Muslims Bite the Hand That Feeds Them! Anti-sharia measure faces legal challenge.

i think you may be on to something there!

thanks supergay youre brilliant, i'm gonna go masterbate now

i can sometimes be quite surprising, especially when folks take a good honest look at themselves once in a while.

carefull, the big guy you pray to doesnt like that.
sends ya to hell for it

dont believe in hell. but with karma like mine i'm already in nirvana, sorry curt.

well someone reached thier limit.
was it the blind muslim bashing, or the general 3rd grade perspective?

you, more than anyone better hope karma is all just theory

if my karma could be any better than it is while in this earthly form i'd already be sittin at the side of adonai. peace

not exactly, more like moron baiting. and you fell for it. muahaha!

ask your friendly local imam about your last mentioned concern

sharia will ** NEVER ** happen here in the US. period. freedom of religion does not allow for the breaking of civil law.

I would that I may have that much confidence, with the examples of the will and intellect of our "leaders", unfortunately I have not the same degree of confidence after witnessing various aspects of bureaucratic lawlessness from these past few decades.

What I'm really worried about is a watered down version where the extreme acts of Sharia Law aren't committed but maybe the less severe ones like the way they treat women.

cuz they are totaly different.

they cant figure out how just yet, but its just different.

when they grow the fuck up and leave the world alone. its difficult to not hold some disdain when most of the worlds conflicts are due to muslims who either cant get along with their neighbors or their host countries.

says the jew bashing, racist.
i dunno when are you going to get over jews, and blacks and grow up.you are on the inside, please enlighten us to the time table, cuz we have been waiting.

good luck with that, you bragging or is it some form of self guilt appeasement? if you dont beat or stone her she'll have a better life than she may have had. righteous dude!

since it is only occasional then she is certainly better off with you. peace

you are a funny mother fucker

no doubt, the muslims that profess and live by sharia laws need to advance and evolve like the rest of the free and civilized world

only if theyre muslim okies

Read the article you posted. As I was saying, the article along with other articles reporting the same story do not make it clear what the amendment means when it says that courts cannot "consider" other types of law. This could mean that the courts will be forced to ignore evidence and or mitigating circumstances in certain court cases. In other words, this amendment is most likely in violation of the U.S. Constitution.

Thats Ok My foil hat will save me.

excellent sa dcrog. a+ a+ a+ a+ a+ just like in little ralphies dream in christmas story

niether do cannibals, but we arent slaughtering them.
the point is we can deffend, with out offending.

i have three jobs actually, so whats your point, reality too much for you?

You really should get a fourth. I'm fixing to hit the Goverment up for a raise.

well ive been thinking of getting rid of the three jobs i have and live on government subsidies for a while. i deserve it!

Well Ok but you know that will put me in the poor house Oh wait I'm already there. AAh hell go for it you can take that trip you've been wanting to take. Besides you look over worked. You could really use the time off. hey I know You could come down here To Texas and do some fishing or duck hunting. It's duck season ya know.

any gov subsidy to pay for my vacation? otherwise no deal.

Does unemployment count as gov subsidy ??

sorta, but its earned and not as easily abused as some. does it pay well enough to take a vaca?

well if you don't have any bills and if you fly jet blu and if you don't leave the house it might.

how can i fly jet blue if i cant leave the house? are we talkin LSD?

Could be Have you ever taken a trip an not left the couch?

yeah, but it involved a girl. does that count?

did she give you frequent flyer miles?

good one! it was a wild weekend.

details man details better yet video we need video to be sure it was wild

sorry, i didnt have the cameras rolling. needles to say it was an excellent weekend

Oh well I don't watch porn any how. But so long as you had fun thats all that matters. :)

whatever freecrack. whether you agree with me or my headlines and stories doesnt matter at least i stir some healthy dialog beyond curt cobain fanaticism.

um, i think you may want to revisit what "healthy dialog" is, cuz i wouldnt catagorize it as such

hmmm i would think even you would disagree with fascists trying to tell us how to run our laws and country. we have enough of those on the left doing that.

the thing is, its trumped up bullshit.just like bill maher, i dont want islam legeslating us.but being as it is not even close to reality, even with the most liberal imagination, its not worth discussing.

and for future reference when the aliens come to enslave us, im against that too.just cutting you off at the pass on that one.the question is wich one is most likely to happen first.i bet aliens

There is a difference between Dick Cavett and Jerry Springer.

Fascists? I thought Liberals were Commies?

Why are idiots so paranoid about Islamic Law taking over. HELLO! - Do we have any Islamic members in the House or Congress? -The people who WRITE our laws?
-No?....then STFU.

-Idiots.!!!

Liberals are whatever the Right hates, and the Right says we are.
I'm actually beginning to think that "liberals" are anyone who disagrees with those on the Right.
If only they were smart enough to learn the differences between fascism, communism, and socialism. Oh and they hate the well educated....Whoops, I mean "elites".
You know, the type of person who has a rich daddy running an oil company, or working for the government, gets sent to some fancy school like Yale, and then get in the same business his father was in. -Oh Shit. Wait a minute. That was George W.
I guess that makes him an Elite, then huh?

what? i'll be leading the alien attack!

hmmmm...ones washed up and the other should be?

all of the above

flavor of the week

honestly, i think its fox.
im not speaking partisanly, its just that fox creates its own alternate world.kind of like the "wwe universe".different rules,and standards,
in wwe world when your have a crush on a chick, the protocal is to fight thier present partner in a winner gets the girl match, and on fox if we good ol' mericans are the good guys, they are the bad guys.
kane shows you he is the bad guy, by chokeslaming a prone woman through a flaming tabel.on fox islam is the enemy cuz they like blowing up babies.

the thing is though, wrestling fans no when the show is over, it is back to reality,
fox calls its entertainment "news" and in its narrative tells its viewers not to believe anything else.

trekkies dress up and go to conventions, and fox viewers get thier guns and hate on islam.well that is until a new boogey man comes about.i mean no heel keeps his heat for ever.sure mcmahon got two wrestlemanias off of andre the giant, but to keep up interest it had to switch to savage, or the ultimate warrior.hogan/america vs andre/islam cant sell forever.

i see mexicans being the transitional champ, until a new bad guy can be formulated.i mean before 9-11 who was thier whipping boy? illegal aliens who were going to outbreed us and take over.

and here i was, just getting used to being a socialist.

what if the aliens have like three vaginas?

would it be cheating to alternate?

nor can we tolerate jewish law, or christian law, but hey picking on sharia isnt racist.singling them out, despite muslims making up less than one percent of that state, and no attempt at instituting sharia law, legeslating against it is reasonable.

can we spend our tax payer dollars on creating anti-martian legislation while we are at it too.i mean its clear in our constitution that that martian law is not to supercede our national law, but lets just waste time on it anyway.

it isnt like it would stoke the flames of hatred, or fear monger, oh..........ooops.............it does.

That is ridiculous... and you well know it... just as you well know that Muslims are continually usurping law of host nations to favor Sharia law... it is the way of Islam to maintain control of the mind and will of Muslims (it is nothing less than the means of policing their own through fear and intimidation)... without Sharia, Islam is just another archaic religious dogma that would be trampled over and kicked aside on the road to progress.

i dont think you and i are in disagreement as to what constitutes a "ridiculous" statement. so here are some stats for your consumption.
http://www.islam101.com/history/population2_usa.html

with the millions of muslims that reside in the united states presently, and the hundreds of thousands who have historicaly, wouldnt it be rediculous to state that "muslims are continually usurping law" when literaly not one case of that exists.
you are making a factual statement about islam that is the exact opposite of reality.

in the entire history of the united states, of the millions of muslims who make up part of our society, 1 case ever had sharia usurp our law.and it was a temperary ruling that was appealed, and overturned.that is like a 0.000000000002% instance.and if you want to actualy be true to statistics it is 0%, as the ruling was temperary, making sharia never actualy instuted, or accepted.

btw the way of RELIGION is to control the mind and will of its followers.not just islam, but all religions.unless you suppose european law, coincidentaly was identical to church mandate? unless israel/judea's laws were coincidentaly one in the same with judaism.all religion is law.torah means law.

you may be ok compartmentalizing "islam" as those crazy fundamentalists in the middle east.but when you refer to thier madness, by describing it as all of islam, you brand the millions of good innocent people erroniously.i dont see any link other than faith, between ice cube, or kareem abdul jabar and the lunatics who blow themselves up.

just cuz christians in uganda are head hunting fags, doesnt mean every christian is on the anti-gay warpath
just cuz idf soldiers kill palestinians, doesnt mean jews hate arabs
and just cuz tribes of fundamentalist throwbacks usurp regional powers, doesnt make islam that.

thats right, this is america. live by our laws and dont try and change them. if you dont like our laws move back to the shit hole you came from.

this is america. live by our laws and dont try and change them. if you dont like our laws move back to the shit hole you came from.

one more chip in americas autonomy

oh sad sad congo.reverting back to the ol cut and paste bit.
well that is actualy what is happening.the ones who dont want to live in thier shit hole come here.shit even the terrorists who are tired of living in thier shit holes give up the jihad, to live in california.not imposing sharia, as hey like our freedom.

You are such a chronic contrarian that you can't help yourself, can you?
Am I threatened for dismemberment/death for the "crime" of apostasy if I "fall" away from Christianity and embrace another?... not in my world... but it sure as blazes happens to many who live within Islam.
... but go ahead and wear your apologist attire, it fits you well.

It's funny to me that you right wing guys are so rah! rah! rah! America and it can do no wrong and yet constantly illustrate how weak you think the U.S. is by your almost psychopathic panic of the idea of MUSLIMS taking over the country. If it's not the "Victory Mosque" ON Ground Zero, IN Ground Zero, whatever, it's the Sharia Law that's going to stone people or cut their hands off.

Why do you believe that this is a credible threat? Why do you think America so weak that this is even a remote possibility? It seems distinctly un-American to assume that the United States would so easily fall into the hands of "undesirables", don't you think?

It sounds like some pretty severe xenophobia to me. Get a grip and do some critical thinking and stop posting these embarrassing stories with their imaginative headlines to try and push your conservative xenophobic agenda. Not everyone in the country is afraid of things and people that they don't understand. You're in a minority.

"The Few. The Loud. The Wrong."

Weird. Aren't Republicans trying to change our healthcare and social security.
-Maybe someone should tell them to stay the hell away from OUR laws. ...and to Stop changing them. Maybe someone should take their head out of whatever hole they have it in, thinking it's America, when we're up here on the surface.

Also...it's not yours. Thinking America is Yours = entitlement. I thought the right was against Entitlement. -right?

like it or not they are our laws to change either left or right leaning. no foreign body or immigrant legal or otherwise has any business telling us how to run our country, make or enforce our laws

and they are welcome in my book if they want to accept, adapt, and abide by american law. although frankly speaking moving to california is trading one shit hole for another

are you threatened for dismemberment/death for the crime of apostasy if you fall away from christianity and embrace another?
in some circles no.in fundamentalist circles yes.(assuming that is a christian deal, as i wouldnt know)
how did the puritans deal with people suspected of conspiring with the devil? a tongue lashing, i think not.
how did the inqusition treat those who fell away from christianity?

according to your understanding, islam with its honor killings couldnt possibly tolerate pornography.yet turkey, a clearly muslim state has a thriving sex industry that rivals eastern europe.no death's.no punishment what so ever.while muslim fundamentalist kill fellow muslims for wearing western dress, you still see them as all the same.if so, then how ever would one be wearing western dress, if they all hate us so?

a fundamentalist is a fundamentalist wether in the name of yaweh,jesus,or mohmed.islam isnt the flaw as a religion, as death sentences for slight offenses arent unique to them.as we speak ugandan christians have compiled, and distributed a list of a hundred people deemed guilty of homosexuality, and therefore worthy of death.not in the name of uganda, or islam, but in the name of jesus.in the name of jesus, they call for them to be hanged.

do you imagine that jesus had no part in creating the basis upon wich those who killed matthew sheppard felt it was acceptable? were those two kids not tought that christianity must strike down such perversions? is christianity not as inspirational (for better or worse) than islam?
holocaust museum shooter kills people, cuz the jews are evil is an isolated incident, and christianity is incidental.but the fort hood shooter represents all of islam?

i make no apologies for terrorists, as they are beneath being considered human beings, as humanity doesnt do what they do.but that fundamentalism isnt exclusive to islam.

i choose to not judge muhamed ali, based on the actions of mohamed atta.i dont judge busta rymes based on the action of bin-laden.it is just that simple.no apologies.just the truest, fairest,equality i know.

.... and Neville Chamberlain rationalized Nazi Germany, refused to acknowledge its danger and offered appeasement... just like progressives do this very day about Islam... and what was the result then?

germany=country
islam=religion
its just that simple.
islam as a religion has no inherant political agenda, as a country would
islam as a religion has no inherant military force, wich nations do
not even apples and oranges.
one could equaly say the same arguement applies to a multitude of things, like inter-racial marraige, or civil rights.
just by the virtue of being a progressive mind, doesnt make it a liberal flaw.

Bullshit... every 'good' Muslim is a soldier for Islam, just ask... they'll tell you so.

it pains me to even dignify the notion, and i hope to god you are just doing this to see if my head explodes, but if every good muslim is a soldier for god, why did mohamed ali not serve in vietham wehn called.why didnt he serve in killing those athiest infidel bastards in nam?

I'm talking about the beat of a different drummer.
It is evident we are not on the page here, but it seems that I recall that it is in the Qur'an that every devout Muslim male was considered to be in will and command, a soldier of and for Allah... am I wrong?

It is not what is commanded, but what is adhered too that defines the mind of the faithful... and unfortunately for infidels, there are still far to many 'faithful' whack jobs in the Muslim community all to willing to kill for Allah.

we (you and i) are teetering on the point of all of this.yippie
if it isnt a matter of what is commanded, but what is adhered too that defines the mind of the faithfull, then islam is not one thing as many sects exist with different adherences.
so all of islam cannot be a threat accoriding to this, only those who adhere to a certain understanding, wich is subjective.meaning in its most literal/extreme sense, only terrorists have shown themselves to adhere to the interpritation that we deem that of our enemy.the other 99% havent adhered to this version of islam.

plus in that statement comes the civil rights question, can you rightfully find some one guilty of a crime that only exists in thier mind? i mean i hate neo-cons, and for all the world knows i may believe that in the name of god i should kill them.but until i do it, i am not wrong right?
i get that finding the holocaust museum shooter guilty before he attacked, would have been a good thing.but we just dont do that.we dont punish people, before they are guilty of something, other than thinking the wrong thing, as it didnt work out so well for the puritans who tried it out.

terrorists are evil,yes.arab nationalists and dictators are evil.but the number of individual muslim's who follow the same broader religious belief's who are pacive, greatly exceeds those who are terrorists.islam is not the enemy.
a section of people who happen to be muslim find reason to kill us.as grouping of people who happen to be arab, preach against us.only 20 percent of islam is based in the middle east.of that 20 percent, less than one percent find cause for violence, no less against us.
if in a blind test you were asked, how you would catagorize a religion with less than one percent violence rate resulting from belief in? you would respond quite favorably no? it would sound like a dream, right.

call terrorist's evil, or jihadi's the enemy, but not islam.it just isnt a reasonable means by wich to define our enemy.saying islam is a threat cuz terrorists are overwhelmingly muslim, is like corrolating terrorism with hair, or eye color."the war on brunette".
every culture, like us or hate us, will have a religion.if the middle east were all scientologists, im sure tom cruise would be an imam calling for our destruction.being as no religion has our four hundred year old country as its basis,the religious distinction or catagorization of who our enemy is absurd.

as citizens of the united states of america, our enemy cannot be a religion, as no religion teaches about us, one way or the other.as individuals, our humanity supercedes any book or word.with or without religion, we arent compelled to kill one another, and the majority dont care to.instinctualy, wether told about jihad or not.some are warriors, but most are not.if those who will not kill, are always subject to those who do, is a natural law, and we have made it this far, our nature must be not to kill.otherwise we either would have gone extinct, or at least without any freedoms at all.
as human beings, the worlds growing population shows our collective nature, and islam not at the gates shows, islam isnt motivated that way.otherwise we would be subject to 1.7 billion terror attacks.

the hassidim dont have thier own laws? well they do, but they dont supercede our collective laws.
they would love to marry of thier kids at 14, but they cant.