Community | September 12, 2010 | 81 comments

Michael Moore Teaches Rahm Emanuel a F**cking Economics Lesson

Image
toyotabedzrock
**cking_economics_lesson/

Moore responds to Obama's chief of staff, quoted as saying he didn't care that tens of thousands of jobs would be lost if GM and Chrysler collapsed.

I read this week that — according to a new book by Steven Rattner, your administration's former "Car Czar" — during White House meetings about how to save the tens of thousands of jobs that would be lost if GM and Chrysler collapsed, your response was, "Fuck the UAW!"

Now, I can't believe you actually said that. Maybe Rattner got confused because you drop a lot of F-bombs, or maybe your assistant was trying to order lunch and you said (to Rattner) "Fuck you" and then to your assistant "A&W, no fries."

Or maybe you did mean Fuck the UAW. If so, let me give you a little fucking lesson (a lesson I happen to know because my fucking uncle was in the sit-down strike that founded the fucking UAW).

Before there were unions, there was no middle class. Working people didn't get to send their kids to college, few were able to own their own fucking home, nobody could take a fucking day off for a funeral or a sick day or they might lose their fucking job.

Then working people organized themselves into unions. The bosses and the companies fucking hated that. In fact, they were often overheard to say, "Fuck the UAW!!!" That's because the UAW had beaten one of the world's biggest industrial corporations when they won their battle on February 11, 1937, 44 days after they'd taken over the GM factories in Flint. Inspired by their victory, workers struck almost every other fucking industry, and union after union was born. Had World War II not begun and had FDR not died, there would have been an economic revolution that would have given everyone — everyone — a fucking decent life.

Nonetheless labor unions did create a middle class for the majority (even companies that didn't have unions were forced to pay at or near union wages in order to attract a workforce) and that middle class built a great country and a good life. You see, Rahm, when people earn a fucking good wage, they spend it on stuff, which then creates more good paying jobs, and then the middle class grows fucking big. Did you know that back when I was a kid if you had a parent making a union wage, only one parent had to work?! And they were home by 3 or 4pm, 5:30 at the latest! We had dinner together! Dad had four weeks paid vacation. We all had free health and dental care. And anyone with decent grades went to college and it didn't fucking bankrupt them. (And if you ever used the F-word, the nuns would straighten you out in ways that even you couldn't bear to hear about).

Then a Republican fired all the air traffic controllers, a Democrat gave us NAFTA and millions of jobs were moved overseas (hey, didn't you work in that White House, too? "Fuck the UAW, baby!"). Unions got scared and beaten down, a frat boy became president and, like a drunk out of control, spent all our fucking money and our children's money, too. Fuck.

And now your assistant's grandma has to work at fucking McDonald's. Ask her for pictures of what the middle class life used to look like. It was effing cool! I'll bet grandma doesn't say "Fuck the UAW!"

Hey, don't get me wrong, Rahm. I fucking like you. You single-handedly got the House returned to the Dems in 2006. But you and your boss better do something fucking quick to put people back to work. How 'bout making it a crime to take an American job and move it out of the country? In other words, treat it as if It were a fucking national treasure like you would if someone stole the Declaration of Independence out of the National Archives or some poacher stole eggs out of the nest of an America bald eagle.

Or how 'bout arresting some of those Wall Street guys who fucking stole our money, the money that ran the American economy. Now that would take some fucking guts.

And maybe, just maybe, that one act of real guts might save your ass come November 2nd.

Oh, I can just hear you now: "Fuck Michael Moore!" No problem. But Fuck the UAW? How 'bout if I just leave off the ‘A’ and the ‘W’?

Yours,

Michael Moore
  1. groups:
    Community,   Politics,   US Politics,   US News,   7 more
  2. tags:
    Michael Moore Rahm Emanuel
  3.     
    |

81 comments // Michael Moore Teaches Rahm Emanuel a F**cking Economics Lesson

  • FoosMaster
    • +1
      FoosMaster  
    • Corporate Regulation AND Union Regulation is desperately needed because Nobody in a position of Corporate or Union power can be trusted due to their unmitigated Greed!

      Unions have done Many good things but today’s runaway union wages and benefits drag down companies the same as the runaway wages and benefits of the management.

      Whatever happened to "an honest days wage for an honest days work"?

      We also need to protect American jobs from Unfair overseas wages and the outsourcing of American jobs.

      The way to do those things is Very complicated but we need to start somewhere and the elimination of NAFTA and similar policies would be a good start.

    • 1 year ago
  • UrbanGypsy
    • 0
      UrbanGypsy  
    • I would say that both sides are to blame. The companies for failing to provide competitive fuel efficient cars and the unions for not realizing that they had to cut down on demands, especially knowing that auto companies had alternatives.

      Management in the auto companies were getting paid huge salaries and they should have not been bailed out the way they were. As ScottyT pointed out, these differences between managerial salaries and workers' pay is not something you see in Japanese or German companies.

      And on the other hand, you have bad management of the unions themselves. Some union bosses do nothing but sit on their asses and collect union fees without doing anything.

    • 1 year ago
  • CalgarC
    • 0
      CalgarC  
    • i like moore :D also he came from michigan like me and i know how fucked up it is there. open 2 new plants, or at least force the car industry to do it... if they loose a bit of money big deal the ceo's can take a paycheck

    • 1 year ago
  • hombre76
    • +2
      hombre76  
    • First I am a Card carrying member of the SEIU and donate not just my dues monthly but a portion to the political action group as well. I will say this the message from Moore is this RESPECT THE FUCKING UNIONS! In my opinion we should not have bailed out GM, but the problem here is that we have a conservative wing in the Democratic Party that does not like the Unions and has badmouthed them for decades and Rahm is a big one. Rham does not come from a middle class background his family is rich and he was born into money and he also subscribes to Milton economics as many conservatives do. what Moore was speaking to was the element within the Democratic Party that allowed moderate Republicans to run as blue dogs in red states so we could capture the house and senate from the republicans. I for one would rather face my enemy no matter his numbers openly than have what amounts to a minority in the Democratic Party acting as a block to the Majority wish for a progressive agenda and legislation. In conclusion the Unions have ever been the means by which working men (without whom the rich would have no business at all) have a hope of earning a fair wage and safe environment to work in. Another effect which the anti-union people always forget is that Unions not only press employers for living wages but are the reason we have work safety laws at all in this country or anywhere in the world. But the UAW tied themselves to a dieing company and they should have taken the opportunity to take over the company with their own capital instead of allowing all us taxpayers to bail out the same management that had fucked over the company just so their Union could keep their jobs without the investment coming from their pocket. IMO they would have had an incredible sales pitch if the workers were the owners of the company something like “Support GM the Company that Supports the American Worker!”. I mean BOOM there is your slogan! But we have to get rid of this mentality that Unions are the problem and Unions must always Keep them selves at arms length from management because thats what is corrupting the UAW now, unless they are gonna take over ownership and run it as a co-op business.

    • 1 year ago
  • eternal_springs
    • +2
      eternal_springs  
    • To me, the crux of his rant is:
      Nonetheless labor unions did create a middle class for the majority (even companies that didn't have unions were forced to pay at or near union wages in order to attract a workforce) and that middle class built a great country and a good life. You see, Rahm, when people earn a fucking good wage, they spend it on stuff, which then creates more good paying jobs, and then the middle class grows fucking big. Did you know that back when I was a kid if you had a parent making a union wage, only one parent had to work?! And they were home by 3 or 4pm, 5:30 at the latest! We had dinner together! Dad had four weeks paid vacation. We all had free health and dental care. And anyone with decent grades went to college and it didn't fucking bankrupt them. (And if you ever used the F-word, the nuns would straighten you out in ways that even you couldn't bear to hear about).

      Then a Republican fired all the air traffic controllers, a Democrat gave us NAFTA and millions of jobs were moved overseas (hey, didn't you work in that White House, too? "Fuck the UAW, baby!"). Unions got scared and beaten down, a frat boy became president and, like a drunk out of control, spent all our fucking money and our children's money, too. Fuck.

      _____________________________________________________________

      My dad was part of that sit-down in Flint, and I'm extremely proud of him for that! Life before unions was harsh on workers. Does anyone really think most companies are going to treat their workers fairly unless the law says they have to do so???

      As in all things, there are the "bad and corrupt," but as the old saying goes, don't throw out the baby with the bath water!!

      Thanks for posting this!!

    • 1 year ago
  • Saladin
    • +4
      Saladin  
    • That was an extremely enjoyable rant, much of it right on too.

      How do these fucking cretins expect America's economy to recover with no jobs or wages to support a consumer class?

    • 1 year ago
  • Elevator
  • crystalman
  • hanzdogy
  • ezrierin
  • hanzdogy
  • trut
  • hanzdogy
    • -1
      hanzdogy  
    • Unions are the people's response to unregulated business practices in relationship to worker compensation. Are the unions out of control? Absolutely, because before that; the companies were out of control. It is better to have the big bad government regulate it than either party, because both sides tend to want practices that favor them.

      No way to do it perfectly however, so you won't here that argument from me.

    • 1 year ago
  • ezrierin
  • hanzdogy
    • 0
      hanzdogy  
    • ezrierin:

      Yes, I agree with you. The problem is that there is no answer then. We have to pick one human made system one way or the other. Corporations will screw the workers, Unions will cause the companies to fail, and the government can't be trusted. What is the fourth option that I am not seeing?

    • 1 year ago
  • ezrierin
    • 0
      ezrierin  
    • hanzdogy:

      YES, all options can suck and can be ridicules to the workers. However, politics that are local are the most effective. Unions are effectively locally controlled. I will trust my neighbor to vote with me for higher wages and benefits at out jobs, then some conservative corporate crack head in Washington or a sweeping economic system of some sort.
      Here is the example. When Unions were strong in this country there was a growing middle class and the US was the economic envy of the world. Unions YES!

    • 1 year ago
  • Dagum
    • +6
      Dagum  
    • I don’t generally find myself in agreement with Rahm Emanuel but I will say this: bad businesses need to fail. If we are going to even pretend that we are a free-market society, then we cannot be afraid of failure. It is a corrective force and deterrent that prevents other business from engaging in the same bad business practices.

      The banks, brokerage houses , GM and Chrysler failed because they either were corrupt, inefficient, or incompetent. They should not have been rewarded for their failure.

      I hear some saying that “Chrysler has been around since the 1920’s” or “Goldman Sachs is almost as old as the republic itself, It would be a shame to let such icons disappear into history.”

      If that is the case, and its some form of SENTIMENTALISM then by all means submit an application for Goldman Sachs, GM, and Chrysler to the United States Secretary of the Interior to be designated a national landmark and stop pretending they are working businesses .

    • 1 year ago
  • hanzdogy
    • +3
      hanzdogy  
    • Dagum:

      I agree. We shouldn't let our emotions cloud the fact that these companies had developed failing business models. Let the market take them down.

    • 1 year ago
  • ScottyT
  • ezrierin
    • -5
      ezrierin  
    • Dagum:

      I agree bad businesses should fail, after all, we can always export all our jobs overseas which in effect says all businesses in the US are failures. After all they can do it cheaper, with slave labor sometimes. In fact by your logic of Natural Selection Economics, the US should fail. Serious fail.

    • 1 year ago
  • hanzdogy
  • Dagum
    • 0
      Dagum  
    • ezrierin:

      You might want to re -examine that. The argument that we should reward corruption because of your distaste for the Chinese isn’t very persuasive.

    • 1 year ago
  • ezrierin
  • ezrierin
    • 0
      ezrierin  
    • hanzdogy:

      The people need to stop listening to conservatives that would inslave them, then get off their dead asses, join the Unions, and vote in mass to change laws that outlaw unions today. Do you know unions are outlawed in China, and were in the Soviet Union? See how well that worked out for the vast majority of workers?
      When half the people in the US were in Unions in the US, we had prosparity. That ended in 1977 when unions got so weak they could not get real wages to keep up with inflation. Add Reaganomics union busting and tinkle down economics and here we are, the Great Depression number two.

    • 1 year ago
  • Dagum
    • +1
      Dagum  
    • ezrierin:

      Please try hard to focus and articulate argument. Because my comment was specifically about not rewarding corrupt business.

      And you replied with comment about the labor conditions in China. There are not many logical connections you make to my comment and yours other than rewarding corrupt business in America helps with working conditions in China. I hope you are not honestly trying to make this argument.

      Now if you intended your comment to stand on its own and replied to me by mistake I understand. But otherwise your comment does not touch and concern any of the material in my comment unless you plan on adding more to it in a subsequent reply.

    • 1 year ago
  • ezrierin
    • 0
      ezrierin  
    • Dagum:

      Okay, I apologies for a bad choice of words by using China as an example. When it comes to foreign policy, historically China has had a better model then ours over it‘s history. Although recently I think they are losing a grip on that. But I digress.
      I have a feeling we actually are on a similar track here in our thinking. Like I said in another reply, “Free Trade” (of our businesses over seas to other countries) is the plague that is putting the last nail in the coffin of the US. Fair Trade, not Free Giveaway I say.
      We need to stop “Free Trade” and get unions working again so the workers can bust their assess to keep the corporation healthy, and so keep themselves in a higher standard of living.
      The economic model the US has today aka Reaganomics, only feeds the short term profits of large stock holders and has no allegiance to our country. F them, America FIRST, end Free Trade, Unions YES!

    • 1 year ago
  • BrushwithDeathToothpaste
    • 0
      BrushwithDeathToothpaste  
    • Dagum:

      I partially agree. If the economy was different I would say let them fail. But when your unemployment rate is dancing around the double digit number you need to do what you can to keep that figure down. Double digit unemployment could have caused the scales to tip too much and lead to more unemployment quickly. Too many people would suffer and the recovery would be much slower.

      On the other hand maybe the country needs a depression to make us rethink our inefficiencies. If I did not have children I would say fail them all and let God sort them out.

    • 1 year ago
  • hanzdogy
    • 0
      hanzdogy  
    • ezrierin:

      Let me make it clear that I am not anti-union, I have a union job. I am an elementary school teacher and enjoy a great many perks that my union has provided for me, and I don't think it should ever be against the law to form a union. Let me make it clear that I also don't disagree that Reaganomics is stupid. I also think that free trade is a horrible idea. Hopefully this clears up any possible future misconceptions about our discussion. I have heard that the US was pretty great in the 70's. I wasn't alive then, so I don't have any first hand experience.

      I have also heard of some ridiculous stories about union abuses, especially with American auto manufacturers and have seen some pretty horrible teachers protected when they should have been fired. You can't tell me that unions are the end-all and be-all fix for our economic woes and that companies should never be allowed to fail.

      I strongly dislike seeing honest hard working people fired in order to fatten the boss man's pocket.

      I strongly dislike watching worthless employees protected by my union, when I know people who are hard working and can't find a job.

      Some companies fail because they fail, and not because of child labor from India.

      Once again, I am not anti-union nor do I give much credence to conservative double speak.

    • 1 year ago
  • ScottyT
    • +7
      ScottyT  
    • It's sad to see the UAW being made a scapegoat in this whole morass. Yes, unions like the UAW have made the American auto industry less competitive with respect to labor costs, but it wasn't the labor unions that designed such engineering marvels like the Ford Pinto or Pontiac Fiero.

      The truth of the matter is that the American auto industry designed shitty cars for decades while their competitors were engineering more fuel-efficient, safer, and more reliable transportation. While companies like GM were worried more about their proverbial bottom line, companies like Nissan and Toyota were actually engineering good cars. Over the course of decades, American auto manufacturers lost their competitive edge.

      The scenario today is that labor unions are most likely going to have to give up a lot of their wages, benefits and pensions in order to get their respective companies back on a competitive foothold with foreign manufacturers. That's the sad and ugly truth.

      I don't fault the unions for this situation, but rather management. And if the shareholders of these companies wish to receive their dividend checks, then drastic changes are going to have to be made. A contract takes two parties, and labor and management had better start paying attention to the bigger picture.

      I refuse to believe, though, that our government has a stake in maintaining the status quo of the American auto industry by bailing out shitty management of failing companies. If these companies cannot compete, then they should fail. It sucks that people may lose their jobs as a result, but it will suck even more if Americans allow management of these failing auto companies to continue in their failing ways...

      There's no reason why America cannot truly compete on the global automotive market just as there's no reason why American workers cannot receive a decent wage and benefits for their travails. Design and manufacture a good product at a competitive price, and people will buy it. Fail to do this, and go out of business. It's that simple.

    • 1 year ago
  • ezrierin
    • 0
      ezrierin  
    • ScottyT:

      Those god damned overpaid auto workers. They must be living it up with all that excess cash. BOTH union and non union auto workers in the US get paid a whopping average of $15 an hour. Of course the non union workers do not have as good benefits, or retirement, but they should just be happy to have a job. F, export it all to China if they pick a bitch!
      Cars made in the United States today are second to none in technology. They are also being bought up by the world. It is a come back and the auto corps. have even paid back our loans with interest years ago, the basterds! But it sucks for American auto stock holders. They are so exploited and only dream of the day they can pay what they want, fire without cause, and export the entire business to China.
      BUT HAPPY DAY! Thanks to the Party of NO, soon everyone will be willing to work for food, just like the Great Depression.
      Hey, let’s face it, for the wealthy the Great Depression was GREAT! If we get that next Great Depression going again, that will get the US competitive to China. Then there will be more jobs! Thank God the economy is bad; we can kill those pesky unions once and for all, and get the cheapest most submissive labor in the world.
      God I love conservative economics! If you do not, then you hate America and apologies for terrorists. Idiots.

    • 1 year ago
  • ScottyT
    • 0
      ScottyT  
    • ezrierin:

      If American automotive technology were second to none (or if that technology were being put to use), then the Amercan auto industry would not be in the situation it is in today...period.

      As I said before, unions aren't the cause of the decline of the American automotive industry. Bad management is.

      If American industry can't figure that one maxim out, then they deserve to be outsourced to China...and it's why I (along with millions of other investors) wouldn't waste a dime of my money on American Auto stocks. And I totally resent the idea of my government spending my tax dollars recapitalizing companies whose stock I refused to buy.

      If management doesn't wish to create an environment conducive to investment, then that's their problem...not mine.

      And what exactly does either the party of NO or the party of YES really have to do with a business staying in business? At the end of the day, it comes down to providing goods and services that people will buy. If I provided shitty services to my clients, then I wouldn't have any clients--the same standard should apply to cars.

    • 1 year ago
  • ezrierin
    • 0
      ezrierin  
    • ScottyT:

      When Unions were strong the workers had power in the factories to keep stupid management decisions at a minimum. I mean the workers had a bread and butter interest in speaking out to get the corporation working top notch. Today if you open your mouth at work you are fired even if the boss is running the business into the ground. That is all because you have no power in the work place because there are few unions you can join.
      Here is a question. Why in gods name would you ever believe, “If American industry can't figure that one maxim out, then they deserve to be outsourced to China” ???
      Even a job plunking along barely making it, is better then no job at all. American first, remember? DO NOT kill the job; improve the company with Union input and power. Those workers want the corporation to win, win, win, because then the workers win.
      BTW, Free Trade (of our businesses over seas to other countries) is the plague that is putting the last nail in the coffin of the US. Fair Trade, not Free Giveaway I say.

    • 1 year ago
  • ScottyT
    • +1
      ScottyT  
    • ezrierin:

      Unions are still pretty damned strong. Sadly, union employees are still at the mercy of their management--and it's the American management buisness model that needs to go. This management model rewards incompetence. Where else, but America, can CEOs get paid multimillion dollar salaries for running their respective companies into the ground?

      You certainly don't see CEOs of German auto companies (who are unionized, have some of the best pay and benefits packages, and are worker oriented) bitching about their golden parachutes, marble-floored offices and private jets.

      Look at Korea and Japan. There isn't as great a disparity between managerial salaries and workers' salaries as there is in the United States. Moreover, if their management fails to produce, they get demoted or flat-out fired!!! They don't blame their problems on their workers.

      As I said before, I think it's a shitty thing that American workers have to bear the brunt of their management's incompetence. I don't want to see workers lose their jobs. However, I don't want to see the last vestiges of American industry destroyed by a system that is an obvious failure--and if that means having to shut down and start over again, then so be it.

    • 1 year ago
  • ezrierin
    • 0
      ezrierin  
    • ScottyT:

      Unions are not strong. Only 15.4 of the workers in the US are in unions. Union workers want the corp to succeed, so they the workers can succeed. Otherwise, I agree that management is way out of control.
      I do not get the psychology that some CEO has to be paid billions of dollars, when we can easily get a person with equal or better business skill to do the same job for a few hundred thousand dollars a year. It is all political corporate BS.
      Here is a perfect example I am very close too. This guy I know is the new CEO of a local company. A cop I know checked his background. This SOB has run every company he has run in Reno into the ground. So why does he keep getting new CEO jobs? Nepotism.
      The company he is killing now was just a few steps away from monopoly. The workers, who made the company so powerful, were all fired. The new CEO is taking most of the profits for himself.
      If Nevada was not a “Right to Work” state, aka Right to Screw the Worker State, the union could have saved that company and all those jobs as they would have had say in keeping the company a success. But no. No union, no corporate supervision, no worker input, no company, no job.
      The fruits of Reaganomics.

    • 1 year ago
  • ScottyT
    • +1
      ScottyT  
    • ezrierin:

      You are absolutely correct about nepotism (I prefer to call it cronyism) in American business. There are too many of these management types who fuck a company and then go on to fuck another--all the while touting their managerial experience. It is an oligarchical system that has corrupted itself to the point of dragging our entire economy down with it. I see it here in the NYC area every day.

      The financial industry provides an even better example of this crap than does the automotive industry.

      Unions ARE strong though. Their leadership has just fallen victim to the same fat-cat mentality that plagues American industry. They still represent their membership, but could use a little more incentive to get off their asses and make some real demands!

      One thing that I think made unions more about collecting dues as opposed to genuine representation of their members' interests was their lobbying of state legislatures in establishing "closed shop" states. By enacting laws compelling workers to join a union, union bosses became complacent and corrupt. These bosses became as corrupt as their managerial counterparts.

      Nobody should be forced to join a union. They should want to be in a union! Coercion destroys the very essence as to why people unionized and stood up to their employers in the first place.

      What is even worse is that certain states remain "closed shop" while other remain "right to work." Since right to work has come to be, unions have become much more democratic than they once were--and they were just as nepotistic as any example you provided. The result is that some locals have to work hard for their members while others get a free ride--just the same as the workers who don't pay union dues get the same benefits as those who do.

    • 1 year ago
  • ezrierin
  • UrbanGypsy
  • Dortha
  • Radical_Centrist
  • ayipis
  • ayipis
  • ScottyT
  • dwb2585
    • +4
      dwb2585  
    • ayipis:

      The airline industry: Pilot unions are crucial in defending and holding pilots accountable. Unions are CRITICAL for airline safety.

      So, there you go ayipiss, that's two.

    • 1 year ago
  • ayipis
    • -2
      ayipis  
    • http://www.unionfacts.com/

      Survey of Labor Economists Shows Overwhelming Opposition to EFCA, Binding Arbitration

      studynlrbA new survey of nine hundred and twenty-five (925) labor economists conducted by the University of New Hampshire Survey Center for the Center for Union Facts illustrates a growing consensus among experts that increased unionization will have a negative effect on the economy.

      The survey further indicates that labor economists are overwhelmingly opposed to a bill currently before Congress that would radically overhaul existing labor law at the expense of American businesses.

    • 1 year ago
  • ayipis
    • -5
      ayipis  
    • Image
    • http://www.redstate.com/bluey/2008/11/19/uaw-workers-earn-130000-a-year/

      UAW Employees Earn $130,000 a Year

      Here’s a little known fact about the Big Three automakers: The average unionized worker costs his or her employer about $75 an hour in wages and benefits. That’s more than $130,000 a year — three times as much as the typical American worker.

      With executives for General Motors, Ford and Chrysler pleading their case for a government bailout, it’s worth remembering the UAW’s role in the problem. These high salaries are chocking the Big Three. Rather than making concessions, however, the union wants the government to pony up money.

      My colleague James Sherk, a labor policy analysts at The Heritage Foundation, ran the numbers for UAW employees and those who work for Japanese plants located in the United States. Sherk notes that UAW workers’ compensation comes as benefits, not cash. The chart shows the dramatic difference.

      Unionized workers at the Big Three cost employers between $71 and $76 an hour for a total of $130,000 in 2006. By contrast, employees at Japanese plants cost their companies between $42 and $48 an hour for about $80,000. The average American private sector worker earned about $25 an hour in 2006.

      What’s my point? If taxpayers are being asked to fund a bailout for Detroit automakers, the UAW should come to the table with concessions. Maintaining this rate of pay is unsustainable in the current economic environment. Everyone but Detroit seems to get the message.

      | Sphere: Related Content
      Share on: Facebook | 0diggsdigg | Reddit

    • 1 year ago
  • oppressed1
  • ezrierin
  • onemalefla
  • ayipis
  • ezrierin
  • H2O_4U
    • -1
      H2O_4U  
    • We can't let GM or Chrysler collapse. Thousands or millions of people will be unemployed.

      The federal government just needs to stop tiptoeing around the issue and nationalize the companies already to ensure full employment.

    • 1 year ago
  • dwb2585
  • UtopianSky
    • +10
      UtopianSky  
    • I agree that there is a need for unions, but if GM and Chrysler collapse, they collapse.

      We can't prop them up if they have been making crappy cars that no one wants to buy.

      They will be replaced by brand new American auto companies, like Tesla Motors.

    • 1 year ago
  • thetrimsmith
  • H2O_4U
    • -4
      H2O_4U  
    • UtopianSky:

      But unions will die if the capitalism has its way! We need a safety net from the government (like bailouts) to secure their existence. I'm sorry but comment voted down.

    • 1 year ago
  • UtopianSky
    • +5
      UtopianSky  
    • H2O_4U:

      I did not say anything about capitalist absolutism.

      I said I agree we have a need for unions to protect workers.
      But individual businesses come and go, it's a fact of life.

      If a business, no mater how huge, is ill managed and makes crappy products, why should our tax dollars go to keeping that company alive?

      Our tax dollars should go to scholarships and trade schools, so when people lose their jobs, they can get new ones.

      Our tax dollars should go to small business incentives so those employees can start new companies that learn from the mistakes of the past.

      We should not pay bad management and bad designers and bad engineers to continue to do crappy work.

    • 1 year ago
  • Dagum
  • H2O_4U
    • +1
      H2O_4U  
    • UtopianSky:

      We aren't protecting business, we are protecting the Unions something you don't care to understand about. This is exactly why bush and obama did the auto bailout, so workers wouldn't be subjected to the market and could be protect by the unions.

    • 1 year ago
  • hanzdogy
    • +2
      hanzdogy  
    • UtopianSky:

      Can't agree more. Tesla actually approached the big auto companies awhile back with his ideas, and they told him to go somewhere else. Now his company is producing vehicles abroad (Northern Europe).

    • 1 year ago
  • UtopianSky
    • 0
      UtopianSky  
    • H2O_4U:

      Again, you keep writing posts as replies to me, when they have nothing to do with anything I said.

      Well, it's obvious you don't give a damn about the AIDS crisis in Africa, and don't care to learn anything about it.

    • 1 year ago
  • UtopianSky
  • Radical_Centrist
  • BrushwithDeathToothpaste
    • +1
      BrushwithDeathToothpaste  
    • I'll say it for Rahm. Fuck you Michael Moore and fuck the UAW! I have family members that worked for GM. Getting 90% of your pay with benefits while having the summer off is too much. While my grandfather was cleaning up bodily fluids at the hospital for decades making crap money, his kids and grand kids were lying in the sun earning most of their pay and whining about how they had to go back to work after the "layoff" was over.

      The UAW was essential at insuring workers got their fair share and pretty much created the middle class. But then they turned into a big fat ugly paycheck machine which overprotected its workers and drove up our car prices until we could no longer compete in quality with foreign manufacturers. The execs were worse but the union is also to blame. I can understand when you have an economy where hard working people who make crap lose their jobs without a auto bailout why he would say fuck the UAW. Coal miners, fishermen, truck drivers, farmers, and everyone else should also say fuck the UAW.

      The only reason I supported the GM bailout was because the economy was so fucked up, the collapse of the auto industry might have put us into a depression.

    • 1 year ago
  • PressCore
    • +3
      PressCore  
    • Despite the emotional statements of overgeneralizations,
      and oversimplifications which has rendered their truth value
      worthless, I belong to the Teamsters Union. Here in New York
      the Labor law is " at will " to prevent Coercion & Slavery. But
      the $250 membership fee, and $18 monthly dues have enabled
      us to have the best of both worlds: Job security and free will
      as to the jobs we can bid to perform based on seniority. Unions
      are a Democratic organization. So long as they're not abused they
      work well.

    • 1 year ago
  • hanzdogy
    • +3
      hanzdogy  
    • PressCore:

      I think that "At Will" contracts are the way to go. I am a public school teacher, and we could definitely let some of the bad teachers I work with go, but the union protects them regardless of their performance levels.

    • 1 year ago
  • Radical_Centrist
  • Sparky2U
  • Radical_Centrist
  • remanns
  • jubal
  • Radical_Centrist
    • +2
      Radical_Centrist  
    • jubal:

      Michael Moore has only had two Documentaries that I thought were worth watching. Roger and Me was depressing and very entertaining at the same time. I also thought that Fahrenheit 9/11 was both entertaining and very educational.

    • 1 year ago
  • PressCore
    • +1
      PressCore  
    • jubal:

      He's likely too busy lisening to the sound of counting coin, and
      protecting the status quo. He knows who butters his bread. In
      Dante's Inferno, the depiction of greed holds it that the souls
      in perdition are condemned to count Gold coins in a gilded bird
      cage for eternity. We can at least content ourselves to know that
      as virtue is its own reward, then vice is its own punishment. There's
      a certain rough Justice in my having Gold fever too, but unlike the
      typical uberrich, knowing i can't take it with me.

    • 1 year ago
  • ezrierin
    • +8
      ezrierin  
    • Michael Moore rules this one. "How 'bout making it a crime to take an American job and move it out of the country?" Perfection.

    • 1 year ago
  • remanns
  • PressCore
    • +3
      PressCore  
    • ezrierin:

      http://Current.com

      Before they can accomplish that important move...(moving is stationary
      in the Orwellian war without end TV surveilance culture)...they'd have to
      change the term " Government oversight " to accountability. The term
      oversight now invariably means "overlooking" because intelligence is
      ignorance. The Corporation Party bought the Republicans long ago.
      And the Democrats had to compete with them, as any sports team would.

      As Jubal once commented(paraphrased) Once the American people wake
      up and realized they're being played by politicians by voting and keeping
      the pendulum swinging back and forth between both teams, then they'll
      realize the dominance of the Corporation Party has kept the pendulum
      still. The point is " change " is an illusion. The Government is a tool of the
      Corporations and their Corporate Party, owned by the 1% uberrich. When
      10,000 people out of 300 Million make 30% of the earnings, their earnings
      are burnings. CEOs used to be constrained to make a reasonable amount
      based on the factor of the lowest wages of the company's actual producers.
      But since the 1980 attitude that greed is good, that honest practice is no more.

      The top dogs want to globalize wages by outsourcing American jobs to China
      because they know they can pay them dirt wages and cheat Americans out
      of their standard of living. The standard of living that unions have maintained
      is crumbling with the hyperinflation caused by their 96 year old sellout to the
      Banksters' Fed. Their credit based economy & monentary system is absolutely
      Anti Constitutional and UnAmerican because it's a fiat money Ponzi Scheme
      intended to allow the uberrich to convert our time & work product into their
      Gold holdings. They've been squeezing us like a tube of toothpaste by putting
      our money on a debt based negative standard which is uncontrolable. Their
      Fed Trojan Horse could not convert the USA into their mega Corporation by
      allowing our Treasury Dept. to coin money on a Constitutional value based
      standard because that would make us too strong for them to subvert sucessfuly.

      I have Email blogged & starred articles posted here on Current.com which assert
      that miniture Thorium power sources could end the USA's enslavement to oil
      within a decade. Do you see anyone in power, protecting the status quo which
      has lubed them into office, rushing out to effect this as change you can believe in ?
      Because if you do, there's a bridge in Brooklyn that the politician hos would like
      to sell you too. Like the Monsanto, Du Pont people, they've adopted the crooked
      lying habit of selling us things they don't own. That's why Michael Moore's articles
      are one of my few, selected Google gadgets, and not Rahm Emanuels. As the
      Grateful Dead once put it: " Some folks trust in reason. some folks trust in might.
      I trust in nothing(but God) 'cause I know it'll turn out right. " Though not in our lifetimes.

    • 1 year ago
  • Radical_Centrist
  • onemalefla
  • PressCore
    • +1
      PressCore  
    • onemalefla:

      http://Current.com

      To be honest, I don't exactly know why. I always opt for the " No immage "
      option when the roboitic program is flagged by my mentionof Current.com.
      Yet like a bubble floating through water to the surface, some immage seems
      to always pop in anyway. Thanks for reminding me. I've deleted it now.

    • 1 year ago
  • hombre76
  • Radical_Centrist
  • toyotabedzrock
more from Community:

top videos