Community | December 06, 2010 | 61 comments

Lawyer asks judge to block video of Conn. boy's Uzi death from ex-police chief's trial

Image
Radical_Centrist
BOSTON — Eight-year-old Christopher Bizilj — 4-foot-3 and 66 pounds — stepped up to the firing range to shoot an Uzi as his father and 11-year-old brother watched from a few feet away.

As Christopher fired the 9mm micro submachine gun at a pumpkin, the weapon flipped backward and shot him in the head. He was pronounced dead at the hospital.

Prosecutors brought manslaughter charges against the gun club where the machine gun shoot took place, two men who supplied the weapons and a small-town police chief who owns a company that sponsored the gun fair.

On Monday, the first trial begins in what is expected to be a heart-wrenching recounting of Christopher's death on Oct. 26, 2008.

Edward Fleury, the former police chief in the tiny western Massachusetts town of Pelham, has pleaded not guilty to involuntary manslaughter as well as four counts of furnishing a machine gun to a minor.

Full Story: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40517427/40518258
  1. groups:
    Community
  2. tags:
    Massachusetts Trial manslaughter Police Chief
  3.     
    |

61 comments // Lawyer asks judge to block video of Conn. boy's Uzi death from ex-police chief's trial

  • noxidereus
    • +2
      noxidereus  
    • The quickness with which some of you turn on your fellow man for making a mistake and jump at their throats while they are suffering the death of their child sickens me.

    • 1 year ago
  • floydyboy
  • mitekillem
  • curtisreed
    • 0
      curtisreed  
    • mitekillem:

      in most locations you have to have a certain type of firearms dealer license.
      the owner had it, to my understanding.
      he was carefully allowing some kids to shoot the gun, and it had gone OK most of the day.
      in this case, what I heard was that the observer was right there with the child, I mean within inches, and usually held the Uzi as the children shot it, but he reached to recover his earphones for protection and the kid squeezed the trigger. the recoil of the shot tipped the gun back toward his head, and the gun fired again, killing him.

      I'm a big 2nd Amendment defender, but I dont think it's wise to let children play with full-auto weapons. Big mistake. Especially total novices. But even tho my kids have fired .22s, even a .223 (bolt action), I would never let them touch a full auto firearm, or even semi auto for that matter.

    • 1 year ago
  • littlwarrior
  • floydyboy
    • 0
      floydyboy  
    • curtisreed:

      That's what happened. He wasn't even letting the other kids really even hold the gun. He held the gun by the bottom of the grip & the clip. They just got to pull the trigger.He got ready to let him fire the gun then remembered the earphones....

    • 1 year ago
  • hammywill
    • 0
      hammywill  
    • floydyboy:

      He should have taken the gun away before putting in his ear plugs. I think this was a tragic accident, and not sure it warrants a charge of manslaughter...BUT, the walking along a road analogy seems to be apples and oranges to me.

    • 1 year ago
  • floydyboy
  • hammywill
  • cantucwearebrothers
    • +1
      cantucwearebrothers  
    • This article breaks my heart.

      It was a preventable accident and there is clearly negligence on the part of the parents. I am unsure if prosecuting anyone with a crime is the right course of action, however. I'm sure their punishment is life-long already.

    • 1 year ago
  • noxidereus
  • unimatrix0
    • 0
      unimatrix0  
    • They are all a bunch of red neck idiots, making a fetish out of a weapon. Playing with machine guns is idiotic for anyone, allowing children to play with them is criminal.

    • 1 year ago
  • PzLuvHappeniz
  • Radical_Centrist
  • KSirys
  • EmperorThan
    • 0
      EmperorThan  
    • Unfortunately survival of the fittest also applies to the ability of a parent, however careless, of raising a child... Such a useless dead. I wish guns never existed.

    • 1 year ago
  • FtheBULLSHT
    • +1
      FtheBULLSHT  
    • "Bennett said Charles Bizilj was not charged because he was a layman and based his decision to allow his sons to fire the gun on information from others who should have known it was too dangerous."

      Are parents not being held responsible anymore?

    • 1 year ago
  • Radical_Centrist
  • jeffreyak
    • +2
      jeffreyak  
    • Guns are dangerous. But to charge these me for the death of this child is wrong. Punishment is meant to rehabilitate an individual. These guys were stupid for giving this kid a gun. Do you actually think they will do this again?

    • 1 year ago
  • alexandrek
  • curtisreed
    • +1
      curtisreed  
    • alexandrek:

      you should read more about the event and then you'll understand, they didn't just hand a kid an uzi at random, there was very close supervision, but there was a single split second of distraction and that's all it took.

      i guess you've never heard of kids killing themselves on skateboards, bikes, motorbikes, swimming pools, trampoulines...bath tubs.

    • 1 year ago
  • toyotabedzrock
  • floydyboy
    • +2
      floydyboy  
    • toyotabedzrock:

      Yes but not close enough. A friend of mine was there that day. There were many other children at this event, he was not the 1st kid to fire that gun on that day. With all the other kids someone was holding the guns clip below the kids hand so something like this wouldn't happen. They got careless one time.

    • 1 year ago
  • curtisreed
    • 0
      curtisreed  
    • floydyboy:

      the problem with firearms is that it only takes ONE mistake, one moment of carelessness or distraction.

      the story i heard was that in the instant the observer/helper reached to put on his earphones the boy pulled the trigger and recoil bounced the gun back so the subsequent shot killed him. a split second. why wasn't the gun on safety?

      don't know.

      but it's dangerous enough to train a boy that age to fire a .22. I've taught my kids to shoot our 22 and I was watching them like a hawk, still nervous. A full-auto uzi? No, I'm not interested in taking that kind of chance.

    • 1 year ago
  • hiooijoij
  • themotivateddropout
  • jubal
  • CalgarC
  • Radical_Centrist
  • PzLuvHappeniz
  • alexandrek
  • Radical_Centrist
    • +1
      Radical_Centrist  
    • alexandrek:

      I agree Children should not be allowed to "PLAY" with weapons of any sort. In my home guns are not toys and toys are not guns. I do not agree that children should not be taught how to responsibly use fire arms however. An Uzi would be too much gun for many Adults, so it goes without saying NOT appropriate for an 8 year old.

    • 1 year ago
  • good_stuff
    • 0
      good_stuff  
    • The criminal justice system shouldn't be used to punish people for crimes they did not intentionally cause. I'm sure everyone involved feels terrible about the incident, but I don't think anyone needs to go to jail over it. The owner of the club should be sued by the family if they feel the club caused the death to occur. Ultimately though, blame should fall on the fathers shoulders for bringing his son to this place and letting him get himself killed.

      At what point does it stop? If your kid crashes into a tree while skiing, is that the ski resorts fault? Is it your fault? I don't follow the logic on this one other than the fact that we have laws on the books about guns.

    • 1 year ago
  • hammywill
  • Radical_Centrist
  • hammywill
  • alexandrek
  • noxidereus
    • +1
      noxidereus  
    • alexandrek:

      yeah if we don't lock this guy up, everyone is going to think they can get away with it and so everybody, yes everybody, will give guns to their children! everybody's doing it!

      you just made zero sense. All you want is to satisfy your instinct to point the finger at someone perceived as worse than you and punish him. There is actually no good argument for punishing him other than revenge.

    • 1 year ago
  • curtisreed
    • +1
      curtisreed  
    • good_stuff:

      "Ultimately though, blame should fall on the fathers shoulders for bringing his son to this place and letting him get himself killed"

      kids get killed while supervised and riding their bikes, motorcycles, swimming in pools...hell the most dangerous place in America for kids is the flipping bathtub.

    • 1 year ago
  • hammywill
    • 0
      hammywill  
    • curtisreed:

      I am not sure that is true statistically speaking. Of course bathtubs cause more deaths in whole number, but do you think that might be because EVERY single child takes a bath? How many kids take baths (whole numbers) vs. the kids that shoot fully automatic weapons (whole numbers). Now run the statistics on the death ratio. Give me THAT number, then we can talk about how dangerous bath tubs are Vs. Machine Guns.

    • 1 year ago
  • littlwarrior
    • +7
      littlwarrior  
    • What the fuck is anyone doing letting an 8 year shoot a machine gun without direct adult supervision. Really, the kids dad should be brought up on charges for fucks sake. I mean thats not to say I hadnt shot a mchine gun by this kids age but my dad had a hold of me and the gun both the whole time. Srsly this kids dad should be brought up on charges. Why would the guy who owns the place be brought up on charges? did he tell the kid here bud shoot away?

    • 1 year ago
  • Radical_Centrist
  • floydyboy
    • +2
      floydyboy  
    • littlwarrior:

      The dad did do right. He left his son with a "professional". A few other kids fired that gun earlier in the day. The guy who was supposed to be helping the kid was not paying attention. All the other kids who fired that gun had an adult holding the clip underneath their hand. To blame the dad is like blaming a parent whose child drowned at a waterpark because the lifeguard was not paying attention.

    • 1 year ago
  • hammywill
  • cantucwearebrothers
  • noxidereus
  • noxidereus
    • +1
      noxidereus  
    • hammywill:

      It is most likely because you don't wish to. I'll help. According to floydyboy both are potentially dangerous/deadly situations supervised by a professional. Agree or not, at least you should get it now.

    • 1 year ago
  • cantucwearebrothers
  • curtisreed
  • hammywill
    • 0
      hammywill  
    • noxidereus:

      I am sure you see that a swimming pool is as dangerous as an Uzi. Perhaps you are right, I don't want to see it that way. But, in my mind, I don't see as large a threat of death swimming around a kiddy pool as I do shooting an Uzi. Maybe it's just me, but I would wager that a large majority of people would agree with me.

    • 1 year ago
  • littlwarrior
    • 0
      littlwarrior  
    • curtisreed:

      who is calling who iliterate. i read the whole article and all it says was that dad was near by. And had you any reading comprehension skills you would have noticed that I wasnt saying there was no supervision but rather what there was was obviously inadequate.

    • 1 year ago
  • floydyboy
    • 0
      floydyboy  
    • cantucwearebrothers:

      So, say this kid was walking down a busy road, with a trusted adult. A busy road, if you're not paying attention is a dangerous place. If the kid got hit by a car, would you blame the parent, would you blame Ford. No, you'd blame the trusted adult who was supposed to know what they were doing so everyone would be safe, or call it a tragic accident.

    • 1 year ago
  • hammywill
  • cantucwearebrothers
    • 0
      cantucwearebrothers  
    • floydyboy:

      A tragic accident for sure, but placing blame in that circumstance isn't going to do anyone any good.

      Don't think for a second, though, that I wouldn't second guess everything involved in that scenario. If I'd just done this or that different my child would not have been hit by a car. The what if's would be endless.

      The point that I was making is that even if there is a lifeguard on duty or a 'hey kid hold your uzi right' person supervising...and I am there....I AM RESPONSIBLE.

    • 1 year ago
  • floydyboy
  • hammywill
    • 0
      hammywill  
    • floydyboy:

      I was being sarcastic. In my mind the analogy would be more appropriate if you said the adult and child were running around on a freeway...but, apparently I am in the minority. I think your analogy is apples and oranges.

    • 1 year ago
  • kennymotown
  • coolplanet
  • noxidereus
  • kennymotown
more from Community:

top videos