Community | February 13, 2011 | 250 comments

Ann Coulter "I Think There Should Be More Jailed Journalists" CPAC Audience Cheers Wildly

bundlebear
How sad and fu##ed up is that audience to have a mentality that locking up journalist is acceptable or even worthy of applauding.


Ann Coulter needs no introduction and despite having a terribly hoarse voice — due to whichever bar she went to last night — Coulter made sure to march on through her speech. Her address gave the usual red meat for the college crowd, but also gave some back handed support to, of all people, Mubarak.

Coulter announced that she was happy and surprised to see liberals had “suddenly” discovered their love for freedom in Egypt. She noted that they didn’t seem as eager to bring democracy to Iraq, even though Saddam Hussein would eventually be deposed and would emerge from his spider-hole looking “like Charlie Sheen after a weekend.”

But now liberals are “shocked and appalled” to find a dictator in the Middle East.

She provided a defense of Mubarak as a pro-Israel ally of America. She suggested some other reasons why liberals oppose him: “he shut down Google; do not get between a liberal and his internet porn”

She also referenced similar critiques about how the Democrats responded to Iran’s revolution: “The voting [in Iran] was over 100%, oh sorry I was thinking about Al Franken’s election in Minnesota”

Her summation on why there is support for Egypt’s revolution? “Now a loyal American ally comes under attack, and they are burning for democracy.”

But it wasn’t all foreign policy. On the bi-partisan seating arrangement for the State of the Union:

“It explains why they were sold out of t-shirts saying ‘I’m with stupid’”

But the best of Coulter’s routine has always been the Q&A session, where overeager college students get to ask questions of their idol. Some paraphrased and selected highlights:

Q: Where do you get your energy?

A: Reading the New York Times gins you up, keeps you going.



Q: Why does the GOP think that free and fair elections can exist in Iraq, not Egypt?

A: Perhaps it will, it’s not as clear as in Iraq. And we had American servicemen to make sure. When Iraqis were waving their purple fingers after having voted you couldn’t find more long faces on the Democrats, including John Kerry.



Q. What is more important to American values? Being friends with Israel or knowing that there are jailed journalists [in Egypt]?

A. I think there should be more jailed journalists. [Huge applause from audience.]



Q. Why don’t we have real conservatism? (ie. Why do we need Scott Brown?)

A. Conservatives don’t get rewarded at the ballot box, but I think the Tea Party will change that.



Q. What do you think about the field for 2012?

A. “I don’t like to attack Republicans” but “If we don’t run Chris Christie, Romney will be the nominee and we’ll lose.” [And Coulter does not like that outcome.] “I warned you about McCain!”



Q. Who is your least favorite Democrat?

A. That’s like asking my least favorite disease! (She settles on cancer.)



Q. Who’s your favorite Democrat, if you have one?

A. “I can’t hate Jim Webb, he served out country honorably.”



Q. Is there any hope me as getting a job as a journalism major?

A. Take “College Republican” off your resume.

The last question was about GOProud’s participation in CPAC. On this point, Coulter actually wanted to give a longer and less off-the-cuff answer, giving an answer that was surprisingly forthright about why she supported their inclusion.

Coulter first took pride in having spoken to GOProud at their convention and took credit getting GOProud to drop their gay marriage platform.

She then argued that the goal should be to not let liberals “co-opt” gays, or as she put it: “They want to use gays as a cat’s paw to attack the family.”

And why do liberals want to use gays to break up families by promoting gay marriage? “They want religion destroyed. They want family destroyed so you have loyalty directly to the state!” (This got a huge applause from the audience)

Coulter made sure to shore up her credentials on this point: “I am as born again evangelical Christian as they come, AND I am friend of the gays!”

For Coulter, she felt that the most important thing was not letting gays becoming “identified” as gay:

“You have all of culture telling gays you should be liberal, just like you had all of culture telling women they had to be liberal.”

She also has a suggestion for the GOProud motto: “Gays without the sodomy.”

“I’m not without sin, none of us are” Coulter added near the end of her remarks.

http://www.frumforum.com/coulter-there-should-be-more-jailed-journalists
  1. groups:
    Community,   Politics,   US Politics,   US News,   10 more
  2. tags:
    Journalism Conservatives Journalists Ann Coulter 1 more
  3.     
    |

250 comments // Ann Coulter "I Think There Should Be More Jailed Journalists" CPAC Audience Cheers Wildly

  • cw1545
    • 0
      cw1545  
    • Money was designed to be a trade medium. It allows us to exchange goods and services in a more functional way. The problem begins when money begins to self-replicate, when investing brings more to the table than production. This is the issue that the U.S. faces now.

    • 1 year ago
  • cw1545
    • 0
      cw1545  
    • Ayn Rand ideology huh? Markets in today's society are too interdependent on one another for that philosophy to work. The pink elephant in the room that no one wants to discuss is that, there are far too many people making too much money without producing viable work. The percentage of GDP held by the manufacturing sector has been in steady decline over the last half of the century pretty much. With the principle sources of income being service and the financial markets the U.S is now in an extremely vulnerable position to the rest of the world. We simply don't make enough of the stuff we use! Without government intervention the house cards created by this massive influx of 'fiat' money would have coming crashing down. There is no way for America to continue trade with countries that have no where near the economic standing that we do. Its just not feasible. The U.S. needs to bring back the protective tariff and begin investing in its own crumbling infrastructure.

    • 1 year ago
  • Warren_Merrill
    • -1
      Warren_Merrill  
    • The country has to stop spending itself into oblivion. There is has to be a serious effort to balance the budget through spending cuts and raising revenues. Getting people to spend money is the fastest way to raise taxes and reinvestment. Just taking the money in taxes does not generate business and two-thirds of government spending is lost in administration. Social Security, Medicare and pensions need to be revamped. Then there will be more money for needed public resources such as teachers, police and firefighters. The problem is everyone in DC on both sides of the political spectrum has their "can't touch this" projects.

      The biggest transition in the past fifty years is how much money the country gives away in social services for those who just take and never give back. If you want to get upset about the loss of teachers, police and firefighters blame those who have adopted welfare as a way of life or those who want to give them this life. If you give a man a fish he eats for a day. If you teach him to fish he eats for a lifetime.

      We also need to blow up the tax code. Get rid of all the deductions (tough sell to the building industry) and come up with a flat personal and corporate tax rate. Our tax code and modifications made to it is the biggest bastardization to our economy. Our economy becomes artificial when government can tweak it with tax breaks. These tax breaks bring short term relief and long term pain. Without deductions the economy would go up and down naturally based on supply and demand. Without the ridiculous tax code lobbyist's clout would be vastly diminished.

    • 1 year ago
  • cw1545
    • 0
      cw1545  
    • I leave this challenge to any right wingers out there.......Give me a legitimate argument for any of your economic or political ideology. Not this crap about Obama is a Muslim, or its the Christians vs the Muslims, or we just want to protect are freedom. Tell me how, cutting taxes and infrastructure programs will help this country. Tell me why we need to furlough teachers and police officers but all of these politicians maintain their full salaries. Lets talk about REAL issues not that garbage misdirection dribble Fox News aires on a daily basis.

    • 1 year ago
  • cw1545
    • 0
      cw1545  
    • The crazy thing is how oxymoronic the statements from righters are. First they advocate armed insurrection at a moments notice (Palanites and Baukmanites) but if it takes place in a country where freedom is truly being supressed then its complete anarchy and the end of all we know. I'm just sayin, truthfully, stop being advocate of rhetoric and be an advocate of ideas.

    • 1 year ago
  • Warren_Merrill
    • 0
      Warren_Merrill  
    • And you people talk about the right wing media taking the left out of context. During her Q&A she was being very funny. It was a flippant, humorous response. It was a joke. It was funny. She didn't even discern left from right. Had a left winger said it about a right winger you would have laughed. Go get yourself a sense of humor. Libs spend far too much time angry at the world instead of trying to find happiness their own world.

    • 1 year ago
  • FoosMaster
    • 0
      FoosMaster  
    • She is Dangerous Conservative TRASH. She wants Freedom for everyone, as long as "everyone" fits Her idea of a Proper person. If you don't support Her views then you should be locked away from society so that Her Conservative Society doesn't have to deal with you. Her Utopia would be Only the people that support Her Ultra Conservative views would be Free, everyone else in Prison and the prisons would be Huge Factories full of Liberal Slaves that support their Wants.
      Come to think of it, we are not far from that now. :-(

    • 1 year ago
  • cw1545
    • +1
      cw1545  
    • Republicans are for one thing and one thing only........Maintaining the status quo by insuring that the rich have access to wealth and power and the 'commoners' remain subjugated. Thats why they are so alarmed about Egypt. The moment at which a subjugated group can unite, they can begin to enforce their collective will. So by whatever means necessary, knowledge must be supressed in their way of thinking.

    • 1 year ago
  • SocialImaging
    • +2
      SocialImaging  
    • I thought right wingers were FOR the 1st Amendment... ??? They're asking for censorship, unless it's their expression of their own opinion.

      I'm thinking of some of the trolls that curse at someone they disagree with and make all kinds of personal remarks in an attempt to degrade the other person based on race or gender or ideology, call names and act like name calling wins an argument but never actually respond to what the other person says.

      It's like Republicans in congress always trying to find the easy answer so they can call the other person stupid. They fail because there IS no easy answer, but in the process they gum up the works and then say, "Ha ha! We win because we made YOU fail!"

    • 1 year ago
  • cw1545
    • 0
      cw1545  
    • Another problem I see that this current Congress has is that there is no one who really understands economics speaking about the economy. Economics isn't some kind of black box that can only be opened by the most knowledgeable of people. A person with 'average intellect can understand the fundamentals if they are given the appropriate information. However, republicans know that the real power of their base is knowledge. They push a lot of smoke and mirror rhetoric to keep a lot of their so called constituents out of the know. I can't count the people that I have met that legitimately believe that they are in the top 5% of earners in the US because they make 60k/yr....I'M SERIOUS. A lot of people don't even understand how or (more relevent) if they would be affected by an increase in that tax bracket. This 'new' republican party( you know, not really against abortion or homosexuality) has a lot of 'old' constituents who don't really know what their party is about anymore. They are just accustomed to their ideology.

    • 1 year ago
  • LucidPanther
    • +2
      LucidPanther  
    • The US has more people in its prisons than any other nation on the planet - including China . America is truly a Prison nation and it is beyond hypocritical for the US to preach human rights to other nations.

      Recently Biden called on Iran to release its prisoners - this while America has the most prisoners - mostly for non-violent offenses like marijuana possession; many thousands for minor civil offenses due to draconian mandatory sentencing and three strikes laws.

      Our prisons are hell holes of abuse, rape, diseases, over-crowding, suicides, gang activity, etc.

      They have been largely privatized, run by for-profit corporate interests and designed to humiliate, punish, abuse and institutionalize inmates rather than rehabilitate them.

      As a result American prison produce more criminals, promote mental illness and eventually release these non-functioning, violent, angry, revenge-seeking, mentally ill prisoners back onto our streets.

      And these conservatives believe we need to be more barbaric and savage and imprison respectable journalists who dare to exercise their constitutional right and their duty to report.

      This is fascism.

    • 1 year ago
  • Slingingstones
  • cw1545
    • 0
      cw1545  
    • Its good for everyone to have a voice in our democracy. Here's the thing though; have something legitimate to say when you speak! Limbaugh, Beck, Coulter they are all media magnets. To me they aren't much different than Kim K or Snookie. Their only popular because they are lightning rods, willing to say whatever to get a rise out of the media. The problem is when they speak some of the 'sheep' listen. Mindless people led blindly by the internet and media are easy to influence but hard to control. It only takes one message, one idea, to turn someone dysfunctional into someone who is socio-pathic. The propaganda and useless rhetoric need to cease. If the republicans are serious about addressing 'real' issues then they should formulate a plan do deal with said issues.

    • 1 year ago
  • noxidereus
    • +1
      noxidereus  
    • I'm not sure why people listen to her. I do not find contrived, planned, purposefully inflammatory remarks to be that interesting. These sorts of statements lose their bite when you know that the person saying them is merely looking for the profits associated with media attention.

    • 1 year ago
  • PeteLeS33
  • haberzet
    • +2
      haberzet  
    • And there you have it another child left behind. Ann Coulter is the perfect example for the "success" of the American educational system. Born stupid, learned nothing, and already forgot half of it.

    • 1 year ago
  • Ophiuchus
    • 0
      Ophiuchus  
    • If any female fits the bill on what a nimp looks like, it is Ann Coulter. She walks the walk, and talks the talk of their nature. It would not surprise me if she ate snakes for breakfast and roaches for dinner!

    • 1 year ago
  • savanah1
    • 0
      savanah1  
    • and we give a rats arse what she thinks for what reason exactly. there are evil people in the Republican party, Coulter, Beck, Limbaugh. I don't understand how they continue to have a platform.

    • 1 year ago
  • Demtothecore
    • +2
      Demtothecore  
    • savanah1:

      They are doing what they know how to do best, and that is to spread hate, racism outright lies and anger. Who we should be concerned about are the air heads who follow them and believe every vile lying word they spew without even bothering to question their motives or the truth. Now that is scary.

    • 1 year ago
  • dinm76
    • 0
      dinm76  
    • Anne...According to the revised "Preppy Handbook" your hair style is only appropreate durring your freshman years in college. Even your peers have noticed.
      Your future will be like ( The Picture of Dorien Gray), your inner dark soul is going to come out in your later years and you are going to be one ugly old lady!

    • 1 year ago
  • john12787
  • Stoneyroad
  • emarston
  • Nephwrack
  • Demtothecore
    • +3
      Demtothecore  
    • Simply remarkable. These Republicans call themselves christians and patriots yet are the first to screw with the constitution and call for death and imprisonment for those who disagree with them. Can someone tell me the difference between these zealots who:

      Always want to deny others their freedom / rights
      Feels it is their right to tell others how to live
      Wants to get rid of members of the press who don't agree with their rubbish and exposes them for their lies and misdeeds.
      Thinks the rich should be the ones to profit off the backs of the poor while milking the system,not pay their fair share of taxes and have off shore accounts to hide their loot.
      Believe in union busting and disagree with ones freedom of choice.

      I think there is a name for people like this but it seems to elude me at this minute.

    • 1 year ago
  • alleyhopper
  • jubal
  • eternal_springs
    • +5
      eternal_springs  
    • It's almost like Sean Hannity, Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh, and Ann Coulter are one in the same person. None of them are worth my consideration for anything of value to be heard. The really sad and scary thing is that there are so many who listen to them with rapt attention, as if every word they speak is gospel truth. They spew hatred and venom, and then people sit back and wonder why there is a great divide in the USA.

    • 1 year ago
  • alleyhopper
    • +2
      alleyhopper  
    • eternal_springs:

      Scares me that there are so many ignorant and gullible people in our country. If not for them the Beck, the Limbaugh and the Coulter types wouldn't have enough of an audience to be concerned with. And, the Beck, the Limbaugh and the Coulter types would not be raking in millions.

      I do not hold personal blame on most who are ignorant but the fact that there are so many certainly says something about our educational system.

      Anybody know how much gold Beck sold last year?.............*¿*

    • 1 year ago
  • artemis6
  • alleyhopper
    • +1
      alleyhopper  
    • People that listen to her and believe one damn word she spews as stable thinking are just as mentally challenged as she is. They all need advanced educational intervention.

      Institutionalized in a good school for their own good......and ours......*¿*

    • 1 year ago
  • BriereBear
    • 0
      BriereBear  
    • “The voting [in Iran] was over 100%, oh sorry I was thinking about Al Franken’s election in Minnesota.”

      Annie obviously overlooked the 2000 presidential election when it wouldn't have mattered if 100 percent had voted; 55 percent of the Supreme Court voted to allow the stoppage of the Fla. recount. You know the rest of the story.

      BTW, Annie writes columns and appears as a Faux Noise contributor. Who died and made her a journalist?

    • 1 year ago
  • Holopoint
  • Vierotchka
  • Tim_Patrick
  • JoeTheNerd
  • Jeremy_Benson
    • 0
      Jeremy_Benson  
    • I was going to say that she was right and suggest that we start with her and glen beck, but then I remembered they're actually just pundits - that being a person who masquerades as a journalist by taking true journalism and twisting it around to mirror your own twisted worldview. Sometimes I'm astonished people like this still exist.

    • 1 year ago
  • bike10
  • Tim_Patrick
    • +4
      Tim_Patrick  
    • Freedom of the Press!

      Except for:
      People who stand up for the Constitution
      Democrats
      Liberals
      Moderates
      Gays and Lesbians
      Women who seek abortion
      Those who seek the truth

      Oh yeah, and that huge majority of the population that disagrees with Ann Coulter, Republicans, and her Fox News cronies.

      I wonder on what basis she thinks Journalists should be jailed.

    • 1 year ago
  • Demtothecore
    • 0
      Demtothecore  
    • This person is a despicable thing so it's sayings mean nothing. BUT what I would like to know is, is she an actual woman, or a mister sister (not that there is anything wrong with that life style)? I know I see an adams apple on it's bony neck so folks your thoughts?

    • 1 year ago
  • Vierotchka
    • +1
      Vierotchka  
    • Demtothecore:

      Oh, she's a woman all right. What you see on her neck is not her Adam's apple but an enlarged thyroid gland, implying that she has an overactive thyroid gland (hyperthyroidism), likely Grave's disease. Among the symptoms of an overactive thyroid gland are skinniness and a hateful and aggressive character, sometimes also protruding eyes (exophtalmos) with a purplish tinge to the whites. One of my sisters-in-law has this condition, and she is very thin, has what people think is a large Adam's apple, and she also has exophtalmos with the purplish tinge, and a hateful, aggressive character. See also: http://tinyurl.com/6ese36h

    • 1 year ago
  • Leen61
  • Vierotchka
    • +2
      Vierotchka  
    • Image
    • Demtothecore:

      It is definitely not an Adam's apple but an enlarge thyroid gland. Adam's apples are a pointed shape in the middle of the throat, whereas an enlarged thyroid gland is an almost butterfly-like protrusion that is smaller in the center.

    • 1 year ago
  • Vierotchka
  • Vierotchka
  • Vierotchka
  • Vierotchka
  • Vierotchka
  • Leen61
  • jennilamb007
  • eden49
  • totally_dilapidated
    • +9
      totally_dilapidated  
    • .
      .
      people
      i did the research
      it is completely within the bounds of proper usage and proper social
      convention to call someone a twat
      here are the sources:

      Collins Unabridged Dictionary
      3) a foolish or despicable person

      Merriam Webster Unabridged Dictionary
      1) British slang : a stupid or annoying person

      so
      with that said
      i present to you:

      ann coulter is a ripe bothersome twat

      .

    • 1 year ago
  • fun_size
  • alleyhopper
  • LivingPong
  • ThatCrazyLibertarian
  • Demtothecore
  • EdJoyProductions
  • jennfischer
  • Blueshound9
  • Prijedor
  • jennilamb007
  • Prijedor
  • jennilamb007
  • pollie_graff
  • Nancy_J_Powell
  • Prijedor
    • +2
      Prijedor  
    • She needs to be fired, who ever is paying her needs to stop paying her, she is a dumb bitch and I am not surprised by the clapping, its really sad, but I am not surprised by it

    • 1 year ago
  • fun_size
  • demsbeans527
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • +4
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • LOL...I wondered how long it would be before Coulter tried to claw her way back to the role of Most Shrilly inappropriate and Disgusting rightwinger darling and spokesperson.

      Palin was threatening Coulter's rightful place at the head the nincompoopery spokesperson for America's political rightwing.

      However, at least Coulter can read, and does read. She was able to attend school--and one school at each level--to get her law degree, and she actually has practiced as an attorney in the past, as well.

      I think that is one of the sad things about Coulter...all of the resources that went into educating and training her as an attorney, and she makes her living by making comments like "I think there should be more journalists jailed."

      Palin is an uneducated avarist, so the fact that she is so foully and dangerously inappropriate in her statements and actions designed to keep herself a subject of the American conversation isn't quite as sad. Annoying, yes. Sad, no.

    • 1 year ago
  • lifestudentno83
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • +1
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • lifestudentno83:

      Well, I forget her on purpose :-)

      I don't know why, but I just can't see the threat in Malkin. Here she is, the darling of the baggers, and the GOP disses her in committee assignments once the GOP gets House majority?

      The GOP is distancing themselves from Malkin, which puts her on the level of Palin and Coulter. Malkin is an elected congressional rep--so to be put on the level of Palin and Coulter is NOT GOOD.

      THe GOP will be showing signs soon of who of the GOP nutballs they will allow to be GOP-endorsed players in the 2012 election.

      Beck has been lusting after being a player in 2012 for awhile now, but i think the GOP is going to shut down his player-2012 dream. When Bill Kristol recoils in revulsion from Beck, you know Beck is never going to be a player in a legitimate, institutional conservative group, especially the GOP and especially related to 2012.

      Palin has dissed herself from being a player in the 2012 election. She is so spooked after being called on her violent written and imagery content against her opponents (like Giffords), and the results of her ill-conceived you-tube releases of defensive videos following the Tucson tragedy, she wouldn't even show up at the CPAC event. So I think she's out, player-2012-wise.

      Coulter has so much baggage, she's made herself a permanent non-player in traditional GOP organizations, especially the Republican party.

      That doesn't mean Beck, Palin and Coulter won't make money in the 2012 campaign season by appearing at fringe groups and on fringe networks, such as Fox.

      But when you have dozens and dozens of really, really loonie and violent quotes in your history, as do Coulter, Beck and Palin, you will never be a serious credible player in the American political campaign race venue.

      Every time either of the three appears and starts spewing political campaign opinions, all one has to do is cut and paste your saved list of violent-lunatic quotes from them, and they are immediately discredited as bat-shit crazy.

      I think Malkin is a step above them...but, as an elected rep, and the bagger darling, she can be so soundly disresepcted by the GOP leadership in Congress...she's not a player. Won't be, either, for the same bat-shit crazy quotes reason.

    • 1 year ago
  • kirkwestlake
    • +2
      kirkwestlake  
    • this is a person who should not be listened too and like many others if people start to ignore what she says and stops adding her to a segment on tv she like others would slowly start to go away....it is ont thing to have a differing opinion but it is another to suggest things as stupid as locking up the media amoung other things she has said over the years

    • 1 year ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • +2
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • kirkwestlake:

      I disagree, to a degree :-)

      I am glad there are groups and organizations who spend a great deal of effort tracking and debunking the ignorant and dangerous comments and actions by the Becks, Palins and Coulters.

      If these individuals' comments were not made public and very publicly soundly criticized, they would be able to travel from nutball rightwinger event to nutball rightwinger event, or ply their hate on Fox (which most of us would rather stick needles in our eyes than watch, for any reason). That would mean it would be likely these hate-mongers would speak their hate under the cover of wide, non-rightwinger knowledge, where it would foment until it erupted into a Loughner event.

      So, when a Palin or Coulter article comes around, I consider it my civic duty to make two or three comments.

      i don't believe I have to research what they are saying and doing, or write a lot of posts or commentary about it---that is done very well by others.

      But the more voices condemning these folks, the better.

      Just my opnion, your mileage may vary.

    • 1 year ago
  • FLeggplant
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • +2
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • FLeggplant:

      She makes sense to the folks at CPAC and other rightwinger events.

      Of more concern is the fact that, after Clinton left office, and the Scaife-funded bevie of bimbos that plied their shop-worn wares to the political talk shows were suddenly out of a job, Coulter was reduced to having to speak at neo-Confederate events, and hang with racists and other nutballs associated with the movement. At least one of these nutballs was an academic, too.

      I know this because I wrote a rather gloating commentary about what the Bevy of Bimbos were doing post-GWBush election, and did a nice profile of Ann Coulter making speeches at these events, where she was pawed by sweaty neo-Confederates and had to endure being hugged and worse for picture after picture at these events--for $20 each.

      I got an email from a professor at a Virginia university who was apparently Coulter's new defender. It was very, very strange.

      It's easy to look with scorn at people like Coulter. It makes me feel better if I can scornfully dismiss her as a nutball.

      But we do that at our own peril because the Coulters and Palins of our country have a loyal following, no matter what they do, and both Coulter and Palin have used violent imagery against their foes as part of their schtick.

      This is what I think is behind Coulter's coming out again at CPAC--one of the more prominent conservative political annual events: she is looking at Palin and thinking, "If that ignorant bimbo can be McCain's VP candidate, I can play an important role in American politics, too."

    • 1 year ago
  • totally_dilapidated
  • kerriberri
  • Demtothecore
  • BenjaminDover
    • +1
      BenjaminDover  
    • For people who hold the constitution in such high regard the cons certainly don't seem to understand it very well. But that never stopped them from misinterpreting it or the bible.

    • 1 year ago
  • HarukoHaruhara
  • PoliticalAmazon
  • remanns
  • lifestudentno83
  • remanns
  • PoliticalAmazon
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • 0
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • remanns:

      I don't have a problem with the correct spellings of either twit or cint.

      Good lord, we routinely call people we don't like "dicks" and "pricks." So why the hang-up over using the name for female genitalia?

    • 1 year ago
  • remanns
  • transfire
    • +5
      transfire  
    • Ann Coulter should be jailed for PRETENDING to be a "journalist". In truth she is a liar and a traitor to this nation.

      All her writings are hate speech. Pure and simple. She twists facts, creatively edits and slanders a dozen times per page. She deserves no respect. It's only b/c of propagandistic Fox news and the sheep-like nature of a largely uneducated populace that she gets any "respect" at all.

    • 1 year ago
  • lifestudentno83
  • demsbeans527
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • 0
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • lifestudentno83:

      She is a journalist. LIke it or not, she write material, for which she is paid, which is read by a very loyal following.

      That is her danger. Yes, she is an opportunist, without moral or ethics stopping her form using violent imagery against her opponents. But she is a danger.

    • 1 year ago
  • lifestudentno83
    • +1
      lifestudentno83  
    • PoliticalAmazon:

      She's not a journalist, she's a political pundit. A horrible pundit, but one nonetheless. She does not report news, she spews her rhetoric and opinion for those gullible enough to buy into it to soak up. There are those who are wise enough to see through her stream of lies and misinformation to dispel whatever nonsense she is vomiting for the consumption of the brainwashed masses conservatives call a "viewing audience". To call her a journalist is to insult the very fabric that journalism is based on: research, integrity, and knowledge. This woman voices statements that do not hold true to any of those factors, but rather rely on enticing and inciting hatred and hostility to those who do not hold the same viewpoint. Even by a stretch, a yellow journalist is not a journalist in the true sense of journalism, nor is a pundit whose sole purpose is to stir controversy to sell books.

    • 1 year ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
  • kennymotown
  • twinite
    • +4
      twinite  
    • Okay....here's how we can do it......lets hook up our media peeps to fact checkers and have the cuffs slapped up upon a reported lie, And the best place to break the little gizmo in can be Faux news.....just saying..

    • 1 year ago
  • WICKET99
  • VFORVENDETTA
    • +9
      VFORVENDETTA  
    • #

      Greetings to all,
      I normally do not comment on such matters, because as I have already expressed in another blog posting for current, to do so is to engage in idle soap opera talk. In this case however, it does perhaps seem to be a case of a picture saying a 1000 words,so I will make an exception.There's an old saying, that the eyes are the window to the soul, and I don't really subscribe to that notion, but I will say this, has anyone ever noticed, I mean looked really closely at those person's expressions? At their eyes? I find that what Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palen, Ann Coulter and Sharon Engel all look like, they look like.... well.... their crazy.I don't mean in any cute, or funny way, but in a crazy, Stepford wives on crack- my expression is completely inappropriate with what I am saying- crazy and frightening way, seriously.

      If for instance one gets past, the cutesy, folksy, I'm just a mama bear (with no brains whatsoever) rhetoric of a woman who I feel can best be described as a cross between an 80s flight attendant and Avon Lady, and actually listen to what she is saying, it is seriously frightening, I would not let my children be in the care of a woman like this, there is something about her, and her previously mentioned associates that should scare the living hell out of people. Seriously.

      And while I'm at it, speaking of eyes and appearances, am I the only person out there who notices how bizarre looking Mitch McConnell is? Mr. no eyebrows as I refer to him, seems to have a permanent expression of one who has just had an orgasm, but cannot comprehend it, I have visualized the only appearance of such a man with such an expression who has apparently shaved his eyebrows that seems to fit, picture Mitch McConnell in full S&M gear being "disciplined" by Michel Bachmann, yes now it seems to be very clear. As always I remain V.

      Remember, remember the 5th of November...

    • 1 year ago
  • BenjaminDover
  • LivingPong
    • +1
      LivingPong  
    • VFORVENDETTA:

      Those Stepford wives darn gone an escaped from the idiot box! It's like Night of The Living Dead all over again, and last time I tried, flowers had no effect against zombies what so ever. Time to go and hide under the covers and hope it's all better in the morning cause this corn syrup is doing nothing for my temperament.

    • 1 year ago
1 - 100 of 250
more from Community:

top videos