Rally To Free Ex-IRS Agent Who Admitted The IRS Is A Fraud & Refused To Add To The Ponzi Scheme

No, it's not.

Income and property taxes are theft by coercion. Sales and use taxes are much more fair and do not require the use of coercion.

Perpetual, creeping monetary inflation is also an unfair, hidden tax on our savings.

http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer?pagename=about_main

Very true, voted up!

Yes it is, there are millions of people that have fought the IRS and have found it is illegal to tax people. There is no law that says you are supposed to get taxed until you die.

Find me that law and i'll gladly say i was wrong, but you can't and won't.

Then how do you propose the government gets money?

Taxation is permitted under the Constitution. You can say it's your opinion, and that's fine, but it's not a fact.

Show me... i don't see it..

Amendment XVI: "The Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."

You found it... very nice! I'm wrong and you were right...

Good job in providing info. Thanks.

Great question, which brings us back to the fact that we would LOVE to end the monopoly on road grants and allow a much more efficient transportation network than currently is allowed under statism. It comes back to Murray Rothbard's argument over libertarians use of statist monopolies,...such as roads. It is not our fault that the road system has been monopolized to violent politics, so we should not think twice about our apparently forced usage on such items. It is not our fault that the road system is monopolized to coercive bureaucrats, but we can still fight to end this monopoly!

The roads are meant to be paid for by taxpayers. Those citizens that purchase gasoline, also pay taxes at the time of purchase intended to improve and maintain our roadways.

In a system without coercive taxation, roadways would likely be paid for on a per-mile basis anyway, as they currently are, by and far.

Then again, without governments preventing the usage and implementation of highly efficient forms of alternative transportation, people likely wouldn't take the roads that often anyway.

With income tax money?

Don't even argue with them. Just smile politely, avoid eye contact and back away slowly...

Sound bout right, LOL

The federal govt. needs to get out of states business. Infrastructure is not part of their critiria. We pay the federal govt. taxes...then they take their cut, and then send pennies back to the state for roads. States need to keep the money, cut out of the middleman, and prosper.

If our tax dollars were being used efficiently our roads would be in better condition. Remember the bridge that collapsed a few years ago? The more people that are unemployed the less tax reveues our gov't will receive.