Beck's bizarre, dangerous hit at Soros - CNN.com

Its about as much a theory as the world being taken over by Microsoft or apple or montsanto. What I noticed is now that it is impolitic to to accuse the jews of taking over the world the Rothschild's suddenly became "false" jews who "became" jewish in order to take over a power base. blah blah blah.

I don't know how relevant that they are Jews, or that they are "false Jews" or any of that, all I'm saying is that the fact that they are rich and seem to be in control of a vast amount of wealth is no conspiracy "theory."

And so is bill gates. Or the Koch Brothers. Or the Queen of England. Or the Saudi Royal family. Many people have lots of money and throw it around to influence what they wish but even i dont think that bill gates or the kochs are literally out to rule the world.

You can easily find all of those names you mentioned on the richest people's lists year after year, Rothschilds don't even make the list. That's how wealthy they are.

By the way I didn't necessarily say that the Rothschild's "rule the world," I just pointed out that their wealth and influence wasn't a conspiracy "theory." It's simply a matter of fact, however this article does the old "if you talk about it you're dangerous and crazy" routine.

I never said that they werent ultra wealthy and powerful I pointed out that that he was repeatng a bunch of anti semitic conspiracy theories of the zionist plan to take over the world as being implemented by George Soros for the Rothschilds.

Mik661 why do you think that it is that Americans aren't taught the history of the Rothschilds, one of the original most wealthy dynasties, in middle school, high school or even college?

dude there is a lot of history that they dont teach in school. Actually I did learn about the rothschilds in school and their roles as bankers. I just dont believe that George Soros is a tool of the Rothschilds in a zionist plot to control the world.

Mik661, is it a coincidence that Americans are led to believe that Bill Gates, Warren Buffet or some Mexican billionaire are the richest men on the planet when families like the Rothschilds have been billionaires since at least the 1800's?

Did you know that in the late 19th century there were more millionaires in Calumet, Michigan than in the rest of the country? Did you know that Huguette Clark's father was the second richest man after the Rockefeller Family and whose adjusted worth was nearly 1.4 billion? did you know that Queen Elizabeth is a Billionaire? Whats your point that since a family has been rich since the 19th century they are somehow special?

No, I was not aware of that.

I just thought I'd point it out because whenever someone mentions the Rothschilds as being an ultra-rich dynasty, some people start screeching about anti-semitism, and I've come to know that whenever people start screeching anti-semitism it's usually that they are trying to tell you to either shut up about something or to tell you not to look into something to closely.

That's just been my experience though, your milage may vary.

Im not saying that you dont have valid points. they are rich, powerful and influential. I just dont think they are any more out to rule the world than say the Koch Brothers, the Scaifes or any other rich family. Its really all abouth the bens.

what makes it conspiracy theory garbage is the attempt at making one family indicitive of millions of others, as the rule rather than the reality that they were the exception.

not sarcastic, just straight up, have you ever heard of "the protocols of the elders of zion"?

becuase comparitively they are a foot note at best.
the same reason we arent taught about the palestinian grand mufti's relationship with hitler.it happened, but isnt important in the grand scope of history, especialy as european history is a slapdash segmented effort on our part as is.

not to mention that the "zionist plot to take over the world", is a complete nazi fabrication based on the protocals libel.
it will never go away, and also never be true.

not a coincidence, just reasonable being as the rothchilds really just dont matter that much.

or they could simply be telling you, you are barking up a pointless hate based tree.
hell read mien kampf if it tickles you.calling hitler antisemitc isnt telling you to not acknowledge him, or an attempt at getting you to shut up.its a heads up so you know the context of the information.

Its disingenuous not to acknowledge that Becks attack on Soro's is rooted in the same slurs that have existed for hundreds if not thousands of years. This is real Knights of Templar stuff.

wait till he spins it away from the old libel (remember fox loves zionism) and swerves it to the enemy, islam.
then i bet youll see the danger

aparently despite the holocaust, we are ok with it.no outrage.

I've read it several times. Have you?

You obviously have, because you can obviously see that Beck's talking points about media control (Hollywood), banking control (the Federal Reserve, World Bank) subversion of government (AIPAC, ADL), electing corrupt politicians with skeletons in their closets (Clinton, Obama, Wilson) ect, is lifted straight from the Protocols.

No I still wouldn't see it as dangerous, unless Glenn Beck was advocating sending American troops off to die in Iran as he has done in the past.

He's kind-of backed off that rhetoric now, since all of the pro-war Jewish lobbies who lied us into war with Iraq are having a hard time getting Americans to buy their Iran lies.

The fact that Muslims would be trying to take over the world is so absolutely ludicrous that no one with the slightest grasp of history and modern politics would even begin to believe it. And if anyone would believe it, all you would have to do would be just to print a few articles dispelling those myths with facts.

As I've always said, it's not the Muslims who are in control of the Federal Reserve, Hollywood, all of the top pro-war lobbies like AIPAC, ADL, JINSA, the US Supreme Court ect. Our politicians don't have the flags of Arab nations hanging in their offices or on little pins attached to their lapels. If there is control of the US coming from anywhere, it's all right there as plain as day for you to see.

Ah yes, here we go. Screeching about the holocaust, anti-semitism, endless persecution Hitler, Mein Kamf, Nazi Nazi Nazi ect...So typical.

right.
now do you believe the protocals are representative of zionism, or an antisemitic smear of zionism?

can ya provide links of some sort to these "jewish pro war" lobbies, cuz im not aware of them.

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, NO ONE IS TRYING TO GET US TO GO TO WAR WITH IRAN.

the fact that jews would be trying to take over the world is so absolutely ludicrous that no one with the slightest grasp of anything wouldnt believe it, yet here you are trying it on for size.do you really think that same thing cant be spun, and done to islam?

you are retarded.
just as many british and french flags adorn those same offices.take off your star of david glass's and it becomes a little clearer.
israel=ally
arab nations=enemy.

if tomorrow the arab world kissed our ass, and israel told us to fuck off, regardless of lobbying groups the flag of israel would be replaced with some nice green/black/red flags.not really tricky stuff.

ah yes, here we go yet again.playing the role of the antisemite whilst pretending to not be.

the mention of the holocaust is present on this thread, as it was the end result of the malevolent subject matter under discussion.unlike your need to interject judaism into every irrelevent nook and cranny.wasnt crying whoa is the jew, and in fact wasnt even saying we are being persecuted presently.the fact that the jews were targeted in the holocaust is an element you introduced, not me.i was just pointing out that despite knowing where this rhetoric leads, we still arent bothered by it.
as a jew im not worried, i got israel.its the rest of us who need take notice.unless you like striped pajamas and starvation.

actualy ya know what, dont take notice.play it all off as some dismisive bullshit so i can watch you idiots meet your end as a result of the history you refuse to learn from.ill be in israel drinking watermelon soda saying told ya so.sure ill be stuck with crystalman, but at least his hate speech uses actual facts, not hyperbolic blind hatred.

"what makes it conspiracy theory garbage is the attempt at making one family indicitive of millions of others, as the rule rather than the reality that they were the exception."

That is only true if the millions of others choose to identify themselves with that one family.

http://notice.pl

"ill be stuck with crystalman, but at least his hate speech uses actual facts, not hyperbolic blind hatred."

Well I hope you will enjoy Israel. By the way, what have I lied about so far, as I've been able to back up everything I say with facts.

Go take a look at crystalmann's (edit: sorry it was one of crystalmann's buddies) latest post about Obama exempting Muslims from a TSA pat down.

IT'S A FLAT OUT LIE!

so our polls are bias here, but some how in israel they are just dead on?
our politics are subject to bias as well as our media, but now when haaretz prints this it is fact?
not to mention haaretz's repeated manufacturing of one sided propaganda vs the jerusalem post's counter propaganda.
is it even possible that 71 percent want to attack iran, when over a third of israelis are muslim?
a poll is never missused to present a notion either right?
like it couldnt be that 71 percent of israelis want the us to strike iran so they dont have to, not just that israelis have this overhwelming desire for us to attack israel.
it also has nothing to do with invasion, as the subject is iran's nuclear facilities.attack and invade are two very different things, especialy considering the circumstances.

if you believe israel is a nation itching for a war, you are beyond help, as they are in a constant state of war to thier collective detriment.what the fuck does israel's citizens have to do with any lobby groups of ours?
the lies that got us into the war with iraq were weapons of mass destruction, wich was our manufacturing alone.israel took out iraq's nuclear program so they couldnt be selling that.plus the united nations got saddams chemical weapons stock piles years before we invaded.
you see israel as so pro war, yet they never made a move.you completely overlook bush senior and junior being the thread, in favor of linking israel.are you sick in the head?might as well make it we invaded iraq cuz zimbabwe wanted us to.

yeah, so they may not be jewish, but you feel completely ok stating they are "pro war jewish lobbies".kind of like calling all muslims terrorists no?
can you provide the links to what makes your list of supposed jewish groups pro war, and not just your inferences.

nope you linked them with zionism.
the rothchilds are just a family, but stating that they are funding the zionist effort to take over the world links the efforts of the rothchilds to global zionism.in conjunction with such wonderfull gems like you "evil zionism" propaganda that has the star of david from top to bottom, you have linked every jew in the world to zionism, wich is funded by this family.

im not a zionist, nor do i identify myself with the rothchilds, but you sure have been working overtime towards that effort linking me to the worlds evil as i am jewish.

the thing is, that you just dont seem to get unless it happens to muslims, is that it doesnt matter how one identifies themselves, when it is done for them.
it isnt as if a nazi is going to read my last name, and pause to ask me if im an athiest as if that would get me off the hook with them.
just as all the muslims who have been subject to attacks by us dont get to pause a bullet cuz they arent terrorists, just you regular average holy muslim.

it would be nice if the world worked that way, and people werent persecuted based on what others think they are, but that isnt the world.and you are spreading the ground work for blind persecution of the innocent by the proactively hatefull.

just like crystalman does to islam, you do to judaism.the funny thing is each of you think you arent doing it, despite both believing the same thing.the other guy has to be stopped before they take over the world.for you its jews, for crystalman its muslims, and your both wrong by miles.

this is a new layer, what is a flase jew?

well you lie all the time about the link between judaism and zionism for starters.repeatedly favoring the presentation of zionism as jewish despite the overwhelming majority of zionist being christian.

you lie in stating that we are at war in the middle east at the behest of israel, when israel has no quams with kicking whom evers as they deem fit.

you lie by stating that jews want to go to war with iran, when it has literaly never once been proposed.attacks are close enough for you, but it isnt even in the same zip code as truth.

your facts are theory. wich you cannot seem to differenciate between the two.you believe israel did 9-11.and that is fine, you are entitled to think what ever bat shit thing you want, but it doesnt become fact just cuz you believe it.otherwise it would be a fact, cuz i believe it, that you are full of shit.

my point about crystalmans use of truth is that while he is libeling islam, he is using facts.he doesnt just brand them ragheads like congo and so many others, he lists direct examples that support his claim.you dig and dig for any scraps of suppositions that if you squint your eyes and tilt your head just right look like what you claim.i dont approve of what crystal does, and he and i have gone at it a few times.but his flaw is one of conjecture, not blatant lies.

"nope you linked them with zionism. the rothchilds are just a family, but stating that they are funding the zionist effort to take over the world links the efforts of the rothchilds to global zionism.in conjunction with such wonderfull gems like you "evil zionism" propaganda that has the star of david from top to bottom, you have linked every jew in the world to zionism, wich is funded by this family."

Actually, you're either purposly spinning what I said or you're just wrong as usual.

If you go back and read what I said, I didn't link Rothschild with anything but being an ultra-rich family.

And then I simply asked why the title of post was called "dangerous" as if Glenn Beck had been ranting and raving about Soros with an AK-47 in his hands.

And I didn't originally inject "the joooos" in this thread at all. The arcticle itself mentioned "the jooooos," not me.

And it was Mik661 who started off about the Rothschilds "being Jews or false Jews" or some other nonesense, not me. I said that Rothschild "being Jews or fake Jews" was irrelevant, but he wanted to keep bringing up anti-semtimc conspiracy theory.

Go back and READ.

But since YOU brought it up, it is the face of a Rothschild that is on the Israeli currency, and it was James A. de Rothschild who financed the Israeli Knesset building (according to Wiki).

NOW I'm linking Rothschild to Zionism since YOU made it an issue.

You are SO full of shit.

First of all, I hardly ever bring up Judaism period, let alone trying to link Judaism with Zionism. So please just stop right there with your paranoid lies freecrack. Zionisn is nothing but Jewish nationalism, a belief in a homeland for Jews. Many Christians and even some atheists subscribe to the politics of Zionism

Second, I've proven that we are in the Middle East for Israel, using multiple American Jewish and Israeli articles admitting that fact.

I've also pointed to documents like "Clean Break" which outlines Israeli directives to America with regards to handling Middle East foreign policy.

And third, Israel and Jewish involvement is pretty well documented, so it is not a "belief" of mine, it is just something that any logical person would conclude after looking at the information.

you do know speech while itself is innocuous, its results can be awfull thus making some speech dangerous.
like "we islam is coming for your babies, so arm yourself and shoot all brown people"
that would be a pretty dangerous thing to say, no less to say in public and even more so in front of idealogical legions who hang on your words as if they are valid.

did you ever notice how on posts not relating to religion mike and myself arent talking jews, while you do? point the finger all you want, but it doesnt change that on every 9-11 post, regardless of the context you throw in your zionist deal.

i would imagine the overwhelming dominant figures in israel are zionist as they are the founders, much like how our founders adorn all that we value.
you do know that just like every political idealogy various shades exist, and the zionism of the 1900s was much different than the zionism of 48 and today.shit even today you got the zionists who want to share israel, as long as it is an jewish state first, and zionist (jewish and christian alike) who want to destroy islam.

im not talking about you penchant for zionist speak in this post exclusively, but your effort in general.
here are your slams of either israel or israel as analogy for jews, based on personal shit, not governmental anything.
http://current.com/news/92805228_the-war-on-terror-is-a-hoax.htm#92805886
http://current.com/shows/upstream/92804506_geraldo-rivera-changes-mind-about-9-1...
http://current.com/news/92799966_if-you-touch-my-junk-ill-have-you-arrested-flie...
http://current.com/news/92795961_criminalising-free-speech-and-silencing-dissent...

and here are the ones that you took it upon yourself to interject you usual.
http://current.com/news/92801561_napolitano-should-muslim-women-be-patted-down.h...
http://current.com/technology/92799126_us-senate-bill-s-3804-allows-government-t...
http://current.com/news/92790576_christian-woman-sentenced-to-death-for-blasphem...

but my favorite one is here, where you are so ever aware of what you are doing, you both acknowledge it and make light of it.
http://current.com/users/maasanova/comments/80.htm

that is how im not full of shit, and simply stating what you are up to.

not only do you bring up judaism more than a rabbic missionary, you are aware of it enough to even make light of the times you dont.
http://current.com/users/maasanova/comments/80.htm
not paranoid lies, but basic observation.you may very well not be aware that your efforts are the picture of antisemitic speech, but they are.im sorry to be the one to break it to you, but i dont make the rules, or type your ideas for you.its all you buddy.

your perseption of zionism is like a jihadis view of us.extremely limited and cultivated to a designed end.zionsim can facilitate awfull things, but no more so than republican gitmo, or arab nationalism, or any political agenda for that matter.you see zionism as pure evil, as you only allow yourself a limited view of it, just like crystalman does with arab nationalism and dhimi law.

you have proven nothing, other than you can cut and paste a propaganda campaign.a campaign that in all reality you are plagerizing from the protocals.just like the nazis.just like hamas.just like david irving and all the other jew bashers.your line is no different than thiers, and some how you feel you arent with them.

here ya go.following your reasoning that validates the idea that the "zionist" state of israel is bent on directing us in thier wars, i offer the same style shit on he other side.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJy9tpGHGXM
in this alone comes tons of credible authorities on politics,theology,and sociology.all stating that islam is a billion strong threat that will kill us all if we dont act.it must be true right, i mean i have all the credibility you base your shit on.if that is as simple as it is then islam must want to kill all of us, and every arab is a threat.

the difference between us, is while we are both watching the propaganda, i know it is propaganda and you think its actual media.i know from an insane amount of personal experience the vast majority of what you put out is antisemitic bullshit, but you think its the news of the century.if i held your low standards for qualifying my experts i would think david horowitz is honest, and we need to kill all muslims.while you are fueling hatred of others im against hate in all its forms.

you can try to some how make me wrong, but it just wont happen cuz i dont have a problem with islam.i dont have a problem with christianity.i dont have a problem with anyone based on the larger group of wich they are affiliated.you post antisemitic shit, and im gunna call you out.you post anti islam stuff, and i would do the same.

Would you care to point out some quotes in these postings where I'm talking about the religion of Judaism?

Sure I'm critical of Israel and the American Jewish Zionist establishment as there is plenty to be critical of, but so what?

Anyone can pull up links to my quote. You said I talk about Judaism and that I always try to connect it to Zionism. Since I maintain that I do not, the burden of proof is now on you to show us the quotes where I specifically talk about the religion of the Jews, or Judaism as it were.

Until then I'll still stand by my previous statement that you are full of shit.

oh ok.so it cant be antisemitism, unless you are arguing against the belief system.you can demonize the people all you want, as long as you dont touch the idealogy.im sorry to tell ya those aint the rules.nazis nor jihadis concern themselves with jewish teachings and still hold views that serve to destroy a people, the jews.we all make fun of monothiesm, as thier is much to mock.that has nothing to do with antisemitism.

so what? the what is that you are doing it in line with antisemitic speech.hate the israeli government all you want, criticize it till the cows come home.
but your commentary isnt exclusive to the government, but the people it represents, the jews.
for instance your post on the dark side of jewish nationalism isnt exactly a criticism of the israeli government as much as it is of israeli,jewish, social order.
had the article been about the negatives of nationalism, including israel amongst the myriad of other cultures who are predicated on ethnic or religious nationalism it wouldnt be antisemitic.but to call out only that one example is.

legitimate criticism of israel, or any nation requires that it not serve to
delegitimize
demonize
or hold that country to disproportionate standards.
your offerings more often than not do at least two of the three d's, and is not legitimate criticism, but hate speech.

the burden of proof is not on me, as "im just offering criticism", and i point it out at the time, every time.your denial has no legs other than "i said so" wich hardly a line of discussion one can negotiate.

ill point out, for the umpteenth time, you posted a pic of headshots of zionists, with a demonizing tag line, all set atop a star of david silloute.unless you live in a world where the star of david doesnt represent jews, you were demonizing judaism under the pretense of political commentary.this isnt complex stuff, and it has no grey area.
ya post a bunch of arab faces, with a tag line stating they are evil, with a crescent moon, the intent is clear, same goes if it were christianity.

It's ok to admit that you just pulled something out of your rear end freecrack, I won't hate you for it lol

You can call me every name in the book, but if you are going to accuse me of doing something which I am 100% sure that I didn't do, such as always bringing up Judaism and connecting it to Zionism, you better be able to back it up.

By the same token, I would own up to it if you could prove it.

sorry im not on your time table.i bring it up each and every time you do it, on each and every post you do it.i prove it ever time you do it, as you respond with this same old dance.

star of david+zionism demonization=antisemitism
is that simple enough for you to finaly adress? or are you going to pretend now for the fifth time this example doesnt exist, and ask me again to cite it?

Oh, you're talking about that picture of all of the people in the media who are calling for war against Iran and continued wars in the Middle East, calling for the hatred of Muslims and police state measures here in the US that was super-imposed with the Star of David?

Oh ok, I didn't make the picture but yes did I post the picture.

If you want to say that I am trying like Zionism with Judaism, you're free to say that , but it wasn't my intention.

My intention was to say that all of those people in the media like Jeff Goldberg, Daniel Pipes, Geert Wilders ect are all working and writing their propaganda for the Zionist cause.

you must be in love with circles, as you cant leave this one.on the thread you posted it we already had this very conversation, but hey if repetition suites you than so be it.
attack, and wage war, are two very different things.just as israel attacked syria to prevent thier nuke program, and didnt wage war.just like when israel attacked iraq to disable their attampts at having nukes, and didnt wage war.just like when we attacked iraq in the 90's and didnt wage war.
nuance, look into it.
the picture had a bunch of non-jews with the super imposed star of david, meaning the assumption by the casual viewer is that they are jews who are trying to destroy shit.
it really doesnt matter what your intent was, as the result doesnt change.

at the end of the day, you hold all the responsability for that wich you post.you post anti islam stuff, your gunna get attacked for hatred against muslims wether it was your intent or not.same goes for jews, or any other group.

you can claim your intent is what ever, but its bullshit.if it was a one off thing, like when onemalefla posted the orange-jews picture not knowing it had antisemitic connotation.it was a one time error on his part, as he doesnt have a laundry list of examples of demonizing jews, wich you do.

here is a real simple suggestion for ya.just dont post pictures with religious symbols ever.it keeps you safe from even running the risk of spreading hate speech in that manor.it isnt really that difficult to do.i dont even know where i would get a crescent moon or star of david pic.yet here we are.my points are no less clear despite not using such pics.

ya might want to also use a slight degree of depth in your thought, and acknowledge that not all zionist are on the same page, as no political group functions that way.

but we all know that typing this to you is a waste of time, as you are just trying (for what ever reason) to soft sell your steady narrative of fuck the jews.from the jews run the media bit, to the evils of jewish nationalism over any others, to your zionist shit.at least have the balls to be an open bigot, and not pretend it is something else.

He would have to make up another boogie man to blame for the worlds woe.

of course he would, just like hogan had to take on the ultimate warrior and savage, but all that effort beck has put into soros.
i wonder how many witch hunts he has left in him?

People have no memory. I have five teenagers and absolutely none of them are interested in history or politics whatsoever. People don't even remember that it was Bush not Obama who produced the stimulus or that all the policies they voted for in 2010 are the same policies that they voted against in 2008 for the same reasons.

maybe its a natural phenominon or a cultural one, but i didnt give a shit about anything remotely political until about 27.maybe it was a matter of circumstances as a young adult trying to purchase property that sparked it, or maybe it was just the getting older and my mind slowing down to accept analytical thought.who knows.

but you are right, we have rediculously short memories.as individuals and as a collective.its funny when wrestling fans forget that lex luger body slamming yokozuna was the same schtick as hogan doing it to andre, but its sad when we forget the holocaust was a result of a culture demonizing a religion, as we are doing it to islam in identical fashion.

When I was a teen there was only 3 TV stations and every night after dinner I watched the local and national news with my dad. He was very outspoken and anti authority. Today we have the results of our high tech cable news society. Everything is so fractured and individualized that there is no common experience left. Religion and patriotism used to glue the melting pot contents together but now every nut can find someone to validate what they believe no matter how outrageous or untrue.

That would be a blessing to American send direct from God and Soros can finally meet his daddy satan.

Tell me are you serious? If you are would you mind sharing what religion you are? Just for demographic purposes of course.

Bush created tarp, Obama created the stimulus.

you are correct. I my brain was thinking faster than i can type.

Even his own church felt the need to publicly state that Glen Becks opinions do not necessarily reflect their teachings or positions.

I am more concerned with the fact that nearly every single Treasury official or advisor and Federal Reserve chief is a former executive with Goldman Sachs who has made a few trillion dollars of the financial meltdown. George Soros contributing to liberal candidates doesn't worry me.

Glenn Beck isnt trying to destroy or using his words a managed decline of the dollar. wake up fool before its too late

I.m an intelligent person whose been listening to Glan Beck for a long time.
And Rush Limbaugh. Beyond any degree of hypocrisy common to humans
I agree with what they say. And you could go a long, long way before you'd
ever find a more open minded, fairer, honest citizen than I.

He made his billions in currency speculation. His nickname is "the man who broke the Bank of England,"

because he destroyed their currency in 1992 by "shorting the British pound with leveraged billions in financial bets,"

In 1997 Soros almost destroyed the economies of Thailand and Malaysia.

Soros on the incident: "I am basically there to--to make money. I cannot and do not look at the social consequences of--of what I do?"

Interestingly enough he is now speaking out against the dollar...

So Glenn Beck AND anyone else who exposes him are doing right.

This guy is evil and he needs to be exposed for what he is. His sights are set on this country.

Bunk. antisemitic slander. As a child was he supposed to volunteer for the ovens? The man that protected him was no more responsible than any other person in germany or occupied countries that went to work and did the job he was told too. Are the men who drove the trains responsible? Are the men who made the paper the records were written on responsible?

And you think that goldman sachs or jp morgan are any different? BOA or Countrywide? If you are going to burn him for that then you better build a big flipping fire for the rest.

The man who needs to be run out of this country is Beck. Lying piece of shit doing it for the money while crying his crocidile tears.

(From the 1998 60 minutes interview): http://sweetness-light.com/archive/george-soros-on-helping-the-nazis-during-the-...

KROFT: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson.

Mr. SOROS: Yes. Yes.

KROFT: Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews.

Mr. SOROS: Yes. That's right. Yes.

KROFT: I mean, that's–that sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult?

Mr. SOROS: Not–not at all. Not at all. Maybe as a child you don't–you don't see the connection. But it was–it created no–no problem at all.

KROFT: No feeling of guilt?

Mr. SOROS: No.

KROFT: For example that, 'I'm Jewish and here I am, watching these people go. I could just as easily be there. I should be there.' None of that?

Mr. SOROS: Well, of course I c–I could be on the other side or I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away. But there was no sense that I shouldn't be there, because that was–well, actually, in a funny way, it's just like in markets–that if I weren't there–of course, I wasn't doing it, but somebody else would–would–would be taking it away anyhow. And it was the–whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator, the property was being taken away. So the–I had no role in taking away that property. So I had no sense of guilt.

Okay so let's celebrate a capitalist billionaire who destroys currencies, because he resembles... goldman sachs? I hope that's not the argument you are seriously trying to make because that makes no sense.

so does it piss you off that he doesn't have survivors guilt? That he doesn't cry himself to sleep because he didn't die in the ovens? That he came from absolutely nothing to become one of the most powerful billionaires in the world?

My point it he does nothing that other businessman havent done but I dont recall any of them donating tens of millions to humanitarian causes.

"Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews."

Dude just give it up. It pathetic to see someone mindlessly parroting antisemitic bullshit that they dont even really understand.

You don't know how to read do you?

What does [George Soros] "helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews" mean?

I'll give you a hint. When Geogre Soros assisted the Nazis in stealing property from the Jews, it was...bad for Jewish people.

And you are more liable to be an anti -semite if you don't know that collaboration with Nazis to steal property from the Jews is not a Pro-semitic thing to do.

But I'll leave you to work that out on your own for awhile.

Do the Swiss feel bad about aiding the theft of billions of dollars from holocaust victims? Does the Catholic church feel bad about turning their backs on Jews across Europe? Do the English feel bad about turning Jews away from Palestine back to Nazi occupied Europe? So one 14 year old non practicing Jew shuffled paperwork to avoid being sent to death in the ovens. I wouldn't feel bad either. Or maybe you are one of those people who think he is an agent of the Rothschild's and pretended to be Jews in Hungary because they seemed to be an easy target to infiltrate as their evil plan to rule the world unfolded.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/14/us/14nazis.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=r... Here why dont you read this about the American goverment protecting nazi war criminal for intelligence purposes.

WASHINGTON — A secret history of the United States government’s Nazi-hunting operation concludes that American intelligence officials created a “safe haven” in the United States for Nazis and their collaborators after World War II, and it details decades of clashes, often hidden, with other nations over war criminals here and abroad.

Yeah, yeah, I got that email too (the one you are directly quoting from)... My father-in-law, the Glen Beck fanatic, sent it to me. From what I researched (in order to rip the email a part) Soros is an asshole, but is no more of an asshole than any other asshole who makes a fortune off of market and currency speculation.

I'm glad you included the part about the 1997 Asian Financial crisis, because it's my favorite. I love how it takes an immensely complex situation the 1997 Asian Financial crisis (a crisis largely caused by the effects of heavy globalization in emerging economic markets) and blames the whole thing on one guy. Yep, George Soros decided he didn't like Thailand so he farted in their direction and destroyed their economy; the power he wields is that immense.

Well said.

Powerfuly self destructive and foolish. You can't take it with you.

Tell me all about his lies. I am waiting to hear them. I will give you all day to explain. Take all the time you need. if you cant tell me about his lies. you sir are the liar and I am exposing you as such until you explain what you just said

Why dont you prove to us all that there is a secret world wide plot by the Rothschild's (who are only pretending to be jews) utiliizing Soros as their agent to take over the United States of America? Or should we believe Glen Beck, a former drug addict and alcoholic who found god with the Mormon Church and makes himself cry on TV as he spews his conpsiracy theories? He is just another celebrity asshole making bank of ignorants like yourself.

I never mentioned the rothschilds. Why are you deflecting the actual discussion from what the story is about? because you have no actual defense thats why. to bad so sad. Try again with someone who isnt as smart....ass

I was responding to the accusations by Glen Beck. If you research what Soros has been accused of there is extensive writings including accusations of Zionist plots involving the Rothschild family and the Federal Reserve. If you would get your "smart" head out of your ass and actually understand a little bit of what you are babbling about you would know that. I think you might be a Mormon or tea party nitwit who thinks that anything you see on Fox News is accurately or fully reported.

Glen beck NEVER mentions the rothschilds. I have watched every episode of Glenn Beck since he went to FOX. Please provide facts that prove he talks about the Rothschild?

Some how that doesn't surprise me. First off Beck knows his audience. He understands that the average fox viewer (that would be you) doesn't have the attention span to pay attention to anything that requires contemplation. So he feeds you bite sized bits that add up to "soros bad". But he also knows, because Beck is a very, very smart man, that those people in his audience that have an ounce of intelligence and education are well aware of the dots being connected in regards to the George Soros, the Rothschild family and and the Zionist plot to take over the world. So you keep doing your part and blindly believe everything Beck says and don't hurt yourself with an original thought.

The best way to produce a good lie is to include just enough truth to make it believable. By referencing Soros Jewish roots, currency trading and political involvement it seems more reasonable when you make unsubstantiated claims about his motivations.

read his books and listen to his interviews. you may see things a bit differently. Course you wouldnt want to have all the facts or anything would you. What exactly did Glenn Beck say that was wrong about soros. Show me, show, prove to the world and the shitheads here on current that Beck is wrong about soros. If you cant, shut the fuck up.

WTF are you talking about? which of the 4 out of the 5 do you think Beck is trying to do. Please explain that to us all.

Um the burden of proof relies on you proving he's right. Or shut up.

No *&^%&(&%#. He is innocent until proven guilty. As much as you might hate it. we still have freedom in this country and you and your shithead progressive liberal freaks arent going to change that.

PROVE HES GUILTY OR SHUT UP