WikiLeaks Nominated For The Nobel Peace Prize
source: http://www.mediaite.com/online/wikileaks-nominated-for-the-nobel-peace-prize/
-
-
- bundlebear
- added this
From Valen’s post:
It is always easier to support freedom of speech when the one who speaks agree with you politically. This is one of the ‘tests’ on liberal and democratic values that governments tend to fail. For instance, western governments have a long history on tolerating oppressive regimes that are ‘friendly-minded’. Internet companies assist China in censoring search engines. And many countries respond to Wikileaks‘ obvious right to publish material that is of public interest, by seeking to ’shoot the messenger’.
…
Nevertheless, many seek to redraw the map of information freedom with the emergence of institutions like Wikileaks. Political powers and institutions that ordinarily protect freedom of speech suddenly warn against the danger, the threat to security, yes even the ‘terrorism’ that Wikileaks represent. In doing so, they fail in upholding democratic values and human rights. In fact, they contribute to the opposite. It is not, and should never be, the priviledge of politicians to regulate which crimes the public should never be told about, and through which media those crimes become known.”
Valen goes on to compare his nomination to the recent win by Liu Xiaobo, the pro-democracy activist, who was not able to claim his award in person since he was still being jailed by the Chinese government.
The actual winners won’t be announced till next October but really, who cares? “Person of the Year?” Nobel Peace Prize? They may sound nice but we only care about the really flashy awards like the Oscars. Let us know when WikiLeaks wins one of those. Ha! That’s impossible.
…or is it?
http://www.mediaite.com/online/wikileaks-nominated-for-the-nobel-peace-prize/
-
- groups:
- Community, News and Politics, World News, current cult, 4 more
-
-
zHellas
-
Disregarding my dislike of Wikileaks, I'm not sure how this will work as they're an organization/website rather than an actually person.
- 1 year ago
-
zHellas
-
-
bundlebear
-
zHellas:
many organisation have won in the past
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS
THE UNITED NATIONS PEACE-KEEPING FORCES
INTERNATIONAL PHYSICIANS FOR THE PREVENTION OF NUCLEAR WAR
OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION
UNITED NATIONS CHILDREN'S FUND
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE REDCROSS
OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES
THE FRIENDS SERVICE COUNCIL
http://nobelprizes.com/nobel/peace/ - 1 year ago
-
bundlebear
-
-
zHellas
-
bundlebear:
You don't have to use All-Caps. It's not always Cruise Control for Cool.
- 1 year ago
-
zHellas
-
-
bundlebear
-
zHellas:
sorry i coped and pasted them in
my fault - 1 year ago
-
bundlebear
-
-
lifestudentno83
-
Wikileaks deserves to win. They've done more towards achieving peace than any wars waged in the modern era.
- 1 year ago
-
lifestudentno83
-
-
samthesixth
-
lifestudentno83:
Do you consider WW2 to be in the "modern era"?
- 1 year ago
-
samthesixth
-
-
lifestudentno83
-
samthesixth:
I know where you're going with this. Yes, I think it was, and the only reason America got involved was because they were attacked.
In addition, if the Bush family had not financially supported Hitler, the Nazi regime might not have gotten the funds to cause World War II. In the end, Wikileaks is still doing more to achieve peace because while WW2 was supposed to be the "war to end all wars", we've still be warring in every decade since then.
- 1 year ago
-
lifestudentno83
-
-
ArchDruid [removed]
-
lifestudentno83: This comment was removed by its owner.
-
ArchDruid [removed]
-
-
lifestudentno83
-
ArchDruid:
I agreed with you in saying it was in the modern era.
I also said that there was a major conflict in every decade following(or Cambodia, Grenada, Vietnam, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Kuwait, etc).
Why are you insinuating I denied this in any way? - 1 year ago
-
lifestudentno83
-
-
ArchDruid [removed]
-
lifestudentno83: This comment was removed by its owner.
-
ArchDruid [removed]
-
-
lifestudentno83
-
ArchDruid:
Spreading confidential information about the U.S. government is doing more for the peace movement than any war effort in the modern era.
Because wars in the modern era were only waged for power over resources and control over the global economy.
- 1 year ago
-
lifestudentno83
-
-
TheAmericanPatriot
-
The prize doesn't mean sh@t after they gave it to O for nothing.
- 1 year ago
-
TheAmericanPatriot
-
-
lifestudentno83
-
TheAmericanPatriot:
And I suppose you could name 5 more worthy people of that prize?
I personally don't think he should have received that award either, but in all actuality I don't think the prize is invalidated because he won one. In all seriousness, let's not forget that the Nobel prizes were invented by the same guy who invented dynamite.
- 1 year ago
-
lifestudentno83
-
-
remanns
-
+^d !
- 1 year ago
-
remanns
-
-
Swisher
-
WikiLeaks is a thing. Wouldn't it be Assange who would be nominated?
- 1 year ago
-
Swisher
-
-
bundlebear
-
Swisher:
it's giving to organizations too
- 1 year ago
-
bundlebear
-
-
good_stuff
-
That prize would certainly help his legal funds... isn't it like 500k? Wikileaks better publish some stuff worth winning over, voting probably starts soon.
Can you win a nobel peace price if stuff you publish causes mass government outrage and protesting? What if somebody gets hurt?
- 1 year ago
-
good_stuff
-
-
AJILIVIZION
-
good_stuff:
Revolutions have never been a dull activity. People will get hurt. But now with the real truth out, people can make real informed decisions about what type of relationship they want to have with their governments, the politicians, and ruling elite. If they choose to violently overthrow oppressive regimes, is the end result not worth the sacrifice of a few good men and women? Of course it is!
- 1 year ago
-
AJILIVIZION
-
-
Oba_min_ation
-
Really. Bam Bam, the prince-of- peace Obama, didn't get nominated for yet another stellar year of peace making activities?
- 1 year ago
-
Oba_min_ation
-
-
mitekillem
-
Oba_min_ation:
That's because he already has one.
All you really need is one. It's not like the Oscars.Besides. He's too busy boosting businesses, cutting our taxes, reducing the deficit, trying to give us shit like good health care, and managing two wars started by the last guy.
I'd say he has a pretty full plate. - 1 year ago
-
mitekillem
-
-
samthesixth
-
mitekillem:
Reducing the deficit......it went up.
Good health care.......No single payer. Requiring everyone to have insurance is not a substitute for good health care.
The wars he inherited.........he could have ended. They are his now.
- 1 year ago
-
samthesixth
-
-
toyotabedzrock
-
samthesixth:
He did reduce it. The deficit is how much we overspend per year and the first yeah of having his own budget it was reduced.
However the tax cuts that where enacted are going to cost 400Billion this year so I expect it will rise again.
- 1 year ago
-
toyotabedzrock
-
-
toyotabedzrock
-
Oba_min_ation:
You might actually make friends if you didn't act like a 5 year old. Many progressive think it was somewhat sudden to give him that honor.
- 1 year ago
-
toyotabedzrock
-
-
samthesixth
-
toyotabedzrock:
The 2010 deficit was 1.416 trillion. In 2009 it was 1.294 trillion. On paper it looks like the deficit went down a teeny bit. But the deficit does not take into account all of the govt spending. If you include the off the books spending, then the true deficit has gone up. If we balanced our books the way they do, we'd be in jail.
- 1 year ago
-
samthesixth
-
-
alexandrek [removed]
- This comment was removed by its owner.
-
alexandrek [removed]
-
-
toyotabedzrock
-
alexandrek:
That would be telling wouldn't it!
- 1 year ago
-
toyotabedzrock
-
-
ras_menelik
-
The whole truth and nothing but the truth so help US GOD!
@WikiLeaks nominated for Nobel Peace Prize http://is.gd/ZESXEu
- 1 year ago
-
ras_menelik
