Community | December 28, 2010 | 107 comments

100 Banks bailed out by TARP funds may collapse

Image
maasanova
The $700-billion bank bailout, launched in the final months of the Bush administration, was meant to save US financial institutions from a systemic collapse. But an analysis of banks' earnings statements concludes that nearly 100 bailed-out banks are at risk of collapsing all the same.

Despite receiving a total of $4.2 billion in bailout cash, 98 US banks are at risk of failing, the Wall Street Journal reports.

The banks are suffering from “eroding capital levels, a pileup of bad loans and warnings from regulators,” the Journal reports, and the nature of the problem indicates that these banks were in trouble before the 2008 crisis hit -- a sign that the US's regulatory structure for banks may have been insufficient for years or decades before the collapse.

So far, seven bailed-out banks have already collapsed, costing taxpayers $2.7 billion.
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   Banking
  2. tags:
    Economy Obama Crime Finance 10 more
  3.     
    |

107 comments // 100 Banks bailed out by TARP funds may collapse

  • sffsmessiah
  • TasteHi
  • TypeMemeHere
  • JT_Lancer
  • Gordon_Cyrus
    • +1
      Gordon_Cyrus  
    • The monetary system is so old, regressive and based on debt. It's all a universal scam a card house waiting to crumble. Read money mechanics to really understand hiw money works people. Or check out Peter Joseph movie Zeitgeist Money is the incentive for 95% of all crime and only holds back human excellence. It's a myth that it's motivation. It's an invented plague that is destroying this earth and everything in and around it, traveling faster than bad news.

    • 2 years ago
  • neuroburger
    • +2
      neuroburger  
    • "both" parties were suddenly able to drop all differences to hand trillions of dollars to banksters "for our own good" - but can't agree to extend unemployment without a tax-cut for the billionaires.

      funny how the democrats couldn't be bothered to repeal the "bush" tax cuts for the past 2 years that they had a lock on congress and the white house

      but the republicans (who still don't control the senate) could "force" the democrats to accept yet more of the "bush" tax cuts

      it's all political kabuki

      go read "the state and revolution" by V. Lenin

    • 2 years ago
  • uShine
  • neuroburger
    • +1
      neuroburger  
    • uShine:

      yes, and don't forget that the banks can resell the properties after they're foreclosed - so it's a win-win racket for them - selling mortgages that the "owners" end up paying 5 or 6 times the (already inflated) "value" of the property to the banks and then they can take back the property and re-sell it, again and again and again.

      not to mention that Goldman Sachs was not only advising their rubes/'investors" to take long positions on CDOs while they were themselves taking short positions.

    • 2 years ago
  • franreves
  • Varex_Sythe
    • +2
      Varex_Sythe  
    • Here's what we need to do for any of these banks if they go under because they made and probably continued to make such bad gambles. Take the bank owners and upper management whom are certain to still be rich, take the majority of their personal money, and use it to repay what little amount of the debt that can be payed off.

    • 2 years ago
  • hammywill
  • dalistuff
  • neuroburger
    • +1
      neuroburger  
    • dalistuff:

      that's like betting on a game of russian roulette - even if you "win" you still end up losing

      what do you think your money is going to be "worth" when the federal government declares insolvency?

    • 2 years ago
  • dalistuff
  • neuroburger
    • 0
      neuroburger  
    • Image
    • dalistuff:

      happy new year

      this is my only real "point" - when it comes to taking care of themselves and their billionaire friends/employers/constituency ("base"), the "two" parties immediately drop all pretense of "gridlock" - when it was time for Billionaire Socialism, the presidential candidates of the "two" parties sure sounded like they were reading from the same script (tho allowed to "improvise" to a certain degree in order to preserve the appearance/façade of a "two" party ideological system) - when it comes to regular working people - the ones that the corporate media prefer to lable as "middle class", there is no end of excuses why "the party of no" could hold up congressional action on a single-payer health-care system, or repealing the "bush" tax cuts - every time there is action needed on behalf of the american workers, these "two" parties put on the same sham kabuki-style show of "gridlock"

      too bad there was no "gridlock" to be found when it was time for bailouts for billionaires - here's an informative article from the NYT during the period:

      Both Obama and McCain Make Push for Bailout

      By MICHAEL COOPER and JEFF ZELENY
      Published: September 30, 2008

      KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Both presidential candidates intensified their efforts Tuesday to help push the financial bailout plan through Congress, lobbying skeptical lawmakers and warning publicly that a failure to act would cause a widespread economic crisis that would hurt regular people, not just financiers.

      Senators Barack Obama and John McCain both began the day suggesting a change in the bailout legislation to raise the federal insurance limit on bank deposits to $250,000 from $100,000, a move that had originally been sought by House Republicans, whose overwhelming opposition doomed the bill on Monday. And both men used their campaign appearances Tuesday to press for action in Congress.

      etc etc

      http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/01/us/politics/01campaign.html

    • 2 years ago
  • gerardange
    • +4
      gerardange  
    • IN A STATEMENT MADE FEW WEEKS AGO:

      JULIEN ASSANGE "Warned all BOA Costumers who have money in BOA to change to another bank."

      "IN MY OPINION ".... I WOULD TAKE MR. ASSANGE'S ADVICE VERY SERIOUSLY!!!!

      WHY? Because, JULIEN ASSANGE, is one person besides, BOA... who knows exactly what is in those BOA internal documents....

      Wall street is preparing everyone today for the released of all those documents to the media and public in the next few weeks.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Bank of America has been reportedly conducting "DAMAGE CONTROL"in the last few weeks.

      Reported As:
      BOA has been in a PANIC spending huge money buying every negative internet Anti-BOA website they can get there hands on...Prior to the release of the internal BoA files that have been given to Wikileaks by a BoA Whistle Blower.

      Side Note:

      Through all my sources.... I am getting the feeling that something big is getting ready to happen...

      MORE INFO:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCfS6Pj_qh4&NR=1

    • 2 years ago
  • artemis6
  • JohnA
    • 0
      JohnA [removed]  
    • gerardange:

      BAC stock has gone up every single day since he made that statement. The US goverment saved GM, you think they are going to let BAC go away? BAC just announced they are raising their dividend. If he thinks he has anything, bring it, what's he waiting for. Buy BAC stock, it's up $3 this month.

    • 2 years ago
  • neuroburger
  • neuroburger
    • +1
      neuroburger  
    • JohnA:

      the US government and the UAW are now working together to force union workers to take wage cuts and to institute "two tiered" wage systems under which all new hires max out at about 15$/hr.

      the partnershp between government, corporations and unions was first tried under Benito Mussolini and was called "fascism"

      it was a disaster for working people then, and remains so today.

    • 2 years ago
  • kennymotown
    • +6
      kennymotown  
    • Just another way the ELITE have lined their pockets with our tax money so as they will survive the big crash just around the corner! But will they survive the glistening blade of the guillotine? Only time will tell.

    • 2 years ago
  • neuroburger
  • JT_Lancer
    • +5
      JT_Lancer  
    • Taxpayer-funded bailouts of Wall Street fat cats - just another government 'success' story.

      Bush signed the $787 Billion bailout bill - with the support of half of Congressional Repubs and 90% of Congressional Dems - DESPITE the fact that a majority of Americans OPPOSED the measure.

      Ain't democracy grand?

    • 2 years ago
  • neuroburger
    • +1
      neuroburger  
    • JT_Lancer:

      funny isn't it how the "two" parties which gave us this whole "gridlock" story when it was time for Obama to deliver on his promises of "single payer" health care - but they can suddenly drop all pretense of "differences" to unite in order to save themselves (you know how much Pelosi's pearls cost?) and their bankster political financiers.

    • 2 years ago
  • galwayman
  • VoyagerFilms
  • tommic
  • KSirys
    • +4
      KSirys  
    • that's what i need to do, a few more million and i can open my own community bank... and when i'm doing bad, i'll call the government and get a bail out... why not? it's the american way!

    • 2 years ago
  • bailey78
  • KSirys
  • bailey78
  • VoyagerFilms
    • +3
      VoyagerFilms  
    • KSirys:

      Actually, what you do is buy insurance from AIG betting that your bank will fail, then when it does as a result to making bad loans to family and friends you can get bailed out and collect insurance - which is also bail out money.

    • 2 years ago
  • neuroburger
  • KSirys
    • 0
      KSirys  
    • neuroburger:

      lol.. don't ASSume... I have connections in the banking sector, hedge fund and real estate. If i had the millions needed, i wouldn't have a problem opening a bank.

      Also, getting the bail out wouldn't be hard either, specially since my friend/attorney is a bank owner himself... connections are the least of my worries...

    • 2 years ago
  • neuroburger
    • 0
      neuroburger  
    • KSirys:

      just because you might have a bank don't mean you'd get the loot

      it seems to be more a case of "coordinated consolidation" - look at Bear Stearns - they were no less worthy of a "bailout" than any of these other corporate behemoths - but somehow they didn't have a history of interlocking relations with the Dept of Treasury, unlike Goldman-Sachs which made out like (pardon the expression - no, heck don't pardon it!) "bandits"!

    • 2 years ago
  • guitar1100
  • hammywill
  • remanns
  • remanns
    • 0
      remanns  
    • hammywill:

      someone should REALLY try that some time. I'm in. ( at least for a trial run,.....I do want the TRUE democracy that is supposed to go with it. )

      Euro-socialism certainly has merits. +^d

    • 2 years ago
  • hammywill
  • hammywill
  • VoyagerFilms
  • neuroburger
    • 0
      neuroburger  
    • Image
    • guitar1100:

      this is capitalism

      capitalism is rule by capitalists

      they rule us for their own benefits

      they control the government - they control who gets elected and who can't even get on a ballot - they control who has access to the debates - they control the media - they control education - they fund or defund programs as they see fit all to further the agenda of the propertied classes

      “Because the state arose from the need to hold class antagonisms in check, but because it arose, at the same time, in the midst of the conflict of these classes, it is, as a rule, the state of the most powerful, economically dominant class, which, through the medium of the state, becomes also the politically dominant class, and thus acquires new means of holding down and exploiting the oppressed class....” The ancient and feudal states were organs for the exploitation of the slaves and serfs; likewise, “the modern representative state is an instrument of exploitation of wage-labor by capital. By way of exception, however, periods occur in which the warring classes balance each other so nearly that the state power as ostensible mediator acquires, for the moment, a certain degree of independence of both....” Such were the absolute monarchies of the 17th and 18th centuries, the Bonapartism of the First and Second Empires in France, and the Bismarck regime in Germany."
      In a democratic republic, Engels continues, “wealth exercises its power indirectly, but all the more surely", first, by means of the “direct corruption of officials” (America); secondly, by means of an “alliance of the government and the Stock Exchange" (France and America).

      At present, imperialism and the domination of the banks have “developed” into an exceptional art both these methods of upholding and giving effect to the omnipotence of wealth in democratic republics of all descriptions. Since, for instance, in the very first months of the Russian democratic republic, one might say during the honeymoon of the “socialist” S.R.s and Mensheviks joined in wedlock to the bourgeoisie, in the coalition government. Mr. Palchinsky obstructed every measure intended for curbing the capitalists and their marauding practices, their plundering of the state by means of war contracts; and since later on Mr. Palchinsky, upon resigning from the Cabinet (and being, of course, replaced by another quite similar Palchinsky), was “rewarded” by the capitalists with a lucrative job with a salary of 120,000 rubles per annum — what would you call that? Direct or indirect bribery? An alliance of the government and the syndicates, or “merely” friendly relations? What role do the Chernovs, Tseretelis, Avksentyevs and Skobelevs play? Are they the “direct” or only the indirect allies of the millionaire treasury-looters?

      Another reason why the omnipotence of “wealth” is more certain in a democratic republic is that it does not depend on defects in the political machinery or on the faulty political shell of capitalism. A democratic republic is the best possible political shell for capitalism, and, therefore, once capital has gained possession of this very best shell (through the Palchinskys, Chernovs, Tseretelis and Co.), it establishes its power so securely, so firmly, that no change of persons, institutions or parties in the bourgeois-democratic republic can shake it.

      http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/staterev/ch01.htm#s3

    • 2 years ago
  • neuroburger
  • hammywill
  • kennymotown
  • JT_Lancer
    • 0
      JT_Lancer  
    • kennymotown:

      Wasn't it the government that artificially lowered interest rates and imposed policies that demanded lending to many who could not afford it?

      Even Keynesian economists acknowledge the govt's role in the housing bubble and bust.

    • 2 years ago
  • kennymotown
  • hammywill
  • JT_Lancer
    • +2
      JT_Lancer  
    • kennymotown:

      You are correct. The Fed is nothing more than a publicly created cartel of private banking interests. Since the creation of the Fed in 1913, the purchasing power of the dollar has been devalued by 95%. Not a great track record.

      Unfortunately, nearly all Congresscritters defend the Fed, and few have the guts to challenge Bernanke and Co., let alone demand accountability via an audit.

    • 2 years ago
  • kennymotown
    • +2
      kennymotown  
    • JT_Lancer:

      These bankers are at the top of the ELITE chart, at their disposal they have a closet full of henchmen that can destroy anyone who gets in their way. The only way, and I have said this time and time again, to destroy this EVIL, is by force!

    • 2 years ago
  • hammywill
    • +2
      hammywill  
    • kennymotown:

      No, it isn't. Force is the resort of people who can not use their brains. How about we run on the banks? What if we refuse to use Dollars? What if we stop going to work and go on a general strike? Every one of those options would work.

    • 2 years ago
  • kennymotown
  • galwayman
    • +2
      galwayman  
    • hammywill:

      If you were to try these methods,which would directly impact the elites profit and control and they will shoot you down in the streets! The only way to beat them is by force and to kill each and every one of them, and their political lackies!

    • 2 years ago
  • galwayman
  • kennymotown
  • kennymotown
  • hammywill
  • hammywill
    • +1
      hammywill  
    • galwayman:

      I won't be the one to instigate violence. But if they shoot at me and my family for trying to get out ourselves free from slavery to the banking masters, then it. will. be. ON! I use Total War tactics. This is why I abhor war...because if it is war..it is Total War5. (look up the tactic)

    • 2 years ago
  • galwayman
  • kennymotown
  • kennymotown
  • kennymotown
  • hammywill
  • kennymotown
  • galwayman
    • +2
      galwayman  
    • kennymotown:

      Thank you hammywill for posting that link my friend a great blog indeed and I subscribed right away! Power to the People was once misused by the left now it must be our battle cry! It is the duty of every patriotic American to rise up against the liberal nanny state and return this country to the rule of the governed with the Constitution as our guide! Our government, which has stolen power from the people and has ceased to represent our best interests,must be replaced with one that does,before it is too late! Democrat or Republican doesn't matter anymore,both are basically the same,both have robbed us of our rights! Both have given power over to the elite,who have no sense of country or honor!

    • 2 years ago
  • galwayman
    • +1
      galwayman  
    • kennymotown:

      My friend you aren't the only one with the knowledge of war and it is well past time to rise up and take our country back! Power must always rest with the governed,by and for the people,not the elite,who have no honor and no loyalty to the principles upon which this nation was founded! It is our duty,and our obligation,to do so!

    • 2 years ago
  • kennymotown
    • +1
      kennymotown  
    • galwayman:

      Nice too hear that soldier, they are constantly dividing us. Can you imagine the heads must be spinning when they see we are seeing through the bullshit. Did you see the movie Matewine, I think that's how it's spelled. This is not the first time a gilded age has arose from the abuses of Capitalism.

    • 2 years ago
  • galwayman
    • 0
      galwayman  
    • kennymotown:

      It is people like this who brought on the great depression and history repeats because the elite doesn't care about anything but profit for themselves! I've said many times unless we all throw off the bullshit and unite we can't win!

    • 2 years ago
  • neuroburger
    • 0
      neuroburger  
    • kennymotown:

      corporate america without its greed is like a shark that only eats tofu

      it's a nice fantasy (for surfers especially) but in the real world, corporatism and greed are like salt and pepper - they just seem to go together

    • 2 years ago
  • Jeremy_Benson
    • 0
      Jeremy_Benson  
    • So true. I've been reading about new bank foreclosures for months now. Is it any surprise that the band aids we slapped over our gaping wounds are starting to slip off?

    • 2 years ago
  • XasthurNortt
  • Jeremy_Benson
  • Darevalo
  • bailey78
    • +1
      bailey78  
    • Darevalo:

      but his friends needed the money. they have jets to buy fuel for ya know. oh lets not forget about the house in spain and the house in vail and the house in france they have to pay for the upkeep on. Ya know it's hard being rich in this day and age. Not that I would know anything about that but i do read about how hard the rich folks are haveing right now.

    • 2 years ago
  • bailey78
    • +6
      bailey78  
    • Let them fail we will be better off in the long run because we will then be able to start a real recovery. I would also like to know how many million did the folks running the banks get for driveing the banks into the ground again

    • 2 years ago
  • ThatCrazyLibertarian
  • maasanova
  • bailey78
  • ThatCrazyLibertarian
  • floydyboy
  • bailey78
  • floydyboy
  • Mikey_Pogoloff
  • bailey78
  • JT_Lancer
  • littlwarrior
    • +1
      littlwarrior  
    • Well we knew going in that it would not work for 100% of the banks that funds were given to, plus the without the tarp the numbers would have kept on dropping and next thing you know we would have been in a depression.

    • 2 years ago
  • hammywill
  • littlwarrior
    • +1
      littlwarrior  
    • hammywill:

      Maybe there is still hope. the economy has leveled off and actually started to slowly inch in the right direction. If the republicans get their way though its all over you can bet on that. trickle down economics, bah how dumb can someone be!

    • 2 years ago
  • Darevalo
  • hammywill
  • hammywill
    • 0
      hammywill  
    • littlwarrior:

      The United States does not produce anything. The economy is not leveling off, the only sector gaining is the financial service sector. These people are making RECORD profits. While inflation continues to FAR outpace wage increases. This country is going nowhere but downhill. There is no other possible outcome.

      Don't forget trickle down economics has also been instituted by THIS administration and Congress for the last two years.

    • 2 years ago
  • littlwarrior
    • 0
      littlwarrior  
    • hammywill:

      You make good points all around, we do need to shore up our industrial sector, hence the automotive bail out, and we could do more to boost manufacturing in our own nation with basic tarifs that would make our government money and help our own industry, and whatever trickle down this administration has done was done at the behest of the republicans, and then bitched about by republicans a week later, that does not mean that this administrations handling of the recession is perfect, but I do feel it could be doing a better job if the right would cooperate instead of just screaming loudly and doing little more.

    • 2 years ago
  • hammywill
    • 0
      hammywill  
    • littlwarrior:

      Funny, the ONE American automotive company who is doing well right now did not receive any bailout money. Also, the Auto bailout only came after a restructuring of UAW contracts. I did not see the same stipulations in regards to Executive bonuses before the banks received THEIR bailouts.

      It is easy to blame the right, because they are openly in favor of making Americans into Serfs. But the Democrats have had control of the House, Senate and White House for the last two years. There is no reason they could not have gotten through EVERYTHING they wanted. None, not one reason.

    • 2 years ago
  • littlwarrior
  • littlwarrior
  • hammywill
    • 0
      hammywill  
    • littlwarrior:

      Except that you do not need a quorum to change procedural rules and get rid of the filibuster. Which is exactly what they are considering in the Senate right now. Although that is a political move to make themselves look better because no matter what happens in the next Senate, the Republicans will have control of the House. So the Senate can end the Filibuster but they know for a fact it will have no other impact other than to garner some political points.

      This is why I am cynical towards both parties. They have never done anything that resulted in a benefit for me, a working class citizen.

    • 2 years ago
  • hammywill
    • 0
      hammywill  
    • littlwarrior:

      The sad thing is, I see those jobs being lost. And now, thanks to things like NAFTA (a Democratic Party treaty incidentally) there is nothing in place in the US economy to replace those jobs. Most economists think there will be at least 5 years before there is a JOB recovery in the United States. However some other economists say that if we keep doing what we are doing, how could there possibly EVER be a job recovery? The United States is a net Importer and our economy is 70% consumer driven. This means we ABSOLUTELY need people spending money. However, with skyrocketing inflation and no wage increases, coupled with no job recovery, we can not sustain the consumer spending neccesary to fuel our economy.

      The other thing is that the rest of our economy is driven by Financial Instruments, and those have taken such a huge hit that they are risky at BEST. Not a wise investment. So even if we wanted to lean on another substantial portion of our economy to help us through the lean times ahead, that portion of the economy is also in a free fall. The economic system in the United States can only have ONE long term outcome. Total collapse. It may not happen today...but it WILL happen.

    • 2 years ago
  • musicjohnny
  • hammywill
    • +2
      hammywill  
    • They got the bailouts in time for the executives at those banks to get one last "bonus" before they collapse. Who does the government REALLY represent? It certainly is not me.

    • 2 years ago
1 - 100 of 107
more from Community:

top videos