Community | February 18, 2011 | 142 comments

Walkers War in Wisconsin!

Image
figgdimension
projected $3 billion shortfall in the state budget over the next two years. (Update: as reader petrograd indicates, an analysis of the state’s finances shows this shortfall to be entirely the result of spending increases planned by Walker. The state ran a modest surplus in the latest fiscal year and the projected falls in tax receipts over the next two years were less than $200 million cumulative. So this budget hysteria is a gross distortion of the state’s true condition).
His state budget plan included ending state worker collective bargaining rights and cutting pay and benefits. He not only said he would not negotiate, but announced he had alerted the National Guard in the event of worker protests (note the last time the Guard was called in to handle a labor dispute was in 1934). Walker since backed down on this particular threat, but has now sent out state police to round up Democratic state senators who are refusing to vote on the latest iteration of Walker’s proposal, From PRWatch:

Mary Bottari reports that the state capitol police are scouring the Wisconsin Capitol in an attempt to track down the Wisconsin Senate Democratic Caucus. The Wisconsin Senate was slated to vote on the budget bill today, but they were prevented from doing so because all Democratic Senators walked out denying the Republicans a necessary quorum. The Republicans issued a “call of the house” empowering the state capitol police to round up missing Senators, but the Democrats were prepared for this and promptly departed the building and may even have left the state.

It’s bad enough that the “make the workers suffer” push is misguided (any budgetary pain should be shared, not dumped on a single target group). According to David Cay Johnson of Tax.com, the average Wisconsin pension is $24,500 a year, which is hardly lavish. But what is stunning is that 15% of the money contributed to the fund each year is going to Wall Street in fees. Thus the blame for any shortfall should go in very large measure to probable kickbacks rank incompetence in the state’s dealing with the financial services industry and the impact of the financial crisis on state revenues
more at figrd & naked Capitalism links at source
  1. groups:
    Community,   Politics,   Culture,   Viral Videos,   8 more
  2. tags:
    War Republicans Wisconsin Union 2 more
  3. recommended by:
    WakeUpPeople
  4.     
    |

142 comments // Walkers War in Wisconsin!

  • reddjoiowa
    • 0
      reddjoiowa  
    • All we can possibly do, is hope and pray the protesting that is now spreading to many other states, will knock these Repbulican governer's on there backsides!!!!! Wisconsin has a shortfall, due to their governor cutting big corpations slack on what they had to pay in taxes....does this Walker guy ever confess, HE is part of his own states problem..........NO!!! I am amazed when one watches these men being interviewed, they have no shame, just no heart or soul for their agenda.. against the working class, getting. rid of unions, blah, blah, blah!!! I wonder if these guys really believe, just because most of us are the middle class worker bee's, that we all are brainless????? Thes guys need to be kicked to the curb for good!!!!!

    • 1 year ago
  • Leen61
  • COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
    • +1
      COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM  
    • PREPARE TO MARCH IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD, IN YOUR CAPITOL! HELP ORGANIZE YOUR LOCAL PROGRESSIVE CHAPTER. THINK ABOUT A NATIONAL MARCH TO WASHINGTON ON MAY 3, COORDINATED WITH A NATIONAL WORK STOPPAGE, 2 DAYS OF PROTEST, WITH A MEETING WITH THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESSIONAL LEADERS ON THE CAPITOL LAWN, PRESENTING "THE PEOPLE'S LIST OF SUGGESTIONS". WE MUST SAY SUGGESTIONS, INSTEAD OF DEMANDS, SO THAT WE WON'T BE PROSECUTED FOR EXTORTION BY THE REPUBLICANS. IF THAT DOESN'T WORK, PREPARE FOR AN INDEFINITE NATIONWIDE WORK STOPPAGE. INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE ARE NOTHING WITHOUT WORKERS. IF GHANDI DID IT, WE CAN DO IT! WE OWE IT TO OURSELVES, OUR FORBEARS, AND OUR CHILDREN. ORGANIZE NOW.

    • 1 year ago
  • LucidPanther
    • +2
      LucidPanther  
    • Walker manufactured a pseudo-crisis to use as a pretext to attack worker's rights. The tactic of using crises ( real but usually manufactured ) has been used by the right wing for decades.

      Naomi Klein wrote a great book titled, "Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism" http://www.naomiklein.org/shock-doctrine/the-book' where she lays out this strategy and its history.

      Here is an article explaining how Walker, upon taking office, implemented Bush style tax cuts recently in order to manufacture a deficit.

      _____________________________________________________________________

      Wisconsin GOP Votes for Walker's Bush-Style Tax Cuts on Anniversary of Passage of Bush Tax Cuts - 5/22/2010

      'Walker Refuses to Say How He'll Pay for Them Just Like Bush; How'd That Work Out for Everyone?' Asks OWN

      Madison - The Republican Party of Wisconsin's formal endorsement of Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker has come almost to the day of the anniversary of the passage of the second Bush tax cuts that helped hand over nearly $1 trillion of federal money to the top one percent of income earners. Walker's central campaign scheme is a $2-billion Bush-style tax cut plan for the rich and big business that he refuses to say how he will pay to finance.

      Walker's unpaid tax plan is even less credible given the state's $2-billion deficit for 2011-13, according to the non-partisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau. The non-partisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities reports the unpaid Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 grew the federal deficit by $1.7 trillion [CBPP, 5/5/09]

      "How appropriate Scott Walker's Bush-style tax cuts are fully-endorsed by the Republican Party of Wisconsin on the anniversary of the Bush tax cuts passed the Republican congress in 2003," said Scot Ross, One Wisconsin Now Executive Director. "It's unfortunate rank-and-file Republicans supported this disastrous plan, since like the Bush tax cuts, they'll be the ones paying to give the rich and big business even more of our hard-earned money."

      Despite the grave budget projection, Walker has repeated four specific budget-busting schemes as the cornerstone of his agenda for Wisconsin:

      * Slash income taxes for the top one percent of income earners who make more than $225,000 a year - two-year budget cost: $287 million.

      * Reopen the "Las Vegas Loophole" which allows Wisconsin businesses to shelter their tax obligations to Wisconsin families through phantom "offices" in states without corporate income tax - two-year budget cost: $375 million.

      * Repeal changes made to the capital gains tax deduction, despite the fact 70 percent of capital gains filings are from those earning more than $200,000 a year - two-year budget cost: $243 million.

      * Shelter the assets of the wealthiest Wisconsinites even more by a radical end to tax paid on retirement income, regardless of income - two-year budget cost: $920 million.

      [Legislative Fiscal Bureau, 2/23/09, 7/8/09, 1/25/10; "Upfront," WISN-TV, 11/8/09; La Crosse Tribune, 11/24/09]

      One Wisconsin Now traveled to the first day of the state Republican Party of Wisconsin convention Friday asking convention goers to sign a "Responsible Budget Petition," that would reject tax cuts for the rich and big business - especially if Walker or his opponent were unwilling to document how they would pay for them. Walker's GOP cronies had One Wisconsin Now ejected from outside the convention activities.

      "When is Walker going to answer the direct question: How with a $2 billion deficit can you pay for $2 billion in tax breaks to the rich and big business?" asked Ross. "The answer is that he has no answer."

      http://www.onewisconsinnow.org/press/wisconsin-gop-votes-for-walker-s-bush-style...

    • 1 year ago
  • Leen61
  • Nancy_J_Powell
  • Leen61
  • LivingPong
  • August_K
    • +3
      August_K  
    • I think the good people of WI should take some of that energy and start a Recall campaign.......Maddow explained in her Bake Sale clip the other day that had Walker not just given the biggest corporations in WI millions in tax breaks that he wouldn't have had a deficit to complain about.

    • 1 year ago
  • dadevil
    • +5
      dadevil  
    • If a state or company makes an agreement in good faith with a union then they are obligated to follow through with it.
      Citizens act like "they" are not the government, when they are.

      The Citizens elected representatives who negotiated with the unions. Since the citizens didn't do THEIR due diligence to see what was going on, all of a sudden, some poor state worker who has worked to earn their pension, given up pay raises because California promised future pension benefits in lieu of raises, etc., is being told by the Citizens -- hey, no fair!

      The contracts were made, the union members gave concessions, the state govt. gave concessions, and the contracts were made. We'll go along with hubby getting a pension based on what he paid into the system over the last 30 years, though. It would be more that what he's actually going to get. You all do know, don't you, that a public union member has no choice regarding pension contributions.

      They are mandated, on top of Social Security -- right now at 8% of pay. If you all had set aside as much of your pay as the average state worker in California has done, over and above social security, you'd all have a nice nest egg, too. Because you didn't, don't blame the state worker because he was forced to.

      http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?p=83800011

    • 1 year ago
  • Joeydee44
  • fairandbiased
  • Oba_min_ation
  • dickmdown
  • Nancy_J_Powell
    • +3
      Nancy_J_Powell  
    • Oba_min_ation:

      Note that OBAMAHATE is not a substitute
      for facts and truth.

      The vast majority of people posting here
      have taken the time to educate themselves
      on both.

      You're wasting your time and diminishing
      your credibility when you come here merely
      to show off how many ways you can be
      hateful. You don't impress the majority
      and you certainly don't do your cause --
      if you have one -- any justice.

    • 1 year ago
  • oppressed1
  • MizPiz
  • Mr_Brainwash
  • the1union1man2organize
  • Milieu
    • +7
      Milieu  
    • Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker: Funded by the Koch Bros.

      google it

      Straight from Mother Jones

      Walker's plan to eviscerate collective bargaining rights for public employees is right out of the Koch brothers' playbook. Koch-backed groups like Americans for Prosperity, the Cato Institute, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and the Reason Foundation have long taken a very antagonistic view toward public-sector unions. Several of these groups have urged the eradication of these unions. The Kochs also invited Mark Mix, president of the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, an anti-union outfit, to a June 2010 confab in Aspen, Colorado;

    • 1 year ago
  • VFORVENDETTA
    • +6
      VFORVENDETTA  
    • Greetings everyone,

      To my surprise, I have received quite a few messages either explaining to me How I have no idea (I can only assume they meant history, since they did not say WHAT it was that I had no idea what the hell I was talking about) what I was talking about, and a group of others, who seemed polite, but simply did not understand how propaganda works, I have decided, to respond to the latter rather than the former, since the former seemed to be irrational, as far as propaganda is concerned, perhaps it is stated best-how it works- by one of the greatest propagandist of the 20th century, he states:

      “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

      Joseph Goebel's-Nazi Minister of propaganda

      Remember, remember the 5h of November...

    • 1 year ago
  • 2hellnwait
  • VFORVENDETTA
    • +1
      VFORVENDETTA  
    • 2hellnwait:

      What you're saying makes no sense, there's no such thing as a "right progressive" that is a contradiction in terms, people on the "right" such as fascist, those involved with any religion, conservatives, are by definition non-progressive, that is to say society is controlled by the ideology and values of the right remain intellectually and technologically static at best, and actually regress at worst, which is actually more typical, India would be a very good example of this.

    • 1 year ago
  • Leen61
    • +4
      Leen61  
    • Love the poster! Update: WI Democrats could be out for weeks! Also, this is the third day in a row that Madison schools were closed! MPS (Milwaukee Public Schools) also were closed today. I'm upset with my Mayor, Tom Barrett, for not showing solidarity with the teachers union. He said last night on our local news "The teachers should go to school." That will come back to haunt him royally if he doesn't reconsider. He's running for re-election in 2012. His own wife is a teacher! Walker wants to take money out of the pockets of hard working tax payers because the state is "so broke" but he can find the cash to put cops on the street to find Democratic law makers. I guess the budget isn't in too bad of shape after all.

    • 1 year ago
  • dinm76
  • Nancy_J_Powell
  • kennymotown
  • BenjaminDover
  • August_K
    • +2
      August_K  
    • BenjaminDover:

      God rest his soul......he was a good man.

      Pathetic..........and those are the jerks that the tea party help put in power in the primaries
      because they were NOT paying attention to the big money that took over their tea party movement.

    • 1 year ago
  • BenjaminDover
  • UrbanGypsy
    • +9
      UrbanGypsy  
    • The funny thing is that while this idiot of a Governor is going around panicking about the state's fiscal problems - he's probably also going around saying that tax cuts are the way to go.

      The Republicans are making no sense whatsoever. You talk about a fiscal crisis and you want to cut taxes - especially on business and richest Americans? What a joke of a party.

    • 1 year ago
  • 2warsoffbooks
  • COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
  • ThatCrazyLibertarian
  • TheAmbivalante
  • COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
  • COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
  • 2warsoffbooks
    • +1
      2warsoffbooks  
    • ThatCrazyLibertarian:

      We need to respond to Walker in crisis then continue to get after Walmart's "back door benefits from the tax payers" policies.

      It makes me wonder though, why the Repus aren't screaming about Walmart foisting their worker's benefits onto the taxpayer?

    • 1 year ago
  • COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
  • HarukoHaruhara
  • BigAL72
    • +4
      BigAL72  
    • The only reason Rightingers stay competitive is because they locked in and captured a large base of easy to control self-ignorant low class people this country has to offer. Unfortunately, lies and more lies can win you elections in this country.

    • 1 year ago
  • TheAmbivalante
  • derk
  • PigFarmington
  • Leen61
  • Paratus
    • -11
      Paratus  
    • Someone on another post on this subject said that Walkers actions were an effort by Republicans at busting the unions. Said this was a political action by Walker more than financial. The Democrat Party and Obamas campaign arm supports and is aiding these rallies, or riots depending on who is talking. I would argue that this is a reaction to the Nov 2 election changing the leadership of some states to Republican and an effort by the Democrat Party to further cement its relationship with the unions in preparation for the 2012 elections.
      On the news I see where the average Wisconsin teacher receives $89,000+ in salary and benefits and the natl average is $61,000+. Couple this with the modest request by the governor for the union folk to shoulder a slightly larger percentage of the healthcare contribution and retirement and we are left with collective bargaining as an issue. While I am not in favor of removing collective bargaining rights of the union people I am also not in favor of these rallies (riots if you will) the way they are being conducted. This is irresponsible on the part of the unions and the state legislators. I am loosing any sympathy I have for their cause.

    • 1 year ago
  • 2warsoffbooks
    • +4
      2warsoffbooks  
    • Paratus:

      Who do you think you are kidding? You have a bankers heart. Cold as stone. There's no sympathy in you. Source your claims about pay. I heard on the news that the Governor gets paid $92 Billion.

    • 1 year ago
  • PzLuvHappeniz
  • mitekillem
    • +4
      mitekillem  
    • Paratus:

      Yeah. I'm pretty sure The President of The United States of America, didn't send people down there to protest. I'm pretty sure he's got a lot on his plate already, not thanks to Republican GW Bush.
      This is not a reaction to the Election. By DEMOCRATIC process, the governor was ELECTED.
      It's what he's chosen to do with his power that has gotten people in such an uproar.
      Democrats don't have to do anything for union support. Unions = American Workers. They are the embodiment of democracy. Most of them are run, or lead by their own members.

      Every citizen has THE RIGHT to ASSEMBLY. It's in the fucking constitution, but I believe you see it as an "unnecessary" part of the constitution.
      Funny, everyone there is calling for a peaceful rally, yet Fox News is the only...The ONLY source calling it, or suggesting it is not.
      Which you can't trust Fox News. They're not even news, they're news commentary.
      Therefore, you CANNOT get news from them.

      I mean, I can print dollar bills all day long, and give them to you, but it's not going to be real money. -The same rules apply here.
      Sorry that you're stupid.

    • 1 year ago
  • TheAmbivalante
    • +6
      TheAmbivalante  
    • Paratus:

      Paratus, I would argue that the corporatist agenda of the GOP is coming back to bite them on their butts.

      And no, there has been no "rioting," if you will. But just like the French, "let them eat cake" produces a nasty result when the cake runs out.

      Simple fact is that the people are tired of being trod on in the name of gaining POLITICAL POWER. See, paratus, the only effective working person's voice in elections comes from dollars that have been concentrated in unions. Walker and the GOP knows that if they break the unions, they break their ability to invest in Democrats and they break their ability to compete with unlimited corporate dollars invested in Republicans who will do their bidding and screw the working person more.

      Oh, and your boy Walker just gave a tax break to the rich that, for some strange reason, equals the sudden shortfall.

      Walker didn't win because people thought he was a leader. His election was bought and paid for by Big Business. The same Big Business that ships jobs overseas, pushes bad paper on unsuspecting people, poisons your water, underpays everyone especially your women, kills your children, fills the skies with toxins, and kills entire seas. But hey, it's just business, right?

      I have nothing but support and admiration for these folks. Folks like us, made this country great. Not Big Business. Not Us the Upper Crust. Not It the Incorporated.
      It's ours.

      We don't riot. We rally.
      Still, you'd better call the National Guard to protect your petunias.

    • 1 year ago
  • wyndesonge
    • +3
      wyndesonge  
    • Paratus:

      The one thing you are not is sympathetic to workers' rights and your assertion that you are not in favor of removing colletive bargaining is a lie. This is a lawful, peaceful demonstration. When that right wing thug running the state sends in the national guard you mght well see a riot.

    • 1 year ago
  • dinm76
    • +2
      dinm76  
    • Paratus:

      I don't think you had any sympathy to begin with, is more like the truth! Your facts are bogus and you are clearly purposely deniging the obvious TRUTH about the republicans everyday practise of lieing and distorting reality...Well....reality is about to hit home for a lot of people like you and you are not going to like it.
      VIVA La Revolution!

    • 1 year ago
  • Jakaro
  • Leen61
    • 0
      Leen61  
    • Paratus:

      Wherever you got the "fact" that the average WI teacher salary is $89,000, here's a clue: it's wrong. Do a fact check from a more reliable source. Riots? What footage are you seeing? I've seen riots and what you are seeing in WI is peaceful and one of the most sincere displays of the democratic system I've seen. WI has a governor who has chosen not to negotiate in good faith with the unions and is taking this "budget" issue into territory that his corporate overlords are directing him to take it. This is all about breaking the unions in order for the GOP to gain an insurmountable advantage in the next election and all elections to follow. They know that it is the Labor unions who wield the most power for Democratic fundraising in this country and they know with them out of the way it is a corporate funded cake walk to political dominance. But I guess you're all for fascism.

    • 1 year ago
  • Dagum
    • +1
      Dagum  
    • Here is the full context of FDR's August 16, 1937 letter in which he clearly states he does not support public sector unions.:

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      My dear Mr. Steward:

      Reading your letter of July 14, 1937, I was especially interested in the timeliness of your remark that the manner in which the activities of your organization have been carried on during the past two decades "has been in complete consonance with the best traditions of public employee relationships." Organizations of Government employees have a logical place in Government affairs.

      The desire of Government employees for fair and adequate pay, reasonable hours of work, safe and suitable working conditions, development of opportunities for advancement, facilities for fair and impartial consideration and review of grievances, and other objectives of a proper employee relations policy, is basically no different from that of employees in private industry. Organization on their part to present their views on such matters is both natural and logical, but meticulous attention should be paid to the special relationships and obligations of public servants to the public itself and to the Government.

      All Government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service. It has its distinct and insurmountable limitations when applied to public personnel management. The very nature and purposes of Government make it impossible for administrative officials to represent fully or to bind the employer in mutual discussions with Government employee organizations. The employer is the whole people, who speak by means of laws enacted by their representatives in Congress. Accordingly, administrative officials and employees alike are governed and guided, and in many instances restricted, by laws which establish policies, procedures, or rules in personnel matters.

      Particularly, I want to emphasize my conviction that militant tactics have no place in the functions of any organization of Government employees.Upon employees in the Federal service rests the obligation to serve the whole people, whose interests and welfare require orderliness and continuity in the conduct of Government activities. This obligation is paramount. Since their own services have to do with the functioning of the Government, a strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent on their part to prevent or obstruct the operations of Government until their demands are satisfied. Such action, looking toward the paralysis of Government by those who have sworn to support it, is unthinkable and intolerable. It is, therefore, with a feeling of gratification that I have noted in the constitution of the National Federation of Federal Employees the provision that "under no circumstances shall this Federation engage in or support strikes against the United States Government." successful.

      I congratulate the National Federation of Federal Employees the twentieth anniversary of its founding and trust that the convention will, in every way, be successful.

      Very Sincerely Yours,

      FDR

    • 1 year ago
  • PigFarmington
  • 2warsoffbooks
  • 2warsoffbooks
  • VFORVENDETTA
  • Milieu
    • +3
      Milieu  
    • And again

      May 8, 1937, in which Roosevelt stipulated: “The right to bargain collectively is at the bottom of social justice for the worker, as well as the sensible conduct of business affairs. The denial or observance of this right means the difference between despotism and democracy

    • 1 year ago
  • Dagum
    • 0
      Dagum  
    • Milieu:

      We have a Public and Private sector in the U.S. Likewise we have a public sector and private sector unions.The distinction is relevant because FDR supported private sector unions. He did not support public sector unions.

    • 1 year ago
  • 2warsoffbooks
  • Dagum
    • 0
      Dagum  
    • 2warsoffbooks:

      Yes. And the government should start treating it like a true trust fund and stop stealing any surpluses, transferring them over to the general fund and spending them.

    • 1 year ago
  • fairandbiased
    • 0
      fairandbiased  
    • Dagum:

      FDR lived in a time before corporations controlled every aspect of government, the SCOTUS, and media. He could never have imagined the repressive corporate war state that we live in today.
      I have no doubt he's spinning in his grave at this very moment.....

    • 1 year ago
  • Milieu
    • +3
      Milieu  
    • And, again for the RWers who keep posting FDR quotes against Public Unions

      The desire of Government employees for fair and adequate pay, reasonable hours of work, safe and suitable working conditions, development of opportunities for advancement, facilities for fair and impartial consideration and review of grievances, and other objectives of a proper employee relations policy, is basically no different from that of employees in private industry. ---FDR

      Sounds like he supported Public Unions.

    • 1 year ago
  • Dagum
    • 0
      Dagum  
    • Milieu:

      See my post above for the FULL context of the letter. FDR identifies the similarities and motivations of private vs public sector employees. Right after that paragraph you quoted comes this paragraph which FDR clearly states he does NOT support public sector unions:

      "All Government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service. It has its distinct and insurmountable limitations when applied to public personnel management. The very nature and purposes of Government make it impossible for administrative officials to represent fully or to bind the employer in mutual discussions with Government employee organizations. The employer is the whole people, who speak by means of laws enacted by their representatives in Congress. Accordingly, administrative officials and employees alike are governed and guided, and in many instances restricted, by laws which establish policies, procedures, or rules in personnel matters." ---FDR--

    • 1 year ago
  • milojacks
    • +4
      milojacks  
    • Rode up to the Capital this morning and people are still there. Those people claiming there are riots are lying. The most subversive thing I've seen in the last few days was the couple giving out free hot coffee from a bike vendor cart (possibly inciting an assault on free market capitalism). There is a noticeable police presence with smiling and amiable officers everywhere, but I haven't seen a single person arrested for anything. An impassioned, peaceful protest that has been very pleasant.

    • 1 year ago
  • bambuu
  • Mr_Brainwash
  • Milieu
  • PigFarmington
    • +1
      PigFarmington  
    • bambuu:

      Walker doesn't give a fuck. Last night be basically said that dems need to come back so they can pass the bill. He has offered no evidence that he is even trying to compromise.

    • 1 year ago
  • littlwarrior
  • 2warsoffbooks
    • +4
      2warsoffbooks  
    • littlwarrior:

      They already are!

      Bail out the crooks on Wall street and the thieves were given billions in bonuses from taxpayer bail out money and then blame workers for fiscal problems. The Fed giving secret undisclosed loans in addition to the TARP funds. How many trillions of dollars will Wall St be allowed to steal from working people?

      When will it be enough?

      When will your greed be slaked?

      There are stinking, rotten fish in Washington, on Wall St, in the Republican Party, and in the Tea Cracked Pots!

    • 1 year ago
  • littlwarrior
    • +3
      littlwarrior  
    • 2warsoffbooks:

      You sound passionate and full of vigor, thats good but does it need to be so full of vigor this early in the morning? I haven't even had my second cup of coffee yet and I'm only on my third cigarette. Come talk to me around noon ish, then I can be as passionate. Till then I'm just gonna give the tea party and their ilk the finger. That should sum it up well for now. Keep your passion though, we need more protesters on the left who are morning people. Me though, Ill be the one protesting from around 1pm till 4 am, thats my proffered shift, and ill be pounding the lady gaga. Ive been thinking of getting me a boom box and protesting in from of the westborough baptist church for a week or two accompanied by the stylings of lady gaga, Katy perry and whatever else im in the mood for.

    • 1 year ago
  • Milieu
    • 0
      Milieu  
    • littlwarrior:

      The Nature of business is to take advantage of people. The question becomes, for the businessperson, does he/she do it in a moral or immoral manner?

      For this bunch of Oligarchs the answer is obvious, Immorality is "Jes Fine!"

    • 1 year ago
  • 2warsoffbooks
  • the1union1man2organize
    • +8
      the1union1man2organize  
    • My friends Unions are not some figure head but your brothers and sister standing together fighting for the rights of all working peoples.
      Unions are our police force protecting our laws, imagine our streets without the police, yes there is laws but if there is no one to enforce those laws! you get my point.
      Unions are needed more than ever. Like to repeat History say 1920.

    • 1 year ago
  • good_stuff
    • +4
      good_stuff  
    • Sure is lucky that state police were not impacted by the measures proposed. Otherwise, the state police may have refused to go out and find the democrats who are standing up to this tyrant in the only way possible.

    • 1 year ago
  • 2warsoffbooks
  • fairandbiased
    • +7
      fairandbiased  
    • Make NO mistake: THIS IS THE WAR of American citizens against the Corporatocracy. It's time to take it to the streets for our way of life, the middle class, and the American dream.
      It is time to take it to the streets in support and solidarity with American working families from coast to coast.

    • 1 year ago
  • highking1979
    • +10
      highking1979  
    • Remember when the GOP spent all of its times screaming about job killing bills and we're doing the will of the American people? Well now that we can plainly see that this is BS, I hope more protest come up like those in Wisconsin, these people need to understand that Americans want jobs, we want homes, we want low gas prices, we want our children to have great education and health care, we want our leaders to act that they give a damn.

    • 1 year ago
  • ejasun
    • +7
      ejasun  
    • Image
    • It's OK - Our Government Leaders can take money from the companies that they Govern? WE NEED TO STOP DOUBLE DIPPING Politicians!

      Now they want to steal the last bit of hope for AMERICAN WORKERS WTF.
      Send these politicians packing! They only represent CORPORATE GREED~

      FU Wisconsin Leaders we need reform!

    • 1 year ago
  • 2warsoffbooks
  • Progresshiv
    • +8
      Progresshiv  
    • Image
    • Time to throw out the road show and elect candidates from our neighborhoods: people who work for a living, who will not accept PAC money, and who talk out of only one side of the mouth.

    • 1 year ago
  • WakeUpPeople
  • Sarah_Honea
    • +9
      Sarah_Honea  
    • I cannot believe the stupidity of some people. For the wacko spectrum of the Right and deluded Libertarians, a disclaimer: I do not identify my self with any party that is or ever was.

      I was raised to love the truth, not opinion, the difference is one is backed by verifiable evidence that can be tested with statistics, cross examination and can hold up to tests forensic and historical. Opinion, like religion is the last refuges of scoundrels and sycophants, might I add that it is not properly used anymore.

      Opinion was only used AFTER one accepted verifiable truth, No veracity, no opinion- it is just shit. Like Hindotka down there,

      That aside,

      To the hopelessly deluded: Ayn Rand and her ilk sold you asses a bill of goods. You are not going to be apart of the rich, even if you support them by selling out and stabbing your own, No amount of brown nosing and anti union rhetoric is EVER going to get you millions. Hard work and pluck: statistically slim. People are getting arrested for selling flowers, not bribing the right official. That is what i happening in Wall Street and Washington, The only way you can get what you want is fi you already have seven to eight figures at your disposal, How many chair jockeys have that kind of cash just lying around. Or a law firm that can get government lawyers to look the other way, while Wall street is raiding your 401k?

      Union workers got your asses the weekend to have time off. Union workers got your asses the right to a living wage. And Union workers gave you an inroad into not being on the street after 65. Dont forget Union workers ended Child labor. you got health care at your job kiss a union worker you pigs.

      Yes the images a of worker is that of a lazy person, you jackals couldnt tell the difference between propaganda and fact if it bit you in your ass. oh yes there are bad apples and it was exposed as the mob, but they were few. monst union workers are hardworking and loyal to their j0bs.Teachers, Firefighters, Paramedics, garbage workers? you dont like them,

      Imagine our country with our them. Really use the braincells you have left and imagine a world without them, overworked underpaid people are far less efficient than those who are. Dont believe me. Show me a scholarly journal or a statistical analysis.

    • 1 year ago
  • 2warsoffbooks
  • nanac
  • Dagum
  • Milieu
  • Dagum
    • 0
      Dagum  
    • Milieu:

      "Meticulous attention should be paid to the special relations and obligations of public servants to the public itself and to the government. ... The process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service." - Franklin Delano Roosevelt -

      Why?

      "A strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent on their part to obstruct the operations of government until their demands are satisfied. Such action looking toward the paralysis of government by those who have sworn to support it is unthinkable and intolerable." - Franklin Delano Roosevelt -

      If you're dissatisfied with the source. Find another. It's not a big secret or a political slant. FDR was against Public (emphasize on Public) sector unions.

    • 1 year ago
  • Milieu
    • -1
      Milieu  
    • Dagum:

      You and WSJ forgot this part of the letter you're quoting from:

      The desire of Government employees for fair and adequate pay, reasonable hours of work, safe and suitable working conditions, development of opportunities for advancement, facilities for fair and impartial consideration and review of grievances, and other objectives of a proper employee relations policy, is basically no different from that of employees in private industry. -- FDR

      Sounds like he supports Public Unions to me

    • 1 year ago
  • Dagum
    • +2
      Dagum  
    • Milieu:

      No kidding. The public workers have the same motivations as private workers? And FDR Identified that in his letter. And than he precedes in his letter to state why he doesn't support Public sector unions. You are deliberately trying to misrepresent his position, or you didn't comprehend what you read.

      Here is the full context of those paragraphs in FDR's Letter:

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      My dear Mr. Steward:

      Reading your letter of July 14, 1937, I was especially interested in the timeliness of your remark that the manner in which the activities of your organization have been carried on during the past two decades "has been in complete consonance with the best traditions of public employee relationships." Organizations of Government employees have a logical place in Government affairs.

      The desire of Government employees for fair and adequate pay, reasonable hours of work, safe and suitable working conditions, development of opportunities for advancement, facilities for fair and impartial consideration and review of grievances, and other objectives of a proper employee relations policy, is basically no different from that of employees in private industry. Organization on their part to present their views on such matters is both natural and logical, but meticulous attention should be paid to the special relationships and obligations of public servants to the public itself and to the Government.

      All Government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service. It has its distinct and insurmountable limitations when applied to public personnel management. The very nature and purposes of Government make it impossible for administrative officials to represent fully or to bind the employer in mutual discussions with Government employee organizations. The employer is the whole people, who speak by means of laws enacted by their representatives in Congress. Accordingly, administrative officials and employees alike are governed and guided, and in many instances restricted, by laws which establish policies, procedures, or rules in personnel matters.

      Particularly, I want to emphasize my conviction that militant tactics have no place in the functions of any organization of Government employees. Upon employees in the Federal service rests the obligation to serve the whole people, whose interests and welfare require orderliness and continuity in the conduct of Government activities. This obligation is paramount. Since their own services have to do with the functioning of the Government, a strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent on their part to prevent or obstruct the operations of Government until their demands are satisfied....

    • 1 year ago
  • Slingingstones
  • Dagum
  • hombre76
    • 0
      hombre76  
    • Dagum:

      unlike you we dont draw a line and say well if your on that side then we won't help you. unlike you we actualy care about all our fellow citizens.

    • 1 year ago
  • hombre76
    • 0
      hombre76  
    • Dagum:

      I dont care if you quote Christ himself saying public sector unions are bad. He would still be wrong FDR is wrong and you are just another voice for the plutocrats trying to take over this country and bring it back to the guilded age. go stick a fork in you cause you and your ilk are done for.

    • 1 year ago
  • Dagum
  • Slingingstones
  • hindotka
1 - 100 of 142
more from Community:

top videos