WikiLeaks Blockade by MasterCard & Visa Europe Under Government Probe...
source: http://www.newsinenglish.no/2010/12/24/wikileaks-blockade-under-probe/
-
-
- gerardange
- added this
Norway’s leading business newspaper, Dagens Næringsliv (DN), has reported in a series of articles this week how Visa Europe and MasterCard have effectively blocked their credit card holders’ ability to send donations to WikiLeaks. The blockade has been carried out through the Norwegian-Danish finance firm Teller, which handles credit card transactions for Visa Europe and MasterCard.
Teller officials claim they were ordered by Visa Europe to suspend yet another firm involved in the complicated chain of credit card facilitators, Datacell of Iceland, which received donations (which donors had charged to their credit cards) on behalf of WikiLeaks.
Demanding legal basis for the suspension
DN reported earlier this week that a leading Norwegian law professor believes the credit card blockade, suspected of being politically motivated because of WikiLeaks’ disclosures of classified government documents, is illegal and violates both national and EU finance agreements and directives.
Now, reports DN, the Icelandic Parliament has launched an investigation into the grounds for the actions taken by Teller, Visa Europe and MasterCard against WikiLeaks. ”Nobody has been able to clarify the judicial foundation as to why payments to Datacell, and therefore WikiLeaks, have been stopped,” Robert Marshall, who leads the Parliament’s control committee, told DN. “And that is, of course, a problem.”
Marshall called the credit card blockade “serious” and “highly dubious” and said the Icelandic parliamentarians were demanding a “legitimate reason” for it. So far, he told DN, Teller has only referred to “due diligence” undertaken to ensure that Datacell has operated in accordance with its agreement with Visa. Neither Teller nor Visa Europe has produced evidence of wrongdoing on the part of Datacell or WikiLeaks, even though they have effectively halted payments to WikiLeaks through Datacell for nearly three weeks. That, according to DN, has cost WikiLeaks an estimated USD 1.6 million in lost donations from its supporters and also is hurting Datacell, which has more than 3,000 other customers.
Norway also demands some answers
DN reports that Norwegian financial authorities at regulatory agency Finanstilsynet in Oslo are also raising questions and have asked Teller to produce a legitimate reason for turning away customers. Finanstilsynet planned to send a letter Thursday to Teller demanding a legal reason as to why Teller has effectively stopped payments to WikiLeaks by suspending Datacell.
Anders Kvam of Finanstilsynet told DN that “we’re looking into this,” and that the regulators want to know Teller’s basis for the actions taken against Datacell. Teller must answer by January 3, an unusually short deadline that means Teller officials will need to work on the issue during what otherwise is a Christmas holiday period in Norway.
“This is a current problem that must be solved,”" Kvam told DN. “It involves payment transactions, and we can’t let these types of questions remain unanswered.”
Teller sent out a press statement earlier this week saying it had concluded that Datacell had violated its agreement with Visa by turning over payments to a third party. Datacell’s officials objected immediately and legal action is pending.
Teller also claimed that it had found no violations on the part of Sunshine Press, WikiLeaks’ company in Icceland, but that it was now up to Visa to approve payments to Sunshine Press.
Views and News from Norway/Nina Berglund
Join our Forum if you’d like to comment on this story.
-
- groups:
- Community, News and Politics, US Politics, Collective Journalism, 2 more
-
- tags:
- Corruption, Freedom, Fraud, Wikileaks, 13 more
-
-
gerardange
-

-
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101225/23385712407/ny-times-finally-speaks-ou...
NY Times Finally Speaks Out Against Financial Firms Blocking Wikileaks
>>>>> from the took-'em-long-enough deptOne of the more annoying things about watching the major news publications discussing the Wikileaks controversy is how infrequently they seem to realize that many of the attacks they themselves have been directing (or redirecting) at Wikileaks could come back to haunt them as well, as many could apply to them when they do things such as publish information about leaked documents. In fact, just last week, we wondered how come all those financial firms (including Visa, MasterCards, Bank of America and Paypal) were not cutting off the NY Times after itrevealed military secrets. It appears that some folks on the NY Times editorial board have realized the same thing and published an editorial condemning the decision to cut off Wikileaks by these financial firms:
[A] bank's ability to block payments to a legal entity raises a troubling prospect. A handful of big banks could potentially bar any organization they disliked from the payments system, essentially cutting them off from the world economy...[...] Still, there are troubling questions. The decisions to bar the organization came after its founder, Julian Assange, said that next year it will release data revealing corruption in the financial industry. In 2009, Mr. Assange said that WikiLeaks had the hard drive of a Bank of America executive.
What would happen if a clutch of big banks decided that a particularly irksome blogger or other organization was "too risky"? What if they decided -- one by one -- to shut down financial access to a newspaper that was about to reveal irksome truths about their operations?
That said, part of the editorial is a bit worrisome, as it seems to be suggesting that banks themselves should not be able to decide who they can and cannot work with, and that since they are "not too unlike other public utilities," perhaps they should be regulated, in the same way that a telco cannot refuse to provide phone or internet service to an operation who it does not like. I'm not sure that's necessarily the lesson we should be taking from this, however. The larger lesson is more about the lack of real competition in the space, where a very small number of intermediaries are effectively able to block off much of the money supply. That's the real problem. The answer should be to encourage greater competition in the space, such that if a few firms decide to cut off a service, it doesn't really matter, since there are many others to step in and help in their place. - 1 year ago
-
gerardange
-
-
AmericanStandard
-
The best thing you can do is pay off your cards and dont use them. You simply cannot just not pay them for political reasons unless you are willing to accecpt unemployment for political reasons. Any good job runs a credit check. Car insurance rates are determined by....credit checks (and driving history). APR for house or car...credit check.
- 1 year ago
-
AmericanStandard
-
-
CalgarC
-
oh-no... you in twouble naow... :D
Go Julian :D
- 1 year ago
-
CalgarC
-
-
FishaHouse777
-
The EU and UN and the people of this country need to start standing against this abuse of wikileaks and julian. Neither have done any illegal acts yet are treated as criminal, this has to be pushed more as an injustice.
- 1 year ago
-
FishaHouse777
-
-
hammywill
-
FishaHouse777:
Agreed!! Whatever happened to Due Process!? Or innocent until proven guilty!?
- 1 year ago
-
hammywill
-
-
southrabbit [removed]
- This comment was removed by its owner.
-
southrabbit [removed]
-
-
FishaHouse777
-
southrabbit:
Nice thought, but impossible. Our society, culture, and government is so deeply intwined with credit that we can't "just go to cash only". I wish we could too but at this point its not possible, we have to compromise a comfortable medium of both credit and cash.
- 1 year ago
-
FishaHouse777
-
-
hammywill
-
FishaHouse777:
It is absolutely possible. Easy, no..possible, absolutely. The only thing keeping people from doing it is they still want to be able to watch Football on a flat panel TV. Sloth and greed are what stop this from happening and nothing more.
- 1 year ago
-
hammywill
-
-
gerardange
-

-
Okay now what?
So now we all go back to sleep? Back to business as usual & doing nothing?
Doing nothing is stupid!
Doing something is courageous...
WIKILEAKS IS A WAKE-UP CALL !!!
Wikileaks is a global "Virus Protection Software" that has shown all of us that our systems are infected.... That there is a trojan virus running in the background - doing things against the interests of the People of the Country that the government is mandated to represent.
This is a real wake-up call for people everywhere.... that Corporations have taken over all our government systems... Stealing all our freedoms and making us slaves of their corporate system.
LEARN FROM HISTORY.....
Mussolini quote: " Fascism should be appropriately called Corporatism because of a merger of State & Corporate Power."
That is what is going on here...
This is a wake-up call for everyone.. and
Wikileaks is the Alarm Bell !!!
Truth is courageous...
~
- 1 year ago
-
gerardange
-
-
FishaHouse777
-
gerardange:
Ok i'm down to help, what can I do? and what are you doing?
- 1 year ago
-
FishaHouse777
-
-
Robotic091
-
mail them money orders
- 1 year ago
-
Robotic091
-
-
Prijedor
-
Crazy to see how easy some one can get cut off and charged with things just because that some one plays for the other side
- 1 year ago
-
Prijedor