Community | October 11, 2010 | 66 comments

John Stossel & Montel Williams On Marijuana

shanklinmike
Montel Williams and John Stossel discuss the medical efficacy of marijuana and the stance of the DEA.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4w6ChLOorYs
  1. groups:
    Community,   H.E.M.P.,   Make Marijuana Matter
  2. tags:
    News Politics Current TV Current 10 more
  3. recommended by:
    lordsbassman
  4.     
    |

66 comments // John Stossel & Montel Williams On Marijuana // Video

  • hunzedog
  • Prijedor
    • +1
      Prijedor  
    • People are waking up and realizing that weed is not a bad thing and is illegal for the wrong reason and big pharma is shaking in their boots

    • 1 year ago
  • XasthurNortt
  • Haley35
  • Dazedandconfused
    • +7
      Dazedandconfused  
    • The pros of legalizing marijuana outwiegh the cons, its plain and simple. So, can we just LEGALIZE, you know let the stoners get in on that whole freedom thing, also side note - WTF why can't gay people get married? SERIOUSLY, i didn't know you could use religeon to sway government, i guess i'm just old school

    • 1 year ago
  • Dmerza1989
    • +4
      Dmerza1989  
    • I'v started to notice the pot fight is becoming more and more like the gay fight. "I dont like it so i will disregard any scientific evidence and vote against it for all people because i dont like it" To quote bill Maher on this "FUCK YOU!, you start calling your marriage a civil union and see how you like it! You take your bottle of jack outside and drink it and see how you like it!" There are things i dont support, but the thing that makes me BETTER is i will NEVER limit someone's abilities or avoid scientific evidence just because i feel a certain way. We need to stop being little bitches saying how we feel and be mature adults and start talking about what we know and be open to change of mind only under correct evidence!

    • 1 year ago
  • utubemafia
    • utubemafia  
    • This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
  • shanklinmike
  • NiceN
    • 0
      NiceN  
    • The horrendous truth is that the government is being Nucky Thomson with marijuana. Giving up a tremendous cash flow with the "war" on drugs, and especially marijuana, is far to profitable to fail. Hopefully the prohibition partially ends with prop 19.

    • 1 year ago
  • Haley35
  • keithponder
  • ImConcerned
  • shanklinmike
    • +1
      shanklinmike  
    • ImConcerned:

      Why can't we get rid of the thieving middlemen who make it illegal in the first place, without being bribed with our own Freedoms to smoke a plant that grows out of the ground.

      What's up with you and a little coercion? It's still compulsion and immoral in the end...and leads to more and more corporatism....

    • 1 year ago
  • dreamsenvoy
  • UtopianSky
    • +2
      UtopianSky  
    • Damn.
      I was expecting a video of John Stossel & Montel Williams ON Marijuana.

      I bet Montel would be playing with John's mustache and giggling.

    • 1 year ago
  • shanklinmike
  • Proud_Progressive
  • shanklinmike
  • utubemafia
  • utubemafia
  • ayipis
    • -11
      ayipis  
    • one quick question for everybody who is advocating medical marijuana...........

      "HOW MANY OF YOU GUYS ARE ACTUALLY SICK TO NEED ANY MEDICATION LET ALONE MARIJUANA?????"

      the real thing behind these crusaders..they hiding behind this issue of medical marijuana for the sick just to satisfy thier fiendish need to smoke dope...thats the bottomline...

      they just want to sit and smoke dope...and you know who you are..LOL

    • 1 year ago
  • shanklinmike
    • +5
      shanklinmike  
    • ayipis:

      Not all are like that, and who cares if people want to smoke pot as long as they don't infringe on others?!?

      It's called Freedom.... let the idiots smoke. Better than them rotting away in a jail at my taxpayer expense.

      You statists are all the same in the end.... "If you don't obey my PREFERENCE in society, I WILL THROW YOU IN JAIL."

      You are the problem...

    • 1 year ago
  • billssqueeze
    • +6
      billssqueeze  
    • ayipis:

      bottomline; you are ignorant. just my personal oppinion. Youve got someballs questioning other peoples illnesses and needs. Its truly none of your damn buisness as to what happens between a Dr. and patient you nut.

    • 1 year ago
  • notsure
    • +2
      notsure  
    • ayipis:

      "fiendish need to smoke dope" Are you propagandist troll? Do you read what you post? Do you get your jollies by judging others? I don't know, But, I think you are hiding something. Me thinks thou are a closet burner. And you love Obama. It's cool brah. Everybody....Please fell free to criticizes my spelling and syntax. It is 4:26pm.

    • 1 year ago
  • mik661
  • mik661
  • mik661
    • 0
      mik661  
    • billssqueeze:

      OK I am very friendly to the whole legalize drug thing but I dont think that medicinal maryjane use is really a good basis for freaking out about doctor/patient relationships.

    • 1 year ago
  • mik661
  • dudefromtherock
  • Proud_Progressive
  • shanklinmike
  • shanklinmike
  • shanklinmike
  • ReverandG
    • 0
      ReverandG  
    • ayipis:

      I have to agree with you. Stoners like easy to get, cheap smoke. No not cheap quality, cheaper as in cost. An ounce of Humbolt used to run upwards of $1000.00 or $250 for a quarter ounce or 7 grams. Pricey, I can't blame them for trying to use the system. But the fact is the majority come up with seriously lame excuses to get prescriptions.

    • 1 year ago
  • dreamsenvoy
    • 0
      dreamsenvoy  
    • ayipis:

      Disapprove...It would be nice if you were to bring your consciousness into the second decade of the tweenty first century,instead of sounding like your unconscious cornball greatgrandpa.

    • 1 year ago
  • hunzedog
  • utubemafia
  • hombre76
    • +1
      hombre76  
    • couple things here.

      First notice how montell is giving a constant stream of verifiable Facts and the interveiwer is only offering oppinion with no facts that can be verified from scientific sources.

      Second WTF is wrong with using Canabis to get High? If your Ok with a beer after work then there is no fucking reason at all to be pissed if I want to use a substance that does not make me queezy from the High I get from it. I also come from a long line of Alcoholics so getting my high from something other than beer is a good thing.

    • 1 year ago
  • shanklinmike
    • +2
      shanklinmike  
    • hombre76:

      The interviewer is in agreement with Montel, just trying to play Devil's Advocate to help Montel combat all the silly arguments that are out there.

      John Stossel agrees with Montel, and in fact, takes it even farther than just Marijuana, believing that individuals should have the right to put what they want in their body as long as they don't infringe on others.

      We are for a free and peaceful society, not state violence, compulsion, and coercion (war on drugs would be included in that)..

    • 1 year ago
  • ayipis
    • -11
      ayipis  
    • hombre76:

      WTF (LOL)...why they hell do you need to get high??????????????

      weed and alcohol breeds idiots...life in this planet for weak minded is hard enough with all the distraction that we do not need to add one more..

      keep that shit illegal..

    • 1 year ago
  • shanklinmike
  • BCDel89
    • +5
      BCDel89  
    • ayipis:

      HA! this is funny, can't help but laugh, do people who break their legs not need crutches, do people with migranes not need ease by use of drugs like tylenol and advil, do people with fever not need medicine, do people who are extremely depressed not need anti-depressants? do people who are scared of death not NEED religion?? NONE of these things are absolutely necessary, but if you take them away from people life will be harder for all of us... so why take away these things, hell i could understand why youd want to take away tylenol because it kills people, but cannabis kills noone... so stop being a little bias bitch and allow people to have their stress relief, their medicines, their crutches, their religion, their whatever it is that they need to make their life that little bit better, and only get pissed off when it starts placing peoples lives in harms way... which it doesnt... and if you think it does well than your a moron plain and simple but i think most knew that already.

    • 1 year ago
  • mik661
    • 0
      mik661  
    • shanklinmike:

      so do you propose that we then supply everyone with all the drugs they want? Whether illegal or not junkies are going to do anything to get a fix. What is a libertarians response to people who are drunks or drug addicts out committing crimes or drunk driving?

    • 1 year ago
  • mik661
  • mik661
    • 0
      mik661  
    • BCDel89:

      Because people use it to escape from reality and resonsibility much like alcohol or hard drugs. In younger users it freezes them emotionally and retards their mental growth. I say this not as some crazy religious antidrug nut but as someone who has seen its use up close and personal for 40 years. I do think it shold be legalized but people dont seem to want to face what that will bring. Its like oh well maybe they will smoke pot rather than drink or smoke crack. Sometimes you need to take peoples crutches away.

    • 1 year ago
  • shanklinmike
    • +1
      shanklinmike  
    • mik661:

      "so do you propose that we then supply everyone with all the drugs they want?"
      ~No, why would you ever say that? That would require government violence through taxation and it would go against the wishes of the people who are having their money stolen that don't want to give people drugs. That is not Freedom.

      "What is a libertarians response to people who are drunks or drug addicts out committing crimes or drunk driving?"
      ~If they commit a crime they commit a crime, just like if they weren't on drugs. The drugs themselves are not a crime. Only when infringements of liberties occur would a crime be committed. In a free society, there are no victimless crimes.

      This also means that drunk driving would be banned on some roads (since all roads would be private, different competitors could have different rules), but drunk driving is not necessarily a crime, as no victim has been committed. Only if the drunk driver wrecked would there be a crime.
      In a free society, there is no such thing as a crime against "society", as only individuals can be infringed upon. The state steals the term society.

      "The great non sequitur committed by defenders of the State, including classical Aristotelian and Thomist philosophers, is to leap from the necessity of society to the necessity of the State." ~Murray Rothbard

    • 1 year ago
  • hombre76
  • mik661
    • 0
      mik661  
    • shanklinmike:

      So then I guess the answer is that you arent for supplying people who want drugs all they want therefore in your utopian world drug crimes and violence will continue.

    • 1 year ago
  • noxidereus
    • 0
      noxidereus  
    • mik661:

      "Whether illegal or not junkies are going to do anything to get a fix"

      We are talking about cannabis here mik, not fucking crack. Cannabis is not addictive. If people are willing to do anything to get it, then they can frigging grow it themselves. Nice try.

    • 1 year ago
  • noxidereus
    • 0
      noxidereus  
    • mik661:

      Again, this discussion is about cannabis. There are no addicts. It does not cause death. Pot smokers will get up and go to work and be productive members of society just like they are doing right now.

    • 1 year ago
  • noxidereus
    • 0
      noxidereus  
    • mik661:

      That is totally propaganda not backed up by facts. Carl Sagan smoked it and he was a great scientist. Some smoked it and became president of the united states. There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that it retards mental growth. That is total bullshit. Whoever you were looking at for 40 years must have been a moron to begin with. It's not like you're the only person who has seen or experienced long term marijuana use for themselves -- especially here.

      "Sometimes you need to take peoples crutches away"

      What have you to say about religion? Pain medication? Disney World? Spouses? Actual crutches? Making life easier through either aids when necessary, or through taking time to enjoy life is not something anyone with a heart would want to deny anybody else.

      "I do think it shold be legalized but people dont seem to want to face what that will bring"

      Really? Like what? You do know it is legal in some places like the Netherlands... Statistically America uses marijuana more than they do and there isn't chaos in those places. You are just fear-mongering.

      Do you even know why marijuana was made illegal in the first place? What will it bring? Freedom. Justice. An end to the government lies that made it illegal in the first place. I'm glad you think it should be legal, but your vision of what will happen is misguided.

    • 1 year ago
  • mik661
    • 0
      mik661  
    • noxidereus:

      They estimate that 75% of the drug cartels profits are from selling weed. Have you watched the new lately? They arent talking about letting people grown their they are talking about pot farms paying taxes and permit fees to the goverment. By the time the dope hits the street it will be as expensive as street dope. So the cartels drop their price and keep right on shipping. How long do you think before the cartels muscle in on the domestic weed production? about 0.1 seconds.

    • 1 year ago
  • mik661
    • 0
      mik661  
    • noxidereus:

      Yes. It was made illegal from the influence of the DuPont family to protect their timber interests. I also know that in the Netherlands they are moving to reduce the number of smoke shops allowed and the types of drugs they can serve. Its not that weed is any better or worse than many other drugs its that like all of them many people use them to escape reality or to avoid growing up. They are self medicating. Regardless of what you may think heavy lifelong usage does have physical affects including cancer and possible links to Alzheimer like symptoms.

    • 1 year ago
  • mik661
  • mik661
    • 0
      mik661  
    • noxidereus:

      And if you would pay attention my response did not include just the weed it was the libertarian thinking that all drugs should be legal and that humanity would use them in a responsible fashion.

    • 1 year ago
  • shanklinmike
  • shanklinmike
  • shanklinmike
  • toastyguy11
    • 0
      toastyguy11  
    • shanklinmike:

      I'm going to take this opportunity to agree with you, we should legalize marijuana! And other ones too, but I'll disagree with you by saying we should tax it, then use that money for something good

    • 1 year ago
  • shanklinmike
  • billssqueeze
  • mik661
  • shanklinmike
  • mik661
  • noxidereus
  • mik661
more from Community:

top videos