Ahmadinejad... Statesman or Madman?

maybe you can make a trip to the middle east and demand it yourself there. im sure theyre even more open to dialog.

while it would be stupid not to notice the void left by russia in our need for an enemy is being filled by iran, it also is equaly rediculous to make it a zionist conspiracy.
zionists dont hold any influnce in many of the nations that find iran to be aggressive
zionists arent writing his speech's, its all him
iran are placing themselves on the global alter as an offering to those who want another cold war.

more reasonable is that the bullshit we were subjected to over the last half century called the cold war has been changed by us to the war on terror, and iran doesnt care to play second fiddle to arabs.they want to be our focus as a matter of status.

zionists or no zionists if we say the sky is blue, they will say it is not, just for the attention.

I have listened to his interviews that he has given not only here in the US but when I have watched the news from Britain or on Al Jazeera or RT News...he seems to be perfectly sensible...very conservative in terms of his religion informing his politics but he doesn't come across as a mad man where as in some US reporting about the interviews he gives here has the spin that emphasizes the bullet points that need to be drum beaten into people's skulls so that they will acquiesce to the demands of war hawks.

he doesnt need the media help. i think the madman does a pretty good job at self portrayal

i miss the cold war. the world was a much more peaceful place.

i agree with you.the auto industry isnt our number one manufacturing industry, bullshit is.we make more bullshit than the world can handle, and we certainly take achmaenajad for a spin quite regularly.but at the end of the day, it is all him.not what we claimed he said but actualy didnt, but what he said.just as zionists have no interest in north korea, kim jong ill's crazy gets our attention as does irans.

achmadinajad says the holocaust is a myth
we say, he said it didnt happen
yes we spun it, but did we lose content?

iran hangs gays literarly for public entertainment and he says iran has no homosexuals.im sure he meant to convey that iran doesnt have the culture of homosexuality we do, but that isnt what he said.he denied thir existance.this man may not be standing at podiums, pounding his fists yelling, but it is the same content we have seen before.the same historical revisionism and current status lies.

we have criteria that needs to be met in order for the powers that be to exploit, and he is competing for that opportunity.he wants to make good on the persian sense of superiority, as our founding fathers wanted endevoured to do the same for liberty.we exploit what he offers, but it is still his offering.he is no less crazy cuz our military benefits from him.

i dont.
i dont miss waiting everyday for the clock to hit midnight.
i dont miss duck and cover drills.
i dont miss living in ready preparedness for nuclear fallout
i dont miss all the fear mongering it created
i dont miss being told to hate a people from wich i decended
i dont miss idealogies being demonized before evaluated
i dont miss having jews, like the rosenbergs, serve as patsy's
i dont miss communism being the agreed upon evil, that was also code for jew
i dont miss being lied to by our government about a fictitious threat

i do however miss the 90's when we figured out it was bullshit and just enjoyed our existance.no longer afraid that viewing communism favorably was treason

ahhh the good old days, i'm feeling verklempt just thinking about it

Iran's President did not say the Holocaust is a Myth as in "It never happened" what he said was that the facts, circumstances, and numbers dead were twisted, exaggerated or some of it invented. There were many Jews who turned on other Jews and helped the Nazi's because of long, long, long resentments and rivalries between tribes.

your historical view is severely fukt, and you know im not saying this as a digg to you, or as a religious zealot.
im not going to get into it here, as im sure you dont care to either, but i assure you jewish tribes havent existed for thousands of years.the only division amongst jews was assimilated or not assimilated.at the end of the day, no conflict existed as a result.

jews turned on other jews for the same reason house slaves turned on field slaves, survival, not politics.you should deductively know better.

as far as achmadinajad's historical accounts, ill go with eye witness's,actual historians,and physical evidence.he has said it was a myth, and other times (depending who is with in ear shot) made concessions on it.point being he is an antagonist for the sake of it.

not the whole country nor innocent civilians. just need to bunker bomb their nuclear capabilties

You do that and you will radicalize 1BILLION Muslims and you will have your Armageddon that you so preciously desire.

really? ya think so? iranian kids who watch the daily show will be radicalized by us bombing thier nukes not thier people while thier own government oppresses them?
iran of the 80s would react that way, not the iran of today.

If the bombing creates massive civilian casualties then, yes...there will be radicalization. An attack on Iranian Sovereignty will be looked at like their 9/11...they will rally around their flag and their religion just like good little Americans do here.

if their sovereignty includes a build up of weapons of mass destruction that can and most likely will be used by psychotic fanatical leaders to annihilate their neighbors and threaten the rest of the world than their sovereignty must not be recognized in this case

i would rather take the chance of possibly dying at the hands of a billion muslims then at the hands of one madman with nuclear capabilities. besides appeasing iran is the pussy way out!

its like when they threaten us that if we dont stop doing as we do, terror attacks will follow.they do anyway, the threat is moot.
it will be no different than it is now.

but no one is talking about civilian casualties, just hitting nuclear facilities.the only way civilian casualties would result is if iran moves populations into thier nuclear facilities.

also dont forget the persians and the arabs while united by muslim nationalism, arent exactly bound too tightly by it.

thier sovereignty must be recognized, otherwise it goes from us attacking a nuclear facility to us attacking a people.leave them as a sovereign nation and very little ground is left to create enemies.ask the shah

cant and will not agree with you on this one. i feel justified and so should israel if they choose to take out this madmans arsenal. the shah? oh yeah just one of many fuck ups performed by another madman, jimmy carter.

In spite of promises to the contrary for both Iraq and Afghanistan...and their laser guided technology...there were and still are massive civilian casualties.

There is no way that they are going to bomb nuclear facilities without affecting huge segments of the population.

I hear the drum beat of war in your voice and that of Congoboy...sad....we don't need more war....we the people need and demand peace.

check out the destruction of iraq's nuclear facilities as well as syrias.mission successfull, and casualties are zero.that is what im talking about.

dont worry, we wont get any skin in this fight, as we never do.we leave this dirty work to israel as they dont enjoy the luxury of distance we do.they will have to hit em long before we would be pressed to.

even more dangerous than that