Would MLK support the Iraq / Afghanistan wars? Pentagon says yes
-
-
- Stoneyroad
- added this
by stating he would support the current U.S. wars.
What would make them think such a silly thing?
King's use of the biblical parable of "The Good Samaritan"
the day before he was assassinated.
How does a story of helping a wounded man on the roadside equate to 8 years
of armed soldiers & predator drones?
I guess everything is open to interpretation . . .?
http://www.commondreams.org/further/2011/01/13-1
-
- groups:
- Community, Afghanistan News, War On Terror
-
- tags:
- Iraq, Afghanistan, War on Terror, Pentagon, 1 more
-
-
samthesixth
-
If they think this they must not have access to a library or youtube.
- 11 months ago
-
samthesixth
-
-
MizzErin
-
The self imposed position of grander are something else these days. My guess is if mlk was still alive they would be firing tear gas at him and throwing his staff in jail in an attempt to shut him up. Putting his name on this is an insult to one of our countries great heroes
- 1 year ago
-
MizzErin
-
-
shippit5
-
good samaritan=occupying soldiers/? hmmm
- 1 year ago
-
shippit5
-
-
BrushwithDeathToothpaste
-
Nice touch in the opening statement. The "Obama" Defense Department sent this out. I'm sure the President personally oversees every article published.
- 1 year ago
-
BrushwithDeathToothpaste
-
-
TheEmpireGuy
-
Short answer: No. Long answer: Hell no.
- 1 year ago
-
TheEmpireGuy
-
-
treewolf39
-
That dude is full of shit. How insulting.
- 1 year ago
-
treewolf39
-
-
toyotabedzrock
-
They miscalculated the general intelligence of the American people and the President. Thats the only explanation I can think of.
- 1 year ago
-
toyotabedzrock
-
-
bertkamp
-
Ya. MLK was a man of peace last time I checked.
- 1 year ago
-
bertkamp
-
-
PzLuvHappeniz
-
This is just stupid, thats all I have to say, this is really really dumb
- 1 year ago
-
PzLuvHappeniz
-
-
Stoneyroad
-
PzLuvHappeniz:
Thank you , i was going for something really dumb with this post.
I spent 10 minutes looking for the dumbest story i could find & this was the winner. - 1 year ago
-
Stoneyroad
-
-
PzLuvHappeniz
-
Stoneyroad:
I think you got it just right
- 1 year ago
-
PzLuvHappeniz
-
-
NiceN
-
What intelligent person would dare to believe that a beacon of peace and unity would support a war that has killed more innocent lives than seen the "enemy". MLK would never fight for oil, or spill blood for money. The Pentagon is full of shit.
- 1 year ago
-
NiceN
-
-
PigFarmington
-
Well...considering the same institution killed him when his ideals were turning socialist, this is very doubtfully accurate.
- 1 year ago
-
PigFarmington
-
-
PigFarmington
-
PigFarmington:
Just before he was killed:
"And I say to you today, that if our nation can spend thirty-five billion dollars a year to fight an unjust, evil war in Vietnam, and twenty billion dollars to put a man on the moon, it can spend billions of dollars to put God’s children on their own two feet right here on earth."
- 1 year ago
-
PigFarmington
-
-
Saladin
-
Considering how powerful the rhetoric was on his famous anti-Vietnam speech and how vehemently he opposed violence, the Pentagon is truly shameless in saying this.
One of my favorite quotes of his...
"The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral, begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. Instead of diminishing evil, it multiplies it. Through violence you may murder the liar, but you cannot murder the lie, nor establish the truth. Through violence you may murder the hater, but you do not murder hate. In fact, violence merely increases hate. So it goes. ... Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that."
- 1 year ago
-
Saladin
-
-
TheAmericanPatriot
-
-
Saladin:
This does not sound like a man that would support the O-surge
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b80Bsw0UG-U&feature=related - 1 year ago
-
TheAmericanPatriot
-
-
treewolf39
-
Saladin:
That is a truly wonderful quote. Thank you!
- 1 year ago
-
treewolf39
-
-
lifestudentno83
-
Yes, I'm sure that MLK would support our wars, despite his staunch stance of non-violence.
Someone please direct these idiots to their respective villages.
- 1 year ago
-
lifestudentno83
-
-
TheAmericanPatriot
-
lifestudentno83:
I would like to quote a friend to respond to your comment
"Actually that's one thing we DON'T know for sure, and something you assume you know."
- 1 year ago
-
TheAmericanPatriot
-
-
lifestudentno83
-
TheAmericanPatriot:
Wow. It's a documented fact that Martin Luther King Jr. was vehemently opposed to non-violence. Anyone who's taken 5th grade social studies would know that.
- 1 year ago
-
lifestudentno83
-
-
littlwarrior
-
We cannot know for sure if MLK would support the war or not becuase we lost him. Speculating just distracts from relevant discussion and starts needless infighting.
- 1 year ago
-
littlwarrior
-
-
Saladin
-
littlwarrior:
Uh no, we can know practically for certain.
He spoke out, vehemently, against the Vietnam war and wars in general.
It would be like saying we don't know what Gandhi would think. Come on.
- 1 year ago
-
Saladin
-
-
keithponder
-
littlwarrior:
You're right. You probably will never know for sure because you weren't even born yet. His memory is being so commercialized that young people today don't even have the slightest idea of what Dr. King stood for, who he really was and why the government made sure that he was silence.
Know this for an absolute certainty kid. Dr. Martin Luther King was vehemently opposed to American foreign policy. He condemned the mass killing of people from third world countries that most Americans try hard to refer to as expendable and uncivilized cave dwellers like you've done with people living in Iraq and Afghanistan. I've got King speeches collected over the years that I know you've never heard. The man was fearless and he never supported wars that he felt in his heart were evil
- 1 year ago
-
keithponder
-
-
littlwarrior
-
Saladin:
Yes we can say with some level of certainty that he would not support the war. But he is not here today to say whether or not he would. Perhaps the plight of the Afghani people would have touched his soul in a way that we cannot understand because we are not him, and he is not here to tell us. We must choose in ourselves whether or not we support this war because it is our war to fight, we must choose for ourselves. We cannot let the past rule us we must shape who we choose to become.
- 1 year ago
-
littlwarrior
-
-
keithponder
-
littlwarrior:
Kid, you are absolutely out of your mind to think that any sane individual that knows just a taste more about MLK than you do, which is nothing at all, would even consider believing an ounce of this crap that you're throwing up against the wall.
At best, you're a joke.
- 1 year ago
-
keithponder
-
-
littlwarrior
-
keithponder:
What I said went right on over your head didn't it? Oh well come talk to me when you can leave the past in the past and stop putting it in the present.
- 1 year ago
-
littlwarrior
-
-
TheAmericanPatriot
-
We know one thing for sure. MLK would not be an O supporter.
- 1 year ago
-
TheAmericanPatriot
-
-
lifestudentno83
-
TheAmericanPatriot:
Actually that's one thing we DON'T know for sure, and something you assume you know.
- 1 year ago
-
lifestudentno83
-
-
Saladin
-
TheAmericanPatriot:
Right, he surely would have voted for McCain.
Did you ever read or watch anything he ever said?
- 1 year ago
-
Saladin
-
-
TheAmericanPatriot
-
Saladin:
Either he supports War or Obama. Obama supports War, so MLK would not support Obama, if MLK did indeed oppose War.
- 1 year ago
-
TheAmericanPatriot
-
-
idealist
-
how dare they try and tell a dead mans perspective! doing that will get your neck bone disconnected! lol
~~ immortal technique~ - 1 year ago
-
idealist
-
-
floydyboy
-
You suck pentagon! Stop wasting my tax dollars worrying about what someone who's been dead for decades might think about anything. You don't know how he would've felt about it. Now get back to work, & quit wasting my tax dollars thinking about things that can't ever be known.
- 1 year ago
-
floydyboy
-
-
keithponder
-
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvymnF-_Pf8&feature=related
'You Don't Know Me'
============================================The great 'Country Soul' singer later titled a song after this statement. In his own words, he said that people mistook this to be love song when in truth he was referring to the American government that pursued and finally had him arrested for drug usage. They actually wanted to destroy him because they were threaten by his crossover appeal.
That being said, I know for an absolute fact that the Pentagon does not and did not ever know or care for who Dr. Martin Luther King. All that I know is that they wanted him dead and he's dead now.
How dare them.
- 1 year ago
-
keithponder
-
-
benjamingon
-
war and death for resources YAY!!!!!
- 1 year ago
-
benjamingon
-
-
Stoneyroad
-

-
I bet King never 'Dreamed' his legacy would be hijacked by so many people who stand in direct opposition of his ideals.
- 1 year ago
-
Stoneyroad
-
-
s_peak
-
Stoneyroad:
Indeed. Using MLK as an excuse to justify war is absolutely repugnant and depraved... for a number of reasons that should be obvious to anyone.
- 1 year ago
-
s_peak
