PALASTINIANS KILL 4 ISRAELIS TODAY, BUT ISNT NEWS WORTHY
source: http://www.newsday.com/news/nation/palestinian-kills-4-israelis-on-eve-of-peace-talks-1.2248...
-
-
- freecrack
- added this
http://www.newsday.com/news/nation/palestinian-kills-4-israelis-on-ev...
As the opportunity for peace rapidly approaches, the palastinians of the west bank have killed four israeli civilians.I guess this news doesnt generate as much advertising revenue as it does when the IDF kills palastinians.The medias bias must all be in my head right.
Fox will certainly mention it every hour, especially as it helps stoke the flames of islamophobia.
Msnbc will avoid it like the plague in fear of alienating its pro palastinian and jewish audiance.
Cnn may or may not wiegh in, but if they do some how the israelis caused it.
I ASK ALL THE HUMANATARIAN ANTI TERROR ANTI TYRANY FOLKS WHO ONLY SEE ISRAEL AS THE ERRONIOUS CULTURE IN THE CONFLICT, WELL...............................
Why is the flotilla's 9 dead worth obscene coverage,review,and scrutiny and these four not?
How is settlement construction a human rights violation worthy of great condemnation, but murder not?
-
- groups:
- Community, ISRAEL AND FRIENDS, sweet irony, NRPI
-
-
ArchDruid [removed]
- This comment was removed by its owner.
-
ArchDruid [removed]
-
-
freecrack
-
ArchDruid:
and who was that authority that arrested them?(fatah)
the palastinian authority have been in a civil war with hamas over leadership since arafat died.i think it bares mentioning when talking about the palastinian authority arresting hamasniks, especially when they hold the same policies in regards to israel. - 2 years ago
-
freecrack
-
-
ArchDruid [removed]
- This comment was removed by its owner.
-
ArchDruid [removed]
-
-
freecrack
-
ArchDruid:
my focus is on american media.im sure al jazeera will exploit the shit out of it, from being fed by cnn.im also sure the bbc will cover it as the bbc for all its flaws makes our news look like preschool.
- 2 years ago
-
freecrack
-
-
freecrack
-
so if we ignore this event, and the bazillions of others like bulldozer attacks and suicide bombings we can keep on pretending only israel does anything wrong.
but its not antisemitism, just governmental critique.
its so funny how easily we can see how fox cherry picks the elements of reality it wish's to acknowledge in favor of building a story, but are blissfully unaware of it in this case.
when asking how are fox viewers so stupid (wich is a valid question) take a moment and ask how it is that you believe your news sources to be better and above them as they turn a blind eye to that wich they dont wish to see as well.
just as it is a fox viewers error to not notice how the left is always shown to be wrong
it is left medias error to only fnd israel at faulti can pretty much say what ever i want here cuz i know it will never be seen as it doesnt suite the prescribed antisemitism of the left.just like evey imam that condems jihad never seems to make it to the rights media.
i just hope im dead long before the idiocy of the mass's and the madness of thier puppetiers brings us the next crusade.
- 2 years ago
-
freecrack
-
-
musicjohnny
-
freecrack:
Well, unfortunately you're not wrong. It is being ignored. Our new coverage is despicable at so many times....this is merely another example of it.
Wanna start a new news network with me that actually covers stuff like this? - 2 years ago
-
musicjohnny
-
-
freecrack
-
musicjohnny:
ya know being as reasonable and civil as you are makes it difficult to fight you advisarily lol.
i would love to start a legit news network, but alas i know im a biased reactionary who doesnt honor the journalistic principles, just like fox and msnbc.i know im not the guy for the job, but damn it we used to have people who did this.
im a stickler for this particular thing cuz i remember growing up in the 90's and watching the news (wich wasnt as bad then but still a far cry from woodward and bernstien) as they discussed oj simpson and monica lewimski to obscene degrees while the banner scroll told of terror attacks in africa and israel.it always bothered me that the tabloid stuff with sex appeal was accepted as news rather than loss of human life, regardless of where those lives were.monica wasnt gunna unblow the pres, oj wasnt gunna unmurder his ex-wife so why all the evaluation, nothing is going to change, ie nothing NEWs.
what made it even worse was when we would get hit, say the first wtc attack in the 90's for a short spell terrorism dominated the news, but of course would give way to the next sex scandal like anita hill.
would we have been so shocked on 9-11 if our news evaluated the bombings of our embassy's in africa at the level the evaluated the first blow job?may be as a collective we would have been prepared for it to a defensive degree against it had we been noticing that our people across the middle east and africa were being attacked increasingly.
in the end we ignore the little unpleasantness like tel aviv sbarro suicide bombers and qassam rocket attacks so it doesnt exist in our collective view so when israel does some shit it plays like military tyrany.
ill get off my soap box now. - 2 years ago
-
freecrack
-
-
BelieverInHumanRights
-
freecrack:
lol, I would definitely love to start a legit news network with both you and musicjohnny, only I would have to be careful about my choice of words. But I completely agree with you two. Our news media, especially Fox, is all a bunch of right wing bullshit and lies mixed with unimportant stories that seem like 'news' when they're really just advertisements. What we need is more alternative news media that will cover all of the IMPORTANT news stories and not just selected ones that aren't that important. We need to be able to see both sides of the story, not just the right wing view. You can't rely on one news source anymore with Fox reporting one thing and msnbc reporting another and newspapers reporting something else. We need to think more critically when it comes to the news and actually do the research. Instead of just saying, "Oh, that must be true. It's on Fox news so that has to be the truth. The news never lies." we need to look up that story and see if that really is all the truth or if Fox conveniently 'forgot' to talk about some of the important things along with it, taking those out because they want to make their right wing corporate sponsors happy. Sorry about the rant, I just had to speak out. I would have never known about the lies and bullshit of Fox and other known news channels if it weren't for my Sociology class and teacher. Thank you, Sociology!
- 2 years ago
-
BelieverInHumanRights
-
-
freecrack
-
BelieverInHumanRights:
rant away.i think this is going to be a cultural element that will encapsulate an era.maybe it was the weed talking but i was watching the daily show and it occured to me that my parents watch msnbc, and geriatrics are the main demographic of fox, while our youth (our cultural inheriters) are growing up based on the higher standards of the daily show.although it is comedy in nature, stewarts reverence for truth exceeds contemperary news, so it is concievable one day in the future if the youth of today dont lose thier resolve in terms of truth as they take the helm of our country he will be reveared as a media pioneer worthy of adulation.
just as the 80's had a theme of excessiveness
and the 90's were an era of intillectualism via artistic endevours
the millenium i think will be seen as the period in wich journalism was abandoned, and we went the way of tabloid specticle.
rant, please rant otherwise the downward spiral will continue as every news story of true value takes a backseat to who paris hilton is fucking this week.im honored, but my news network would just be me attacking those i dont like lol, like masnbc and fox.although i gotta say at least msnbc has the common courtesy to be upfront with its bullshit as tagging itself as "the place for politics" unlike fox calling itself "news".the "fair and balanced" part is just insult to injury.
- 2 years ago
-
freecrack
-
-
BelieverInHumanRights
-
freecrack:
lol, that's okay. My news network would be just me attacking all the close-minded ignorant Republican right wing people who refuse to have tolerance towards others who aren't exactly like them. I don't watch the Daily Show at all, though now I think that I will after hearing you. Yeah, the news is nothing but a bunch of fake news, hidden advertisements, right wing views, and celebrities. I get my news from Current and from online. We need more news channels like Current that will tell the truth and give us real news, not the fake lies that they call 'news'. But until more people start to realize that they need to analyze the news media and question what the news call 'truth', then we are all fucking screwed.
- 2 years ago
-
BelieverInHumanRights
-
-
freecrack
-
-
BelieverInHumanRights:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JnDY2Gv5YQ
the thing ive noticed is all "news" entities have a bias.even current as any shcmuck can post what ever they like.i mean just look at the stuff i post, half is just snarky shit.personaly i get my news from npr, wich is mostly from the bbc wich i know also has its bias.what trips me out is after listening to npr/bbc and fox radio during the day, watching msnbc and fox news in the evening, i know what the events of the day are, but i dont have any real context to that information.
i watch the daily show wich is supposed to be the "fake" news, and that is where it all comes together for me.alone it isnt a viable news source as it only uses the parts of events that are directly persuent to thier comedic narrative, but within the scope of what ive already taken in, it is a voice of clarity amongst all the other bias bits.
the colbert report is similar but has a gimmick to it, and if you hate the republican standard of bullshit rhetoric, colbert should really tickle you.his whole show is him being a living parody of republicanism.my fav part is some really dumb republicans actually think he is conservative.they dont notice that he is saying conservative talking points as jokes.when i am truly bothered by the right colbert is like chicken soup for my soul.im hopefull that future generations will not follow in my generation (x) footsteps of apathy.only time will tell, but colbert,stewart,the yes men,ifc media project,and even current tv keep me hopefull.
i live in a very conservative area, and my wifes friends despite being slaves to the right's propaganda still watch current style journalism to stay aware of what is going on in asia and africa.it may not be the next generation, but if it keeps going we may return back to the journalism of the early 70's.especially as the internet allows for it to flourish.def check out the daily show you wont be dissapointed, especially if the issue under discussion is one you are familiar with.
- 2 years ago
-
freecrack
-
-
BelieverInHumanRights
-
freecrack:
lol, that is hilarious and so TRUE!! Now I definitely will watch the Daily Show more often. I'll make sure to check out the colbert report too. But yeah, all news does have bias. I really am hoping that our generation doesn't follow past generations. My parents are definitely from the generation X with all their apathy and conservatism. I never want to and NEVER will end up becoming like them. The only problem is that those generation x parents are teaching their kids, our generation to think and act like them, resulting in some of our generation becoming like the one before. My parents are already teaching that into my little brother, but I obviously rejected those teachings. I just hope that we will eventually get better over the years and go forward instead of backwards.
- 2 years ago
-
BelieverInHumanRights
