Rockefeller Wants Government to Shut Down Fox and MSNBC
source: http://www.infowars.com/rockefeller-wants-government-to-shut-down-fox-and-msnbc/
-
-
- im1mjrpain
- added this
“I hunger for quality news, I’m tired of the right and left,” Rockefeller said.
“There is a bug inside of that wants to get the FCC to say to Fox News and MSNBC… out, off,” he said during a hearing on retransmission negotiations between broadcasters and cable providers. “We have journalism that is always ravenous for the next rumor, but insufficiently hungry for the facts that can nourish our democracy.”
“I hunger for quality news, I’m tired of the right and left,” Rockefeller said.
He failed to mention that both networks are cable television channels and the FCC has little if any regulatory power over their content.
Millions of Americans have tuned out the false right-left paradigm of the corporate-dominated news channels in favor of alternative news sources on the internet. For the establishment, this trend is highly disturbing and must be turned back.
In March of 2009, Rockefeller said the internet is the “number one national hazard” to national security.
“It really almost makes you ask the question would it have been better if we had never invented the internet,” Rockefeller mused during the confirmation hearing of Gary Locke, Barry Obama’s choice for Commerce Secretary. He then cited a dubious figure of three million cyber “attacks” launched against the Department of Defense every day. “Everybody is attacked, anybody can do it. People say, well it’s China and Russia, but there could be some kid in Latvia doing the same thing.”
The former Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell and Obama’s current director Admiral Dennis C. Blair, agreed with Rockefeller about the internet and national security.
It is not likely the FCC will suddenly move to close down Fox and MSNBC, even if it had the power to do so. Both are prized Operation Mockingbird assets that specialize in disseminating government propaganda and perpetuating “democracy” ruled by bankers and transnational corporations.
Jay Rockefeller is apparently concerned with the tenor, not the content of corporate news. As a blue blood, Rockefeller is irritated by the guttersnipe character of what passes for mainstream news in this country.
Rockefeller’s comments once again demonstrate the arrogance of “elected officials” who believe they have the power to control large corporations like Government Motors and dictate what sort of news and even entertainment Americans should consume.
http://www.infowars.com/rockefeller-wants-government-to-shut-down-fox-and-msnbc/
-
- tags:
- Fox News, MSNBC, Censorship, FCC, 2 more
-
- recommended by:
- Monkey_Films
-
-
Dejan_Croatia
-
this is really good, but more news then those two should be included. however, this is the first step.
- 1 year ago
-
Dejan_Croatia
-
-
indecisiveh
-
Why is CNN hardly included in any of this talk?
- 1 year ago
-
indecisiveh
-
-
NuclearLullaby
-
Biased news has been going on far too long!!! As have the so called "Reality " TV shows!!! Yeah...They do ,by current US law,actually have the rights to exist,but that doesn't make them right in any way shape or form!!! We SHOULD take them off TV & we SHOULD kick Palin out of the US,BUT...That's just not happening sadly!!! *sigh*
- 1 year ago
-
NuclearLullaby
-
-
mitekillem
-
The internet is "Evil" because of places like WikiLeaks...which provides accurate, no biased information, about things the government probably doesn't want you to know about.
It's also a place where the "estiblishment" has not true hold. I.e. No government, or company which provides me access, can censor the words that I type.
It's democracy and freedom at it's best.But I guess that makes it "evil".
- 1 year ago
-
mitekillem
-
-
RMattnerTours
-
Here, Here Mr. Rockafeller, I agree with you fully. Only please don't pull the Fox soccer channel, it's not politically biased.
- 1 year ago
-
RMattnerTours
-
-
jeniferalmond
-
Wrong again, Rocky! If you're going to have FOX and MSNBC censored, you need to get rid of ALL of them! No news is good news! But what you mean by "quality tv" is NOT what I view as "quality tv!" When the msm stops being paid by your elite corporate/Wall Street friends...THAT'S when the msm will be reborn! Til then, keep your dirty hands OFF our tv's and internets!
- 1 year ago
-
jeniferalmond
-
-
fun_size
-
I long for the days of NEWS not entertainment and bullshit opinions disguised as news. Then again censorship isnt the best way to handle it either...
- 1 year ago
-
fun_size
-
-
nanac
-
I disagree with Senator Rockefeller completely..I feel that Fox is more of a tabloid organization and should be exposed, for broadcasting deceptive, racist, and misleading information...On the other hand, MSNBC demonstrates journalistic integrity by airing factual, researched, and well documented stories..MSNBC offers a variety of programing that is unbiased, however they have commentators that appeal to people on the left,and on the right.. Fox is a division of the Republican Party..MSNBC is a legitimate news organization, while Fox is tabloid dressed up as news..
- 1 year ago
-
nanac
-
-
im1mjrpain
-
Bottom line is that this guy is against FREE SPEECH. If left up to him he'd render the constitution obsolete and stomp all over our inalienable rights.
- 1 year ago
-
im1mjrpain
-
-
chief_longhair
-
We can't yell fire in a theater and this is what fix does on a 24hr repeat over and over until the listeners believe and vote accordingly
- 1 year ago
-
chief_longhair
-
-
UtopianSky
-
Well that is loony.
I do think the government should mandate FOX remove the label "fair and balanced" as false advertising. But other than that, they are free to spew whatever crap and lies they want, unfortunately.
Perhaps the government can regulate the definition of the word "News" so they would have to call themselves something else, like "FOX Talk" or "FOX Rants".
- 1 year ago
-
UtopianSky
-
-
RMattnerTours
-
UtopianSky:
how about Fox crap rap for a title
- 1 year ago
-
RMattnerTours
-
-
Ritespa
-
Freedom of the press dude....they can say what they want....and be brought to criminal justice if they purposly lie to the public.....AMEN
- 1 year ago
-
Ritespa
-
-
good_stuff
-
It is the companies freedom of speech to say whatever they want on their network. Instead of "shutting them down", we just need to prevent them from advertising as "News". Afterall, isn't false advertising a crime? Especially when it is blatently un"fair and balanced".
- 1 year ago
-
good_stuff
-
-
The_Inglorious_Bastard
-
I love it when people just say "well, people just need to stop watching". Way to state the obvious. Also, it is ignoring the rules of behaviorism. Unfortunately, behaviorism in the field of psychology has become the red-headed, step-child, yet it can easily explain why society is so sick. Americans have been brainwashed to not be alarmed by their news sources. The problem can never be fixed, until sympathy is shown towards those who have not been enlightened on their behavioral programming are shown the mechanism they are sucked into. Rockefeller is just creating the illusion that someone in Washington is on this. The elites are probably chuckling about having Rockefeller be the "lone voice" against the "evil, corporate media".
- 1 year ago
-
The_Inglorious_Bastard
-
-
jubal
-
Rockefeller is really a tool isn't he? He has got some weird notions about communication mediums. The internet is the most amazing thing to have ever been invented. He hates it because it empowers people all over the world to think for themselves.
Yeah he wants more factual news...but that ain't gonna happen when news is being generated for profit.
- 1 year ago
-
jubal
-
-
CarlosBobthe3rd
-
No need to shut them down, people should just stop watching these crappy "news" stations.
- 1 year ago
-
CarlosBobthe3rd
-
-
dreaddaze
-
they all must go
MSG TV - 1 year ago
-
dreaddaze
-
-
observer2121
-
MSNBC is not the opposite of Fox. The opposite of Fox would be PETA or something crazy on the left of the spectrum.
- 1 year ago
-
observer2121
-
-
TomTucker
-
observer2121:
Left defends MSNBC and the right defends Fox. That should tell one all they need to know.
- 1 year ago
-
TomTucker
-
-
riverratt50
-
His off spring should be neutered and spade.
- 1 year ago
-
riverratt50
-
-
Nick19
-
I could care less about either network. All I want to hear is news and just fucking news. I could care less about the opinion of the reporter and all I want is simply unbias reporting and what not. I say let us implement the Fairness Doctrine and bring back real news.
- 1 year ago
-
Nick19
-
-
rodstradamus
-
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ct9xzXUQLuY
He also wishes the Internet never existed. - 1 year ago
-
rodstradamus
-
-
EdJoyProductions
-
I thought a little more about my idea to charge fines to news organizations that willfully misinform. If there was a minor fine per instance, I was thinking that Fox News alone could close the budget deficit within about a month. This is an idea that the FCC should really look into.
- 1 year ago
-
EdJoyProductions
-
-
CarlosIsDown
-
How about bringing back FCC ownership rules?
- 1 year ago
-
CarlosIsDown
-
-
indecisiveh
-
CarlosIsDown:
Good point. It seems alot of things could be solved just braking up the Newscorp, GE, and Viacom etc... monopolies on media.
- 1 year ago
-
indecisiveh
-
-
CarlosIsDown
-
I hope he's just using hyperbole.
- 1 year ago
-
CarlosIsDown
-
-
Monkey_Films
-
CarlosIsDown:
This is tame compared to some of D. Rockefeller's beliefs. I doubt hyperbole is a habit of his.
- 1 year ago
-
Monkey_Films
-
-
chief_longhair
-
FOX and MSNBC should not be painted as equally biased, right/left,,, FOX makes stuff up and MSNBC operates on facts.
- 1 year ago
-
chief_longhair
-
-
ImConcerned [removed]
-
chief_longhair: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
ImConcerned [removed]
-
-
TomTucker
-
ImConcerned:
Democrat?
- 1 year ago
-
TomTucker
-
-
ImConcerned [removed]
-
TomTucker: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
ImConcerned [removed]
-
-
TomTucker
-
ImConcerned:
A little left....LOL I don't have cable :)
- 1 year ago
-
TomTucker
-
-
NickerBocker09
-
Im perfectly fine with the Government taking over corporations that knowingly harm this country (as was clearly evident in the economic crisis). The government is the people. Corporate news has been able to get this idea in everyones head that government isnt the people...even though we elect whos in charge unlike Walmart and Shell who we have no part in. HOWEVER News is a different story, it shouldnt be censored. So please dont try and spew right wing bullshit by saying liberals want to take over the world with the government. We are very much against it just as anyone who belongs to a minority political ideology should be. You would think the Right and Left wing would unite on thise issue but I guess not.
By the way, your evil bad cookie monster "Government Motors'" stocks are surging today because of the government intervention.
- 1 year ago
-
NickerBocker09
-
-
im1mjrpain
-
NickerBocker09:
The Government is the people? It doesn't seem that way these days.
- 1 year ago
-
im1mjrpain
-
-
Dmerza1989
-
As much as i do not like Fox news at all, is it needed. Ying and Yang.
However! Programs that are opinion that disguise themselves as news should be taken off or have restrictions. I want a country of un basis news where everyone is given the facts, and the opinion is up to the viewer not the host.
AND LET US FUCKING SWEAR! - 1 year ago
-
Dmerza1989
-
-
TomTucker
-
Rockefeller.......Hmmm
- 1 year ago
-
TomTucker
-
-
Nephwrack
-
is he shilling for the libertardians now?
- 1 year ago
-
Nephwrack
-
-
ReverandG
-
I thought all of the Rockefellers were dead...just brain dead for this one I suppose.
- 1 year ago
-
ReverandG
-
-
artemis6
-
ITS A TRAP ! I hate FOX as much as the next person , but this is a clear ploy . FOX , may be the first to go , the next will be one that corporations have it in for . Better to make FOX IRRELEVANT !
- 1 year ago
-
artemis6
-
-
TomTucker
-
artemis6:
What about MSNBC.?
- 1 year ago
-
TomTucker
-
-
bronxyank
-
It's up to the people what they want to watch and believe. It's not like somebody is forcing you to watch either. and suggesting that government feed us news is worse the watching fox and csnbc at the same time. anyway somebody has to inform us about people like geore soro's, i get that from the Beckster
- 1 year ago
-
bronxyank
-
-
The_Inglorious_Bastard
-
bronxyank:
Here is a fitting quote when referring to the "Beckster"....
"Especially important is to avoid conversations with the demon... The demon is a liar. He will lie to confuse us. But will also mix lies with the truth to attack us. The attack is psychological, Damien, and powerful. So don't listen..." - Father Merrin - The Exorcist
- 1 year ago
-
The_Inglorious_Bastard
-
-
Username6555
-
regulation 4tw
- 1 year ago
-
Username6555
-
-
KSirys
-
that will never happen... but someone has finally grown some balls to tell it like it is...
- 1 year ago
-
KSirys
-
-
Ihatethemall
-
KSirys:
Dude man, Are you one of those saying........"that could never happen here" I hope not
- 1 year ago
-
Ihatethemall
-
-
KSirys
-
Ihatethemall:
lol.. hey, i'm a realist and do i think it can happen? maybe, but to be honest... i rather say no and not get my hopes up...
- 1 year ago
-
KSirys
-
-
im1mjrpain
-
KSirys:
So are you saying you hope the government bans free speech?
- 1 year ago
-
im1mjrpain
-
-
KSirys
-
im1mjrpain:
not free speech... but fake news? yes!
- 1 year ago
-
KSirys
-
-
CalgarC
-
wait what... some in the government is actually doing something progressive...
- 1 year ago
-
CalgarC
-
-
Nephwrack
-
CalgarC:
if you think any rockefeller is a progressive you're sadly mistaken.
- 1 year ago
-
Nephwrack
-
-
CalgarC
-
Nephwrack:
hey, i am just stating the fact that hes saying something smart... somethung progressive, deep down he's still a politician
- 1 year ago
-
CalgarC
-
-
ImConcerned [removed]
-
CalgarC: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
ImConcerned [removed]
-
-
CalgarC
-
ImConcerned:
Zzzz...
- 1 year ago
-
CalgarC
-
-
im1mjrpain
-
CalgarC:
So banning free speech is a good thing to you?
- 1 year ago
-
im1mjrpain
-
-
CalgarC
-
im1mjrpain:
hahaha
- 1 year ago
-
CalgarC
-
-
The_Inglorious_Bastard
-
Is there a schism between Jay and David? Because this is a very odd statement from a Rockefeller. Anyone who doesn't see that FOX, CNN, and MSNBC are just corporate tools for pitting the electorate against each other is just not paying attention to what is right in all of our faces. Sorry, but I don't like a Rockefeller being the one sounding the alarm bells on this. Feels like an attempt to fool those of us who see FOX, CNN, and NBC for what they are, that politicians in Washington are actually on this. If Obama lied to me about respecting the constitution more than G-dubs did, why would I put my faith in a Rockafeller?
Our saviors our not in Washington or on TV, but each other. The politicians who can save us have yet to be elected. Those, liberal or conservative, who will refuse corporate funds and see politics not as a career, but rather a civic honor.
We must protect net neutrality with great vigilance, educate one-another via the net and turn off Fox, CNN, MSNB, etc.
We need to truly look into what legislation our elected official pass, and fire those who side with corporate interests.
Separating the government from the corporations and big banks is not an encroachment on the free-market, but rather a protection of America's freedom.
- 1 year ago
-
The_Inglorious_Bastard
-
-
Itsbatman_Durr
-
The_Inglorious_Bastard:
this is exactly the way i feel as well and i am glad that there are others who think the same way. i only hope there are more and eventually enough to make what is right swing from potential to actual
- 1 year ago
-
Itsbatman_Durr
-
-
PressCore
-
So we here on Current.com are the #1 threat to national security here
in the USA, huh ??????. MR. YOU'RE NUTS !!! The internet news sites
like Current are the United Nations of all Newspapers' Journalism now in
the electronic age. ALL TV is garbage save for the BBC. Radio leaves
too much hard core news out of its broadcasting. It's the Internet that has
maintained the New York Times and other major newspapers all around the
world, and saved them from extinction. But Rockefeller has shown what
a misguided missle he is. As Thomas Jefferson said: " If I had a choice
between Government without Press, and the Press without Government,
I'd choose the Press." Our internet website has opened minds, educated
people hungry for Democracy all over the world better than Radio Free
America ever did. As Walter Chronkite said: " The Free Press is not an
institution in a Democracy, it IS the Democracy. Pull your head out of your
ass mr. NWO elitist anti-intellectual. Even your Bankster buddies are
likely cringing over such negative IQ oxymoronic absurdity as yours. - 1 year ago
-
PressCore
-
-
Debra_
-
Senator Jay Rockefeller is right. MSNBC and Fox should be shut down. These networks distort the message from the white house and disrupt communication flow. And they polarize and divide the country. Time to take away their broadcasting licenses.
- 1 year ago
-
Debra_
-
-
Itsbatman_Durr
-
Debra_:
the answer should never be to silence or censor, but instead shine light so that all know that the source may not be impartial, its a slippery slope once you start silencing voices for any reason, it just makes it easier to swallow shutting down voices for the wrong reasons
- 1 year ago
-
Itsbatman_Durr
-
-
Debra_
-
Itsbatman_Durr:
Its a worthy reason. We need to have standards in this country especially for the flow of information. There is a public trust and these two networks have breached it.
- 1 year ago
-
Debra_
-
-
NotFooled
-
Debra_:
If they could shut these networks down, then they could shut you down. Do you have any sense ? Common or regular ?
- 1 year ago
-
NotFooled
-
-
mindcruzer
-
Debra_:
Debra, how much do they pay you to be a professional troll?
- 1 year ago
-
mindcruzer
-
-
Monkey_Films
-
Debra_:
Debra, honestly, what type of Democratic strategist are you? It's obvious you're getting a check to be that partisan. Shame on anyone for agreeing with David Rockefeller that fascist laws should be passed and fascist behavior legitimized. You're wearing your swastika too proudly.
- 1 year ago
-
Monkey_Films
-
-
Debra_
-
Monkey_Films:
Religious wackjobs like yourself demonize David Rockefeller, because you fear progress and a more civil society. Fortunately your superstitions and children that believe them are dying out.
- 1 year ago
-
Debra_
-
-
Debra_
-
NotFooled:
Its not the internet you lame brain.
- 1 year ago
-
Debra_
-
-
Monkey_Films
-
Debra_:
Where in my sentence did I mention religion? You use another textbook psy-ops attack. My you're not hard to spot. Religion has nothing to do with it. Ideology does. I consider anyone who agrees with David Rockefeller a threat to our Republic Democracy and therefore a threat to America.
Censorship of the press is the most despicable idea in a free society and a key turning point in a country's move towards fascism.
I don't like David Rockefeller because he continually speaks of censorship and tightening of freedoms as a means for population control by government. I assume this is to insure corporate interests. He has also given speeches on population control, as in amount of people, by means of government manipulation. He comes from the same group of people and line of thinking that created Nazi Germany.
The increasing move towards fascism and the rogue Progressives pushing for it will eventually wind up on the firing lines of free citizens. History repeats itself. First the fascism, then the rebellion, then we eliminate the fascists.
Btw, your previous argument was the same used by the SS to demonize the resisters and those who had opposing politics in 1939.
- 1 year ago
-
Monkey_Films
-
-
Debra_
-
Monkey_Films:
You don't provide a shred of evidence to back up your obvious hallucinations.It is only religious extremists that attempt to defame Mr. Rockefeller's good name.
"Freedom of the press" isn't freedom to lie. More importantly its an outdated concept. There is so much information out there. MSNBC and FAUX distract with unimportant stories, or cause miscommunications with important stories that are presented in a way that causes division.
- 1 year ago
-
Debra_
-
-
Monkey_Films
-
Debra_:
I accept your challenge. I'll write an article on Examiner.com this evening about Rockefeller's agenda and provide endless links to recording and videos proving exactly as I have stated above. I will then post it to current and send you a message. There is too much information on David Rockefeller and his family's current and past agendas to post in a reply here.
I will also provide detailed correlation, recordings and documentation of 1940s Germany, the ideology, propaganda and writings and how they correspond to some extreme Progressives and their ideology, propaganda and writings currently.
Oh, and since when was the Rockefeller name associated with goodness?
And yes, Freedom of the Press is the freedom to lie if that is the choice of the person. While not ideal in a perfect world, it is up to others to prove, promote and identify the lie. To censor what one believes to be lies means to make one side the decider leaving no room for debate or Democracy.
Your complaints about Fox and MSNBC can be said of all news organizations. Too much entertainment news, not enough depth, too much opinion, important news done for entertainment without respect for the story. You only complain about the two that lean towards opposing views of yours so you want to censor it. The followers of Fox would say the same about CNN. The country is divided 50/50. The definition of fascism is when 50% get to decide for the other 50%.
So tell me this. How are David's views and therefore yours not fascist?
- 1 year ago
-
Monkey_Films
-
-
Itsbatman_Durr
-
Debra_:
i agree that they have breached it but i would prefer to allow all to recognize they are not always deserving of full trust rather than silence them completely, it just for me would set an ugly precedent.
- 1 year ago
-
Itsbatman_Durr
-
-
EdJoyProductions
-
Debra_:
Seriously?
- 1 year ago
-
EdJoyProductions
-
-
ImConcerned [removed]
-
Debra_: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
ImConcerned [removed]
-
-
Stever_B
-
Monkey_Films:
Oh, no, mister! The left doesn't claim her either.
- 1 year ago
-
Stever_B
-
-
Stever_B
-
Debra_:
No it is not just religious extremists that attempt to defame Rockefeller's "good name". It's anyone that values freedom that would disagree with the tripe this man is trying to foist on the public. What's "fair and balanced" is to have Fox and MSNBC and CNN and all the others.
You want to do away with anything that doesn't jibe with your opinions. How is that good for a democratic republic?
And in case you're going to try to accuse me of being something I'm not, I'm far left leaning and don't believe in god -- knock yourself out.
- 1 year ago
-
Stever_B
-
-
UtopianSky
-
EdJoyProductions:
Never take anything she says seriously.
- 1 year ago
-
UtopianSky
-
-
UtopianSky
-
Monkey_Films:
Hold on- she is NOT on the left. She is not on the right either. If I were to associate her views with a direction, it would be down.
- 1 year ago
-
UtopianSky
-
-
dreamsenvoy
-
Debra_:
Turning
- 1 year ago
-
dreamsenvoy
-
-
im1mjrpain
-
Debra_:
So you are against the constitution and freedom of speech?
- 1 year ago
-
im1mjrpain
-
-
im1mjrpain
-
Debra_:
Maybe you need to do some research on the Rockafellers.... then come back and tell us what you think.
- 1 year ago
-
im1mjrpain
-
-
im1mjrpain
-
Debra_:
Yep.... you are typical shill. He never made one reference to religion and you are calling him a "religous wackjob". That's a piss poor attempt at creating a straw man argument. You have no facts to back up your opinion so instead dealing with what he actually said you resort to name calling.
Damn! Your old and lame... have a glass of warm milk grandma and go back to sleep. Who taught you to use a computer anyway? You should be out playing bingo and watching the home shopping network. You make old ladies look bad. - 1 year ago
-
im1mjrpain
-
-
im1mjrpain
-
Monkey_Films:
Excellent Points! Of course she has no response. I hate to say it but you really can't waste your time on people like her. I do like how you didn't let her straw man argument lead you off the original topic and points you made. Nice job! Obviously the old bitter lady is on the wrong site.
- 1 year ago
-
im1mjrpain
-
-
im1mjrpain
-
ImConcerned:
She's obviously an bitter old woman.
- 1 year ago
-
im1mjrpain
-
-
Itsbatman_Durr
-
anyone with half a brain recognizes that every so called news outfit has a bias and an agenda slanted one way or another. it isnt right/left its profitability. the way the system is now, the only way to get the honest story is to either eyeball the events yourself or sift through the millions of outlets each reporting on everything and decide what you want to believe
- 1 year ago
-
Itsbatman_Durr
-
-
tolerance2
-
I think Sen. Rockefeller's presentation was clumsy & ill advised, but I (as a self-described progressive), do agree that both Fox news and MSNBC are dumbing down the level of political debate which, IMHO, thereby undermines our democracy. I don't expect much enlightenment from Fox, but MSNBC really upsets me because they could be educating their viewers to what is really happening to their government, and they are not, because some of their commentators are polarized people who negate any possibility of engaging independent voters. Maybe they are just taking orders from their corporate execs who just want increased viewership and don't care if that means just broadcasting a lot of crap that draws viewers. For example why don't they challenge the lack of common sense in the tea party rhetoric that just rails about big government without any factual content? Why have we witnessed such an increase in recent years of contaminated food, dangerous or ineffective drugs, faulty and dangerous products for children (cribs, toys, strollers), unchecked deceit by mortgage lenders, investment abuses on Wall St., uninspected and unsafe workplaces (including coal mines), anti-freeze in your toothpaste, courtesy of the Chinese who chided us b/c we're not really supposed to swallow toothpaste, so if we ingest antifreeze, it's our fault. Those communists sound just like capitalist corporate execs. Arrogance and unchecked power in both cases. It's common sense that protecting the American people applies to the above threats as much as it applies to military threats. Years of Bush Administration has led to the underfunding of the government agencies that were instituted (by both parties) to protect us. Hence, it's a no brainer to say that the Bush Administration was DERELICT in its duty to protect our people. Railing against "big government" without being specific is idiotic; the failure of our media to point this out is a dereliction of their duty to inform the American people of this fact. You can't run a democracy when everyone thinks in sound-bytes and the corporate media just encourage more sound bytes. Maybe the movie "Idiocracy" was prophetic.
- 1 year ago
-
tolerance2
-
-
im1mjrpain
-
He sounds like he's issuing a threat to the witnesses.
- 1 year ago
-
im1mjrpain
-
-
neocongo
-
This would be a good video if its title actually matched what was said. Leave it to infowarz.com.
- 1 year ago
-
neocongo
-
-
Ihatethemall
-
neocongo:
only you could find something good in what this shit bag has to say. showing your true colors again huh?
- 1 year ago
-
Ihatethemall
-
-
tverdell
-
Ihatethemall: This comment was removed by its owner.
-
tverdell
-
-
Ihatethemall
-
tverdell:
fuck no
- 1 year ago
-
Ihatethemall
-
-
Ihatethemall
-
CalgarC:
I really wish you would quit posting pics of your sex doll.
- 1 year ago
-
Ihatethemall
-
-
ImConcerned [removed]
-
CalgarC: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
ImConcerned [removed]
-
-
CalgarC
-
ImConcerned:
funny thing you should say... you have more comments er... i mean opinions then me on this story..
http://hippiekiller.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/troll.jpg - 1 year ago
-
CalgarC
-
-
im1mjrpain
-
neocongo:
well since we are pointing insignificant things.... you spelled www.infowars.com wrong.
- 1 year ago
-
im1mjrpain
-
-
ImConcerned [removed]
-
CalgarC: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
ImConcerned [removed]
-
-
CalgarC
-
ImConcerned:
i am making fun of you lol... :D
- 1 year ago
-
CalgarC