U.S. evangelical push for GM foods
source: http://www.gmwatch.org/latest-listing/1-news-items/12558-us-evangelical-push-for-gm-foods
-
-
- JanforGore
- added this
First broadcast 10:32am, 7 Oct 2010
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/gd/episode/p00b2rgn/One_Planet_The_father_of_GM_foo...
GMWatch comment: This programme, part of the BBC World Service’s One Planet series on the environment, interviews genetic engineer Dr Roger Beachy. Beachy's interview appears to be part of a new evangelical push on the part of the US government hyping GM crops as the solution to world hunger.
In the BBC interview, Beachy claims GM is being demonized but then proceeds to demonize organic production, as he has done before (even suggesting organic food may be dangerous to eat!) http://www.grist.org/article/usda-research-chief-concerned-about-safety-of-organ...
Beachy characterizes people who oppose GM crops as anti-science or just plain ignorant. He also uses straw man arguments, dismissing scientifically valid concerns about the uncontrollability of GM contamination with a story about a man who (according to Beachy) had an irrational concern about potatoes being contaminated by GM corn or cotton.
This strategy exactly fits with what Guy Cook, Professor in Language and Education at the Open University (OU) and author of Genetically Modified Language, a book which critically analyses the war of words waged by those arguing for GM crops, found in research investigating the type of language deployed by GM crop scientists. The 'public', Cook's data revealed, tend to be portrayed as as frequently emotional, rather than rational, and as uniformly ignorant. Cook notes that this "characterization of the public is often achieved through anecdotes of some farcical encounter with a particularly 'uninformed’ member of the public: a commonly voiced one concerns people who are worried that they may be 'eating genes'." Interestingly, research suggests that technical knowledge of GM does not necessarily lead to increased acceptance of GM crops.
http://bit.ly/djBb7i
Beachy also seems to suggest, by implication, that those concerned about GM foods may be candidates for psychiatry ("They choose, not based on science. Where have those attitudes come from?"). He also deliberately attempts to link those concerned about GM with people typically characterised as anti-technology or anti- modern medicine.
It is therefore amusing that another interviewee in this BBC programme is a genetic engineer working in the field of medical biotechnology (Dr Michael Antoniou) who does not share Beachy's confidence about the safety of GM when applied to agriculture.
The BBC calls Beachy "the father of GM foods" and mentions in passing one of Beachy's links to Monsanto: "Two decades ago, his research - in collaboration with Monsanto - helped develop the world's first genetically modified crop (a tomato)".
But the BBC does not mention that Beachy was the founding president of St. Louis' Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, which was principally established by Monsanto, or that he is still a trustee and a member of its scientific advisory board (along with the Monsanto-connected British GM promoter Jonathan Jones, and Monsanto's CEO Hugh Grant).
http://www.powerbase.info/index.php?title=Roger_Beachy
Beachy is now working for the US government. In September 2009, President Obama put Beachy in charge of a USDA agency, the National Institutes of Food and Agriculture, that will fund R & D in agricultural "technological innovations". So don't expect a lot of research dollars for badly needed agro-ecological approaches.
http://www.grist.org/article/usda-research-chief-concerned-about-safety-of-organ...
Beachy is also joined in the BBC programme by Jack Bobo, senior advisor for biotech in the US Dept of State, and Beachy's BBC appearance seems to coincide with a new GM push on the part of US government. On 7 October, the same day that the BBC broadcast Beachy's GM hype, the USDA put out a press release flagging up research claiming there were benefits from GM crops for neighbouring non-GM farmers as they have fewer corn borer pests. The release quoted US Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack plugging GM. (But see why the corn borer may not be such a problem on organic farms: here and here)
On 8 October, Jose Fernandez, the US assistant secretary of state for economic, energy and business affairs published an article in the Huffington Post claiming - surprise - that "Unjustified and impractical legal obstacles are stopping genetically-enhanced crops from saving millions from starvation and malnutrition".
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jose-w-fernandez/addressing-global-food-pr_b_75611...
So stand by for more evangelical efforts to win us all over to the U.S. GMO way.
-
- groups:
- Community, Green, Current Tonight, Earth and Science, 8 more
-
- tags:
- Environment, Climate Change, US Politics, Pollution, 27 more
-
-
artemis6
-
Great post , Jan . I had actually thought they realized they were in the wrong .... Silly me .
- 1 year ago
-
artemis6
-
-
queenofit
-
"Corporations, which control the levers of power in government and finance, promote and empower the psychologically maimed. Those who lack the capacity for empathy and who embrace the goals of the corporation—personal power and wealth—as the highest good succeed. Those who possess moral autonomy and individuality do not. And these corporate heads, isolated from the mass of Americans by insular corporate structures and vast personal fortunes, are no more attuned to the misery, rage and pain they cause than were the courtiers and perfumed fops who populated Versailles on the eve of the French Revolution. They play their games of high finance as if the rest of us do not exist. And it is a game that will kill us."
taken from - http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?noframes%3Bread=164516 (article written by Chris Hedges)
Our system is broken, money rules, "we have ceased to exist" and promises made that would have fixed[some of] this have been broken, and probably were never more than empty promises, just like the alcoholic or addict who wakes up the morning after and promises never to drink or drug again, and breaks his/her promise the next night. Maddening...
- 1 year ago
-
queenofit
-
-
CalgarC
-
organic or starve!!! plus who takes evangelicals seriously anyway...
- 1 year ago
-
CalgarC
-
-
mindcruzer
-
CalgarC:
I think there may be a little more to it than that.
- 1 year ago
-
mindcruzer
-
-
CalgarC
-
mindcruzer:
lol true :D
- 1 year ago
-
CalgarC
-
-
artemis6
-
CalgarC:
They are seriously dangerous , but yeah ....
- 1 year ago
-
artemis6
-
-
CalgarC
-
artemis6:
lol... i see no threat or danger just low iq's... i can't think or look at an evangelical and not laugh
- 1 year ago
-
CalgarC
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://discussions.latimes.com/20/lanews/la-sci-gmo-corn-20101008/10
And also be wary of PR coming out like this at the same time it is reported that their share price has plummeted 42% this year... that GM BT pesticide corn has actually helped farmers who have not planted it... of course, transgenic contamination is not mentioned, nor the number of farmers financially ruined by such contamination, nor the gestapo tactics used by Monsanto to sue farmers for this happening when it was not their fault because their seeds are patented. Just looking at the comments here also shows people are not falling for this obvious PR move, especially considering that the University of Minnesota was the lead on this "study" and Monsanto has bought universities via grants in order to skew results. They have also gagged scientists at universities who dared to do independent research claiming that their patent on seeds excludes such research. So we can surely question that any such "study" like this that suddenly makes them look good was more than likely bought by them.
edit:
Ok, brace yourself because I just googled Monsanto /University of Minnesota and there is defintitely a connection which puts the credibilty of this "study" into question just from one page. I know, what a shocker. Just a few;
http://eebweb.arizona.edu/Undergrads/careers/conner.html
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/erin-ahlers/12/83b/243
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/cindy-arnevik/3/982/2b9
http://highered.mcgraw-hill.com/sites/0073031216/student_view0/exercise2/science...
http://monsanto.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=543
The University of Minnesota which was the "lead" in this "study" is bought by biotech!
http://agronomy.cfans.umn.edu/Corn-based_Cropping_Systems_Research2.html
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
thetrimsmith
-
Humans pursuit of the Dollar, our epitaph.
- 1 year ago
-
thetrimsmith
-
-
ImConcerned [removed]
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
ImConcerned [removed]
-
-
JanforGore
-
ImConcerned:
I believe in this instance the word evangelical refers to a zealous campaign to convert people to their way of thinking on GMOS... and that basically has covered all parties regarding this.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://current.com/technology/92633215_gates-foundation-invests-in-monsanto-both...
Consequences now for Africa.
See the pattern?
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
-
Consequences for the World.
The World According To Monsanto. Their patented world where what you think or want is not considered in their quest to not lose "one dollar" of business.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
-
http://current.com/technology/89109074_gmo-rice-in-kansas.htm
Consequences in the U.S.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://current.com/technology/92685375_roundup-sprayed-on-gm-soy-causes-health-p...
Consequences in Argentina.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
-
http://current.com/shows/upstream/92365552_soy-destroying-the-forests-and-indige...
The environmental and health consequences of GM soy monoculture on Paraguay.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oju86YIOOLI
This is not just an issue of responsible science but of environmental democracy. These untested patented seeds are being spread globally with the collusion of governments and corporations with the intent of owning the food you eat without your consent and without caring about any longterm health or environmental effects they bring, and has been planned for years now. This is patently undemocratic and immoral. YOU have the right to save seeds, plant your seeds, and eat those foods YOU want to eat. Places such as Africa cannot survive on just substandard GM cornmeal aid bags while stealing their land to clear it to grow animal feed and biofuel thus exacerbating climate change, but this is the world being prepared by these companies with the willing cooperation of US agencies and the WTO. Being able to plant your own food and save your seeds is the ultimate freedom. And as Dr. Shiva stated in this video, any move to take that freedom away WILL be met with continued resisitance on the part of the peoples of this world.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://current.com/technology/92571604_gm-lobby-reduced-to-insults-and-mud-sling...
Typical ploy, Mr. Beachy. In lieu of real science, insult and mudsling.
BOYCOTT GMOS.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
