Community | December 14, 2010 | 108 comments

Why I'm Posting Bail Money for Julian Assange By Michael Moore

source: http://j.mp/i0vgv5

Image
ras_menelik
Yesterday, in the Westminster Magistrates Court in London, the lawyers for WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange presented to the judge a document from me stating that I have put up $20,000 of my own money to help bail Mr. Assange out of jail.

Furthermore, I am publicly offering the assistance of my website, my servers, my domain names and anything else I can do to keep WikiLeaks alive and thriving as it continues its work to expose the crimes that were concocted in secret and carried out in our name and with our tax dollars.

We were taken to war in Iraq on a lie. Hundreds of thousands are now dead. Just imagine if the men who planned this war crime back in 2002 had had a WikiLeaks to deal with. They might not have been able to pull it off. The only reason they thought they could get away with it was because they had a guaranteed cloak of secrecy. That guarantee has now been ripped from them, and I hope they are never able to operate in secret again.

So why is WikiLeaks, after performing such an important public service, under such vicious attack? Because they have outed and embarrassed those who have covered up the truth. The assault on them has been over the top:

**Sen. Joe Lieberman says WikiLeaks "has violated the Espionage Act."

**The New Yorker's George Packer calls Assange "super-secretive, thin-skinned, [and] megalomaniacal."

**Sarah Palin claims he's "an anti-American operative with blood on his hands" whom we should pursue "with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders."

**Democrat Bob Beckel (Walter Mondale's 1984 campaign manager) said about Assange on Fox: "A dead man can't leak stuff ... there's only one way to do it: illegally shoot the son of a bitch."

**Republican Mary Matalin says "he's a psychopath, a sociopath ... He's a terrorist."

**Rep. Peter A. King calls WikiLeaks a "terrorist organization."

And indeed they are! They exist to terrorize the liars and warmongers who have brought ruin to our nation and to others. Perhaps the next war won't be so easy because the tables have been turned -- and now it's Big Brother who's being watched ... by us!

WikiLeaks deserves our thanks for shining a huge spotlight on all this. But some in the corporate-owned press have dismissed the importance of WikiLeaks ("they've released little that's new!") or have painted them as simple anarchists ("WikiLeaks just releases everything without any editorial control!"). WikiLeaks exists, in part, because the mainstream media has failed to live up to its responsibility. The corporate owners have decimated newsrooms, making it impossible for good journalists to do their job. There's no time or money anymore for investigative journalism. Simply put, investors don't want those stories exposed. They like their secrets kept ... as secrets.

I ask you to imagine how much different our world would be if WikiLeaks had existed 10 years ago. Take a look at this photo. That's Mr. Bush about to be handed a "secret" document on August 6th, 2001. Its heading read: "Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US." And on those pages it said the FBI had discovered "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings." Mr. Bush decided to ignore it and went fishing for the next four weeks.

But if that document had been leaked, how would you or I have reacted? What would Congress or the FAA have done? Was there not a greater chance that someone, somewhere would have done something if all of us knew about bin Laden's impending attack using hijacked planes?

But back then only a few people had access to that document. Because the secret was kept, a flight school instructor in San Diego who noticed that two Saudi students took no interest in takeoffs or landings, did nothing. Had he read about the bin Laden threat in the paper, might he have called the FBI? (Please read this essay by former FBI Agent Coleen Rowley, Time's 2002 co-Person of the Year, about her belief that had WikiLeaks been around in 2001, 9/11 might have been prevented.)

Or what if the public in 2003 had been able to read "secret" memos from Dick Cheney as he pressured the CIA to give him the "facts" he wanted in order to build his false case for war? If a WikiLeaks had revealed at that time that there were, in fact, no weapons of mass destruction, do you think that the war would have been launched -- or rather, wouldn't there have been calls for Cheney's arrest?

Openness, transparency -- these are among the few weapons the citizenry has to protect itself from the powerful and the corrupt. What if within days of August 4th, 1964 -- after the Pentagon had made up the lie that our ship was attacked by the North Vietnamese in the Gulf of Tonkin -- there had been a WikiLeaks to tell the American people that the whole thing was made up? I guess 58,000 of our soldiers (and 2 million Vietnamese) might be alive today.

Instead, secrets killed them.

For those of you who think it's wrong to support Julian Assange because of the sexual assault allegations he's being held for, all I ask is that you not be naive about how the government works when it decides to go after its prey. Please -- never, ever believe the "official story." And regardless of Assange's guilt or innocence (see the strange nature of the allegations here), this man has the right to have bail posted and to defend himself. I have joined with filmmakers Ken Loach and John Pilger and writer Jemima Khan in putting up the bail money -- and we hope the judge will accept this and grant his release today.

Might WikiLeaks cause some unintended harm to diplomatic negotiations and U.S. interests around the world? Perhaps. But that's the price you pay when you and your government take us into a war based on a lie. Your punishment for misbehaving is that someone has to turn on all the lights in the room so that we can see what you're up to. You simply can't be trusted. So every cable, every email you write is now fair game. Sorry, but you brought this upon yourself. No one can hide from the truth now. No one can plot the next Big Lie if they know that they might be exposed.

And that is the best thing that WikiLeaks has done. WikiLeaks, God bless them, will save lives as a result of their actions. And any of you who join me in supporting them are committing a true act of patriotism. Period.

I stand today in absentia with Julian Assange in London and I ask the judge to grant him his release. I am willing to guarantee his return to court with the bail money I have wired to said court. I will not allow this injustice to continue unchallenged.

P.S. You can read the statement I filed today in the London court here.

P.P.S. If you're reading this in London, please go support Julian Assange and WikiLeaks at a demonstration at 1 PM today, Tuesday the 14th, in front of the Westminster court.

http://j.mp/i0vgv5
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   JUDGE THE JUDGE
  2. tags:
    Wikileaks,  Julian Assange,  Michael Moore,  Freedom of the Press,  1 more
  3. recommended by:
    Vierotchka,
    pjacobs51,
    ras_menelik
  4.     
    |

108 comments // Why I'm Posting Bail Money for Julian Assange By Michael Moore

  • Varex_Sythe
    • 0
      Varex_Sythe  

    • Though I think Michael Moore is quite likely doing this as much for publicity as anything else, I can't argue with him bailing the guy out.

    • 1 year ago
  • treewolf39
  • Varex_Sythe
    • 0
      Varex_Sythe  
    • treewolf39:

      No, publicity is not what drives liberal minded people, no more than it drives conservative minded people. However, Michael Moore does seem to have a flair for the dramatic in his documentaries. Don't get me wrong, I liked "Sicko" and "Bowling for Columbine," but Michael Moore does pull some dirty handed stunts on occasion which seem to be just about raising his publicity. At the end of "Bowling for Columbine," Moore surprises Heston with an unscheduled interview at his own home. Heston is an old man and was probably very confused, but the way the attempted interview was set up painted an extremely one sided picture to the whole thing and in doing so was also probably one of the large reasons the film made as much money as it did.

    • 1 year ago
  • treewolf39
    • 0
      treewolf39  
    • Varex_Sythe:

      I will have to watch it again to see what you are referring to. My memory of the flick is about guns and killings in America compared to other nations that have gun access as well.

      You have to have a flare for something or no one will watch your movie; also part of his gig is bringing public attention and awareness to an apathetic population. I think anyone who tells the truth about the disparity in the American dream and what most Americans are experiencing is a hero and deserves to be celebrated.

    • 1 year ago
  • Mark701
    • +3
      Mark701  

    • I said this before and I'll say it again. The military information leaked by WikiLeaks is a non issue. To the best of my knowledge no one has died as a result of it. Additionally, none of the revealed information is the least bit surprising. War sucks. People murder other people in EVERY war. I'm not justifying it, just saying it's not something that surprises me. This leads me to believe that the military revelations are not the big concern.

      However consider, the day before Assange stated he would be releasing information on the Bank of America,(not yet done) the Fed came clean about where all the TARP money went. They stated they did so because they were required to do so by law. However, keep in mind that Paulson and the Fed had flat out refused to reveal this information to Congress just over a year ago. The excuse that US law required them to do come clean is bullshit in light of the situation created by WikeLeaks. You know as well as I do how things go in DC. The Fed does NOTHING it doesn't want to do. What has this got to do with BoA? Everything.

      BoA was one of the biggest recipients of TARP money so the process and requirements for receiving TARP money would be crystal clear for the country to see. This information package would likely have included at least some information regarding the Feds bailout of foreign banks. So rather than when for the other shoe to drop, the Fed released the information first.

      Can I prove this? Nope. We'll have to wait and see what financial information gets released. However I'm a firm believer that in the BoA info release there will be revelations of corruption, fraud, theft and unbridled greed that will make everything to date pale by comparison.

    • 1 year ago
  • ras_menelik
  • steveo102938
    • +3
      steveo102938  

    • LOL @ onemalefla dude...you are totally right because you read an article on yahoo news....lmmfao...omg ok..you do realize that our corporate run govt is trying to haul this guys ass in for delivering thousands of secrets that we aren't supposed to know right? I don't really care how big of a toolshed you are, I just wonder what he really has to say... you know the guy who is falsly being charged with rape... I mean anyone who the world govt is trying to bring down probably is worth listening to right? Why else would they be trying to silence the guy. ONEMALEFLA just so you know, yahoo! is a complete detriment to society. You should be ashamed..

    • 1 year ago
  • Dejan_Croatia
  • ninja_tiger
    • +3
      ninja_tiger  

    • bravo Michael, please don't let us forget to look beneath madia HYPE and get to truth. Michael already has respect, fame and fortune, and does not need to steal the spotlight....he is the spotlight.

    • 1 year ago
  • ras_menelik
  • ras_menelik
  • ras_menelik
  • onemalefla
  • ras_menelik
  • onemalefla
  • ras_menelik
  • ras_menelik
  • ras_menelik
  • MrMxyzptlk
  • ras_menelik
  • MrMxyzptlk
  • ras_menelik
  • artemis6
  • Benjamin_McMichael
  • Benjamin_McMichael
  • UtopianSky
    • +5
      UtopianSky  
    • Benjamin_McMichael:

      I can honestly say I have no respect for you.
      And far more respect for Michael More than you.
      Yet, you still freely state your thoughts in public.
      So does Michael Moore.
      So, what's the difference?
      Oh yes- he is better at it than you are.

    • 1 year ago
  • lenhart
    • +1
      lenhart  
    • Benjamin_McMichael:

      No --YOU are anti-American for implying that Michael Moore should be denied free speech. Secondly, you epitomize what is wrong with what passes for 'debate' in America --vast generalities, ad hominems and right wing smear jobs which, in fact, mean absolutely nothing, the deliberate smear-job based not upon facts but personalities.

    • 1 year ago
  • lenhart
    • +1
      lenhart  
    • Benjamin_McMichael:

      Again --another meaningless ad hominem, a tactic that has become the defining characteristic of the utterly USELESS right wing in America. Do you guys go to a special school that teaches you how to shut down vast amounts of brain cells? Is there a 'stupid' school where insults and BULLSHIT are taught rather than physics, calculus, history, political theory (NOT PROPAGANDA) sociology, biology to include natural selection, molecular biology? I know for fact that the GOP conducts 'campaign schools' for prospective candidates and political consultants. I know that for a fact --I attended one of them. I know PRECISELY how Republican candidates have been taught to 'frame' opponents, how GOP candidates literally design campaigns of character assassination so that the specific characterizations and outright lies are more likely to be believed among specific demographic groups. Frankly --you are a tool and you have been used but --alas --you fell for it. ERGO: you are NOT a free man; you are, rather, a TOOL.

    • 1 year ago
  • lenhart
    • +1
      lenhart  
    • Benjamin_McMichael:

      I should mention, however, that the American 'right-wing' in particular had absolutely NOTHING to boast about. It has verifiable record of UTTER FUCKING FAILURE. Volumes may be written of this but, in a very short post here I will have to leave it at this: EVERY Democratic regime in America has presided over much greater GDP growth and JOB CREATION that has ANY GOP regime at least since World War II. My source for that are several Federal agencie: the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Census Breau, the U.S. Commerce Dept -B.E.A. et al. I will admit that I have not yet researched the stats for IDIOTS like Calvin Coolidge, Warren Harding or Herbert Hoover. But as GOP policies and its easily documented COLLUSION with the BIG BANKSTERS was most certainly a prime cause of the Great Depression as were the same practices more recently under the utterly failed and corrupt regime of George W. Bush.

    • 1 year ago
  • sffsmessiah
  • n537
    • +9
      n537  

    • If I had a quarter for every time a U.S. Agent called somebody a rapist I'de be one rich prole right now.

      Gov: "There is no one behind the curtain. Hey over hear (jumps frantically) "America against rapists" all eyes on rape, hide your kids hide you wife, we going find you Assange."

      Doe: "No really! I'm sure the real rapist is behind this curtain. I can see him hiding behind all the lies, fallacies, and holes in the material."

      Gov: "Yea we're working on a new curtain. The old one just gives the illusion that we're raping rights around the world in your name..uh just close your eyes for now. It will pass, oh look something glittered in show-biz world."

      But in all seriousness, it's obvious this was a smear campaign against Assange. My heart goes out to the people on this forum who haven 't realized that yet.

    • 1 year ago
  • UtopianSky
    • -1
      UtopianSky  
    • n537:

      If I had a quarter for every time a rich famous person actually committed a rape I'd be wealthy enough to rape you and get away with it.

      But in all seriousness, it's obvious that there really is such a thing as rape. It's a crime, and it does occur in the real world. Not everything is part of some vast conspiracy theory. My heart goes out to the people on this forum who haven 't realized that yet.

    • 1 year ago
  • ras_menelik
  • n537
    • 0
      n537  
    • Image
    • UtopianSky:

      Yea and if you exposed hundreds of thousands of documents about the international community and the U.S. Iraq War, you'de make me rich all over again; after I sue you for sexually harassing my eyes on this forum.

      Just keep dreaming Utopian. The Government is selfless they don't need hundreds of loopholes, repressed voices, and violence to be in control. Why would our benevolent leaders have to go to such lengths? After all, they have done such good things for everyone -- all around the world.

      Rape does indeed happen in the real world, so does conspiracy, here take my heart. As to whether Assange is actually a rapist, I'll wait till after the trial because the timing is a little convenient and the words are very charged. Whether there are rape charges here or not, this case is
      being used to distract people from the work Assange has done. This article gives a pretty nice thorough run down. You may enjoy it.

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1336291/Wikileaks-Julian-Assanges-2-nigh...

      love,
      n

    • 1 year ago
  • UtopianSky
    • 0
      UtopianSky  
    • n537:

      And you prove my point-

      Did I say ANYTHING to even slightly suggest an attitude of the government being angelic? Hell no. My point is Assanege is no angel either.

      If you spend your life thinking everyone are Angles or Demons, you miss out on all of the subtleties that exist in the real world.

      There are NO Angels. There are NO Devils. There are just Human beings.

      Stop worshiping some and demonizing others.

    • 1 year ago
  • n537
    • 0
      n537  
    • UtopianSky:

      What point? That rape is real,and rich people can be rapists; or that not everything is part of one vast conspiracy. Why would I disagree with those general ideas? It's like the comment you made just now--angels and demons. You got me Utopian, I totally thought in black and white terms before now-- bravo! bravo! I can take down the Assange poster that I have been masturbating too all day.

      Utopia 3000, I never called Assange an angel, but I don't believe that he is a serial rapist either; at least not with the evidence that has been provided thus far. I can say with certainty that this coverage is being used to demonize Assange in the eyes of the public so that they will disregard the material that's being released by wikileaks.

      You don't call the government angelic, but your comment infers that the Government has nothing to do with this fiasco. I disagree with that point. The U.S. government and their drones have been coming down so hard on Assange for the material his site released. Do you really want to make this an example of how everything is not one vast conspiracy? I agree with you just not in this instance. The U.S. has pulled sneakier cards and this smells like one of them.

    • 1 year ago
  • mrandrewmills
  • n537
    • +2
      n537  
    • mrandrewmills:

      Why don't you spread positivity instead of bitching about how much you hate other people's opinions. Another option, is to become a lurker so we don't have to skim through your ill informed generalizations.

      with love

    • 1 year ago
  • mrandrewmills
    • 0
      mrandrewmills  
    • n537:

      Please don't get me wrong. I was upset because I just made an account on this site and didn't set it to not send me emails for every time someone commented on this thread. I should have put more thought into my words. I was just looking for information about what was going on in the case, but most of the things I've read here were really one-sided opinions. I was just looking for facts. I should probably know better. I probably won't be coming back to this site anymore...unless they bring back Super News because I loved that show.

    • 1 year ago
  • coolplanet
    • +1
      coolplanet  
    • mrandrewmills:

      Go to your profile page and shut off email responses.
      I had to do this when the spammers bombarded Current two months ago.
      BTW i realy wish we had a spell-check option before posting messages.

    • 1 year ago
  • Benjamin_McMichael
  • n537
    • +2
      n537  
    • mrandrewmills:

      Sorry my friend, the world is filled with mostly one-sided opinions. Finding facts take some searching--use multiple resources. In any case, have fun, educate yourself, form your own solid opinions, and than share them with us, cause we're bored lol.

    • 1 year ago
  • ForgetTheBox
  • hanzdogy
    • +6
      hanzdogy  

    • Where was the espionage act when Valerie Plame was outed as an agent due to leeks?... oh wait that was the president's office doing that, so it was ok then. It is just not ok when regular citizens do it.

    • 1 year ago
  • lenhart
    • +7
      lenhart  

    • Lieberman is concerned about the espionage act! FUCK the espionage act! Where was the outrage when the GOP repeatedly flouts the Constitution and the very rule of law itself! Where is the outrage? Lieberman is not a Democrat; he's GOP-lite, a TOOL of the so-called Jewish Lobby, in fact, the richest, most powerful lobby on K-Street!

    • 1 year ago
  • Benjamin_McMichael
  • artemis6
  • DidiT79
    • +6
      DidiT79  

    • Who watches the watchmen? WikiLeaks, that's who! We should be thanking Julian Assange, not wasting time on ad hominem attacks on Michael Moore.

    • 24 days ago
  • Benjamin_McMichael
  • Michael_Miller
    • +6
      Michael_Miller  

    • Oh please! The sexual assault was dropped and is now being brought back up on the fact that a lot of powerful people don't want the people to stand up against the powers that be. They want to dress Assange up in drag and piss all over him so that those who read the surface media don't believe anything from Wikil-eaks.

    • 1 year ago
  • CarlosIsDown
  • onemalefla
  • Nephwrack
  • BrushwithDeathToothpaste
  • telcod
    • 0
      telcod  
    • onemalefla:

      Logic here would make our so-called democracy untenable. Can't possibly vote for someone you don't know personally, "i guess"? Back to tribal. I can go with that. I'm with you brother, don't vote, it only encourages them.

    • 1 year ago
  • hanzdogy
    • +1
      hanzdogy  
    • onemalefla:

      Some sources say he is a rapist, and some say he is not. If you can't make a judgment either way because you don't know him, then I am leaning towards CIA smack down. I feel like I know the CIA better than I know Mr. Assange. I did not vote you down however for bringing up it up. Cheers.

    • 1 year ago
  • coolplanet
    • +1
      coolplanet  
    • onemalefla:

      "Consensual but unprotected sex" does not constitute rape.
      Isn't it obvious to you that rape charges dismissed in Sweden a few years ago and now being rehashed in London is a smear campaign?
      Wiki leaks are uninteresting to most people. Sex gets everyone's attention.

    • 1 year ago
  • UtopianSky
    • +3
      UtopianSky  
    • onemalefla:

      I agree, and was about to post the same thing.

      People are losing the big picture here- they are focusing on the fact that they like him politically, and forgetting that he is a human being who just might be a rapist.

      This reminds me of the Michael Jackson fans who refused to accept that he's a pedophile simply because they like his music.

    • 1 year ago
  • UtopianSky
    • +3
      UtopianSky  
    • CarlosIsDown:

      FORCED sex, with or without a without a condom, is rape.

      Non-consensual sex with an unconscious person, with or without a condom, is rape.

      I have no idea why people dwell on the condom aspect, and forget the consent aspect- that is what defines a rape.

      These women did not want to have sex with him.

    • 1 year ago
  • UtopianSky
  • steveo102938
    • +1
      steveo102938  
    • onemalefla:

      Did you also find the part about how he met those women and how they tweeted about having sex with Assange afterwards. They knew he was famous and wanted a piece of the guy. Tell me something, if Julian Assage raped you, would you go BRAG about it on twitter right afterwards? Yah sounds like a rape to me...

    • 1 year ago
  • coolplanet
    • +2
      coolplanet  
    • UtopianSky:

      Whatever happened to being innocent until proven guilty?
      Even after Jackson was cleared of all charges most people seem to believe he was guilty of molesting children.
      Gossip is more important than justice nowadays.
      And what about Bill Clinton. Starr couldn't find any evidence that he committed any crime in Whitewater (after spending a half-a-billion tax dollars searching for six years). So he was found guilty and IMPEACHED for a few consentual blowjobs.
      We are a tabloid world now and sex seems to be the only thing that matters, besides money of course.
      Beam me up, Scotty!
      This planet sucks.

    • 1 year ago
  • coolplanet
  • Itsbatman_Durr
    • 0
      Itsbatman_Durr  
    • UtopianSky:

      thank you for saying this you are so right and while he deserves his day in court, that is what he is getting, so people need to take his 'status' and their cheerleading out of the equation and lets determine if there were rapes here

    • 1 year ago
  • UtopianSky
    • +1
      UtopianSky  
    • coolplanet:

      Of course not- you don't want someone who weighs the evidence honestly and fairly. You want a unilateral decision to free a man you decided to idolize because of his professional life without knowing who he is as a man.

    • 1 year ago
  • UtopianSky
    • 0
      UtopianSky  
    • coolplanet:

      Whatever happened to being innocent until proven guilty?
      It's there, and it's great! IN COURT.
      Whatever happened to actually weighing the evidence and being able to think for yourself as a human being?
      THAT'S GREAT TOO!

      OJ Simpson was cleared of all charges most people seem to believe he was guilty of killing two people.

      Money is more important than justice nowadays.

      So, if we are in a tabloid world now and sex seems to be the only thing that matters, besides money of course; it seems you picked money over sex.

      I pick actually finding out what really happened and judging him by that in a court of law.

      Sound good to you?

    • 1 year ago
  • scotmanart
    • +2
      scotmanart  

    • What a JOY when good men DO DO the Right Thing.
      Lets kick unctous evil in the nuts Everyday.
      "The Lions of fire shall have their hunting in this land.You are sick with the stench of your money." k. Patchen

    • 1 year ago
  • mrandrewmills
    • 0
      mrandrewmills  

    • Wait I thought this guy was in jail for sexual assault? If this is incorrect please let me know because I haven't been following as well as I should be.

    • 1 year ago
  • onemalefla
  • CarlosIsDown
  • coolplanet
  • onemalefla
  • coolplanet
  • ras_menelik
  • irie_ojo
  • nanac
    • +5
      nanac  

    • Micheal Moore is a national treasure and a true patriot..He will be severely attacked by the unpatriotic, pathetic, power hungry,Right-Wingers, for making this courageous stand..Micheal More has the support of millions of people around the globe, who are hungry for the truth..God bless Micheal Moore. I hope not, but I am sure that his life is in danger..

    • 1 year ago
  • NothingIsAbsoluteTruth
  • telcod
  • nanac
    • +1
      nanac  
    • NothingIsAbsoluteTruth:

      This is only an expression. Micheal Moore is in need of blessings/luck depending on your preference..He has entered very dangerous territory by posting bail..I want God to bless Micheal, you, and all believers..I wish the nonbelievers well too.............Peace

    • 1 year ago
  • NothingIsAbsoluteTruth
  • NothingIsAbsoluteTruth
  • jubal
  • jubal
    • +26
      jubal  

    • Openness, transparency -- these are among the few weapons the citizenry has to protect itself from the powerful and the corrupt.

      This is my fav quote....I love this message, too. Its right on the mark.

      People say that governments cannot operate without secrecy...I call BULLSHIT...that is true only if their very souls are corrupt. We aren't talking about revealing troop positions here, we are talking about the fact that America has never really tried to protect its whistleblowers who expose corruption at the highest levels. Wikileaks provides that service.

      All the politicians are cowards when the people demand that they confront the rich and powerful elite of the world that through their corporate entities engage in immoral behavior towards humanity in the name of CAPITALISM, FREEDOM TO MAKE UNLIMITED PROFITS, and DEMOCRACY FOR ALL CORPORATIONS.

    • 1 year ago
  • treewolf39
  • RMattnerTours
  • Juas
    • -12
      Juas  

    • All abord the wikileaks traiiiiiinnnnn!!!

      Although im very sure what Mr Moore is doing is for a very good cause, I cant stop thinking hes also doing it for the spotlight.

      Hes playing a double game and certainly I dont care if hes on the spotlight or not. At least, hes doing something about it.

    • 1 year ago
  • kennymotown
  • remanns
  • cantucwearebrothers
  • noxidereus
    • +19
      noxidereus  

    • Michael Moore and Julian Assange are for the people when governments and the media are not. They are demonized by the powers of the world who lie to and exploit the people and use us as pawns for their own gain and some of the lesser intelligent among us (e.g. Itsbatman_durr below) fall for it (sad, sad, sad). In propagating the propaganda vomited upon us, those ignorant among us demonstrate just how easily it is for people/sheep to be manipulated by the powers that be. Thank goodness for Moore and Assange and others. If the powers that be can't silence them, the ignorant will slowly awaken from their fog and they will finally see what is really going on.

    • 1 year ago
  • CalgarC
  • Itsbatman_Durr
  • telcod
  • MrMxyzptlk
  • telcod
  • hanzdogy
  • MrMxyzptlk
  • hanzdogy
  • Stever_B
    • +1
      Stever_B  
    • Itsbatman_Durr:

      And so what if everything you wrote is true? Assange still got bailed out. You think that now that he's bailed out, he's just going to fade away and Michael Moore can be in the spotlight again? That isn't how this works.

      Nice score though.

    • 1 year ago
  • lifestudentno83
12
1 - 100 of 108
more from Community:
from the community

top videos