Out FOX!! LMAO!!! That's how they roll... they report, we decide. And we're deciding alright. Fake journalism.

blatant false journalism should be illegal... we put red tape on every other fucking thing in america, why cant we touch journalism too? they should be held accountable

FOX is just a propaganda factory for the right wing and their ideology!

Typical Fox News bullshit. Lying, narrow minded, yellow journalistic crap.
Beck is a crybaby weenie, O'Reilly just out and out lies, Murdoch pushes his right wing agenda with no regard for the truth.

Sorry...I meant "low Information" crowd. It's morning. Not my best time for typing.

This doesn't surprise me FOX lied about Ron Paul. I watched the video above and saw that episode on Jon Stewart with the 2 different videos from 2 different tea party rallies. They will use any false footage to back up the lies they spew. This is the channel the low informantion crowd watches....and believes. Scary.

This was no accident! It's media manipulation. They were trying to manipulate their viewers, plain and simple. Unfortunately, it works. It has worked in the past, or their viewers would not be so misinformed.

Everyone just moves along, to their wrongs. Sad, sad, sad.

AGAIN !? Good grief !

Lil old here folks.

The biggest thing about Fox that is irritating is how they put up blatantly misleading and often times wrong information and then move on without saying "we were wrong." Even CNN puts up a default page when the info they ran proved to be BS.

If you believe Fox News is journalism you need to go back to 3rd grade and start life over... If you learned this fact already, you probably aren't republican...

There was a politician on NY1 tonight in a debate with another politician and she said, "this is not Fox News, you can't just make up whatever you want". I love how you can even use that line in a televised debate.

Okay, let me jump into the mix here and say that misleading and disingenuous presentation of the news is not the exclusive domain of a singular 'news' agency...
* forthwith, here is an example:

The New York Times continues its fraudulent campaign to depict conservatives and Republicans as, in the words of its latest editorial on the subject, purveyors of "Dangerous Threats." The latest purported example:

Representative Denny Rehberg, a Republican and Montana's House member, boasts that he brings Made-in-Montana solutions to Washington. His latest, proposed last week in a speech advocating states' rights to the State Legislature, is to put a judge "on the Endangered Species List."

If you are familiar with the Times's swindle, you will recognize its method of supplying a brief out-of-context quote, and you will suspect that the quote in context is actually far less invidious than the Times's description would lead you to believe. You will be right. The (Butte) Montana Standard has the full text of Rehberg's address. Here is the relevant portion:

Environmental obstructionists found a federal judge in Missoula that was willing to ignore the scientific evidence as well as the expert opinions of on-the-ground wildlife managers here in Montana. And he ruled last August that the grey wolf had to remain on the Endangered Species List.

"When I first heard his decision, like many of you I wanted to take action immediately. I asked: how can we put some of these judicial activists on the Endangered Species List? I am still working on that! But in the meantime, I have introduced legislation that would permanently end federal jurisdiction over the gray wolf population--and return responsibility to the wildlife managers here in Montana."

The left-wing site ThinkProgress.org--which seems to be a frequent, though uncredited, source of raw material for Times smears--picked this up and accused Rehberg of making "a thinly-veiled threat" against the (unnamed) judge.

ThinkProgress omitted the last sentence in the passage we've quoted, so that it appeared "I'm working on it!" was his conclusion. In fact, it is clear from the full quote that it was the punch line of a joke that preceded Rehberg's statement that he was proposing legislation to change the statute he thinks the judge interpreted wrongly.

The Times's treatment of the quote is even more misleading than ThinkProgress's: The paper falsely asserts that Rehberg said he wanted to put a particular judge "on the endangered species list," when Rehberg actually referred to "some of these judicial activists"--to a type, a metaphorical species, of judge.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704657704576150363613941564.html?m...

Fox news' reason for being is to mislead people.Therefore by misleading people they are not misleading anyone QED

These people are just plain out right liars! Funny stuff KSirys!

There goes Faux news, always unfair and unbalanced!