Community | September 02, 2010 | 182 comments

Obama: "We cannot allow the corporate takeover of our democracy"

Image
NickerBocker09
While the media buzzes about Beck, the so called continuing failure of our economy (despite reports saying otherwise), Republicans taking back the House, etc.. etc... our President tells us we need to end the corporate takeover of our country that has plagued us the past 50 years. Yet, no one will hear him, because it is a simple blimp at the bottom of the tv screen. Our so called "liberal" media decides its better to talk about Beck. After all, why would a corporation want to end corporatism?!?!

It would seem there are no longer a Few Good Men.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/08/21/obama-slams-corporate-takeover-o...
  1. groups:
    Community,   Culture,   US Politics,   Greatest Depression,   1 more
  2. tags:
  3.     
    |

182 comments // Obama: "We cannot allow the corporate takeover of our democracy"

  • Jake_Leonard
  • WhiteCrow22
  • WhiteCrow22
  • freecrack
  • Jake_Leonard
  • Sparky2U
  • bking74
    • +1
      bking74  
    • Shit in 2010, President Obama gave me a 3.4% raise. Next year we're getting 1.4(?) I think. I believe that's a fair share of the bail out money. Now I can buy milk and bread.

    • 1 year ago
  • ayipis
    • 0
      ayipis  
    • when obama supporters finally sober up..they would realize its NOT THEM that got obama to office its the corporations..

      the issue i have with this is about obama painting himself as the man of the people..shiiiiiiit!! who got the most bailout money??? YOU??

      THINK

    • 1 year ago
  • projectmayhem
    • 0
      projectmayhem  
    • ayipis:

      How are you not embarrassed by your comments? Do you even know what you're talking about? Where do you get your information? What happened to your girlfriends teeth? Did you punch her? What was the last grade you passed? 6th grade? 5th? I've been following your comments, and most of them are unintelligible. You can't focus your thoughts and convey them in a way that makes sense. My grammar and spelling were better in 6th grade than yours are presently. Why are you commenting? Nobody listens to you. You have nothing of substance to contribute. I love it when dipshits like you try to sound intellectual. GO. THE. HELL. AWAY.

    • 1 year ago
  • WhiteCrow22
  • freecrack
    • 0
      freecrack  
    • ayipis:

      highschool economics much?
      he used our money, just as every leader does (who paid for bush's two wars?) in the pressumed interest of the collective.as we are a nation that is for better or worse (i say the latter) relient on corperate stability, he needed to bail them out to not have to bail us out.

      how come trickle down economics works when republicans use it as a philosophy by wich tax policy should be made, but not when a democrat puts it into direct action?why is that?
      either it is the appropriate thing to do, take care of the top in order to support the rest, or it isnt.it cant be a good idea from a conservative mouth and a bad idea from a liberal one.

    • 1 year ago
  • freecrack
    • 0
      freecrack  
    • projectmayhem:

      not to toot my own horn, but he calls me dumb all the time wich tickles me.im no genius but far more a critical thinker than his elementary school nonsense punctuated with irrelivant pictures.

      thank you for noticing the avatar thing, i never said anything but damn that pic skeeves me out.

    • 1 year ago
  • ayipis
    • 0
      ayipis  
    • http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cycle=2008&cid=n00009638
      Because of contribution limits, organizations that bundle together many individual contributions are often among the top donors to presidential candidates. These contributions can come from the organization's members or employees (and their families). The organization may support one candidate, or hedge its bets by supporting multiple candidates. Groups with national networks of donors - like EMILY's List and Club for Growth - make for particularly big bundlers.

      University of California $1,591,395
      Goldman Sachs $994,795
      Harvard University $854,747
      Microsoft Corp $833,617
      Google Inc $803,436
      Citigroup Inc $701,290
      JPMorgan Chase & Co $695,132
      Time Warner $590,084
      Sidley Austin LLP $588,598
      Stanford University $586,557
      National Amusements Inc $551,683
      UBS AG $543,219
      Wilmerhale Llp $542,618
      Skadden, Arps et al $530,839
      IBM Corp $528,822
      Columbia University $528,302
      Morgan Stanley $514,881
      General Electric $499,130
      US Government $494,820
      Latham & Watkins

    • 1 year ago
  • projectmayhem
  • ayipis
  • freecrack
  • freecrack
  • ayipis
  • DogBoy
    • +1
      DogBoy  
    • The Industrial part of the I.M.C. at work. This is how politics are influenced all over the world by big corporations and whoever can throw the most money behind their political objectives will achieve more power and control.

    • 1 year ago
  • mik661
    • +2
      mik661  
    • The most powerfull political party in the world is the few hundred individuals in this country that control almost all of its wealth. Men like the Koch brothers in the rich tradition of American corporate heros such as Rockefeller, DuPont and Morgan buy and sell us every day.

    • 1 year ago
  • Herrin
    • +1
      Herrin  
    • mik661:

      It's pretty scary the power that those big money lenders and power brokers wield. Obama at least is making moves to shift this power. There will be plenty of resistance. Thanks for clarification on the bailout by the way.

    • 1 year ago
  • Mark701
  • mik661
    • +1
      mik661  
    • Mark701:

      the money is how you keep score. Its all about the power. Thats what you have wills an dfoundations for to use your money to screw with people even after you have died.

    • 1 year ago
  • Sparky2U
  • mik661
    • +1
      mik661  
    • Sparky2U:

      No, i remembered him quite well. I didn't mention him becaue unlike the Koch brothers George is quite vocal about his activities. He writes, gives speeches and publicly supports his efforts. Love or hate you usually know what he is up too. He doesnt hide in the shadows and attempt to deny his invovlement like they do. If you are going to spend your money on a cause you should be proud enough to freely admit it.

    • 1 year ago
  • WhiteCrow22
  • WhiteCrow22
  • WhiteCrow22
  • Radical_Centrist
  • mik661
  • WhiteCrow22
  • Herrin
    • 0
      Herrin  
    • Obama seems to have a sense of the founding documents of America and the constitution.

      Why then did he allow the bailout?

      OK maybe Congress allowed it too, but wasn't that a giant scam the size of Australia? Apparently the banks weren't even required to show where the money was going???

    • 1 year ago
  • alexandrek
  • mik661
    • +1
      mik661  
    • Herrin:

      How about because Bush enacted the bail out prior to leaving office. The alternatives were like trying to cure a brain tumor by cutting your head off at that point.

    • 1 year ago
  • Herrin
    • +1
      Herrin  
    • alexandrek:

      I'm Australian by the way. Just happen to care about what happens in the US. I did not realize that this was something that was already passed by W. Thanks.

    • 1 year ago
  • BrushwithDeathToothpaste
    • +1
      BrushwithDeathToothpaste  
    • Herrin:

      Obama voted for the bailout. If Congress didn't vote for the bailout then the economy would have nearly or completely collapsed. Maybe that should have been allowed to happen so people could see how bad things really were.

    • 1 year ago
  • Herrin
  • Sparky2U
    • -1
      Sparky2U  
    • Herrin:

      Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and
      then campaign against them..

      Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are
      against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

      Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and
      high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

      You and I don't propose a federal budget. The president does.

      You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on
      appropriations. The House of Representatives does.

      You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.

      You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.

      You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

      One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme
      Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are
      directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the
      domestic problems that plague this country.

    • 1 year ago
  • WhiteCrow22
  • WhiteCrow22
  • tommic
    • +2
      tommic  
    • If you have not guess it by now its all about money. Corporations use the financial resources to buy influence, if you do not contribute money to those groups who feel the same as President Obama's remark and fight for the de-corporatization of congress and SCOTUS you can bitch here all you want, and nothing will change, people of ordinary means who understand what is going on had better wake up and realize you fight money with money. Honor, ethics and morals are so absent from our culture today thats that what it comes down to.

    • 1 year ago
  • twohawks
    • +1
      twohawks  
    • tommic:

      I think the only meaningful "money fighting" takes place "at a closed table" amongst the big money makers who have setup the game. Its not an open game. Anyone "from the outside" who comes to the table.. I don't think their money matters.

      I think the real question is... now that we, and I mean over this whole planet, have been thoroughly overtaken by corporate gamers (politically, economically, and socially)... now that we see the game so full and deep in swing - meaning we are in for the long ride on this now... if there is a truth to what I suggest there... what are we really going to do to make a difference? What steps can we really take?

      I do not mean to sound pessimistic... I am trying to look at this pragmatically, accepting the fact that my money and vote don't mean anything in that game.

      And I think physical revolution is either a long way off, or maybe even not possible.
      I am thinking, if one is looking for a/the revolution... one is going to have to look within.

      So I see no fight with money... I think that is a delusion the gamers want us to continue to buy into (as ludicrous or stupid as it sounds).

      If it weren't so apparent how powerfully people's minds have been worked over, to the point of believing what they hear and are told in spite of what they see ...it would be unbelievable hearing some of the continuing pro "Obama message of hope" followers.

      I do believe that real change is made by individuals. If a significant leader were to step up and take the risk of being a man/woman with balls of steel... to actually serve the oath and not the corporate, in the face of utter threat to their life and the wellbeing of their family and those they love... then perhaps the people could begin to create some footing for positive political change.

      Your comment about morals and ethics, tommic, is so poignantly right on. I believe that is at the heart of what we need to be waking up to and fighting for and with. Even if we can only do it one soul at a time.

    • 1 year ago
  • tommic
    • +1
      tommic  
    • twohawks:

      Idealistic but not realistic, if you are unable or unwilling to contribute to those groups that share your values you really can only help by blogging and writing both your senator and congressmen. You can join a organizations that shares your concerns. If your waiting for a revolution either non violent or violent you will never see your dream. Failure to recognize limitations and options will stymie any real change. The first reality comes from within realizing how you do go about formenting change. Money talks and bullshit walks as the old saying goes. Join the charge, take a chance you really have nothing to lose.
      The powers that be will never allow a revolution in the purist sense. Wake up smell the coffee and get your ass in gear.

    • 1 year ago
  • twohawks
    • 0
      twohawks  
    • tommic:

      If I respond to this point by point it will be too long winded.
      My dear fellow, it seems you missed my point, and made a lot of assumptions.
      Brief responses (inserted)...

      tommic wrote: "Idealistic but not realistic, if you are unable or unwilling to contribute to those groups that share your values (where did I indicate such, as I only spoke to not contributing to a group that doesn't share my values?? Why would you assume knowing anything about my interests, or not, regarding contributing elsewhere, whether with money or other??) you really can only help by blogging and writing both your senator and congressmen. You can join a organizations that shares your concerns (Since I did not even speak to this, why would you presume to infer I either do or I don't?). If your waiting for a revolution (where did I say I was waiting for a revolution?!?) either non violent or violent you will never see your dream. Failure to recognize limitations and options (I specifically address both - did you miss it?) will stymie any real change. The first reality comes from within (idealistic notion ...but it does not equate to unrealistic, you seem to concur what I speak to on this point) realizing how you do go about formenting change. Money talks and bullshit walks as the old saying goes (not so cut and dry... your money is no good at the "their table" (they already own that money), and its not all about money anyway, you said so yourself). Join the charge, take a chance you really have nothing to lose.
      The powers that be will never allow a revolution in the purist sense (um... its already happening, its just you don't bring a gun to mind-fuck battle). Wake up smell the coffee and get your ass in gear.

      ----
      tommic, I generally love the spirit of where you seem to be coming from (so don't take this the wrong way...), however, you really missed my points... possibly by making some powerful assumptions before, and without even, first bothering asking me about certain things you could only guess at about me.

      Idealistic but not realiestic?! Really? Try reading my post more carefully, without assuming things that I am not actually saying. You may find something completely different from what you are making it out to say, and actually probably closer to the tune you yourself are playing (reread your post after rereading mine).

      My 'revolution' line was meant to suggest something ...perhaps along these lines...
      ...the battle is not "out there" or "coming". We are already "in it", and "it" is now inside us...

      (As an example...) We are so compromised in moral integrity (individually and societally), so many things we do "without thinking" is based in "immoral programming".. so much so that many do not even notice it when it is slapping us in the face. We are numb to it. It is idealistic to think this ingrained programming is not having an impact on our abilities to listen and formulate understandings, on our choices, and our actions, ...and the outcome.
      I am not waiting for a revolution, or even looking for one... I see the one that is evident right now, pressing inside of me/us, and I am working on careful attention to that. I have been expressing my opinion about the importance of this because I feel it is so readily overlooked by so many ...as having no importance or significance.

      Point: how many people do you see portending to "fight the good fight" while using the same tools of hate and fear that they so regaliously claim to be battling? The disease of immorality will not be overcome with more immorality.

      Idealistic? Hardly... you yourself point out the prime importance of the "first reality". The fight has been largely taken off the battlefield "out there" and is being brought to you "within" by so many non-gun-related "sponsers" its not even funny. The purist revolution is not currently being televised... the battle to wake up, claim some balanced sensability of mind, and stay awake ...cannot be fought against with a gun, or physically be seen taking place ...only we "can" see and feel the results.

    • 1 year ago
  • WhiteCrow22
    • +2
      WhiteCrow22  
    • tommic:

      It is better to fight the LIES that the people with money promote with truth and your vote, than to try to keep up with them. There is no way to do that unless all of US low or no income Citizens all win the Lotto. Stop the lies by not listening to them, and start speaking the truth to those who lie. You have the power to drive them from their lair.

    • 1 year ago
  • WhiteCrow22
  • WhiteCrow22
    • +1
      WhiteCrow22  
    • tommic:

      Hey tommic, sometimes and some of US only have OUR actions to offer, BIG or small, and those offerings ought to be appreciated, and are appreciated at least by moi.

    • 1 year ago
  • tommic
  • EmperorThan
  • ThresholdBroken
  • alexandrek
  • WhiteCrow22
  • alexandrek
  • WhiteCrow22
  • hombre76
  • Chargois777
  • BKsaysAction
  • WhiteCrow22
  • samantha420
  • WhiteCrow22
  • KSirys
  • WhiteCrow22
    • -1
      WhiteCrow22  
    • samantha420:

      Sorry samantha420. I don't believe everything that I read in The Huffington Post. Huffington used to be in the Repugs camp. I agree with Idealist below. The Shadow Government, spearheaded by Cheney, has probably threatened the President and his family, if he goes too far. Have you noticed his gray hair? What do you think turns a fairly young man's hair gray over 18 months? If you are not a Repug or a Tea Bagger, then you are no better than one. You certainly are doing their work for them.

    • 1 year ago
  • Chargois777
  • Chargois777
  • WhiteCrow22
    • +1
      WhiteCrow22  
    • KSirys:

      Sorry ksirys, I meant this for you. I don't believe everything that I read in The Huffington Post. Huffington used to be in the Repugs camp. I agree with Idealist below. The Shadow Government, spearheaded by Cheney, has probably threatened the President and his family, if he goes too far. I wouldn't be surprised by that. Have you noticed his gray hair? What do you think turns a fairly young man's hair gray over 18 months? If you are not a Repug or a Tea Bagger, then you are no better than one. You certainly are doing their work for them.

    • 1 year ago
  • KSirys
    • +2
      KSirys  
    • WhiteCrow22:

      That's fine... but to follow blindly like he's the second coming of Jesus is absurd. In some ways, you could be right... DICK cheney could be doing that or even bush senior. But we have to look at what's happening right now...
      kids are still being killed by cops with no repercussion,
      AWOL bush is still out there, even though he lied and destroyed america!
      we are PAYING banks and corporations to MAKE MORE MONEY! while our Vets are HOMELESS!!!

      So, it doesn't matter how good or how bad the "evil forces" are pushing him. WE NEED CHANGE!! but with someone with BALLS!

    • 1 year ago
  • Sparky2U
  • WhiteCrow22
    • 0
      WhiteCrow22  
    • KSirys:

      Ksirys, we are the ones who have to have the balls. We can lend the President OURs, if we all lend them together. I know he wants to accomplish what we want to accomplish. We want to accomplish peace and happiness for our selves and our loved ones. Every person on the planet wants to do that in their heart of hearts. Maybe some are not in touch with that desire yet but it is there, and sooner or later will discover it. That desire can be satisfied, if we each play our part in accomplishing it.

      We are the US in the US of America! We are the real power behind the throne, not Cheney, not Bush, not Lipstick Palin, not even President Obama, who currently sits on it. WE determine what happens in the US of America. Not BIG OIL, not DIRTY COAL, not UN-NATURAL GAS, not MONOSANTO, not BIG INSURANCE, not BIG BANKS, especially not IMAGINARY CORPORATE PERSON-HOODS, US, WE decide. Religion does not determine our future. WE do. I could go on and on though I don't think I need to.

      You have the balls to do it. Please, don't blame President Obama for our own shortfalls as leaders and participants in this Democracy?

      Remember, Think Globally, Act Locally?!

    • 1 year ago
  • ampersand
  • WhiteCrow22
  • MindsiMedia
    • +2
      MindsiMedia  
    • That's funny coming from the man who did everything he could to protect the interests of the health insurance corporations w/ his so called reform. Not to mention putting those at the center of the Wall St. meltdown in charge of the economy. I voted for the man and was at Grant Park the night of the election but he has been timid and unwilling to fight for the real change he campaigned for.

    • 1 year ago
  • WhiteCrow22
  • idealist
  • Ruben_D_Monroy_Gonzalez
  • WhiteCrow22
    • +1
      WhiteCrow22  
    • Ruben_D_Monroy_Gonzalez:

      You seem to be excited by the possibility ruben_d_monroy_gonzalez? If that is true, then you and people like you are what truly threatens OUR country. Fear, hate, and violence seems to be the only thing some people strive for. What a shame. What a waste.

    • 1 year ago
  • idealist
  • Progresshiv
  • Dagum
    • +1
      Dagum  
    • Corporations have long ago taken over America, They helped put him in power! They owned every president after kennedy.

    • 1 year ago
  • KSirys
    • +1
      KSirys  
    • no more good men... this country will only change when we have a President like Obama, with bush jr. balls. I hope i'm around to see that happen...

    • 1 year ago
  • kennymotown
  • jubal
  • H2O_4U
101 - 182 of 182
more from Community:

top videos