Bombshell: Government Admits Fluoride Hurting Children

Yeah, I get most of my updates from the Bible. False flags everywhere, brother, or option #2, most people are flaming idiots and grossly incompetent. Reality is sad, but delusions are sadder.

Fluoride is poisonous...Fact! It's a by product of making aluminum. There have been court case won by people who have sued companies of being poisoned by fluoride. It may be a conspiracy, but it's not a theory. And by the way, I'm not a Libertarian, just an American who is willing to question things you should try it sometime.

Laws Regarding Fluorides in Pennsylvania

1. No Sodium Fluoride or Related Compounds Allowed in Food:
31 P.S. § 10 (1998), TITLE 31. FOOD, CHAPTER 1. ADULTERATION OR MISBRANDING OF FOOD IN GENERAL, [P.S.] § 10. Sale of food containing formaline, etc., prohibited, PENNSYLVANIA STATUTES

2. Fluorides Listed as Schedule 'A' Poisons in Pennsylvania (along with arsenic, cyanide, mercury compounds and the like):
63 P.S. § 390-9 (1998), TITLE 63. PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS (STATE LICENSED), CHAPTER 11. PHARMACISTS, PHARMACY ACT, [P.S.] § 390-9. Poisons, PENNSYLVANIA STATUTES

3. 1909 Food Adulteration Law Cites Fluorides as Deleterious to Health (referenced in the following case law):
Commonwealth v. Pflaum, No. 148, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 236 Pa. 294; 84 A. 842; 1912 Pa. LEXIS 749, April 8, 1912, Argued, April 29, 1912

Case Law Regarding Fluorides in Pennsylvania

1. Lebanon Loses Right to Remove Fluoride From Water: [Note: Lebanon is currently fluoridated]
COMMONWEALTH v. CITY OF LEBANON, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 482 Pa. 66; 393 A.2d 381; 1978 Pa. LEXIS 968; 9 ELR 20053, November 18, 1977, Argued, October 5, 1978, Decided

2. Lebanon Fights for Right to Remove Fluoride from Water:
Ditzler v. City of Lebanon, No. 17 T.D. 1976, Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 29 Pa. Commw. 69; 370 A.2d 441; 1977 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 719, February 2, 1977, Submitted on Briefs, March 3, 1977, Decided

3. Storage of Chlorine and Fluorides Cited as Hazard of Water Treatment Operations:
LEVIN v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF BENNER TWP., No. 394 C.D. 1995, No. 395 C.D. 1995, No. 518 C.D. 1995, No. 519 C.D. 1995, COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, 669 A.2d 1063; 1995 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 594, September 15, 1995, Argued, December 28, 1995, Decided, December 28, 1995, FILED, Petition for Allowance of Appeal Granted August 6, 1996, Reported at: 1996 Pa. LEXIS 1608.

4. Dentist Loses Mandatory Fluoridation Attempt in Philadelphia Suburban Case:
Rovin v. Pennsylvania PUC, No. 62 C.D. 1985, Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 94 Pa. Commw. 71; 502 A.2d 785; 1986 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1840, November 14, 1985, Argued, January 7, 1986, Decided

5. West View (Allegheny County) Fluoridation Fought Too Late: [Note: West View is currently fluoridated]
Aitkenhead v. Borough of West View, No. 1169 C.D. 1979, Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 65 Pa. Commw. 213; 442 A.2d 364; 1982 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1101, October 6, 1981, Argued, March 9, 1982, Decided

6. Armco Steel Sludge Dumped in Mines Causes Fluoride Pollution:
Lucas v. Commonwealth, Nos. 1251 and 1293 C.D. 1979, Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 53 Pa. Commw. 598; 420 A.2d 1; 1980 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1716; 14 ERC (BNA) 2185, June 3, 1980, Argued, September 3, 1980, Decided

7. Court Rejects Challenge to State Permit for Fluoridation of Allentown, PA Water Supply [Note: This case didn't result in the fluoridation of Allentown's water system, which Allentown residents kept unfluoridated for 40 years until November 2000. See the Allentown Fluoridation Page for details.]
Commonwealth v. Bierman, No. 1025 C.D. 1975, Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 23 Pa. Commw. 646; 354 A.2d 48; 1976 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 943, January 7, 1976, Argued, March 11, 1976, Decided

8. Fluoridationists Lose Legal Fight to make Water Fluoridation Mandatory Statewide:
Crawford v. Commonwealth, Nos. 1637 and 1650 C.D. 1973, Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 19 Pa. Commw. 10; 338 A.2d 727; 1975 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 961, December 3, 1974, Argued, May 6, 1975, Decided

9. Court allows Sunbury, PA officials to ignore Anti-Fluoridation Initiative: [Note: Sunbury is currently fluoridated]
Williams v. Rowe, No. 270 C.D. 1971, Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 3 Pa. Commw. 537; 283 A.2d 881; 1971 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 388, September 8, 1971 Argued, November 17, 1971, Decided

10. Philadelphia and New Castle fluoridation challanges defeated:
"Two important court fights advancing the state's authority to promote and grant fluoridation projects were won in 1955. Philadelphia entered the fold last year following the denial of an injunction restraining the department in the program. A similar decision was handed down in Lawrence County Court upholding fluoridation in New Castle."

Fluoride-Related Court Cases
The following are fluoride-related state court decisions. While the courts have acknowledged that fluoridated chemicals are hazardous, the courts have overwhelmingly ruled in favor of water fluoridation whenever the courts were asked to rule on the merits of fluoridation or on the right of government to fluoridate. The courts have consistently brushed aside the scientific and ethical matters raised by safe drinking water advocates, while deferring to the opinions of pro-fluoridation state authorities. These decisions have formed a body of case law so one-sided that the courts have allowed this momentum to justify further pro-fluoridation decisions. This "follow the leader" approach is especially evident in cases from Kentucky, Minnesota, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. The few cases where the courts ruled against fluoridation were on technical matters unrelated to the merits of fluoridation.
Residents Lose Suits Over Local Water Fluoridation Decisions

* Fond du Lac City, WI (Wisconsin Court of Appeals, 1994)
* Charleston, SC (South Carolina Court of Appeals, 1985)
* Madison, IL (Illinois Supreme Court, 1984)
* Beverly Hills, CA (California Court of Appeals, 1973)
* Beverly Hills, CA (California Court of Appeals, 1972)
* Pesotum, IL (Illinois Appellate Court, 1972)
* Somerville, NJ (New Jersey Supreme Court, 1972)
* Gonzales, LA (Louisiana Court of Appeals, 1966)
* Columbia, SC (South Carolina Supreme Court, 1966)
* New York City, NY (New York Supreme Court, 1965; New York Court of Appeals, 1966)
* Detroit, MI (Michigan Supreme Court, 1965)
* Lincoln, CA (California Court of Appeals, 1965)
* Chicago, IL (Illinois Supreme Court, 1964)
* Asheville, NC (North Carolina Supreme Court, 1964)
* St. Louis, MO (Missouri Supreme Court, 1961)
* Council Bluffs, IA (Iowa Supreme Court, 1961)
* LaPorte, IN (Indiana Supreme Court, 1956)
* Cleveland, OH (Ohio Supreme Court, 1956)
* Bend, OR (Oregon Supreme Court, 1956)
* Milwaukee, WI (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1955)
* Chehalis, WA (Washington Supreme Court, 1954)
* Tulsa, OK (Oklahoma Supreme Court, 1954)
* San Diego, CA (California Court of Appeals, 1953)

Courts Force Fluoride on Residents and Local Governments

* Resident Forced to Use Fluoridated Public Water System - Privacy Rights Argued (Minnesota Court of Appeals, 1993)
* West View, PA Fluoridation Fought Too Late (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
* Lebanon, PA Loses Right to Remove Fluoride From Water (Pennsylvania Supreme Court, 1978)
* Lebanon Fights for Right to Remove Fluoride from Water (Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, 1977)
* Cincinnati, OH Made to Comply with State Fluoridation Mandate (Ohio Supreme Court, 1975, 1977)
* Brainerd, MN Forced to Fluoridate by State (Minnesota Supreme Court, 1976)
* Court Rejects Challenge to State Permit for Fluoridation of Allentown, PA Water Supply (Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, 1976) [Note: This case didn't result in the fluoridation of Allentown's water system, which Allentown residents kept unfluoridated for 40 years until November 2000. See the Allentown Fluoridation Page for details.]
* Temporary Hold on Somerset, KY Fluoridation Lifted by State (Kentucky Court of Appeals, 1969)
* Mountlake Terrace, WA Fluoridates and residents of a neighboring water district sue and lose, even though it affects their water system (Washington Supreme Court, 1966)
* Ruling by City Commission of the City of Fort Pierce, FL Against Fluoridation Reversed (Florida District Court of Appeals, 1962)
* Decision Prohibiting the City of Shreveport from Fluoridating Overturned (Louisiana Supreme Court, 1954)

Rulings Against Initiative/Referendum Attempts

* Court Upholds State's Deletion of Text in Oregon Fluoridation Referendum (Oregon Supreme Court, 1976)
* Court allows Sunbury, PA officials to ignore Anti-Fluoridation Initiative (Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, 1971)
* Court allows Wisconsin Dells, WI to ignore voters who rejected fluoridation through referendum (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1966)
* Court Allows Lincoln, CA to ignore Anti-Fluoridation Initiative Process (California Court of Appeals, 1965)

Successful Rulings Against Fluoridation (none ruled on the merits of fluoridation)

* Dentist Loses Mandatory Fluoridation Attempt in Philadelphia Suburban Case (Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, 1986)
* Fluoridationists Lose Legal Fight to make Water Fluoridation Mandatory in Pennsylvania (Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, 1975)
* Canton, OH Refuses to Comply with State Fluoridation Requirement & Court Refuses to Enforce It (Ohio Supreme Court, 1970)
* Evansville, IN Stopped from Fluoridating Due to Lack of City Ordinance Authorizing the Appropriation (Indiana Supreme Court, 1963, 1966)
* Kansas City, MO Fluoridation Ordinance Found to be Subject to Referendum (Kansas City, Missouri Court Of Appeals & Supreme Court, 1963)

Other Water Fluoridation Cases

* Fluoridation Costs Increase Water Bills in New York City (New York Supreme Court, 1997)
* Tully, NY Case Shows that State Permits Needed to Fluoridate in New York State (New York Supreme Court, 1986)
* Anti-Fluoridation Doctor Sues the American Medical Association for Defamation (Washington Court of Appeals, 1974)
* Anti-Fluoridation Dentist Sues the American Dental Association for Defamation (New Jersey Superior Court, 1958)
* Milwaukee Anti-Fluoridationist Claims Challenged in Bet (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1969)

Non-Water Fluoridation Cases that involve Fluoridated Chemicals (showing that fluorides are toxic poisons/pollutants)

* Reynolds Aluminum Plant in NY Pollutes Native American Lands with Fluoride (New York Supreme Court, 1997)
* Sodium Fluoride used as an Anticoagulant and Preservative (Louisiana Court of Appeals, 1995)
* Benner Twp, PA Case Cites Storage of Chlorine and Fluorides as a Hazard of Water Treatment Operations (Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, 1995)
* Fluoride Chemical Exposure at Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant in Piketon, Ohio (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1994)
* Fumigation company ruled to be strictly liable for damages caused by sulfuryl fluoride poisoning. (Florida Court of Appeals, 1992)
* Fluoride Pollution from Aluminum Plant - Chemical Trespass Case (Washington Supreme Court, 1985)
* Armco Steel Sludge Dumped in Pennsylvania Mines Causes Fluoride Pollution (Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, 1980)
* Fluoride Pollution from Aluminum Plant (Washington Supreme Court, 1969)
* Fatal Workplace Potassium Fluoride Poisoning Case (Kentucky Court of Appeals, 1953)
* Fatal Fluoride Poisoning Case (Louisiana Supreme Court, 1950)
* Fluoride Acid Pollution Damages Windows (Illinois Appellate Court, 1945)

So shut up!

Man pull your head out and find something real to worry about - this fluoride conspiracy crap was all played out in the 60's.

Just for your teeth.

Genetics are more important than fluoride, darling and IQ's are dropping like a stone.

So you choose pretty smile, cavity free teeth over risk of bone cancer, bone fractures, thyroid disorder, brain inflammation, lowered IQ and mental functions, sterility?

Having access to dental work is more important then fluoride. Not one of my cavities has ever been fixed by using a fluoride toothpaste. On a side note, sense I quit using fluoride toothpaste my mouth and gums have been healthier then ever; no more bleeding.

I can not afford the dental work I need thanks to No fucking insurance and bad genetics. God I wish my teeth were good. My teeth would be fine if I had just had an extra 20 thousand dollars to spend over the last 20 years on top of the 10 thousand I have spent. Truth be told, I probably would have bought property.

Wow. Many I know have a thousand dollar tooth. I never could get into flossing. Bad :{ At this point I am looking for new top teeth. Then I will be coollllllll aagain :}

Terrific point. ^+d

Check out Dr. Strangelove. Way ahead of the curve. My toothpaste is definitely free of fluoridation. Purity of Essence all the way, rain water and pure grain alcohol. Found out Tom's of Maine was bought out by Colgate or some such scum bag corporation. Love the tats. Hang in there girl.

No wait just a minute. As a youth, I always enjoyed going down to the aluminum waste pond and slurping up some sludge and my teeth are very pretty. I have shit for brains, but this is america, gawd dam it, and priorities are priorities. You think anyone gives a shit if Paris Hilton has brains? But man, has she got some teeth. We used to slurp at the same pond.

When can we expect to see you do stand up at Live at the Improv, telcod ?
No sarcasm intended, amigo. You're a scream as we used to say in the 50's
and 60's. You have genuine comedic talent. Look at Jackie Gleason. He made
a footnote in the history of the 1st American TV generation with his comedic
reactions to his wife's sarcasm in his 1955-1956 seasons. There isn't one of
those episodes, even the lost episodes from 1954 that I didn't put on VHS.
When my priorities finaly allow me to obtain a combo VHS player/Blue Ray
recorder, I'll be part of the TCM movement to preserve those films onto new
digital media.

My toothpaste and mouthwash are fluoride free!

I think you missed my point. I was talking about how we are being "forced" to ingest flouride through water companies/the government. I realize there is flouride in toothpaste... and it's not harmful unless you INGEST it. Hopefully you don't do that.

Thanks for the beneficial information. But I want LIVING teeth in my mouth.
And not merely one or two, but all of them. Unless I'm mistaken, dentists
drill through and destroy the dentine to make space to fill it with amalgams
or composites, don't they ? I was the victim of a lot of malpractice by a
brutal, cold blooded alchoholic dentist who was money hungry, and
excessive. He would drill even teeth where you wouldn't expect to find
fillings. I merely want to be restored to the place I was before he ruined
them. No insult intended toward yourself, sir. But I've heard foolish people
in dentistry claim that artificial teeth are better than the teeth you were
born with. I seriously doubt that is anything other than wishful thinking
and opinion misrepresented as fact. But even if so, I still want all living
teeth. When I finaly get them, I'll have them cleaned, sealed, and use
baking soda to brush with. Baking soda neutralizes acid. I've limited my
added sugar intake, and brush directly after eating. So I'm prepared to
maintain those good habits to avoid plaque and tartar. Thanks just the same.

You're a riot, man. A regular riot. Heh. I mean that in the most respectful
of ways, alluding to Jackie Gleason's using the term.

Ernie Kovaks and Steve Allen are also worth a second look. Thanks for the encouragement. I tend to go off the rails at times and get really pissed. Irony and sardonic tend to be my guiding lights. Preaching is my Achilles heal, so I tend to not like it in others. Always remember, No false idols. Peace be upon you.

Well it's no dishonor or disgrace to admit to a presumption. I promise
to never again address you as sir. I understand what you mentioned
about it being an abrasive. Perhaps as an after brush- with- regular-
toothpaste, rinse, to neutralize any acidity remaining in the saliva.
Having teeth pulled to regrow new teeth is radcal, and somewhat
traumatic. I would not resort to that future procedure if there were
any other way to repair fully the teeth damaged by drilling. Because
I'm convinced it wasn't the plaque that formed cavities that had
destroyed many teeth. It was his drill. More to the point his abuse
of it, and excesses in misusing it.

There is one dental office in some large city in England which has
had success in rebuilding the teeth of people too disabled to brush.
They've used a lattice structure to rebuild others' teeth. Am unsure
whether it's been successful in rebuilding the natural crown of teeth.
I have to look into that. Because by either method, to the best info
I have available to me now, it takes 3 months. And it would be more
expensive to make many trips to the dentist. Especialy if they have
to be international flights. I don't enjoy flying. Here in the States, the
idea of rebuilding teeth isn't being reported. If it even exists in Beverly
Hills, I haven't heard of it, yet...No money in anything that humanitarian
it appears. The lets- make-them-dentures business can't get their cut
that way. My uncle used to make dentures for others, God rest his soul.
But one way or the other, I mean to regain all the teeth I can in their
original, undamaged condition. And even if being 62, and having the
teeth of a 12 years old is the only way I can accomplish that, so be it.

I'm a man of a very high IQ. If my values in life were focused to making
gobs of money, I would have retired a Millionaire in the 1960s. Thanks
again for your concern. I do listen to reason. What my parents gave me,
and my grandparents gave them, and on and on back to the beginning,
is what God gave my family to give to me. They're intensely personal
beyond what anyone in this world save God & I can understand. I want
to be buried someday with a mouth full of teeth in as nearly the same
condition as I was bequeathed with at birth. We live in a culture where
the top of the food chain wants to steal anything that isn't nailed down
tight. Too many others are corrupted by their my- God- is- money- false
values. The very fact that they don't share my values is precisely why
I do. But I didn't mean for this to develop into any manifesto. Thank you
again for your benign concern. We should have more people like you
on this site who care about others. Muchisimas gracias. Que se vaya
con Dios, muher.

Et spiritui, spiritus sanctum, et vobiscum, and all that good stuff too.
Being an acolyte serving Catholic priests was a regimen of mine in
the late 50s, very early 60s. I stuck with it because a French Canadian
priest Father Martineau was a man I looked up to. Otherwise I wouldn't
have gotten up at 5AM in the Winter to walk miles in the snow to help
him serve Mass on the weekends. Often I was the only kid there. He
was a chaplain on some American Navy ships during WW2, and the
look of pain he grimaced while repressing the carnage he witnessed
burned a lasting impression into my brain. That was one of my formative
experiences. That and having a Cancer Midheaven Angle made me
destined to be a farmer eventualy. Hopefuly an orchard keeper with
a ranch in Colorado so that I can raise dogs & horses. Not to ride them.
Just to be around them. They are the spirit of America, more than we are.

For you who are a little weak on science, this article says a study was done, and more research is needed. OMG that's really fucking scary. LMAO

Thanks for the link Jubal. It is an AP story.

And thalidomide worked dandy for morning sickness and cigarettes are not harmful and "milk is good for everybody" and North Viet Torpedo boats attacked US ships in the Gulf of Tonkin and the biggest lie the devil ever pulled off was to make people think he didn't
exist. Purity of essence............

so you guys give us more fluoride when you're aware that the problem is Fluorosis?

If you believe it does not hurt you then go ahead have plenty of fluoride. You can have mine.

I'm not saying flouride in water is good, I don't think it is, but infowars is not a credible source. i would trust george noory before alex jones.

Then destroy the article instead of bitching.

If it causes your teeth to go yellow imagine what it is doing to your body after you swallow it.

Fair enough.

Jubal posted another link above to a story on the subject.

Wait I thought you said it was perfectly good for my teeth before they lowered the amount. You never let on about the pitting. That sounds bad!

Allow me to point you in the direction of an EPA study done just last month. The study is entitled "Fluoride: Dose-Response Analysis For Non-cancer Effects".

I took a quote from section 3.3 of the study which was entitled "Skeletal Fluorosis and Bone Fractures"

"Excessive intake of fluoride can result in skeletal fluorosis, a condition characterized by increasing bone density (preclinical and Stage I); sporadic pain, stiffness of the joints, and osteosclerosis of the pelvis and spine (Stage II); and chronic joint pain, arthritic symptoms, calcification of ligaments, and osteosclerosis of cancellous (porous) bones (Stage III). Alterations in micro-structure of bone tissue (e.g., abnormal crystal structure) resulting from skeletal fluorosis may be manifest as an increase in the likelihood of bone fractures."

I would like to point you in the direction of section 3.3.1, where you will find some interesting information of Skeletal fluorosis and it's relation to fluoride intake.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day .

HAHAHAHAHA. How true, how true.

Highly suspect!

Amen to that. ( BTW, I like you're new avatar. ) As if human life on this Earth
weren't the absurd commedy of errors for the amusement of the Gods it is...
How much has the human race sold itself short, so often, by relying on the
minimalist attitude " Who're you going to believe ? " compared with " How do
I reason with an open mind ? " And how much suffering have they caused
on others who paid the price for taking their " free advice " The greatest of
men & women were never followers of any but even greater leaders. I won't
take lame advice about how to protect my health from people who care more
about swaying me to their appeals to emotion than they care about me
protecting my life. Want to hear something good ? I watch the History channel
a lot, as I do Nat Geo, Animal Planet etc...The swastika that was the symbol
of ugly Fascism in the 20th century, and represents the " twisted cross "
didn't always have that meaning. Swastikas are many thousands of years old.
They originated from many ancient civilizations spanning the Globe. They
were used to denote simply " good luck ". Immagine that. That a symbol
more recently connoted as evil was originaly denoted as innocently as a
shamrock or 4 leaf clover is to people today. But then, that's why Webster's
Dictionary exists: to list all the different uses of terms and how they're defined.
And to remind us that people are not their own authority on the English language.