaust Museum gunman, the kamikaze pilot who flew his plane into an IRS building in Austin, Texas, and the Pittsburgh cop-killer who set up an ambush because he was convinced Obama was going to take away his guns.
All the vigilante attacks appear to have been fueled by an almost pathological hatred for the U.S. government -- the same open hatred that right-wing bloggers, AM talk radio hosts, and Fox News' lineup of anti-government prophets have been frantically fueling for the last year, pushing doomsday warnings of America's democratic demise under President Obama.
And the sad truth is we're going to see more like Byron Williams. We're going to see more attempts at vigilante violence during the Age of Obama simply because the right-wing media, lead by Beck, continue to gleefully (albeit irresponsibly) stoke dangerous fires with the kind of relentlessly incendiary rhetoric that has no match in terms of modern day, mainstream use in American politics or media.
Just listen to Glenn Beck:
* Progressives "are sucking the blood out of the republic" and are "gonna start getting more and more violent."
* "To the day I die, I am going to be a progressive hunter."
* "[Y]ou will have to shoot me in the forehead before you take away my gun" and "before I acquiesce and be silent."
* "This game is for keeps"; "[Y]ou can shoot me in the head ... but there will be 10 others that line up."
* "There is a coup going on. There is a stealing of America"; "God help us in an emergency."'
And don't forget about the unhinged response when health care reform was passed in March: "Get down on your knees and pray. Pray. It's September 11th all over again, except that we didn't have the collapsing buildings." After financial reform passed last week, Beck told his audience, "Your republic is over."
Meanwhile, Andrew Breitbart's website recently tagged Obama as the "suicide-bomber-in-chief," while the conservative Washington Times just last week published an op-ed -- by a former congressman, no less -- asserting the president poses more of a threat to America than al Qaeda.
Note that the radical right's media rhetoric is no longer even political in a partisan sense. Instead, it's purely revolutionary. It isn't, "We think taxes should be lower" or "Obama should be more hawkish overseas." It's, "There's an insidious and deadly plot afoot by Democrats and progressives to strip Americans of their freedom and this country of its greatness." Obama is now the incarnation of evil (the Antichrist?), and his driving hatred for America, as well as for democracy, runs so deep that he ran for president in order to destroy the United States from inside the Oval Office.
Rush Limbaugh: "Our country is being overthrown from within."
And this summer, the latest toxic twist to that line of attack is that Obama is destroying America on purpose in order to exact revenge from white America for the historic sin of slavery. (Think: Black Manchurian Candidate.) The GOP Noise Machine is now mixing a vile cocktail by stirring revolutionary rhetoric with hateful race-baiting.
It's impossible to argue that today's avalanche of insurrectionist rhetoric doesn't have a real world effect. Or that those on the fringes don't find comfort in seeing and hearing their worst fears legitimized on AM radio and Fox News.
The consequences of the doomsday programming seem entirely predictable. As Jeffrey Jones, a professor of media and politics at Old Dominion University, recently explained to the New York Times in regard to Beck's rhetoric, "People hear their values are under attack and they get worried. It becomes an opportunity for them to stand up and do something."
Indeed, the relentless message that right-wing audiences hear is unequivocal and inescapable: Do something! Take action!
And last week, Byron Williams, likely inspired by Glenn Beck's Tides obsession, grabbed his guns and set out to do just that.
-
- groups:
- Community
-
- tags:
- Beck, media matters, Conseratives, Radio Shows, 2 more
-
-
maasanova
-
-
Kinda seems like the left establishment can't wait for there to be an violent domestic incident so they can get Obama's ratings up, just like Clinton and OKC. They just can't wait!
http://www.breitbart.tv/libtalker-calls-for-deaths-of-limbaugh-beck-oreilly/
- 1 year ago
-
maasanova
-
-
Twenty3Enigma
-
maasanova:
Then how come it's the conservative professional-talkers who seem so bring up the subject of violence and disorder? And I call them this because Beck and his kind are not thinkers. They're talkers. Nothing but endless rambling and ranting. I can't realistically accuse them of thinking. Glenn Beck doesn't draw a huge salary by being profound --- he gets paid to make up imaginary problems and then rant about them until he finds a catch phrase that hits a raw nerve and gets a reaction. But why expect more? He's no brighter than the people who are his fans.
- 1 year ago
-
Twenty3Enigma
-
-
maasanova
-
Twenty3Enigma:
They bring up violence because they are trying to provoke violence, but the left is provoking the right by repeatedly warning that there will be another OKC if they don't shut up about the economy, takeover of healthcare, how the Obama administration is just continuing Bush policies ect. I am not sure how people cannot see how this game is played. Both sides are playing a role because they are reading from a script, a government talking point.
- 1 year ago
-
maasanova
-
-
ayashe
-
If Glenn Beck's incendiary angst is to have a body count, I hope his is among it. "[Y]ou can shoot me in the head ... but there will be 10 others that line up." Yay, execution style! That just makes it easier!
- 1 year ago
-
ayashe
-
-
2hellnwait
-
The Tides Foundation promotes a multitude of leftist agendas, as evidenced by its assertion: "We strengthen community-based organizations and the progressive movement by providing an innovative and cost-effective framework for your philanthropy." Among the crusades to which Tides contributes are: radical environmentalism; the "exclusion of humans from public and private wildlands"; the anti-war movement; anti-free trade campaigns; the banning of firearms ownership; abolition of the death penalty; access to government-funded abortion-on-demand; and radical gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender advocacy. The Foundation is also a member organization of the International Human Rights Funders Group, a network of more than six-dozen grantmakers dedicated to finaning leftwing groups and causes.In 1996 the Tides Foundation created, with a $9 million seed grant, a separate but closely related entity called the Tides Center, also headed by Drummond Pike. The Tides Center functions as a legal firewall insulating the Tides Foundation from potential lawsuits filed by people whose livelihoods or well-being may be harmed by Foundation-funded projects. (These could be, for instance, farmers or loggers who are put out of business by Tides-backed environmentalist groups.) In theory the Foundation's activities are restricted to fundraising and grant-making, while the Center focuses on managing projects and organizations; in practice, however, both entities do essentially the same thing.
The Tides Center's Board Chairman is Wade Rathke, who is also a member of the Tides Foundation Board. Rathke, a protege of the late George A. Wiley, serves as President of the New Orleans-based Local 100 of the Service Employees International Union, and is the founder and chief organizer of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN).
The Tides Foundation and its closely allied Tides Center distributed nearly $66 million in grants in 2002 alone. The Tides Center was spun off from the Foundation but is also run by Drummond Pike. The Tides Center, the Foundation,and two other entities under the Tides roof collaborate as partners. There is a technical – but insignificant – separation between the Tides Foundation and the Tides Center. From 1994 – 2004, the Heinz Endowments, which Teresa Heinz Kerry heads, have given the Tides entities $8.1 million in grants. Until February 2001, Kerry was also a trustee of the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Carnegie has given Tides numerous six-figure grants.
Tides allows donors to anonymously contribute money to a variety of causes -- and thereby avoid public accountability for their donations. The donor simply makes the check out to Tides and instructs the Foundation where to forward the money. Tides does so, often keeping as much as ten percent of the total amount for “charitable advisory fees.” This allows high-profile individuals to fund extremist organizations by “laundering” their money through Tides, leaving no paper trail. Founder Drummond Pike referred to his organization as “a convenient vehicle with squeaky clean books.”
The entities the Tides Foundation has chosen to fund are overwhelmingly leftwing. The so-called “legal left” (its own referent) has been a prime beneficiary of Tides largesse. One of its principal beneficiaries, for example, is the National Lawyers Guild (NLG), which began as a Communist front organization and remains proud of its lineage. Its national convention in October 2003 featured a keynote address from Lynne Stewart, a lawyer specializing in defending terrorists who has been indicted by the Justice Department for providing “material support” to sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, whose organization, known as the Islamic Group, bombed the World Trade Center in 1993, killing six people and injuring more than a thousand.
Stewart is on record supporting terrorism against defenders of “capitalism” and “racism.” “I don’t believe in anarchist violence but in directed violence,” she told the New York Times in 1995. “That would be violence directed at the institutions which perpetuate capitalism, racism, sexism, and at the people who are the appointed guardians of those institutions and accompanied by popular support.” In her National Lawyers Guild keynote address, Stewart said she and her NLG comrades were carrying on a proud tradition of their forebears, past and present:
- 1 year ago
-
2hellnwait
-
-
cire122
-
2hellnwait:
so it is ok to condone violence towards a nonviolent organization as long as they do not agree with you politically?
- 1 year ago
-
cire122
-
-
maasanova
-
-
http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/07/revealed-racist-talk-show-host-turner-was-an-fb...
Glenn Beck is the mainstream version of Hal Turner: An FBI informant which a high-level security clearance who was paid to make intentionally provacative statements which would then provoke people into violence.
This is a plot to purposely start violence in the US. It is a gross generalization to catagorize this as a "right-wing" phenomenon because the "left" can just as easily be provoked into violence, especially when they lose their jobs, home and cannot afford to put food on their family.
- 1 year ago
-
maasanova
-
-
Twenty3Enigma
-
maasanova:
Hal Turner was on the fringe, though. Never a threat to left, right, or center. Big talk, small impact. Pathetic, really.
- 1 year ago
-
Twenty3Enigma
-
-
Twenty3Enigma
-
What depresses me the most is that I'm a Republican, and I've been watching helplessly as the party has descended further and further into this madness since the Nixon administration. What fascinates me the most is that "the core" of the Republican party is impossible to unify. It consists of social conservatives and libertarian types -- two groups who despise each other. I was much happier when the social conservatives were called "Southern Democrats" and were politely ignored by both the right and the left, and the Glenn Becks of the world only spewed their bullshit in dive bars.
- 1 year ago
-
Twenty3Enigma
-
-
cztheday
-
Twenty3Enigma:
Heh. Interesting and amusing observation. I too recall when there were actual principled debates between conservatives and progressives -- and the loopiest on both sides were considered the lunatic fringe. The takeover of the Republican Party by its loopiest members has not just been bad for Republicans, it has been bad for the country by lowering the quality of debate and making bipartisanship nearly impossible. By analogy when someone wants to kill you, it is very difficult to reach a satisfactory compromise position.
- 1 year ago
-
cztheday
-
-
wayseeker
-
Twenty3Enigma:
I feel for you. Though I'm a Democrat I realize that which concept, conservative or liberal, may work best depends on details of whats happening at a certain point in history. Now having said that I feel certain that when our forefathers wisely created the multiparty system they had enough faith in America's people to believe that neither party would succumb to the type of radical fanaticism being displayed today by so many Conservatives and Republicans. It must be heart wrenching for sane and true Republicans to stand by and watch their Republican philosophies publicly torn to shreds by these childish and selfish egomaniacs who call themselves legitimate commentators and politicians. I just hope after the dust from the present controversies gets settled we are still equipped with a working multiparty system that a Democracy demands.
- 1 year ago
-
wayseeker
-
-
Twenty3Enigma
-
wayseeker:
Our founding fathers didn't all intend for parties to become institutionalized. Washington warned against forming partisan factions. He saw ANY kind of institutionalized partisan factions as undermining our democratic principles. And they do. Large partisan political institutions have inertia; they do not and cannot respond quickly and appropriately to changes in the world around them. Similarly to the term limits that have become popular in so many states, political organizations should be bound by law to be dissolved every 7 to 9 yrs. They're more dangerous than individual politicians anyway.
- 1 year ago
-
Twenty3Enigma
-
-
Twenty3Enigma
-
wayseeker:
By the way. I'm a register Republican who's belief system has been clumsily shoved to the left by 30 years of stupidity within my own party. As a result, I'm probably way further to the left now than many Democrats.
- 1 year ago
-
Twenty3Enigma
-
-
bike10
-
Glenn Beck the new Jim Jones of 2010.
- 1 year ago
-
bike10
-
-
tommic
-
Well this is one progressive that would be happy to see a stranger walk on our 300 acres past the do not trespass signs. If he wants to hunt progressives I'll bet he'll ony hunt unarmed ones. tiny dick
- 1 year ago
-
tommic
-
-
wayseeker
-
* "[Y]ou will have to shoot me in the forehead before you take away my gun" and "before I acquiesce and be silent." .......That's a stupid thing to say in the insane political climate he is helping to create. He could end up being a victim of his own hate mongering.
- 1 year ago
-
wayseeker
-
-
freecrack
-
on one hand the left has been saying this for literaly years at this point, with no event to call upon to validate the claim.but it really is just a matter of time
- 1 year ago
-
freecrack
-
-
wayseeker
-
I wonder how many people watch him just for the entertainment of seeing and hearing the idiocy this baby-faced clown spews out. Actually if one sees his performance as a parody on the current right wing fanaticism it's pretty comedic. Unfortunately there are a number of right wing wing-nuts who take him serious enough to pose a danger to the rest of us.
- 1 year ago
-
wayseeker
-
-
freecrack
-
wayseeker:
when i have a surplus of weed i get high and watch him just for the fun of bugging out
- 1 year ago
-
freecrack
-
-
Twenty3Enigma
-
wayseeker:
I can see your point. If only to distance yourself from the unsettling reality that he's taken seriously by far too many people, let's just imagine that -- like Stephen Colbert -- he's only kidding. Damn, I wish it was that easy!
- 1 year ago
-
Twenty3Enigma
-
-
toyotabedzrock
-
They should be forced off the air, this same insanity happened during the Clinton years.
- 1 year ago
-
toyotabedzrock
-
-
littlwarrior
-
toyotabedzrock:
therefore proof positive that the right is crazier than the left, nobody advocated violence against bush, well at least those that did the rest of the left mad clear they thought those people were crazy too.
- 1 year ago
-
littlwarrior
-
-
freecrack
-
littlwarrior:
each side has its fanatics, but the right love thier guns a little too much, and with the religious twist feel they have the authority to use em.if he were alive you could ask the security guard at that holocaust museum.or doctor tiller, or really anyone who works in the field of female reproduction
- 1 year ago
-
freecrack
-
-
littlwarrior
-
freecrack:
This is the sad twist however getting rid of guns will do nothing to stop these crimes the crazies will just find another way.
- 1 year ago
-
littlwarrior
-
-
freecrack
-
littlwarrior:
right of course
but if they dont have guns the rest of us have a greater chance of not being taken down so easily, wounded maybe but not fataly perhaps - 1 year ago
-
freecrack
-
-
littlwarrior
-
So hes a crazy right wing nut job, who is insiting violence in america to up his ratings. I thought we already knew that. So all I have to say is please someone exile him back to radio please. Oh and i wonder how much of his ratings is just people watching him for ammo to dis him later? Just a thought.
- 1 year ago
-
littlwarrior