Community | January 06, 2011 | 21 comments

WikiLeaks: Secret whaling deal plotted by US and Japan ~ Against Anti-Whaling Activists

Image
gerardange
American diplomats proposed Japan reduce whaling in exchange for US help cracking down on the anti-whaling activists Sea Shepherd, leaked cables reveal.

Japan and the US proposed to investigate and act against international anti-whaling activists from the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society as part of a political deal to reduce whaling in Antarctic waters.

Four confidential cables from the US embassy in Tokyo and the state department in Washington, released by WikiLeaks, show US and Japanese diplomats secretly negotiating a compromise agreement ahead of a key meeting last year of the International Whaling Commission, the body that regulates international whaling.

The American proposal would have forced Japan to reduce the number of whales that Japan killed each year in the Antarctic whale sanctuary in return for the legal right to hunt other whales off its own coasts. In addition, the US proposed to ratify laws that would "guarantee security in the seas" – a reference to acting against groups such as Sea Shepherd that have tried to physically stop whaling.

The US proposal was eventually shot down by Britain and the EU in June 2010, but the cables show that the Sea Shepherd group had become a political embarrassment to Japan after stopping its whaling fleet reaching its annual quota of whale killed for several years.

The group, led by Captain Paul Watson, a co-founder of Greenpeace, has a reputation for physically confronting whalers, sealers and illegal fishing boats. Its flotilla of ships, which sport the skull and crossbones flag, monitors illegal fishing in the Galapagos islands and spends months each year following and harassing the Japanese whaling fleet in frequently dangerous clashes.

Yesterday two Sea Shepherd ships, the Steve Irwin and the Gojira were involved in cat and mouse skirmishes with two whaling ships. Activists reportedly hurled stink bombs onto the deck as whalers tried to use water cannon.

The US cables show how on 2 November 2009, Shuji Yamada, Japan's vice-minister for international affairs, asked lead US negotiator Monica Medina about an investigation of the tax affairs of Sea Shepherd. It is unclear whether the US government had already launched an investigation or which country had proposed it.

"Yamada inquired about an investigation into the tax status of the US-based NGO Sea Shepherd Conservation Society and repeated Japan's request for the US to take action against the organisation, which he said created a very dangerous situation on the seas," says one cable.

The US government dodged this request but the cable continues: "The DCM replied that the US places the highest priority on the safety of vessels and human life at sea, and added that if any violations of US law are discovered, we will take appropriate enforcement action".

But the Japanese diplomats then responded, "It would be easier for Japan to make progress in the IWC negotiations if the US were to take action against the Sea Shepherd".

One week later, the Japanese pressed the US to take action against Sea Shepherd again, saying that "violent protests by the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society (SSCS) could limit the government of Japan's flexibility in the negotiations".

It appears from the diplomatic chatter that the US did look into the NGO's status. In the same cable, Medina is reported as saying that the US government, "can demonstrate the group [Sea Shepherd] does not deserve tax exempt status based on their aggressive and harmful actions".

The cables then suggest that the US had itself proposed the tax investigation of Sea Shepherd, saying in the same cable on 9 November 2009: "the Netherlands should have primary responsibly for taking action against the SSCS, but he [the Japanese diplomat] appreciates the US government initiative to address the group's tax exempt status".

The US attempt to compromise with Japan failed at the IWC meeting in June after a majority of countries, led by Australia, the European Union, and the Latin American nations rejected it.

In a statement made yesterday from the Sea Shepherd flagship, Captain Watson said: "The US government may have very well looked into Sea Shepherd's activities and if they did so, then they obviously did not find any irregularities or unlawful activities because Sea Shepherd was never contacted by any US government official in connection with this matter. For Sea Shepherd, the most important part of this document is the declaration by Japan that Sea Shepherd has been responsible for the whaling fleet not reaching their quotas for the last few years. This completely validates Sea Shepherd's actions as effective."

Go To article:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/jan/06/wikileaks-secret-whaling-deal?...
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Green,   US Politics,   3 more
  2. tags:
    Environment Japan Wikileaks Ocean 9 more
  3. recommended by:
    Vierotchka
  4.     
    |

21 comments // WikiLeaks: Secret whaling deal plotted by US and Japan ~ Against Anti-Whaling Activists

  • NickerBocker09
    • -1
      NickerBocker09  
    • The US government could've easily said "well stop Sea Shephard for you" but instead they said the Japanese will have to reduce whaling.

      Frankly I'm glad the US did this. I want whaling to be stopped completely but it cannot be done in one swift action. They were honoring the treaty by looking at reducing whaling.

      You know what this info being leaked means? It means a loss of trust. Its already being talked about in all levels of government and embassies, countries less willing to say things because they are afraid it will be leaked. Thankyou Assange, you have done a wonderful job at crippling diplomacy. Why on Earth will Japan want to talk to the US about stopping whaling now?

      People forget that secrecy is important.

    • 1 year ago
  • Tyr
  • GISchmo
    • +2
      GISchmo  
    • This deal that the US embassy wanted to make with Japan, to let them kill a certain amount of whales, is just sick. In my opinion this is another huge mistake of the Obama administration (thankfully the EU and Britain were smart enough to turn down such an awful proposal). While I do not agree with all of the Sea Shephard's actions and philosophies; they are fighting the good fight by trying against impossible odds to stop Japan from MURDERING hundreds of whales every year.

    • 1 year ago
  • tverdell
    • tverdell  
    • This comment was removed by its owner.
  • NickerBocker09
  • rickyracer
  • ArchDruid
  • rickyracer
    • +1
      rickyracer  
    • ArchDruid:

      Your missing the whole point here, uninformed i guess. I seen the episode and they were on a collision course not with the intension of collision with their Million dollar plus boat but to slow down the Japanese whaler. The Ady Gil ran out of fuel and could not move and so the collision. The point here Whaling to distinction, but hey what's the Whales done for you right? just another mammal there's plenty more to go kill?

    • 1 year ago
  • oppressed1
    • -3
      oppressed1  
    • I dont know what the big deal is. They eat whales, we eat cows. They are all animals. We have no right to tell them what they can or cant eat.

    • 1 year ago
  • NickerBocker09
  • FishaHouse777
    • +2
      FishaHouse777  
    • oppressed1:

      Even though I love south park and how it satyrically represents our culture and society, if anyone uses a south park episode to support their argument than that person has little to no credibility.

    • 1 year ago
  • rickyracer
    • +1
      rickyracer  
    • oppressed1:

      @ oppressed1, A big difference here WoW...whaling world wide shopping with a limited amount of whales for Japanese compared to US eating are own farm raised cows...dude educate yourself. So what your saying is its ok they come kill your cow and eat it because YOU don't want to tell them what they can or cant eat, i get it.

    • 1 year ago
  • eden49
  • SamuraiDave
    • +4
      SamuraiDave  
    • "The American proposal would have forced Japan to reduce the number of whales that Japan killed each year in the Antarctic whale sanctuary in return for the legal right to hunt other whales off its own coasts."

      This is sensible as it IS their own coast. Keep them out of the Antarctic all together then Sea Shepherd can't do anything without trespassing. Of course I wonder if the whale population on their coasts will be able to support the [koff!] "scientific research" they are so diligently pursuing every year.

    • 1 year ago
  • oppressed1
  • FishaHouse777
    • -1
      FishaHouse777  
    • Depending on how much whaling would be reduced and how much whaling would be allowed off japans native coast, I think this compromise is a great idea... Sea Sheperd wants reduced whaling, so they should of agreed to it as well, am I wrong?

    • 1 year ago
  • rickyracer
  • FishaHouse777
    • +1
      FishaHouse777  
    • rickyracer:

      I don't smoke weed....and also only in America are their people like you who believe tey have a right to tell other countries and cultures how to live. Japans economy and culture is closely tied to whale hunting, but mass whale hunting will lead to extinction so we must limit them greatly.

    • 1 year ago
  • AJILIVIZION
    • -1
      AJILIVIZION  
    • Another great example that the US government is being used to secure profits and not the welfare of its citizens or any ecosystem. I would love to hear how any "conservative" supports this type of behavior.

    • 1 year ago
  • Itsbatman_Durr
    • 0
      Itsbatman_Durr  
    • well sheeeeeit.. some people are never happy.. hey will you reduce whaling if we get these pests to back off? sure! then waaaaah waaaah go the activists

      i thought reducing whaling was like a good thing to them

    • 1 year ago
  • remanns
more from Community:

top videos