In a remote town in Mali, climate change takes on a sinister reality
source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentsfree/2010/oct/31/climate-change-mali-africa-aid
-
-
- JanforGore
- added this
This is the central paradox of climate change politics, argued the sociologist, Anthony Giddens, that electorates can't grasp the significance of climate change because it is too abstract, and not dramatic enough (they need catastrophe footage), and won't – until it's too late. By the time we are experiencing massive floods, freak weather, sea-level rises and higher temperatures, we will be well past the point of doing anything about it. He christened it Giddens paradox.
Ten years on, the impact of climate change is frighteningly more concrete. In the remote town of Anakila in Mali, west Africa, I find what we were looking for in the Nile delta 10 years ago. Campaigners know the power of images to drive the message home, and that's why the aid agency Tearfund took me on a 1,000km journey from the capital, Bamako.
Three hours after we left the paved road, we arrived at low mud houses clustered under large mango trees. This is part of the Sahel, and the nine months of the dry season have always left a narrow ecological perch for the community and its subsistence agriculture. They are poor, yet the town is vibrant; the Dogon people are much admired in Mali for their resourcefulness and hard work. Circling the town are the small vegetable gardens on which they depend.
For years now, the elders explain, they have been worried by climate change. Disrupted rain patterns, shifts in winds have no parallel in collective memory; they notice how it is prompting changes in the behaviour of animals and birds. But all of these anxieties are dwarfed by the sand dune now looming above their town – the result of those drier, fierce winds and erratic, intense rainfall.
The dune stands several hundred feet high, spilling into the river and stemming its flow, slowly burying trees whose trunks are now deep in soft white sand. Plenty of fields have been swallowed by the sand already. The villagers' defences against further encroachment are hedges of euphorbia – they surround the rows of sorghum that stand pitifully in ground which is more sand than soil.
The dune glows golden in the sun, a dramatic and unfamiliar eruption in the landscape. This area was once forest, but gradual deforestation has thinned the tree cover and exposed the sandy soils. The dune is moving inexorably towards the outskirts of Anakila. It's a sinister sign of the vulnerability of the Sahel, the grasslands that border the Sahara in a swath across Africa, and where millions have farmed and herded cattle for centuries. The ecological niche in which they have built their lives has always been full of uncertainties – and often hardship – but now the niche on which they have built cultures of great sophistication and resilience is shrinking beneath them as desert threatens.
This is another paradox of climate-change politics: it is in remote places like this that climate change will hit first and hardest. It is cultures built on deep understanding of their environment – whether the Sami of the Arctic or the Dogon of the Sahara – whose way of life is the first to be threatened. Anakila's residents are the canaries down the mine, their experience a foretaste of an Earth hostile to human inhabitation. But their experience of threat, potential devastation and loss of livelihood is discounted and ignored. No dunes are threatening Manchester.
But Anakila's plight will come back to haunt us in two ways. The entire debate around Africa and aid will shift in coming years from one dominated by charity and post-imperial responsibility to one framed primarily around environmental justice. The continent is one of the most vulnerable, with many of its delicate ecosystems threatened, as Camilla Toulmin's charts in her book, Climate Change in Africa. It is also the least well equipped to respond – and the least responsible for the coming calamities.
Media attention on the climate change talks in Cancún at the end of this month will focus on the negotiations over emission cuts, but equally important is the financing of climate adaptation – at Copenhagen $100bn a year by 2020 was pledged. Detailed proposals are due to be published this week on new forms of climate financing to start bringing this into effect. But the danger is that funding for climate adaptation will be poached from aid budgets. Already the development secretary, Andrew Mitchell, has made it clear that the pledge for foreign aid of 0.7% of GDP inherited from Labour will be used to finance climate adaptation. Ensuring this money reaches communities as marginalised and as poor as Anakila is a huge challenge.
snip
As we left Anakila, we were given gifts – fresh milk and two hens. When might this generosity become a demand for environmental justice? When might such visits prompt anger and recriminations instead of smiles and greetings? Mali is a country of crushing poverty, and the predicted outcomes of climate change could spell catastrophe for much of the country. Back in Bamako, a government spokesperson wanted compensation put on the agenda in Cancún. It's only a matter of time before the demand for compensation becomes the rallying cry for a new generation of activists – not just in Africa, but across the globe.
-
- groups:
- Community, News and Politics, Green, Sustainable Agriculture, 6 more
-
- tags:
- Politics, Environment, Global Warming, Africa, 4 more
-
- recommended by:
- Vierotchka
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=51027
Monitoring a Changing Climate
NAIROBI, Apr 13, 2010 (IPS) - The gathering environmental crisis presented by global warming makes effective weather information and prediction a matter of urgency. As Africa's farmers come to grips with adapting to climate change, it may be that the best way to equip them is to involve them directly in collecting the data.
Evidence presented to the first conference of ministers responsible for meteorology in Africa, taking place in Nairobi, Kenya from Apr 12-16, shows that countries which have involved local communities in monitoring of climatic conditions have markedly better outcomes in terms of improved agricultural yields and public health.
African governments may need to localise meteorological services from the monitoring level, through data analysis, to dissemination, in order for weather and climate information to make sense to the people who need it most in agriculture and related sectors.
The need for the information is pressing.
"For years, African communities have used traditional methods of predicting climatic conditions. But in the wake of climate change, it is no longer easy for them to use natural indicators to determine the same," said Issa Djire, the director of the Upper Niger River Valley Programme (OHVN in French, Office de la Haute Vallée du Niger) based in Bamako, Mali.
Insuring against riskAccurate weather information is a key part of more than one climate change adapation strategy. The UAP Insurance company in Kenya is offering pastoralists and small-scale farmers insurance against losses incurred in times of drought or excess rain. Vital to the schemes functioning is accurate weather information. The Kenyan insurance scheme relies on solar-powered meteorological equipment powered by solar energy, and is monitored in collaboration with local farmers.
So far, 5,000 farmers from Western Kenya have been enrolled in the insurance plan in a project that is expected to be replicated in other parts of the country.
Herders in the Marsabit Districtof northern Kenya have signed up to a different scheme serving pastoralists.
The past 40 years have seen both increased flooding and desertification in Mali. The country's national action programme for adaptation expects average temperatures to rise between 1 and 3.5 degrees by 2060. With nearly three quarters of the population living in rural areas, sustainable land management is a primary challenge. According to the UNDP, effects of global warming have already contributed to mass migration to urban centres.Earlier in April, the Red Cross said it was nearly tripling food aid to Niger and Mali, citing government estimates that more than 250,000 people in northern Mali are facing food shortages due to drought. The situation in neighbouring Niger is worse, with half of the population of 16 million affected by food insecurity.
Twelve years ago, Mali adopted a new system in which rain monitoring is carried out entirely at the local level. Thousands of rain gauges are located in villages, and community members are involved in collection and analysis of rain patterns.
The information is then passed on at community meetings and through community radio stations broadcasting in local languages.
"Packaging of the information is extremely important. The farmers will use it accurately only if they understand it fully," Djire told IPS at the conference.
"Local monitoring of rainfall patterns has boosted preparedness among farmers, and through agricultural extension officers, they have been able to determine exactly the type of seed they should plant, when to plant them, and the insecticides they need to buy in advance," said Djire.
Improving resilience
Meteorologists at the conference want other African governments to emulate Mali’s strategy as a method of improving resilience to the impact of climate change.
"Collecting meteorological data is extremely expensive. Yet it is pointless if the data does not benefit the end user, who in most cases is a peasant farmer in a remote village," said Alhassane Adama Diallo, the director general of the African Centre of Meteorology Applications for Development (ACMAD).
cont.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
IceKat
-
JanforGore:
Great, get local people involved in monitoring the climate. I'm all for that.
The climate has always changed and the more people get involved in monitoring and adapting to natural changes the better. - 1 year ago
-
IceKat
-
-
IceKat
-
Here we go again. The ultra-left Guardian has produced another tear-jerker - because you charged your Nokia, Mali roasts!!!
I like this comment, "Global warming is REAL, HAPPENING NOW and being exacerbated by HUMAN ACTIVITY." Yawn, ok, but where's the proof? Using capital letters makes it more believable, obviously. But let's imagine (and I know you need a good imagination for this) that global warming is real. Yes, the world warmed by about half a degree during the latter end of the 20th century, but this was natural, no-one's disputing that. The implication now is that global warming is roasting Mali, as JanforGore tells us it "is REAL, HAPPENING NOW". Gulp, nearly got scared there for a mo!
Then we find this line in the scare-article, "it is in remote places like this that climate change will hit first and hardest." Hello? But but... according to the scientific expert JanforGore climate change is happening NOW. Although, maybe she has decided to make climate change and global warming two separate entities?
Then she writes, "The people of Mali and people all over this world live the reality of climate change daily" Yes, but is it really all negative? Absolutely not, but that doesn't make a good story, does it?And this Guardian article is just that, a scare-story and nothing more. Read carefully and you find absolutely no substance or fact, just a few well placed lines with which to construct your own conclusion - that Mali is on the brink of disaster and it's your fault.
In the first paragraph the author states, "He [an engineer] explained how everything we could see around us would be under water if sea levels rose as they are predicted to do"
Altogether now - how bad, oh no... but then think about it for a moment. "would be underwater"? Notice it's a prediction! A prediction that the nearby city of Alexandria is at severe risk from climate change. This was written during the author's time in the Nile delta ten years ago.
He now moves the story ten years forward and we find ourselves in the present. Seems Alexandria didn't succumb to the impending doom the author predicted so he had to move to Mali to hunt out something more dramatic with which to invent his story.
Read on and you're left with the impression that the sand dunes are about to swamp Mali. And here's the key, "This area was once forest, but gradual deforestation has thinned the tree cover and exposed the sandy soils." So are we talking climate change or deforestation now? You're left to make up your own assumptions because the author doesn't elaborate. So I found another article which states, "In the mostly desert nation of Mali, environmentalists and government officials are concerned about the increasing amount of wood used, largely for cooking." So there you go, they're cutting the trees down and burning them! That is what is causing the encroaching dunes, not global warming!The rest of the article falls into some sort of political rant and emotive babbling, "But their experience of threat, potential devastation and loss of livelihood is discounted and ignored. No dunes are threatening Manchester." and notice the wording, "potential", because you're always left thinking this is impending.
Why didn't the author go back to the Nile delta or to Alexandria? Simple, because he wouldn't have found the scare story he was looking for, he had to hunt that out and exaggerate, and leave a lot to your imagination in order to produce a story like this.
________________________________________Update: Hot off the press. October's satellite temperatures have been released. The temperature anomaly now stands at +0.42C, and that's down 0.2C from last month. Hardly the image of global warming! CO2 continues to rise, showing absolutely no correlation with temperatures.
- 1 year ago
-
IceKat
-
-
JanforGore
-
IceKat:
Here we go again... OIL SHILL PROPAGANDA and outright BULL following me around like a puppy dog. There is reality in this story from the woman who saw it. And we don't need you to give us a narrative to tell us what or how to read it. But again it appears you prove you have no tolerance or caring for people in this world who are poorer or browner than you. You are a sad individual.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
IceKat
-
JanforGore:
No, 'this woman' didn't see it. If you read it carefully she visited the Nile delta ten years ago but then had to go looking elsewhere (Mali) in order to get the story she needed, and even then she had to fabricate it and make people think something that isn't actually there. You're left thinking Mali is facing doom due to climate change, when if you read it carefully there is absolutely no evidence other than her word. Fact is the locals have burned their own trees, that is what is causing the desertification, not global warming.
- 1 year ago
-
IceKat
-
-
JanforGore
-
IceKat:
"Ten years on, the impact of climate change is frighteningly more concrete. In the remote town of Anakila in Mali, west Africa, I find what we were looking for in the Nile delta 10 years ago. Campaigners know the power of images to drive the message home, and that's why the aid agency Tearfund took me on a 1,000km journey from the capital, Bamako."
Please don't waste anymore of my time here. - 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
IceKat
-
JanforGore:
"Ten years on, the impact of climate change is frighteningly more concrete." only because she discovered a scare story in Mali, as opposed to the Nile delta. The scare story being the encroaching desert. Do a little research and we find the encroaching desert is caused by the locals burning the trees.
"Campaigners know the power of images to drive the message home, and that's why the aid agency Tearfund took me on a 1,000km journey from the capital, Bamako." She was taken to somewhere (by a charity that relies on people giving it money) where she would get the scary images that would fool people like you into thinking climate change had ruined the village and therefore give the charity money.
Real life - the locals chopped down the trees to cook with causing the desert to encroach upon the village!Explain to me exactly how global warming (+0.4C in 30 years) caused the desert to encroach upon the village.
- 1 year ago
-
IceKat
-
-
IceKat
-
tverdell:
The +0.42C figure comes from RSS MSU data.
- 1 year ago
-
IceKat
-
-
IceKat
-
IceKat:
This is hilarious! I present a fact in answer to a question, add no further commentary, and I get voted down? That says a lot about some people here :)
- 1 year ago
-
IceKat
-
-
IceKat
-
tverdell:
RSS Satellite temperatures are global.
- 1 year ago
-
IceKat
-
-
IceKat
-
tverdell:
Oh it's really ok, I find the voting system here a source of amusement rather than a personal attack.
- 1 year ago
-
IceKat
-
-
Proud_Progressive
-
Tragic.
- 1 year ago
-
Proud_Progressive
-
-
fhffcbf [removed]
- This comment has been hidden for review.
-
fhffcbf [removed]
-
-
uujj2 [removed]
- This comment has been hidden for review.
-
uujj2 [removed]
-
-
JanforGore
-
uujj2:
Thanks for pushing this post up!
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
And do these spammers know that with every piece of spam they only bring the post up in the ranks? ... ;-)
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMRy7lU0hWk
Mali is working to reverse desertification and adapt to climate change and they are poor! If they can do it why can't we?! These are initiatives globally in areas feeling effects of global warming that we need to use our resources to support. This is much more important than using our resources for war. Unfortunately, in this video I saw a waste of irrigation water... this is one area regarding agriculture in developing countries that needs much more support in the way of providing drip irrigation systems to conserve limited water resources. Climate change/global warming is attacking our food and water globally and our ability to feed the world will be greatly diminished the longer we rely on wasteful practices and fossil fuel agriculture in a time of peak oil. It was good to see in this video that farmers are breeding climate resistant crops naturally, which will help to preserve biodiversity.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
H2O_4U
-
That's libertarianism for ya, they destroy villages and don't give a damn.
- 1 year ago
-
H2O_4U
-
-
JanforGore
-
This is one VERY IMPORTANT reason why Republicans and all others who peddle lies regarding this crisis must be voted out of office. They are deliberately lying to people regarding the urgency of global warming in order to suit their own campaign contributors at the expense of our planet's sustianability and our health. Global warming is REAL, HAPPENING NOW and being exacerbated by HUMAN ACTIVITY. This is settled science going back to the seventies, and these bastards in government have done nothing all of these years but obfuscate and block any measure meant to deal with it even knowing the consequences of not doing so all for their precious ideology!
Now, I also know there are Democrats who have stalled on this as well and those who have appeased Republicans, but there are more Democrats seeing this reality than Republicans and at least they have made an effort to do something about it and I can concede that. And while it was not what we needed on the whole, it was a start. Should Republicans take over with the help of their planted tea party skeptic pals however, we will see NO movement regarding this crisis as it continues to affect people globally including the USA and that WILL be detrimental to our national security, our health, and our economy.
We as a people can no longer afford to allow these obstructionists to deny our children the sustainable future they deserve. The people of Mali and people all over this world live the reality of climate change daily, but we do not hear of it over the din of our distractionary political and media noise. It is now time for us to make some noise for climate justice which will be positive for our economy, our health, and the health of our world, and to see our responsibility regarding the plight of others brought on by our rapacious way of life. That is humanity. That is our moral imperative.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
