Community | August 11, 2010 | 117 comments

ASU denies claims made by student | The Augusta Chronicle

Image
toyotabedzrock
Augusta State University officials said it's not a graduate student's religious beliefs, but her refusal to work toward being able to counsel homosexual clients that is threatening her standing in the school's counseling program, according to court documents filed Monday.

The filing states that Jennifer Keeton must demonstrate her ability to counsel all clients, including the homosexual and transgender population, in order to graduate.

The response is the school's first legal answer since Keeton filed a lawsuit July 21 alleging that she was facing expulsion from the counseling program based on her religious beliefs and her refusal to complete "a thought-reform remediation plan."

In an e-mail cited in the suit, ASU assistant professor Dr. Paulette Schenck told Keeton "the faculty did not expect (her) to change (her) personal beliefs and values."

"(T)he unethical part (was) applying your own personal beliefs and values on other people and not truly accepting that others can have different beliefs and values that are equally valid as your own."

Keeton is a graduate student in ASU's K-12 school counseling program, which requires students to adhere to a neutral code of ethics.

The university's response explains that ASU professors asked Keeton to complete a remediation plan after she wrote in a term paper regarding the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender, or GLBT, community that "it would be hard (for her) to work with this population."

Keeton also told fellow student Justin C. Earnest that she would tell gay clients "their behavior is morally wrong and then help the client change that behavior," according to an affidavit by Earnest included in the school's filing.

The remediation plan required Keeton to attend counseling workshops, read counseling journals regarding the GLBT community, increase her exposure to the gay population and write reflections on what she was learning.

The university's legal filings did not directly address Keeton's contention that she was told to attend a gay pride parade as part of the remediation plan.

Members of ASU's faculty also were concerned with Keeton's support of conversion therapy for homosexuals, which the American Counseling Association's ethics committee has concluded "may harm clients."

In her lawsuit, Keeton said the remediation plan "subjects her to aggressive ideological instruction" and asks that she "change her beliefs."

Keeton said she would like to continue her education in the counseling program without fear that the school "will punish her for her religious views" and her "unwillingness to change or abandon those views."

But university officials said if they exempted Keeton from counseling homosexual clients, they would also have to exempt those opposed to war from counseling soldiers.

"The same curriculum would require an atheist student counselor to competently counsel a deeply religious client," the filing said. "A staunch feminist student counselor is required to competently counsel clients from male dominated cultures ... the common thread being that all counselors are required to keep separate their own belief system from the counseling relationship."

The suit also points to a U.S. District Court judge's recent opinion in a similar case, Ward v. Wilbanks.

In the July 2010 ruling, a judge upheld Eastern Michigan University's decision to dismiss a student who refused to counsel a homosexual student or participate in a remediation plan.

University officials said that if the court moves forward with Keeton's case it could affect the school's accreditation and other students' degrees.

What's Next?

Jennifer Keeton has asked the federal court to force the college to drop its requirement that she complete the remediation plan. The U.S. District Court in Augusta scheduled a hearing on her request for a preliminary injunction at 9 a.m. Wednesday.

******************************************************************************
Links to articles on gay history.
http://current.com/news/92599958_asu-denies-claims-made-by-student-the-augusta-c...
  1. groups:
    Community,   Politics,   US Politics,   Sex and Love,   13 more
  2. tags:
    Gay GLBT LGBT LGBTQ 3 more
  3.     
    |

117 comments // ASU denies claims made by student | The Augusta Chronicle

  • ForgetTheBox
  • ShaneSamson
    • 0
      ShaneSamson  
    • If she was going to be a counselor for adults and she could pick and choose her own clients, then MAYBE she'd have a case. But she's going to be counseling children! LGBT children already face hardships in the school system, the last thing they need is a homophobic school counselor telling them they're immoral.

      If she wants to use her religion in her counseling, she should have gone to a religious school. Simple as that.

    • 1 year ago
  • noxidereus
    • +1
      noxidereus  
    • This woman should not be anyone's counselor. It definitely makes sense that a counselor has to be able to put aside their own biases in order to be able to help people. To have a real problem with homosexuality is an indication that one does not truly comprehend the human condition and therefore has no business being a counselor.

    • 1 year ago
  • Morgan_Bauer
    • +3
      Morgan_Bauer  
    • C'mon guys, this is simple.
      She cannot be allowed to graduate without out completing course requirements. Did anybody like every college course they had to take? Was every essay easy?
      IF COLLEGE DID NOT PUSH YOU OUT OF YOUR INFANTILE COMFORT ZONE, EXPAND YOUR REALITY, there would be no point in wasting the money!
      For the student to be a respected and employable counselor, she needs a respected degree.
      For the degree to be respected, it must address all possible counseling situations.
      Not having to intellectually stimulate yourself... Not having to truly study human existence... ARE WHAT RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS EXIST FOR.
      And that is why those degrees will never be respected.
      So if she wants to be employable in public schools, she better quit whining.
      If she dreams of working in a (which specific denomination? Yet another possible belief conflict!) christian private school, then maybe she'll get lucky and a(probably unaccreditied) christian school's counseling program will respect her devotion (and credits?) and let her enroll there for free...
      GO TO YOUR ROOM AND DON'T COME OUT UNTIL YOUR HOMEWORK IS DONE! You baby.

    • 1 year ago
  • Prettynpink6
  • NorwegianHammer
    • +2
      NorwegianHammer  
    • Thank god ASU is not letting this chick graduate. Coming from someone who is about to start graduate school for clinical psychology, the last thing we need is some religious homophobe nut job counseling our kids.

    • 1 year ago
  • mik661
  • flyingkick
    • +7
      flyingkick  
    • "The same curriculum would require an atheist student counselor to competently counsel a deeply religious client," the filing said. "A staunch feminist student counselor is required to competently counsel clients from male dominated cultures ... the common thread being that all counselors are required to keep separate their own belief system from the counseling relationship."

      ^This paragraph says it all.

      She won't win her lawsuit. The curriculum is very clear.

      I think she'll just end up quitting the program. Then she'll transfer all her units to a homophobe friendly university graduate program with different standards.

    • 1 year ago
  • LinXitoW
    • +1
      LinXitoW  
    • Im too lazy to research it, but id bet there were enough of the same kind of problems "back in the day" when being black was bad.

    • 1 year ago
  • Saladin
    • +8
      Saladin  
    • How in the hell did she get into graduate school while still being a Fundamentalist idiot?

      ""the faculty did not expect (her) to change (her) personal beliefs and values."

      "(T)he unethical part (was) applying your own personal beliefs and values on other people and not truly accepting that others can have different beliefs and values that are equally valid as your own.""

      Ok, fine, you don't expect her to change her beliefs.

      But she is NOT equally valid in her belief system. First off, her belief system mandates non-judgment and loving her enemies, second, her belief system is demonstrably inconsistent with a field of science.

      According to her own religion, it's Satan and demons that cause bad behavior in children, not bad parenting or psychological issues.

      I hope she doesn't graduate, people like this shouldn't be anywhere near children.

    • 1 year ago
  • Disarm33
    • +5
      Disarm33  
    • Oh hell no! The last thing an LGBT youth needs is a counselor who condemns them, tells them they are immoral, and tries to "counsel" them into heterosexuality and/or gender normativity. Life is hard enough for an LGBT individual in K-12. Yeah, she is allowed to have her own beliefs (bigoted as they are) but applying them in a professional environment is not appropriate and would be harmful. As someone who used to got to therapy and spoke at great length about gender, someone like her would have been a nightmare. Mental health is way too much of a sensitive subject for someone who openly admits they would have trouble with certain clients to be involved in.

    • 1 year ago
  • Seraphina76
    • +8
      Seraphina76  
    • This would be like a nursing student refusing to treat a homosexual because of religious beliefs...that nursing student would be flunked, because they are taught not to let their own biases affect their nursing care. Anyone in the healthcare field who thinks they should pick and choose who is worthy of their service, needs t

    • 1 year ago
  • bc_f
  • Seraphina76
    • 0
      Seraphina76  
    • bc_f:

      I didn't...but those who denied treatment should be fired and sued. Healthcare is supposed to be ruled by ethics not personal moral values...there's a big difference.

    • 1 year ago
  • derk
    • +19
      derk  
    • This is a pretty simple riddle to solve: She either picked the wrong profession or she needs to realize it is not about her, it is about them.

    • 1 year ago
  • seanalyn
    • +6
      seanalyn  
    • derk:

      Agreed! If youre going into counseling or any other therapy based program you need to learn that your personal beliefs cannot play a roll in your work. If shes so strongly religious and cannot put her beliefs aside to help others, then she needs to explore Christian counseling at churches or Christian private schools because she is not fit to work with the general populous.

    • 1 year ago
  • derk
  • WeBelieve
  • toyotabedzrock
  • cheshiresleeves
  • corndog67
    • -19
      corndog67  
    • Once again, people are trying to force their way of life down someone else's throat (so to speak). You don't want to council gays? So don't. What's the problem. They are trying to force her to accept other peoples way of life? That's not right. I don't want to force anyone to accept anything that I might do, why do the gays feel that she needs to be forced to accept what they are doing? Or the school anyway. If she passed the curriculum, let her go on her merry way, and council whoever it is she wants to council.

    • 1 year ago
  • toyotabedzrock
  • UtopianSky
    • +8
      UtopianSky  
    • corndog67:

      So, she should go to school with different requirements.

      As it stands, it's like a Vegetarian trying to graduate from Cooking school without ever touching meat. She should have went to an all-Vegetarian Cooking school.

      I'm sure there is some right-wing fundamentalist christian school out there where she can get a degree in Christian counseling.

      ...and what would you say if she refused to council black people?

      It's not about "accepting" or not "accepting", it's about doing your job, and not letting your bigotry get in the way.

    • 1 year ago
  • flyingkick
    • +9
      flyingkick  
    • corndog67:

      I don't think you understand the situation.
      She's not going to 'council whoever it is she wants to council' after she graduates. She's in a program for counseling children K-12. That means kids will come to her when they have problems, she doesn't get to choose who she talks to- and some of them will be gay.

      A neutral perspective is at the core of being a counselor. Christians must counsel atheists, patriots must counsel anarchists, vegans must counsel omnivores. All with an objectively neutral attitude that is not influenced by their most personal beliefs.

      So, you have it backwards. She would be the one forcing her beliefs onto young homosexual children that come to her for counseling.

    • 1 year ago
  • bc_f
  • Democrap
  • Democrap
  • Democrap
  • Democrap
  • corndog67
    • -1
      corndog67  
    • Democrap:

      I think a few of you guys have it wrong. She can choose who she is willing to counsel. Whether they are athiests, Jews, Catholics, Muslims, Gays, whoever, it's a free world, you can basically do what you want. If she has completed the curriculum, give the paper, adios. There's lots of shit I don't accept, that I don't have any intention of ever dealing with in my life. There are so many politically correct people out there, you aren't going to force your beliefs on my life, make me change my thinking and I'm not going to force mine on you. Why does it bother so many people on this site that some people don't accept gays, will never accept gays, don't accept Muslims, don't accept illegal aliens, whatever. So I was voted down. Wow, I'm sure going to lose a lot of sleep over than one. So the school wants her to accept LGBTs. And she doesn't want to. Well it's her choice. You can't force someone to accept what their religious brainwashing has been telling her is wrong since the day she first went to church. Religion is another deal I won't accept. Big surprise, huh?

    • 1 year ago
  • corndog67
    • -2
      corndog67  
    • UtopianSky:

      ...and what would you say if she refused to council black people?

      Well, Sky, that's her choice. I guess she could go counseling in Utah or Vermont. I'm not saying it's right or wrong. But it is her choice. If she wants, she could go to the bible belt, where people that actually are gay, don't admit it. If she didn't want to counsel her least favorite race, there are places that are still segregated. Everyone talks as if she is wrong in her choice here. It's HER choice, not yours, not mine.

    • 1 year ago
  • Mark701
    • +5
      Mark701  
    • corndog67:

      Well let's extend your "logic". Your a pharmacist who believes in Scientology and you decide you're not going to fill any prescriptions for anti depressants. You're a doctor/nurse that anti gay so you decide you won't treat them when they come into your office. The list goes on.

      No one is forcing her to accept other peoples way of life, they expect her to do her job as a trained therapist. If she can't accept that her job will require her to provide counseling to the GLBT community then she's no better than a doctor who get nauseated at the sight of blood. She should get out and do something else.

    • 1 year ago
  • Mark701
    • +3
      Mark701  
    • Democrap:

      Your under some kind of misconception. Liberals are not tolerant of everyone. We draw the line at stupidity and bigotry. If you can't accept that someone who is different than you is entitled to the benefits you enjoy, that makes you stupid and bigoted. Got it? We don't accept, nor are tolerant of stupid, bigoted people. Voted down. Oh, we despise liars too.

    • 1 year ago
  • corndog67
    • -1
      corndog67  
    • Mark701:

      Hey Mark, that came up in court recently when a pharmacist refused the morning after pill to a chick that had unprotected sex the night before, and it upheld his right to refuse to fill the prescription on religious grounds.

      Again, I believe she can counsel whomever she wants. You don't have to be a counselor in West Hollywood or San Francisco. If counseling is her chosen field, she could always become a religious based counselor, you know, making minimum wage.

    • 1 year ago
  • Mark701
    • +2
      Mark701  
    • corndog67:

      She might be able to choose who she is willing to counsel IF she starts her own business. However, I suspect if the insurance companies that paid her clients bills got wind that she was picking and choosing her clients based on their sexual orientation, they would simply stop sending patients there. I see no reason why the entire psychiatric/counseling industry should change their ways to suit her ideological idiosyncrasies.

    • 1 year ago
  • flyingkick
    • +7
      flyingkick  
    • Democrap:

      "You people"
      Are you kidding?
      She said she would counsel a gay student to change their gay behavior.
      That is clearly inappropriate behavior for a K-12 counselor.

      I don't think you have a grasp of the issue.
      She can't let her personal beliefs on homosexuality influence how she councils children.
      Just like an atheist can't let their personal beliefs on religion influence how they counsel Christian children.
      Why is that so hard for you to understand? It's not like it's a difficult concept to wrap your head around.

      I think I understand your problem though. You're saying she is entitled to her opinion on homosexuality, which she is.
      However, (here's the important part) >>>>she cannot let that opinion affect how she counsels children according to her graduate program.

      Really, going by your logic, it would be OK for a Christian counselor to try and convert a Muslim student.
      This counselor would be imposing her views on homosexuality onto a gay student. Does that make sense to you?

      You really don't have a point, lol.
      You used to be better at this :/

    • 1 year ago
  • KSirys
  • flyingkick
  • corndog67
    • 0
      corndog67  
    • flyingkick:

      flyingkick, I can see your point, but there are people out there in every profession, whether it's counseling kids, selling cocaine, running BP, to managing a McDonalds, that let their personal beliefs flow over into their professional training/their field of choice. If her religion has here completely convinced that the flying spaghetti monster doesn't like gays, she is going to run with that. Same with extreme Christian counselors, there is no doubt they are going to try to instill in Muslims, or Athiests or Buddhists or whoever, that they are wrong. I'm absolutely sure of this. People, no matter what they are doing, will generally try to put their beliefs on other people. People I know, people you know, it's just most peoples nature. The ole "I'm right and you're wrong."

    • 1 year ago
  • UtopianSky
    • 0
      UtopianSky  
    • corndog67:

      upheld his right to refuse to fill the prescription on religious grounds?

      GIve a link.

      Every single time a similar case has occurred, people have NOT been allowed to deny service to others based on their personal bias.

      It's what Rosa Parks fought for.

      If what you say occurred, it was a judgement by some right-wing fundamentalist judge who ignores the constitution in favor of his beliefs.

    • 1 year ago
  • UtopianSky
  • div
  • div
  • wellhunggimp
    • +1
      wellhunggimp  
    • If she feels like homosexuals and what not are unworthy of her help, that's fine. That doesn't mean that she should get to circumvent the required curriculum of a school she chose to go to based on her feelings.

    • 1 year ago
  • Democrap
  • wellhunggimp
    • +1
      wellhunggimp  
    • Democrap:

      She should be punished. If you don't do what you're required to do in college you don't graduate. Call that a punishment if it makes you happy. There's plenty of schools that offer degrees in counseling/therapy, I'm willing to bet not all of them make you practice on gays.

    • 1 year ago
  • div
    • 0
      div  
    • Democrap:

      The school is doing its job by not letting a student who is incapable of following protocol to graduate. If she did her job, they wouldn't have a problem. You might be unaware, but schools do have the right to fail students that cannot do their jobs.

    • 1 year ago
  • Omnomynous
    • -2
      Omnomynous  
    • Homosexuality was considered "mental illness" through the VAST majority of history, up until the past 30-40 years that's how it was usually thought of. So understandably there is a percentage of the population that still considers it a form of "mental illness" (not saying it is illness, just stating fact).

      With that in mind it's not unheard of for doctors or therapists to at least quit seeing patients for them refusing treatment, or doing things to sabotage treatment.

      If she sees it as an illness that people are refusing to address why treat them, if they've already established a pattern of not dealing with their "problems"...

      Just playing "devil's advocate", but in all fairness even "Christ" was no door mat, so you can only expect a "Christian" to tolerate so much; sin, illness, whatever.

      At least there's hope of me finding an attractive chick that isn't so homo-tolerant as to expect me to watch re-runs of which ever trendy gay shows with her....

      Yaye!

      (she sees it as mental illness they are refusing to address, and that is why she doesn't want to treat/counsel them........)

    • 1 year ago
  • toyotabedzrock
  • UtopianSky
    • +2
      UtopianSky  
    • Omnomynous:

      In the past, all mental disorders were believed to be caused by demonic possession.

      All scientific disciplines are based on the LATEST findings, not on the OLDEST.

      If she wants to be a councilor and she still thinks homosexuality is an illness, that is no different from a medical student who thinks cancer can be cured by chanting and painting magical symbols on the patient's skin.

      Thus, she is not qualified to graduate and hold the profession she was being trained for.

    • 1 year ago
  • flyingkick
    • 0
      flyingkick  
    • Omnomynous:

      That's not entirely true.

      There have been many cultures throughout history where homosexuality was accepted. Also, the idea of 'mental illness' is relatively new.

      Read Foucault's History of Sexuality or Birth of the Clinic.
      Or anything by Foucault for that matter.

    • 1 year ago
  • Democrap
  • flyingkick
  • Mark701
    • +2
      Mark701  
    • Omnomynous:

      You are incorrect. Homosexuality was not considered a mental illness throughout the "VAST" majority of history. It was accepted and practiced in many advanced cultures. The Spartans were encouraged to take their male lovers into battle with them because it made them fight harder. Think you'd have the guts to call a Spartan gay? The Romans practiced it, middle eastern cultures, tribes in Africa etc. Also Christ never said a word about it. Nothing, nada, zip, zero. It was St. Peter that came down on it but frankly, he hated all sexuality.

      Also you comment about Christ being no doormat is strange. Wasn't it Christ that taught that we should turn the other cheek? The fact is you know nothing about Christ, what he taught or what he felt, no one does. Christ didn't write anything down so all you know is what was written by ignorant men no sooner than 50 years after his death. Some writings in the Bible were written hundreds of years later. If you boil it down, what is written in the bible accounts for about a week of actual face time with Christ, with even that being reduced to about 15 minutes worth or reading. Not a lot to base an opinion on if you ask me.

    • 1 year ago
  • div
  • KSirys
  • littlwarrior
    • +4
      littlwarrior  
    • If you cannot be counsel to any one at any time forget your failure as a therapist but as christian as well. Christ wanted his people to have empathy not hate, he wanted his people to see the pain and struggle of others not condemn it. Im sorry i think this girl is just making a big deal out of this because she wants to be a part of the bigger national debate.

    • 1 year ago
  • You_are_afraid
  • littlwarrior
    • +1
      littlwarrior  
    • You_are_afraid:

      if she doesnt have hate then why this refusal? Why wont she try to help all people equally regaurdless of race gender or sexual orientation? Is what she doing really that different than if she said she would not counsel men?

    • 1 year ago
  • You_are_afraid
  • littlwarrior
    • 0
      littlwarrior  
    • You_are_afraid:

      Nope thats not the point at all. The point is that she cannot be considered educated if she refuses to help one group or another. There are no viable institutions that consider being gay a psychological problem, therefore wether the person is gay or not is irelavant to the matter. So ya shes just hatin, and I do hate hate so you kinda right.

    • 1 year ago
  • 2helenahandbasket
    • -7
      2helenahandbasket  
    • She is absolutely right. Although the thought police would like to tell her how she has to be I find it funny that she was told this...""(T)he unethical part (was) applying your own personal beliefs and values on other people and not truly accepting that others can have different beliefs and values that are equally valid as your own." LOL!! Can you say Pot.....Kettle...?

      The left has preached "tolerance" for how many years now? They need a lesson in the meaning of tolerance. It means "to put up with". Today's left will not just 'tolerate' (agree to disagree) anything that's not of their opinion. Why is it that the right is expected to, not only 'tolerate' but actually embrace, things that go against their values, whether Christian values or any other difference of opinion? If one wants tolerance, one needs to tolerate. We're all in this together but that shouldn't mean we all have to be the same.

    • 1 year ago
  • bc_f
  • ozoneocean
    • +3
      ozoneocean  
    • 2helenahandbasket:

      I don't think you understand the issue. You're just using it as a soapbox for your own anti-left ideology.
      Ironically this article is about a person whose own crazy ideology makes her unsuitable for her chosen field. -They ARE a pretty tolerant bunch; if her hate wasn't going to get in the way of her job, then she'd be ok. As it happens, she says it will.

      It's pretty simple and you'd have to be even simper not to see that.

    • 1 year ago
  • Saving_Abel
  • 2helenahandbasket
    • +2
      2helenahandbasket  
    • bc_f:

      My point was exactly what you gathered. Tolerance IS a two way street and NO ONE is right or wrong when it comes to personal opinions. And each of us have as much right to our opinions as anyone else.

      There are many professionals who choose their clients. Lawyers do it all the time if they don't want the case. They don't have to give a reason. They might refer the person someone more suitable. This girl could be an effective counselor even though she chooses to not counsel homosexuals. Perhaps she could have an attitude like this: "I have very strong feelings about working with homosexuals and transgender and don't feel that I understand them well enough to be able to help them. I find it impossible to identify with them in any way and I feel I would be more effective working with others."

      If I were homosexual or transgender I would certainly not want or need a counselor who struggled to understand where I was coming from or who was disapproving of my lifestyle. I believe there is room for both sides to compromise without compromising their values.

    • 1 year ago
  • ozoneocean
  • ozoneocean
  • MotherForTruth
  • MotherForTruth
  • UtopianSky
    • +1
      UtopianSky  
    • 2helenahandbasket:

      So, what would you say if she had refused to deal with black patients?

      I agree that no black patient would want a racist therapist, but should someone who openly admits to having a problem with black people that is that severe be considered qualified to even BE a therapist?

    • 1 year ago
  • flyingkick
    • +5
      flyingkick  
    • 2helenahandbasket:

      Sure, she might be an effective counselor, even though she chooses not to council homosexuals.
      But, she's not becoming just any counselor; she's becoming a K-12 counselor. That means she can't pick which students come to her for help. That means there will be homosexual children coming to her for help.

      She's already admitted that she will council homosexuals to change their homosexual behavior.
      ^That right there is against the principles of the program she's in. That's why she fails.

      In the program she's in, an atheist can't counsel a Christian against Christianity, a vegan can't counsel an omnivore to stop eating meat, just like she cannot counsel homosexuals against homosexuality.

      Understand?

    • 1 year ago
  • bc_f
  • Democrap
  • div
  • div
    • 0
      div  
    • Democrap:

      This particular woman woman wants to be a school counselor. If you've been to school, which I'm sure you have, then you are aware that students don't get to choose which counselor they speak to.

    • 1 year ago
  • ayipis
  • bc_f
  • Saving_Abel
  • bc_f
  • Saving_Abel
  • bc_f
  • bc_f
  • Saving_Abel
  • bc_f
  • Saving_Abel
  • bc_f
  • You_are_afraid
  • UtopianSky
    • +1
      UtopianSky  
    • You_are_afraid:

      But you are not conservative or liberal.

      Both conservatives and liberals have VIEWS on TOPICS, and then DISCUSS those VIEWS.

      All you do is childish taunts and name calling.

      The fact that you direct your bile at liberals does not make you a conservative, it just makes you anti-liberal.

      Since the topic of this article is psychology, I wonder what the psychological motivations behind your actions are.

      You do not seek intellectual stimulation by discussing views.

      You seem to just want attention- like a small child having a tantrum.

      Is this really the best you can do?

      Honestly- what joy do you get from being a mindless troll?

    • 1 year ago
  • bc_f
  • Hiro_Jammer
  • UtopianSky
    • 0
      UtopianSky  
    • Hiro_Jammer:

      And you are back- with how many different names on this page alone? Three? Four?

      Of course you don't see my views on issues- because you don't see any actual views.
      You are not here for issues.

      Instead, you have raw emotions, and project those raw emotions on others.

      So, why do you do it?

      Let's start with something simple- Why the multiple accounts?

      You are able to post multiple comments with a single account, so that would not be a reason to have more than one.

      Is it because all you are doing is trying to get people mad at you on purpose, and then get banned, and then come back, over and over?

      Why would that be a goal for you?

      How is that fun?

    • 1 year ago
  • MotherForTruth
  • MotherForTruth
    • +4
      MotherForTruth  
    • We all bring our personal beliefs to our everyday work and home life. Having said that I believe good psychologist's job involves developing remediation plan for the client, patient, or student. How can Keeton be successful helping others if she chooses to ignore her own remediation plan?

      We have plenty opinionated, ignorant, inexperienced school psychologists already why add more? A good psychologist must be able to "change her beliefs." and demonstrate ability to address variety of students and variety of the issues they bring; be it health concerns, fears, religion, cultural, stress, motivation, or homosexuality.

    • 1 year ago
  • B_TriPpiN
    • 0
      B_TriPpiN  
    • Wow, what a selfish person..to refuse to help someone, lend an ear to listen, just because they are different thats messed up...and shes putting other peoples degrees at risk for her own...selfish..

    • 1 year ago
  • Idoknow19
  • Reeseismyname
  • ozoneocean
    • +8
      ozoneocean  
    • They did the right thing. Imagine how many lives a moron like that would be in a position to ruin as a councillor? The very idea is horrific!

    • 1 year ago
  • Saving_Abel
1 - 100 of 117
more from Community:

top videos