Community | January 04, 2011 | 100 comments

Arizona Representative to Introduce Citizen Militia

Image
congoboy
New Az. State Rep wants to form the Arizona Militia to guard the border. Something all of us should consider, a State militia and Civil Defense accountable to the Governor. No sense in not being ready.
More on the Global Chessboard Series - Yes, another Border Patrol agent on the Arizona border was shot and killed by Mexican drug smugglers last month. There were eight attackers this time with four in custody Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was part of a border tactical unit (BORTAC) tracking armed drug smugglers 15 miles northwest of Nogales, Ariz., when the team was attacked with automatic weapons. The area is well-known as a major drug-smuggling corridor, and the smugglers are known to be armed with AK-47s and tactical battle weapons. The captured smugglers had AK-47s and backpacks filled with ammunition, food and radios. There are rumors that three of the captured four are members of the Mexican military, but that is unconfirmed. Yet, it would not be the first time Mexican police and military have been apprehended smuggling drugs into the United States.http://patriotsforamerica.ning.com/forum/topics/arizona-militia
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Culture,   Opinion,   1 more
  2. tags:
    Arizona Law Enforcement Illegal Immigration Drug Trafficking 4 more
  3.     
    |

100 comments // Arizona Representative to Introduce Citizen Militia

  • Cloud_William
    • 0
      Cloud_William  
    • Well, what this lawmaker suggests, classed as a State Defense Force, STILL is not a "militia" but a SELECT Militia, with non-elected leadership.

      The "Shot Heard 'Round The World" that began the American Revolution was fired by a Militiaman in a Civilian Organized Militia.

      Of interest...

      The final legal authority of the United States Government, its
      Supreme Court, spoke clearly on the militia issue in its 2008
      decision District of Columbia vs. Heller. According to that opinion
      published for that decision, militias may be Citizen Organized. In
      other words, the Supreme Court (speaking as the final "decider" of
      the Federal Government) requires Citizen Organized Militias.

      * Pursuant to District of Columbia vs. Heller, 100s of
      inhabitants of Tennessee State, who are jealous of their defending
      their God-given (as well as civil) rights--for which countless
      patriots have given their lives--and not in vain--are now restoring
      the "Tennessee State Militia" as a "Citizen Organized Militia,"
      keeping in mind Chapter 61 of The Magna Carta as their inspiration--
      and also inspired by the memory of Sir William Wallace, who fought
      English tyranny to restore Magna Carta rights.

      The Tennessee State Militia (Citizen Organized) as its
      organizational laws, will observe and adhere to The Constitution of
      Tennessee State, and the existing and unrepealed Tennessee General
      Assembly's Militia Laws: Acts of 1831, 1833, 1840, 1842-44, 1846,
      1849-50, 1852, 1856-58, 1860-81, 1885, 1887, 1889, 1893 & 1917 --
      and also respecting the much later T.C.A. Acts 1933, ch. 128, TGA
      Acts 1970, ch. 596, et. al.

      Yours in liberty,

      Cloud William, State Organizer
      http://TennesseeMilitia.com

      "We are going to fight for the reestablishment of our... charactor,
      misunderstood and vilified at home..." General Andrew Jackson,
      Tennessee Militia, Commanding (1812)

    • 1 year ago
  • Tyr
    • +2
      Tyr  
    • I have an interesting question to pose, which has the greater influence on the obvious problems that exist along the border with Mexico, the apparently insatiable demand for drugs and the evidently limitless amount of money to purchase them, or the people who supply that demand?
      We don't seem to have a problem with Mexicans smuggling in Mexican jumping beans because there just isn't any demand for them...now here is something to consider, if we truly want to end the violence, the killings that are the result of the drug trafficking perhaps, just perhaps we should take a closer look and what is attracting the drug dealers.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
  • curtisreed
    • 0
      curtisreed  
    • Tyr:

      isn't it interesting that when liberals talk about American's being energy hogs, they condemn them for their irresponsibile behavior, driving SUVs etc, and want them banned.

      But when it comes to DRUGS, liberals think it's the LAWS taht should be changed so people can do all the drugs they want. Meanwhile, those liberals participate as consumers in the drug trade and therefore contribute tothe profits of these murderous gangs.

      isn't there a word for that?

      starts with ..."hypocrisy"?

    • 1 year ago
  • Paratus
    • 0
      Paratus  
    • I was wondering when this would happen. I am surprised that the landowners along the border have not pooled their resources to provide some sort of mutually beneficial armed protection against this invasion from Mexico. The central government is not living up to its mandate in this area and police are unable to deal with it. It's up to the people. I'm all for it.

    • 1 year ago
  • keithponder
    • 0
      keithponder  
    • A childhood friend in Arizona over the holidays, told me that you can now carry a gun without a weapons permit any place in Arizona except for the airport and the banks.

      Arizona is about ready to get in one and become the "wild, wild west" again.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
  • postlapsaria
    • 0
      postlapsaria  
    • This is a terrible idea.

      The original militia was a united peoples fighting to save their land from an army. This will be a bunch of angry racists killing innocent people because they believe it's "us against them." not the same thing, and won't get the same result.

      and all of you who have commented that you are for this, YOU'RE IDIOTS.

      I'd be curious to hear your actual reasoning, with empirical information as to why you feel that way. I've never heard anything that's rational, nothing that isn't just ignorance and racism.

      yes there are some criminals, yes it's not 100% safe, but what in America is? there's assholes, criminals, drug dealers here too, some illegal criminals from europe or russia. why do the brown ones who walk here deserved to be killed or taken from their kids once they get here?

    • 1 year ago
  • Paratus
    • 0
      Paratus  
    • postlapsaria:

      The people are uniting to save their land from an invasion. Just because the invaders don't wear military does not make it any less of an invasion. Race has nothing to do with it. IT isn't a racial thing. The federal government does nothing and is actively trying to prevent Arizona to do anything either. It's up to the people. I just don't understand your willingness to roll over and do nothing.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
    • 0
      congoboy  
    • postlapsaria:

      again a leftylib makin shit up to make an illegitimate point. arizona has a latino population of 30%. if these folks were inherently racist theyd be killing their neighbors. sure every group has their share of racists including hispanics but this is more of a rule of law issue and a self preservation and protection issue. unless you live in arizona you really dont know shit about whats going on. pull yourself away from cnn for once. crime is spilling over from mexico and innocent americans are being killed. really the best answer is to crack down on americans who use illegal drugs because they are the real reason people are being murdered on both sides of the border.

    • 1 year ago
  • Robotic091
    • 0
      Robotic091  
    • what i don't understand is why would you create a civilain militia that WILL go toe-to-toe with some of the most battle harded gangsters in northern america. and on top of that 90% of the gangs guns are from america every type you can imagine. they have been fighting for decades, Why temped fate? just send in more trained border patrol or upgrade their trainning.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
    • 0
      congoboy  
    • Robotic091:

      so youve got a point. but lets say a guy with a gun jumps over the fence in your back yard and your local cops are undermanned and too busy on the other side of town. i say shoot the fuck.

    • 1 year ago
  • Robotic091
  • congoboy
  • teto007
  • bailey78
  • teto007
  • bailey78
  • congoboy
  • congoboy
  • Robotic091
    • 0
      Robotic091  
    • kinda sad that drug cartels buy weapons from the US to arm themselves and in turn use it on americans. What a cycle drugs/armed dangerous people go north and the money/best weapons in the world go south.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
  • bailey78
  • Mark701
    • +4
      Mark701  
    • bailey78:

      Put pressure on American citizens and companies to stop hiring them and it will be stopped altogether. Stopping them at the borders is treating a symptom, not the disease (illegal hiring).

    • 1 year ago
  • bailey78
    • 0
      bailey78  
    • Mark701:

      Well this is true but you don't expect folks to work real jobs that require them to get hot an sweat do you? Besides they want to get paid more than eight bucks an hour. Thats all the local lawn care folks pay. Most of the jobs the illegals have are the ones the require you to do manul labor. folks today don't want to work. hell most of them don't even want to leave the comfort of mom&dads house or to relocate to get a job. They want a job to come to them. Every time I say hey folks are hireing down here they say it cost to much to move or they have a family that can't move with them. I know for a fact that a local company is hireing welders they are haveing to train the locals because there are not enought welders to fill the job quota. i see lots of out of state plate in the local motel parking lots because of the jobs we have here. My father used to leave us for six months at a time to go out of state to work. But was a real man that did what He had to do to make a good living for his family. Not some little pussy that couldn't take care of His family and cried that the mexican took his job. The jobs are out there for those that want to work. but those that don't want to work will never find a job.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
  • congoboy
  • congoboy
  • bailey78
  • bailey78
  • congoboy
  • congoboy
  • congoboy
  • Nephwrack
  • congoboy
  • Sparky2U
  • congoboy
  • hotjuno
    • 0
      hotjuno  
    • To curtisreed, "...armed and trained by the states--was a revolutionary idea...way back in 1776" yea and so was the 4th estate, the press. Right, but no mention of this. 'Sophistry' is a word I can use here for what I am reading.
      Why wont the Arizona representative introduce a bill to regulate big banks--I mean, that's why the Mexicans are here-- because of the damages inflicted on Mexico for years. So the same people who want militias also want the banks to stay 'deregulated', true? This is funny, criminalize the outcome of what banks have been doing while turning a blind eye toward the banks themselves, priceless.
      If you don't want Mexicans here crossing our boarder(s) illegally then why not stop the banks, why not? You stop Mexicans...bank even stronger now. LOL
      Militias will not protect our boarders they will protect the banks.
      Why do you want this?
      Ultimately this is why the planet is melting today...our criminalizing the 'outcome' of what banks do w/out touching the banks in the least. Turn blind eye, bank even stronger now.
      Oh, and Obama not having birthcertificate...LOL He is your great white hope, is he not? Your national day of prayer LOL You all are attempting to destroy the planet by 'devine decree', no? Corporation/N.A.T.O and the like are hard at work executing resource extraction using religion as a prerec. And I know your religious...about that...the only evidence you have of god the christ is the blood of those who don't accept your lie. This is you god--my blood, blood in street, right...bank even stronger now. LOL Havent you heard the words, "Barbarism and Religion" together? Although I would say instead Barbarism and Western Religion LOL
      Plunder Is Groundless

    • 1 year ago
  • Sparky2U
  • Nephwrack
  • Mark701
    • +2
      Mark701  
    • Sparky2U:

      You know what bothers me about this map? The "Not Yours" area can also be accurately flagged as "Not Yours or Ours". We took "our" country from Native Americans, with the exception of Texas that was taken from the Mexicans. Given that we seized Native American lands by virtue of immigration, it seems a hypocritical for you to post this really stupid map.

    • 1 year ago
  • Daena_Smith
  • a619ko
    • 0
      a619ko  
    • Image
    • Sparky2U:

      Ok, and Im sure they'll want the land the US ceded. California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona and New Mexico....naw scratch that...They are really only coming here for one reason- and thats NAFTA, so, if your goin to blame someone. Blame clinton and gore.

    • 1 year ago
  • Robotic091
  • Robotic091
  • postlapsaria
    • 0
      postlapsaria  
    • Daena_Smith:

      by your stupid ass reasoning of history's precedent then the WHOLE world belongs to Africans.

      idiot.

      the argument is that americans kind of have no right to claim such a hard ownership of the country. we didn't fill the entire country till 150 years ago. we've only been here for 400 years, that's a minute in recorded history's clock.

      Indians, thousands of years. same with the native mexicans, which are the brown people that are apparently ruining our country, they were here for thousands of years before the spaniards.

      so if they put up a fence and claimed manifest destiny then it'd be ok for them to shoot us and blame us (based on unfounded rumors and complete lies) for their problems?

      be opposed to illegal immigration all you want but don't be stupid just for the sake of vilifying immigrants, learn something before you talk.

    • 1 year ago
  • Daena_Smith
    • 0
      Daena_Smith  
    • postlapsaria:

      What the heck are you talking about?? All I asked was a question about the history of the world and who conquered whom.. Might want to read what a person questions or comments BEFORE responding idiotically to what someone has said.

    • 1 year ago
  • postlapsaria
    • -1
      postlapsaria  
    • Daena_Smith:

      I'll explain.
      I agree with the previous to yours comment, about how we stole the land. you seemed to be shooting down that comment, so i assumed i disagreed with you and I thought your comment about how everyone gets invaded and the thing about the spaniards was a useless and generic comment on your part.

      so i commented, then I realize i went on a tangent and a rant that really didn't respond to your comment, so I apologize for everything after "idiot."

    • 1 year ago
  • postlapsaria
  • keithponder
  • Mark701
    • +1
      Mark701  
    • Daena_Smith:

      For the most part, that's probably true. But there is a difference between being invaded and driven off your lands and killed in such vast numbers that reclaiming them is impossible. This is how the "superior" European empires treated those who were not as technologically advanced as they were. If native American Indians had a modern standing army when the pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock, we'd probably still be living in England.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
    • 0
      congoboy  
    • hotjuno:

      big banks arent as big of a concern as crime and murder spilling over their borders. maybe after they get their border issues cleaned up they can look at lesser problems like the banks. but hey, we have barney frank all over that one already right? apples and oranges my friend.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
  • congoboy
    • 0
      congoboy  
    • Daena_Smith:

      invasion has been going on since the beginning of mankind. sometimes barbaric sometimes not. the french, the british, the spanish, heck even the muslims. the list goes on and on. do we forever pay reparations?

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
  • congoboy
    • 0
      congoboy  
    • postlapsaria:

      uhh we didnt steal it. europeans did. no one currently alive either conquered or was conquered. get over it. most reasonable folks try and get along but the pc crowd keeps driving a wedge between integration, compassion, and brotherhood. cant we all just get along?

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
  • Daena_Smith
    • 0
      Daena_Smith  
    • congoboy:

      My point exactly and who knows how it will be 100 years from now. The US economy may collapse and instead of invaded the "old fashion" way, we could be bought out and called "New China" or something. Even the Native American's invaded each others tribe and assimilated them into their own. It's just one nasty habit the human has...lol

    • 1 year ago
  • Daena_Smith
    • 0
      Daena_Smith  
    • Mark701:

      Could be, but we will never know since it didn't happen that way. Who knows what modern weaponry will be available to what country in the future? Just because we are in modern times now, as were the conquerors of their day, doesn't mean history can't repeat itself in the future.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
  • robin49
    • +2
      robin49  
    • As long as there is a demand people will find a way to get drugs, guns, and people across the border. If you want to fix illegal immigration, you need to fix the problems in Mexico that drive people to come to America. If you want drug trafficking to stop, you need to get rid of the demand for those drugs in the U.S.. Of course that will never happen, but a girl can dream.

    • 1 year ago
  • onemalefla
  • congoboy
    • 0
      congoboy  
    • onemalefla:

      well even a bigger problem than greedy u.s arms sellers is american drug users and addicts. they are the ones truly fueling this war. so essentially its the druggies of this country that are committing the murder on both sides of the border.

    • 1 year ago
  • musicjohnny
    • 0
      musicjohnny  
    • I completely agree with what they're doing as long as they are accountable to the state government. Obviously if they start trying to operate outside of those confines then it turns in to vigilantism and that's not appropriate. But seriously, why would anyone have a problem with citizens coming together in a controlled and orderly and regulated way to deal with a massive and deadly problem in their state? It's apparent that we can't rely on the federal government to get the job done (otherwise drug and arms traffic wouldn't be increasing like it is now) so if their are citizens willing to step forward and defend their state, I'm all for it.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
  • MizPiz
    • 0
      MizPiz  
    • Thats not to say I don't like the idea of a militia (I actually believe it should be how you become a citizen, whether you were born here or not), but I'm completely oppose what they plan to do with it.

    • 1 year ago
  • musicjohnny
  • MizPiz
    • +3
      MizPiz  
    • musicjohnny:

      You and I both know that within two months (at the very least) is going to turn into a "who can kill the most mexicans" contest. I'm going to give the benefit of the doubt that there is a semi-noble reason behind this, but this Arizona we're talking about.

    • 1 year ago
  • XasthurNortt
  • MizPiz
    • +1
      MizPiz  
    • XasthurNortt:

      I'm fully aware of both pieces of information. What seems to be lost is the fact that Arizona is, at least as far as I can tell, a powder keg of racial and jingoistic tension. Just because Mexicans are on both sides doesn't mean that race doesn't play a part in this.

    • 1 year ago
  • musicjohnny
    • +4
      musicjohnny  
    • MizPiz:

      Maybe I'm just being optimistic, but I really think that there will be restraint and control shown by these people. If there's not, well that's what the governmental oversight they're talking about is for. But honestly, I think you're over dramatizing the issue a lot. If the people behind this were really of the "let's go kill us a bunch of mexicans" variety, do you really think they'd be so upfront about their desire to form a militia and have oversight from the government? Of course they wouldn't. They're going about this in a very rational manner. Not everyone who wants to curb illegal boarder crossing is a gun-toting, racist lunatic like so many people would like us to believe.

    • 1 year ago
  • MizPiz
    • +1
      MizPiz  
    • musicjohnny:

      I'm aware of that too, it's just that I know this will attract the "lets kill mexicans" crowd. Who knows, maybe the government can keep them under control, but tell me one time when someone is given legal power over someone, especially the power to kill, and the ones who recieve power haven't abused it.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
  • congoboy
    • 0
      congoboy  
    • MizPiz:

      wow, must be that mexican ganja talkin. and you dont think arizona who is suffering most from this problem shouldnt be the ones to decide whats best for their own state? apparently the citizenry feel compelled to elect officials willing to tackle these issues. everyone else should butt out.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
  • congoboy
  • remanns
  • MizPiz
  • MizPiz
  • musicjohnny
  • musicjohnny
  • congoboy
  • congoboy
    • 0
      congoboy  
    • MizPiz:

      where on earth did you get that idea? as usual you sound like a typical leftylib who makes shit up when youre on the losing end of an argument. btw, i'm only in favor of killing the bad ones.

    • 1 year ago
  • MizPiz
    • 0
      MizPiz  
    • congoboy:

      Just a question, how could I be losing an argument when all you've given as your argument are something thats seems to have came from a bumper sticker, a command to "butt out", and a couple of attacks for being a liberal? You know what, don't bother answering, its just going to end up being embarrassing for the both of us.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
    • +1
      congoboy  
    • MizPiz:

      as a lib you should be used to it and again youre putting false words in my mouth. for someone who makes shit up to make a point youll be the only one worthy of embarrassment.

    • 1 year ago
  • MizPiz
    • -1
      MizPiz  
    • I'm going to call it, Arizona is what America is going to be in the future. I god honestly wish it wasn't, but it's true.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
  • curtisreed
  • curtisreed
    • -1
      curtisreed  
    • Libtards will freak, but the notion of militias--comprised of ordinary citizens armed and trained by the states--was a revolutionary idea...way back in 1776. The militias that fought in the Revolutionary war were actually BETTER armed than the military, because while the muskets used by the British AND American military (Marines) were not rifled, the muskets used by the civilian militia by and large were rifled, giving them superior accuracy.

      Hence, the notion on the left that the average citizen should not be equipped with "military grade" weaponry is stupid. It was the concept that freed us in the first place, and it is a concept still active in places like Switzerland and Israel.

      It would be a good idea in states like Arizona to create a mandatory draft at age 18 of all male citizens--not RESIDENTS, CITIZENS (must show a real birth certificte, so Obama could not participate)--train them properly, arm them, and then call them up for periodic service.

    • 1 year ago
  • remanns
    • 0
      remanns  
    • curtisreed:

      we agree on this. ( militias,...and "what it means" in the constitution. )
      actually, you and I agree on a lot of things,.....but differ STRONGLY on others.

      Obama citizenship is one of those " differ" points.

      But "militia",.....I think MOST of the public is out of touch with the root definition of that.

      TOWNS can have militias,....and "WELL REGULATED" referred to TOWN level regulation.

    • 1 year ago
  • remanns
    • 0
      remanns  
    • curtisreed:

      examples -

      AUSTIN,....could have a militia,....not "owned" by the State or fed
      Detroit,......could have a militia,...not "owned" by the State or fed

      ...........and so could WACO,....constitutionally,.....or even a 'compound' in Waco

      The "individual" right to bear arms, that the "anti-gun" folks want to struggle so doggedly over the definition/terminology of,.....is a FAR CRY FROM, the intent of the founding fathers and the cultural line THEY meant to draw !

      The damn "black -pathers" are ALLOWED to be armed,.....AND DRILL !

      This is a nation bassed on the principle of "cutting deals to get by",....not one "de clawed, de fanged" .

    • 1 year ago
  • remanns
  • curtisreed
    • 0
      curtisreed  
    • remanns:

      actually, I don't pretend to have an opinion on his citizenship, I think he should show all his records. EVen Chris Matthews agrees.

      Obama would have to show his birth certificate to participate, which he won't do, so he would be disqualified.

      All that is REQUIRED to enter the FBI, CIA, even the Military. How can it be that he doesn't have to show a REAL birth certificate to become President?

      What I suspect is that he WAS born here, but either there is something that could undermine his "natural born citizen" status (if he had claimed to be a foreign citizen as an adult, for example), or something very embarrassing that would interefere with re-election.

      Either way, we have a right to know.

      Wikileaks, get to work!

    • 1 year ago
  • carslut
    • -1
      carslut  
    • Guarding the border is an obligation of the Federal Government. This could be one of the first steps in a disintegration of the Union/REVOLUTION. The Feds have become a "Sloth". It takes a sloth a couple of hours to realize that it's arm has been cut off. The Feds are out of contact with our reality. Maybe it's time.....

    • 1 year ago
  • littlwarrior
    • -2
      littlwarrior  
    • I am down, I think we should just legalize anyways, but these bastards are crossing our border illegally and hurting our people so praise the lord and pass the ammunition.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
  • Itsbatman_Durr
    • +3
      Itsbatman_Durr  
    • hey the more private police forces there are to fight each other, the less attention they will pay to screwing with me.. rock on with your bad selves arizona

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
  • Itsbatman_Durr
  • congoboy
more from Community:

top videos