How A Different America Dealt with the Great Depression
source: http://figrd.blogspot.com/
-
-
- figgdimension
- added this
Were confirmation needed that the American public is in a sour mood, the 2010 midterm elections provided it. As both pre-election and post-election surveys made clear, Americans are not only strongly dissatisfied with the state of the economy and the direction in which the country is headed, but with government efforts to improve them. As the Pew Research Center's analysis of exit poll data concluded, "the outcome of this year's election represented a repudiation of the political status quo.... Fully 74% said they were either angry or dissatisfied with the federal government, and 73% disapproved of the job Congress is doing."
This outlook is in interesting contrast with many of the public's views during the Great Depression of the 1930s, not only on economic, political and social issues, but also on the role of government in addressing them.
Quite unlike today's public, what Depression-era Americans wanted from their government was, on many counts, more not less. And despite their far more dire economic straits, they remained more optimistic than today's public. Nor did average Americans then turn their ire upon their Groton-Harvard-educated president -- this despite his failure, over his first term in office, to bring a swift end to their hardship. FDR had his detractors but these tended to be fellow members of the social and economic elite.
Still, as now, the public had some reservations about the stretch of government power and found little consensus on specific policies with which to tackle the nation's troubles.
Optimistic 'Socialists'
Broadly representative measures of public opinion during the first years of the Depression are not available -- the Gallup organization did not begin its regular polling operations until 1935. And in its early years of polling, Gallup asked few questions directly comparable with today's more standardized sets. Moreover, its samples were heavily male, relatively well off and overwhelmingly white. However, a combined data set of Gallup polls for the years 1936 and1937, made available by the Roper Center, provides insight into the significant differences, but also notable similarities, between public opinion then and now.1
Bear in mind that while unemployment had receded from its 1933 peak, estimated at 24.9% by the economist Stanley Lebergott,2 it was still nearly 17% in 1936 and 14% in 1937.3 By contrast, today's unemployment situation is far less dismal. To be sure, despite substantial job gains in October, unemployment remains stubbornly high relative to the norm of recent decades and the ranks of the long-term unemployed have risen sharply in recent months. But the current 9.8% official government rate, as painful as it is to jobless workers and their families, remains far below the levels that prevailed during most of the 1930s.
Still, despite their far higher and longer-lasting record of unemployment, Depression-era Americans remained hopeful for the future. About half (50%) expected general business conditions to improve over the next six months, while only 29% expected a worsening. And fully 60% thought that opportunities for getting ahead were better (45%) or at least as good (15%) as in their father's day.
Today's public is far gloomier about the economic outlook: Only 35% in an October Pew Research Center survey expected better economic conditions by October 2011, while 16% expected a still weaker economy. The Reagan-era recession found the public somewhat more hopeful than at present, but less optimistic than in the 1930s.4 In November 1982, with unemployment at its recession peak of nearly 11%, Americans believed their personal financial situation would improve over the next year by a 41%-to-22% margin.
However, the most striking difference between the 1930s and the present day is that, by the standards of today's political parlance, average Americans of the mid-1930s revealed downright "socialistic" tendencies in many of their views about the proper role of government.
True, when asked to describe their political position, fewer than 2% of those surveyed were ready to describe themselves as "socialist" rather than as Republican, Democratic or independent. But by a lopsided margin of 54% to 34%, they expressed the opinion that if there were another depression (and fears of one were mounting), the government should follow the same spending pattern as FDR's administration had followed before.
more on this at http://figrd.blogspot.com
source: pewresearch.org
-
- tags:
- America, Economics, Great Depression, research polls
-
-
remanns
-
Our collective pack "sanity" has waned.
( too much seemingly uncontrolable negative feedback ? )
- 1 year ago
-
remanns
-
-
emarston
-
Without the lasting effects of the cold war I think it was much easier to take over a sector, create a mass project and create jobs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal). Now a days anything even mentioning a creation of jobs outside the private sector is Socialist or Communist depending on which happens to be the buzz word of the day.
- 1 year ago
-
emarston
-
-
gerardange
-

-
Yes... "Happy Days Are Here Again!"
- 1 year ago
-
gerardange
-
-
Lindsay_K_
-
The less gov involvement the better. This is getting ridiculous. They tell you who you can and can't marry, what you can and can't do with your body (as a woman) , drink this alcohol and get into a car crash BUT DONT YOU DARE SMOKE MARIJUANA!! Pretty soon they're going to own almost all the major companies, then they will own us. Im pretty sure the already do.
- 1 year ago
-
Lindsay_K_
-
-
gerardange
-
Lindsay_K_:
I think you have that backwards...
Today, the corporations have corrupted our government... the people are now bound and gaged and stuffed in the trunk!
- 1 year ago
-
gerardange
-
-
remanns
-
gerardange:
+^D ( though I think she just said the same thing,.....looked at from the ASS end of the elepant, as it were . ) is government,....business,.....or business,.....government?
the distinction blurs.
- 1 year ago
-
remanns
-
-
Jeremy_Benson
-
Lindsay_K_:
Less government involvement in the individual, perhaps. But certainly not in industry and banking.
- 1 year ago
-
Jeremy_Benson
-
-
NickerBocker09
-
Of course they were optimistic. The government was setting up shop left and right employing anyone they could find, they also advertised out of the gazoo.
Guess what isnt being done today. Instead of the government creating jobs, they are giving all the money to corporations to create the jobs. I dont see advertisements from our government talking about a brighter tomorrow. You can spew all of the "government is bad" bullshit you want but we need them and the people of this country need hope. We got a burst of it in the 2008 election but then it was stalled.
- 1 year ago
-
NickerBocker09
-
-
JanforGore
-
-
What else could they do but be optimistic? Losing absolutely all hope was a death sentence. At least they found a man who cared about them in FDR, whatever you may think about him.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
figgdimension
-
JanforGore:
He was awesome
- 1 year ago
-
figgdimension
-
-
JanforGore
-
figgdimension:
He sure was, as was his wife. I'm honored to share the same birthday with him. ;-)
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
Progresshiv
-
People in the 1930s had not been brainwashed by FOX to believe that down is up, bad is good, and black is white.
- 1 year ago
-
Progresshiv
-
-
emarston
-
Progresshiv:
it's black is muslim
- 1 year ago
-
emarston
-
-
remanns
-
emarston:
Well,.....with all that oil money,....more and more "moslem" IS in the black.
- 1 year ago
-
remanns
-
-
figgdimension
-
I like the Bonnie & clyde reaction
- 1 year ago
-
figgdimension
-
-
kennymotown
-
figgdimension:
I agree, and baby face Nelson as well!
- 1 year ago
-
kennymotown
