Evidence: Cannabinoid Therapy Reduces Breast Cancer Tumors
-
-
- bundlebear
- added this
A very specially genetically bred mouse (MMTV-neu) that makes human-like breast tissue was used. This animal is the gold standard that is used and recognized in all breast cancer research because its genes have been changed and instructed to grow the same type of aggressive breast cancer tissue.
Also, these mice/clones are all identical to each other in every way, which allows for tight experimental controls. These mouse experiments speed up research, because humans are not involved, only their diseased tissue.
The results of this study provide strong preclinical evidence for use of cannabinoid-based therapies for the number one, hard to treat, aggressive, ErbB2 driven breast cancer, which makes up 30 percent of all breast cancer cases and causes the most deaths in women.
Advanced ErbB2 driven breast cancer typically spreads to the lungs and has a poor outcome for survival with existing conventional treatments used presently. A new, novel treatment idea was desperately needed to find a (non-toxic?) effective new medicine to be a game changer.
Background:
When a lump is discovered in a breast, and a tissue biopsy sample is sent to pathology, the pathology report guides the course of the treatment. It tells the cancer tumor's size, if it has spread or is stable, if it is hormone-receptor positive or negative, and most importantly its ErbB2 receptor count.
About 30 percent of newly diagnosed breast cancer samples will come back from pathology as "ErbB2 / over expression." Over expression means that the DNA which you were born with, and which is the "build blueprint" for breast tissue, has a genetic defect in its code, and, say, instead of building 100 ErbB2 receptors, it builds 10,000 ErbB2 receptors. This means that when the signal is sent by Akt 1 to grow and build more proteins, the breast tissue is overstimulated, because there are too many ErbB2 receptors built into the cell's membrane.
Too many signals to grow are sent into the internal machinery inside the cell, the ErbB2 receptors "over-receive and over-send the signal" and may cause normal cells to form cancer or to stimulate any single cancer cells that exist also to grow and multiply out of control and form a tumor over time.
The present drug treatment for ErbB2 driven breast cancer is a drug called Herceptin. This is the trade name under which it is sold; trastuzumab is the generic pharmaceutical name.
Herceptin was originally developed in mice, as a mouse antibody. Because humans have immune reactions to mouse proteins, it was later developed into a humanized antibody. Because the antibodies were produced from one cell that was grown into a clone of identical cells, it is called a monoclonal antibody.
This drug was developed using the same MMTV-neu mouse model as THC was, as described above.
The original studies of trastuzumab showed that it improved survival in late-state (metastatic) breast cancer, but there is controversy over whether trastuzumab is effective in earlier stage breast cancer. Trastuzumab is also controversial because of its cost, as much as $100,000 per year, and while certain private insurance companies in the U.S. and government health systems in Canada, the U.K. and elsewhere have refused to pay for trastuzumab for "certain patients" (code for the poor), some companies have since accepted trastuzumab treatment as covered, preventative treatment.
Think about that: $100,000 for one year of treatment per patient! Let's see: A thousand patients times $100,000 = $100 million! Ten thousand patients times $100,000 = $1 billion. It's so expensive that even the U.S. government doesn't want to pay for it. Somebody, somewhere, is making a lot of money.
Now do you know why cannabis isn't being researched as a cure? Do you see why some would have a vested interest in stopping it?
Oh, I left out one important fact: Trastuzumab only has a 25 to 30 percent successful rate of cure! And nearly 15 percent of people treated eventually develop new metastases. This drug's cure rates are no better than the effect of a placebo!
When an experiment is conducted, the new drug being tested has to outperform the "placebo effect" to show it works. The new drug should be in at least the 40 percent range to show its effectiveness. In this case, it failed to do that -- yet it is still being prescribed as a main, go-to treatment at $100,000 per year per breast cancer patient.
What happens if you have no health insurance or a job? Is this a crime? You tell me... And cannabis is still illegal?!
Note: About 10 percent of patients are unable to tolerate trastuzumab because of pre-existing heart problems. It causes the heart to pump out less blood volume, leading to congestive heart failure.
The Experiment
A colony of MMTV-neu mice was allowed to mature, and after 36 weeks, 50 percent of the females developed breast cancer.
A sample of 87 grade 3 invasive breast ductal carcinomas in which the cancer had spread to the lungs was chosen to be treated with THC. In the experimental groups, THC-treated mice had fewer and smaller (by weight and size) tumor counts after 90 days of treatment, as documented by microscopic tissue analysis.
Key Findings
"Our results show that down regulation of Akt is involved in cannabinoid anti-tumoral acteion." When THC down regulated the ArK 1 gene, this "shut down signal" to the ArK 1 gene by THC appears to trigger apoptosis in the ErbB2-driven cancer; "programmed cell death" is executed and the cancer kills itself.
Remember, this is only a phase one study. This effect still needs to be proven in humans. However:
• Akt over-activation has been detected in a significant percentage of primary human breast cancers. THC plays a role in its regulation.
• The cancer growth in humans and the mice is near identical in both cases.
• Treatment with cannabinoids significantly decreased tumor growth, size, and numbers due to the "remarkable growth-inhibitory effects of cannabinoids."
• THC reduced tumors from growing new blood vessels to feed themselves (anti-angiogenic).
• THC decreased the number of tumors spreading to nearby tissue and the lungs. This was also observed in advance cancer that had spread to the lungs already.
• "Remarkably, this is, to the best of our knowledge, the first report suggesting that cannabinoids hamper not only tumor growth but also tumor generation."
• "Our data suggest that the endocannabinoid system has a physiological protective role against tumorigenesis, in line with the general idea that this system contributes to maintain homeostasis in health and disease."
http://www.tokeofthetown.com/2011/02/evidence_cannabinoid_therapy_reduces_breast...
http://www.molecular-cancer.com/content/9/1/196
-
- tags:
- Health, Cannabis, Cancer, Medical Marijuana, 2 more
-
-
Anthony_Buckland
-
The only way this evidence can be presented to the masses is that we have a National Debate. Please sign this petition for such a debate. Above is a fine example of the evidence we can bring to the debate and educate the masses to this injustice.
http://www.change.org/petitions/petition-for-a-national-debate-between-cannabis-... - 1 year ago
-
Anthony_Buckland
-
-
dudefromtherock
-
What a wonderful plant....make it your friend
- 1 year ago
-
dudefromtherock
-
-
Robert_Miller1
-
Marijuana laws were first put on the books so police had another tool to harass black musicians who were becoming too popular at the time.
The sooner we get these racist laws off the books the better.
EVERYONE should write to Obama, newspapers and all other media outlets and ask why the president allows racist laws to remain on the books.
- 1 year ago
-
Robert_Miller1
-
-
meg0321
-
true pot is a great tool for medical use... but i'm pretty sure they monitor the levels in your system to see if you go over the prescribed dosage, and you know there are people who would be willing to exploit med. marijuana laws just to get stoned... myself included... they should just realize that weed isn't that detrimental to society and legalize the damn stuff already...
- 1 year ago
-
meg0321
-
-
remanns
-
meg0321:
agreed +^d !
- 1 year ago
-
remanns
-
-
kyackr
-
insane is this prohibition of cannabis . it makes no sense.... proof the u.s. government is hardly concerned with what's 'good' for u.s. citizens. the government holds the patent on cancer fighting use of cannabinoids .. ?
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6630507.html
why would that be? one thing for sure.. cannabis prohibition is not about the governments concern for public health - 1 year ago
-
kyackr
-
-
kcaid
-
that's why my bo o b i e s will never suffer from cancer, can I hear an AMEN!!!!! :)
- 1 year ago
-
kcaid
-
-
remanns
-
kcaid:
well,...........allrightythen,....AMEN ! +^d
- 1 year ago
-
remanns
-
-
bundlebear
-
studies that it can reverse, suppress, or completely halt tumor development in lung, skin, and prostate cancers.
- 1 year ago
-
bundlebear
-
-
sugarmountian
-
Another reason added to the long list for legalization of marijuana.
- 1 year ago
-
sugarmountian
-
-
remanns
-
sugarmountian:
Yepper ! +^d
- 1 year ago
-
remanns
-
-
DShannon
-
this is good knowledge to have...hope that someone may benefit... :)
- 1 year ago
-
DShannon
-
-
themotivateddropout
-
People continue to scoff at the idea of marijuana as a deterrent of cancer. But good health is no laughing matter.
- 1 year ago
-
themotivateddropout
-
-
remanns
-
"Featured" at the grope ; keep the group healthy !
- 1 year ago
-
remanns
-
-
mitekillem
-
Swallowing semen has the same benefits, for women.
- 1 year ago
-
mitekillem
-
-
bundlebear
-
mitekillem:
there is an article i noticed the other day that linked an increased risk of head and neck cancers to oral sex
http://www.usatoday.com/yourlife/health/medical/cancer/2011-01-29-head-neck-canc...
- 1 year ago
-
bundlebear
-
-
mitekillem
-
bundlebear:
That's retarded. Not everyone has STDs. So it doesn't apply to all oral sex.
Where as, with hetero oral sex, semen is almost always a factor.
With homo oral sex it's 200% for men, and 0% for the women. lol - 1 year ago
-
mitekillem
-
-
bundlebear
-
mitekillem:
i know not everyone has a an std
i just thought it was funny in context to your comment - 1 year ago
-
bundlebear
-
-
dudefromtherock
-
mitekillem:
there goes my breakfast
- 1 year ago
-
dudefromtherock
-
-
hindotka [removed]
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
hindotka [removed]
-
-
floydyboy
-
hindotka:
Vaporize my friend, vaporize. That's how I start my day, the shit energizes me. None of that dangerous caffeine for me.
- 1 year ago
-
floydyboy
-
-
dudefromtherock
-
floydyboy:
word....I have a 'Deluxe Daddy" vapourizer it's so frickin' awesome clears my mind and keeps me nimble.
- 1 year ago
-
dudefromtherock
-
-
dudefromtherock
-
hindotka:
Heard it cures "asshole syndrome"...you should try it, there's hope for you yet.
- 1 year ago
-
dudefromtherock
-
-
floydyboy
-
dudefromtherock:
Haha, yes it does. Can't we all get a bong.
- 1 year ago
-
floydyboy
-
-
floydyboy
-
dudefromtherock:
I've got the "eclipse vaaap" a nice lil portable. I love it.
- 1 year ago
-
floydyboy
-
-
NiceN
-
Thats why I don't do dates; just blaze and kick it. Sticking it to cancer one blunt at a time.
- 1 year ago
-
NiceN
-
-
hindotka [removed]
-
NiceN: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
hindotka [removed]
-
-
NiceN
-
hindotka:
Sorry, you can't kick it by yourself, and I can't stick it to cancer, because I don't have breasts. You are a master of comprehension and the English language. Maybe you should change your name to MatalinoKa.
- 1 year ago
-
NiceN
-
-
bundlebear
-
our salvation from cancer could lie in a illegal plant
- 1 year ago
-
bundlebear
-
-
hindotka [removed]
-
bundlebear: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
hindotka [removed]
-
-
themotivateddropout
-
hindotka:
You don't need to have breast cancer to be concerned about it LOL ass.
- 1 year ago
-
themotivateddropout
-
-
bundlebear
-
hindotka:
they also have studies that it can reverse, suppress, or completely halt tumor development in lung, skin, and prostate cancers and i'm pretty sure i have those
- 1 year ago
-
bundlebear