Community | November 18, 2010 | 123 comments

TSA targets 'smoking hot' woman for naked scan; fondles children

source: http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2010/11/13/tsa-targets-smoking-hot-woman-for-...

Vierotchka
Are transportation security authorities looking for terrorists or a hard on? Why would 19 agents and police officers need to handle -- and watch -- a 20-something woman who happens to be 'smoking hot' get her breasts squeezed and twisted?

Children are fondled, too. Three-year-old Mandy Simon screams, "STOP TOUCHING ME" when a woman searches her for weapons.

(more at link)
  1. groups:
    Community,   Actual News,   TSA
  2. tags:
    TSA,  Sexual Abuse,  Pedophilia
  3. recommended by:
    pjacobs51,
    Vierotchka
  4.     
    |

123 comments // TSA targets 'smoking hot' woman for naked scan; fondles children // Video

  • dariusvons
  • cclark_productions
    • +2
      cclark_productions  

    • omg.. this is so sad! I fly out of fort lauderdale airport all the time.. holy shit. thats so messed up that this could happen in florida or anywhere for that matter :( what kind of country is this....

    • 1 year ago
  • twohawks
    • +4
      twohawks  

    • I do not agree with the tenet that "liberty must always be sacrificed to the value of security."
      -reference:
      http://www.palgrave-journals.com/cpt/journal/v6/n2/full/9300301a.html#aff1
      Security, Liberty and the Myth of Balance: Towards a Critique of Security Politics
      by Mark Neocleou

      I do not agree with giving leaders absolute authority where the lines of individual freedom become subjugated.

      This teaches people, especially our children,
      - how to be submissive and subservient,
      - how to let someone else think for them, and to be implicitly accepting of what their teachers (and therefore elders and leaders) teach them, without questioning and seeking understanding on their own strength for themselves
      - it teaches weakness
      - it teaches hatred, bigotry and arrogance as values and useful tools for living..., that these are moral values to be cherished, and should be ethically leveraged for building the foundation and tools and integrity of society
      - it teaches how to be embracing of the 'tools for living' with fear and hate, thus subjugating the mind, and logic, to the grip of these qualities.

      The people, not one leader, are the teachers, elders, and leaders of our children, and our communities and society.
      We teach and lead by our example.
      A trusted leader, someone who has been entrusted with absolute authority to care for the interests of the society, should never take liberties with individual freedoms. This is an immutable boundary if you wish to call yourselves a free, compassionate, and benevolent society. In the moment that boundary is yielded, confused by our failure to be perseverant to protecting it, ...if it comes, it is incumbent upon the members of that society to recognize and address it.

      If they do not, they will be doomed to subjugation, and not just physically, but mentally, emotionally, and spiritually as well.

      ----------
      I cited the liberal-political discussion by the professor (and his colleagues if you follow out to any of his peer review, argument and discussion) just because, clearly, this is the venue where the discussion of civil liberties, security, and the mind of society and leaders is being addressed, especially since 9/11. If you dig into the discussions you will quickly recognize that it actually exists coming from all political directions, and for many long years now.

      And 80% people polled by cbs who say they are for the security measures certainly must be a mix of people from all 'parties'.

      So, to make clear, my statement here has no partisan issue or agenda. I think the issue is how people may be unwittingly sacrificing their humanity in the name of logic-of-convenience that embraces total disregard for their better qualities of humanity... the qualities we are supposedly trying to nurture, understand and protect.

      I think our example should be to show some courage and dignity. To pay attention. To think for oneself. To learn the meaning of civil liberties and the mind of the history, your ancestors' mind, that brought you here. To remember their spirit of living. To speak up. To not accept authority blindly.

    • 1 year ago
  • cmdinc
  • takobaka
    • +1
      takobaka  
    • cmdinc:

      Or try to become an active part of government like these people are doing, and like our forefathers intended for us to do.

      The alternative is to accept all rules being shoved down our throats in the name of safety, and "live" in safety up until the point we're gassed by those looking out for our "best interests".

    • 1 year ago
  • JuliusBC
    • +1
      JuliusBC  
    • Image

    • After a full body scan, this senior citizen was suspected of carrying a stick of dynamite in his pants. Consequently, this TSA agent took it upon himself to get a much closer look. Later it was revealed that this particular TSA agent had been a Catholic priest 5 years prior to working for this non-disclosed airline.

      The names have been withheld to protect not only the innocent but the guilty.

    • 1 year ago
  • NuclearLullaby
    • +4
      NuclearLullaby  

    • If people don't like the invasions of privacy, blame George W Bush & his patriot act!!! If ANYONE has actually looked over the details of that, they'd CLEARLY see just how twisted & wrong it actually is & why all these invasive things exist! Yeah,I DO understand the intent is sopposidly to check for terrorist,but I have to ask if catching a few terrorists is really worth taking away freedoms of...well...Just about any freedom these days?

    • 1 year ago
  • dr_robert14
  • metaloki
    • +2
      metaloki  

    • It's just another example of how we've allowed ourselves to be treated as cattle and responsibility for the security that we desire has been handed to other cattle.
      We must realize that while we get fondled and prodded; our government is poking it's megalomaniac head into our most private areas like never before. We are being fooled into thinking that this is the worst of it while big brother hammers and chisels our rights away.
      Piece by piece our freedom will be stripped away unless we start standing up as one and shaping this country into what is best for all freedom loving peoples.

      There's a trade off for safety but loss of common sense shouldn't be one of them.

    • 1 year ago
  • Nikita_Gorshkov
  • alexandrek
  • Nikita_Gorshkov
    • 0
      Nikita_Gorshkov  
    • alexandrek:

      well, I too lived in both. 5 years in the states, but mostly (and right now), Russia, and I got to say, in terms of bureaucracy (I find the TSA part of the bureaucratic system) the states are a paradise compared to Russia. And it gets worse from year to year.

    • 1 year ago
  • dreaddaze
  • TomTucker
  • observer2121
  • TomTucker
  • Mark701
  • ThatHarlemKat
  • TomTucker
  • ayipis
  • Stever_B
  • NuclearLullaby
  • ayipis
    • -9
      ayipis  

    • its amazing that pretty much the ones that is really ticked off about these are the same motherfuckers who tend to go "nude" at every protest or cry about "conservatives" being too uptight about sexuality and the 'beauty of the human body" and somehow someway all of these people all of a sudden have a problem with a shadow of their bodies on a tv screen???????????

    • 1 year ago
  • JuliusBC
    • +1
      JuliusBC  
    • Image
    • ayipis:

      By simply profiling, there could be some that would be overlooked such as this one.

      McVeigh's only known political affiliations were his voter registration with the Republican Party of New York when he lived in Buffalo, New York, and a membership in the National Rifle Association while in the military.

      McVeigh was raised Roman Catholic. During his childhood, he and his father attended daily Mass at Good Shepherd Church in Pendleton, New York. In a March, 1996, interview with Time magazine, McVeigh professed his belief in "a God", although he said he had "sort of lost touch with" Catholicism and "I never really picked it up, however I do maintain core beliefs.

      Timothy James McVeigh (April 23, 1968 – June 11, 2001) was a United States Army veteran and former security guard responsible for detonating a truck bomb in front of the Alfred P. Murrah Building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995, killing 168 people. It was the deadliest act of terrorism within the United States prior to the September 11, 2001 attacks and is referred to as the Oklahoma City bombing. McVeigh, a militia movement sympathizer, sought revenge against the federal government for its handling of the Waco Siege, which had ended in the deaths of 76 people exactly two years earlier. He also hoped to inspire a revolt against what he considered to be a tyrannical federal government. He was convicted of 11 federal offenses, sentenced to death and was executed on June 11, 2001. Terry Nichols and Michael Fortier were also convicted as co-conspirators in the plot.

    • 1 year ago
  • JuliusBC
    • 0
      JuliusBC  
    • ayipis:

      Republicans generally have more to hide as Dick-tated by the frequency of the reporting in the news of not-so-uptight sexual behaviors once they have been discovered. It seems that there are more Republican politicians and/or public figures that are caught with their pants down, "so to speak," than there are Democrats. Perhaps if the Republicans were a bit more open with their sexuality they wouldn't be so inclined to be sneaky and pursue their choice of sexual deviations as they cloak themselves behind their incessant bellowing out of their religious convictions and beliefs.

    • 1 year ago
  • nanac
  • ayipis
    • -11
      ayipis  

    • we can "fondle children" or "target smoking hot women" in an act of political correctness and fairness as DICTATED BY BLEEDING HEART LIBERALS OR we simply just PROFILE THOSE TERRORIST looking motherfuckers...

      take your pick

    • 1 year ago
  • Nephwrack
  • Mark701
    • 0
      Mark701  
    • ayipis:

      Ayipis, only 5 thumbs down? You can do better than that, you're not being obnoxious enough. Try yelling "bleeding heart liberal" 40 times in a post instead of 25. Guaranteed to yield more thumbs down. We're all rooting for you!

    • 1 year ago
  • NuclearLullaby
  • nanac
  • BJones424
    • 0
      BJones424  

    • I do agree the security measures are out of hand, but unfortunately flying is a luxury- not one's right. Also, why lie... this girl says she was the only person picked for the body scanner when the security video of her @ FLL clearly shows her sitting and watching numerous (& not necessarily attractive) people go through the scanner? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trQp6V8dx7A

    • 1 year ago
  • Mark701
    • +2
      Mark701  
    • BJones424:

      Perhaps, but "flying" isn't at issue here, body scans are. Flying may not be a "right" but personal integrity, modesty, and concern about your health are. I wouldn't step through one of these things for the simple reason that I don't want my body blasted with radiation. Yes, I know, they're "safe". So was Vioxx, giving teens anti-depressants, smoking (at one time) etc.

      No one knows the long term effects of stepping into these things especially to someone who flies several times a week. It will be interesting to see what happens when someone goes after TSA for causing cancer.

    • 1 year ago
  • chief_longhair
    • +1
      chief_longhair  

    • flying in an aluminum machine 5000 feet in the air full of hundreds of feet of hydraulic hose and electronic relays and computer systems that are all subject to failure is WAY over rated,,, slow down, keep your feet on the ground and smell the roses

    • 1 year ago
  • treewolf39
  • Dmerza1989
  • ayipis
  • Mark701
    • 0
      Mark701  
    • ayipis:

      Wow Ayipis, I'm getting more and more disappointed with you. Only one thumbs down??? You can do better than this. You could have fit "crying liberal babies" or some other inane comment into your statement and made us all proud of you. There is no need to be satisfied with meidocre performance. I've seen you do much better. Come on, let's kick it up a notch!

    • 1 year ago
  • Elevator
  • KSirys
  • Debra_
    • -4
      Debra_  

    • Funny how the viewers of Current only care about this story because the woman is supposedly pretty. If the story had been about a less attractive woman, you can bet it won't even be within the top 40 stories.

    • 1 year ago
  • Ihatethemall
    • +8
      Ihatethemall  
    • Debra_:

      I would defend even women that arent attractive. I would even defend foolish women who have strange beliefs that I done ever agree with. Yes Debra, even you I would defend to the death from bullshit intrusive searches.

    • 1 year ago
  • KSirys
    • KSirys  
    • Debra_:       This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
  • Debra_
    • Debra_  
    • KSirys:       This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
  • Elevator
    • +7
      Elevator  
    • Debra_:

      Or perhaps people recognize that the male employees would be more likely to abuse their power in an instance where, given the supposed attractiveness of the woman, they would have more motivation to do so and therefore the case for corruption is more believable.

      The moral outrage however would be the same regardless of her looks and I think users on current recognize that.

      Perhaps you have missed the fact that Current has been dominated lately by stories of power abuse by the TSA.Popular stories included the mistreatment of an old woman and a toddler both of whom it is unlikely were popular because the users of this site thought they were hot.

    • 1 year ago
  • KSirys
    • KSirys  
    • Debra_:       This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
  • frank_runyeon
    • +6
      frank_runyeon  
    • Debra_:

      I'm sorry you feel attacked Debra -- but the woman's appearance is relevant to the story. She was supposedly selected at random, and the fact that she is unusually attractive casts doubt on that.

      Moreover, it's not the first report of creepy and predatory behavior by gov't officials using these scanners.

      PS. I also regret that some current users engage in petty attacks. My advice is to not engage.

    • 1 year ago
  • Incredulous
    • +7
      Incredulous  
    • Debra_:

      debra, debra, debra...we actually like each other on this site. I realize you have been having a tough go of it, and I do admire your tenacity, but people truly care for each other here, even when they disagree. Something about that seems to elude you, and I don't think you are going to have a much easier go of it until you understand that we may disagree and insult each other's opinions day and night, but in the end, we value the differences between us. Eventually, you will find your niche, and yes, you do have to have a pretty thick skin some days.

    • 1 year ago
  • Incredulous
  • Ihatethemall
  • Debra_
  • Debra_
  • Debra_
  • TomTucker
  • pjacobs51
  • treewolf39
  • pjacobs51
  • ayipis
    • -1
      ayipis  
    • KSirys:

      LOL>>>you cant be serious about what you just said....

      and you know her enough to 'categorize" her as ignorant and stupid..LOL..

      HAHAHAH typical current liberal..and i say i followed you long enough to know..

    • 1 year ago
  • ayipis
  • KSirys
  • KSirys
    • +2
      KSirys  
    • ayipis:

      I might be a typical current liberal... but i'm not the village idiot/coward/bigot/racist/punk that likes to hide under a screen name... coward...

    • 1 year ago
  • KSirys
  • Nephwrack
  • Nephwrack
  • EtVoila
    • +3
      EtVoila  
    • Debra_:

      I've never seen or responded to a comment from you before and yet you're fantasizing about me flying off of a cliff in a bus...

      HOW SWEET OF YOU. :] We've really hit it off, haven't we? How about we go to that new cafe on 81st street for some coffee and a bit of chin wagging?

    • 1 year ago
  • Vierotchka
  • thedirtman
  • JuliusBC
    • 0
      JuliusBC  
    • Image
    • Debra_:

      Debra, that is not true. Not all stories hit Current due to the lack of availability which is beyond the control of the people here at Current. The lady here in this picture went through exactly the same ordeal back in February. After all was said and done, they gave her some chocolates after she swore to never go public with her story. Had she gone public, it would have definitely ended up here on Current. The only way I know this is because I was waiting behind her in line and missed my flight. Had she consented to the full body scan I might have made it to my flight and we wouldn't be having this conversation. Pat-downs can take a fair amount of time and seem to be a bit more invasive.

    • 1 year ago
  • Vierotchka
  • KSirys
    • +3
      KSirys  
    • Vierotchka:

      Again, people with no education attacking a female, like a killer with a gun. If i was there and that was someone close to me, i would have been arrested for putting those clowns on the floor...

      People need to do something and not just stand there and look like idiots... if we continue to let this happen, we will be treated like shit..

    • 1 year ago
  • Incredulous
    • +2
      Incredulous  
    • Vierotchka:

      what a bunch of hyper-violent under-educated assholes. I hope she gets every penny she sues them for, and all those assholes lose their jobs. They should be charged with assault and put in jail. She must have had some effect on the system, because I go through Reagan and Dulles frequently and have never seen that kind of aggressive behavior from TSA. I think in 2007 there was this "guilty if not meek and mild" presupposition TSA operated under, and while you don't see that kind of overt physical violence, naked body scanners are a different kind of violent physical assault on the public.

    • 1 year ago
  • Incredulous
    • +2
      Incredulous  
    • KSirys:

      I so agree with you ksirys....and I might be female, but there would be some swift kicks to the groin coming from me if some ill-educated, hyper violent TSA agent ever tried to pull something like that on me or someone I was with. I hate it when you see people just standing around like idiots and allowing this sort of disgusting behavior to proceed unopposed....seems like it all started with the "don't taze me bro" and things have progressively gotten worse. We have ourselves to blame for not standing up for each other, and for not standing up to our self absorbed politicians who do nothing because they are subjected to none of this type of treatment.

    • 1 year ago
  • mayhem
  • onechance
  • alexandrek
  • onechance
  • KSirys
    • +6
      KSirys  

    • How sad...
      is this the "Home of the Brave and Land of the Free"? or

      the "Home of the fearful and Land of the Captive"?

      What the fuck happen????

    • 1 year ago
  • Ihatethemall
    • +4
      Ihatethemall  
    • KSirys:

      To many people said....."that cant happen here"

      That phrase is the funniest AND the saddest thing I ever hear people say. Its Funny because they believe it and its sad for the same reason.

    • 1 year ago
  • ayipis
  • KSirys
    • 0
      KSirys  
    • ayipis:

      LOL... you're the one that hides behind the internet spewing your bullshit... when you come out and show us all who you really are, that's when i find you and make you say uncle.. =D

    • 1 year ago
  • Stever_B
    • 0
      Stever_B  
    • ayipis:

      I'd love to hear how you feel after the TSA gropes you and your son or subjects both of you to a backscatter x-ray before you get on a plane even though you are probably not a criminal or a terrorist.

    • 1 year ago
  • nanac
    • +3
      nanac  

    • I long for the days, before gangstas Bush and Cheney's fake war on terror screwed up everything....They just about knocked the entire world off it's axis..

    • 1 year ago
  • riverratt50
  • Paratus
    • 0
      Paratus  
    • nanac:

      I've been wondering when someone would try to pass this off as a "blame Bush" thing. Hey, for your information, this is on Obama, not Bush. The Islamists have been at war with us since before Bush. What stupidity.
      Now, that said, this TSA thing is really getting out of hand. Pistole said that his agency is going to keep on keeping on. Janet Napolitano, who probably will not get groped or see the inside of a backscatter x-ray machine, is barking up the wrong tree. Profile, profile, profile. Stop frisking 7 year olds and nuns. Stop requiring a penis massage (I'm a guy, sorry ladies but you get the idea) as a condition for flying. I predict that this will be upheld in court as permitted. The only answer will be to stop flying. The pocketbook remedy will work.

    • 1 year ago
  • Agent_Alpha
  • nanac
    • 0
      nanac  
    • Paratus:

      I felt like the TSA anti-American policies/methods were intrusive from the start..The TSA was established during the tenure of George W. Bush..The majority of policies that was adopted by the Bush Administration to defeat Islamist's attacks were dumb and ineffective..What about that color coded chart that appeared prior to every election? Americans could look forward to a new video from Osama Bin Laden, before every election.. Republicans had the nerve to use that same old video scam in the last election! As far as Janet Napolitano, she is very lucky if she can avoid being groped..I don't know anybody that wants to be groped, male or female..I am only saying that, I long for the days when insanity wasn't the norm!

    • 1 year ago
  • nanac
    • 0
      nanac  
    • riverratt50:

      I am too, however all of his unprecedented accomplishments are over-looked because Big Business and greedy politicians want him to fail....They could care less about who they hurt in the process..

    • 1 year ago
  • nanac
  • JuliusBC
    • 0
      JuliusBC  
    • nanac:

      Big Businesses and greedy politicians are of the view point that in the end, all will survive long enough for them to get Obama out and then they can pursue their idea of some form of recovery. The public is of little or no concern to them and anything at their expense is nothing more than collateral damage necessary to assist them in pursuing their success of obtaining more money and better political standing.

    • 1 year ago
  • nanac
    • 0
      nanac  
    • JuliusBC:

      Obama and the people were under estimated in 08...There is big business on both sides of the aisle, and they have an interest /investment in the prosperity of America...

    • 1 year ago
  • madjik68
  • riverratt50
  • Sparky2U
  • lazloman
    • +1
      lazloman  

    • Why would someone find these images erotic? This seems just so weird. These images are as about as arousing as a naked Barbie doll. But then again, maybe naked Barbie dolls are their favorite pastime.

    • 1 year ago
  • TomTucker
  • mitekillem
    • +2
      mitekillem  
    • TomTucker:

      That would actually be something they could do.
      Think about it. No one else wants to give them jobs.
      Now they can make a living doing what they love...somewhat.
      And it's legal!!!

      We now have a perfectly good use in society for perverts.
      Go apply with the TSA. The TSA - "Groping for your Safety"

    • 1 year ago
  • riverratt50
  • Elevator
  • bertkamp
12
1 - 100 of 123
more from Community:
from the community

top videos