Iceland let their banks fail; economy set to grow 3%
source: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/economy/news/article.cfm?c_id=34&objectid=10706907
-
-
- maasanova
- added this
The crisis almost sank the country. The krona lost 58 per cent of its value by the end of November 2008, inflation reached 19 per cent in January 2009, GDP fell 7 per cent that year and the Prime Minister resigned after nationwide protests.
But with the economy projected to grow 3 per cent this year, Iceland's decision to let the banks fail is looking smart.
"Iceland did the right thing by making sure its payment systems continued to function while creditors, not the taxpayers, shouldered the losses of banks," says Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, an economics professor at Columbia University in New York. "Ireland's done all the wrong things, on the other hand. That's probably the worst model."
-
- groups:
- Community, News and Politics, World News, Actual News, 3 more
-
-
GENERALNATTY
-
What they fail to mention is that the icelandic banking system does not have a CDIC or FDIC insurance system , what they had was a depositors and investors guarantee fund that covered only up to 20000 euros as opposed to the 250k in the u.s FDIC or 100k in the canadian CDIC also the fund was not adequate enough to cover all the deposits that means that a lotta good folks lost a hell of a lot of money in there bank deposits.
A lot of your investments carry shares in the banks themselves , that means that by the govt investing billions in bailing out big banks to keep them afloat that the FDIC aka your tax money would not be on the hook for all those federally insured deposits as well they kept a lot of your investments from falling to pieces because of your money invested in the banks themselves.
Last of all Iceland did not "let" there banks fail , the 3 major banks in iceland are roughly 11 times the size of that nations economy as stated in the article , a bail out was clearly not an option.
http://adventuresincapitalism.com/post/2010/12/09/Whats-The-Difference-Between-I...
So get this idea that the people did not have to shoulder the weight of the economic collapse over there because they did , they just got back on there feet and hit the ground running.
The netherlands and the uk had to fight tooth and nail to get there citizens there deposit money.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icesave_dispute
If the Big U.S banks were allowed to fail , you would the taxpayer would have to shoulder the burden , the FDIC would be completely overwhelmed so you the tax payer would have to put more money into the FDIC to cover the deposits or you would have to payback the debt the FDIC would have to take on to cover the deposits.
Out of all the options the bailout is the cheapest you pay a few billion to keep the bank afloat or a few trillion to clean up the mess once it collapses i would go with option 1.
plus ad to all this what 2warsoffbooks said below about iceland.
- 1 year ago
-
GENERALNATTY
-
-
rodstradamus
-
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wca0-2HGu-I
Big fan of Iceland. Here's a clip from last year of the Alex Jones Show interviewing Birgitta Jónsdóttir, a leading member of the Icelandic parliament who has called for the country to declare a debt moratorium and stop attempting to pay the $6 billion which the British and Netherlands governments are seeking to extort from Iceland with the help of the International Monetary Fund and the European Commission in Brussels. Great info from the ground as history unfolds and a lesson to other nations on how to save your country from the NWO.
Birgitta Jónsdóttir on Alex Jones Tv 1/4: Iceland Takes on The NWO with The Spirit of 1776 - 1 year ago
-
rodstradamus
-
-
Schnookums
-
At least when the next catastrophic collapse happens in the United States the ability of the Fed to print and loan with impunity will be hamstrung, to some degree, by the exposure to Monetary Policy people have had since the last collapse.
I am pretty sure there is a clear consensus, now, in the United States that collapse should be allowed to happen. I can't wait to see how principled that position is next go around......
- 1 year ago
-
Schnookums
-
-
JohnA
-
Goes to show you their is no such thing as too big to fail. The government should not be bailing out companies. If a company acts stupidly, they should fail, it should not be the responsibility of the taxpayers to bail them out. Bear Sterns, AIG, GM, Chrysler, Lehman Brothers, should have all been let to fail. If they can't cut it in the free market, they need to go away. If they serve a market need, the free market will fill the vacumm they leave behind. The free market always wins out. Iceland let the free market work, and it has as it is supposed to.
- 1 year ago
-
JohnA
-
-
demsbeans527
-
The US should have allowed the big banks to fail also. Community banks and credit unions could have picked up the slack and will have learned a valuable lesson not follow in the footsteps of the big baks. Instead we bailed them out and not only did they get richer they also became more powerful. And they are using that power to keep a strangle hold on our politics and to finance the decline of the middle class.
- 1 year ago
-
demsbeans527
-
-
twinite
-
PERFECT......I've said from the start of our banking crisis to let them fail. The failure of a broken system initiates new idea's and a chance for a better system to emerge. The best we can hope for now is to not be ripped off as badly as the year before.
- 1 year ago
-
twinite
-
-
figgdimension
-
Love Iceland
- 1 year ago
-
figgdimension
-
-
BenjaminDover
-
figgdimension:
The people are great, but eggs and beer were expensive.
- 1 year ago
-
BenjaminDover
-
-
Progresshiv
-
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2JyGsHZvEI
The bankers are laughing in your face.
- 1 year ago
-
Progresshiv
-
-
UrbanGypsy
-
At least the Icelanders did the right thing. The banks failed, but the people did not have to shoulder the losses just for the sake of a couple of shareholders.
Who are we beholden to in this country? Shareholders or the people? I think we all got to know that answer back during the bailouts.
- 1 year ago
-
UrbanGypsy
-
-
andreii
-
Cool, now let's arrest some bankers.
- 1 year ago
-
andreii
-
-
BenjaminDover
-
Inflation is only the enemy to those who have money.
- 1 year ago
-
BenjaminDover
-
-
Dagum
-
BenjaminDover:
You have it backwards. During an inflationary period those who have dollars put it into commodities and other hedges against inflation.
Those who have no dollars to move into commodities or other hedges against inflation have to deal with higher prices, lower purchasing power of the dollar.
Think of the rising food prices and ensuing riots in Egypt.
- 1 year ago
-
Dagum
-
-
BenjaminDover
-
Dagum:
I'm looking to the fact that most of us owe more money than we have.
- 1 year ago
-
BenjaminDover
-
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
-
I ditto Ziggy... As tragic as that scenario was, it still is. Ziggy may be able to contribute to a formulation of how much the public should demand from the banking systems for reparations and loan taxes. Who else can help generate such a figure? Is it not more worthy to consider how we can our national wealth, than arguing over the fine points of how we lost it? Yes, of course, we must know how it was lost to know from where to reclaim it. But keep in mind, our legislators are the most immediate culprits. It was, and is, they who steadily and stealthily committed, and are committing, treason by selling us and our country down the river for corporate America's forty pieces of silver. We know we need to reclaim our misappropriated wealth, but how will we hold the legislators who have betrayed us accountable?
- 1 year ago
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
-
-
2warsoffbooks
-
Krona value down 58%,
Inflation up 19%,
GDP down 7%
and now GDP up 3%.Can anybody add and subtract?
Try this experiment:
The day before failure, your Icelandic bank account has $100.00 (Krona).
After 58% devaluation you have $42.00 (Krona).
If you had a job and GDP fell 7%, good chance you didn't get a raise. Lets arbitrarily assign a loss of 2% in personal income due to lower GDP, now you have $41.16 (Krona).
Inflation at 19% lowers your buying power to $33.34 (Krona.)
If you had a job and GDP rose 3%, good chance you didn’t get a raise. Lets arbitrarily assign an increase of 1% in personal income due to higher GDP, now you have $33.67 (Krona).
Who is really paying for the Icelandic failure?
- 1 year ago
-
2warsoffbooks
-
-
Gravity_Man
-
2warsoffbooks:
Americans.
- 1 year ago
-
Gravity_Man
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
2warsoffbooks:
Good analysis. Voodoo economics always tells you the reverse of the truth.
Up 3% from what? The "what" is all important.
+^d
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
2warsoffbooks
-
Gravity_Man:
Don't we pay for everything?
- 1 year ago
-
2warsoffbooks
-
-
Gravity_Man
-
2warsoffbooks:
Our military all over the world puts the other countries at the 60 Yard Line of every football game. We start from 0, they start from 60. They win, our team runs wearing lead boots.
They have 6 weeks vacation each year,plus every other perk, go riding bicycles around the hills and dales taking in the sights, getting plenty of sunshine. We work in the caves. Our wife works in a cave. Our children take few vacations so they watch TV and live in a video world, so they have a life in a fancy cave, without their parents around.
Been like this for 6 decades I know of. Canadians have a medical problem they drive over and get help. We have to locate an approved "Network" doctor, "Network" clinic and "Network" hospital, while sick having to run a steeplechase getting every step pre-approved or we're screwed in the bank account, which is a given.
American means Screwed. I've had a thyroid dysfunction all my life, which meant my Immune System was also rendered less than functioning, so I've got a jaw bone infection underneath a tooth and Medicare won't cover it because it's near a tooth so they rule it dental work, which conveniently enough they refuse to pay.
Even though many bodily diseases come porting in through the mouth. Been like this all my life, always a big screw in yer back.
It all needs to be nuked if it only results in a Big Screw.
- 1 year ago
-
Gravity_Man
-
-
Gravity_Man
-
Gravity_Man:
The American Military is the most screwed of all. They go get maimed, die, come back with many vile medical issues while thinking they did all that to "save our Way of Life". Well, what is the American way of life?
Pay taxes? No dental care like the other countries we shore up? When sick and ill have to fight through a wall of paperwork and of course make the inevitable mistakes insuring the size and position of the Big Screw never changes? Pay on a home for 30 years watch TV and die?
The super brave men an women of the US military are dying for THAT?!
- 1 year ago
-
Gravity_Man
-
-
Gravity_Man
-
2warsoffbooks:
Presidential Elections, last one cost 3/4 of a billion dollars led us by the nose into a world financial collapse. They plan right now to squeeze Americans for every penny they can scrounge because they want that NEXT ELECTION to slam the money meter at $1 Billion so they can brag about how they accomplished it during a major ongoing Recession while millions have lost their homes.
Party on dudes. hahaha Eat lots of black crow meat too. Um, tastes like chicken.
- 1 year ago
-
Gravity_Man
-
-
maasanova
-
2warsoffbooks:
I don't think that the point of the article was to say that the Icelanders came out unscathed because they let the banks fail.
Their economy did crash, but essentially, so did the economy, but our economy is not growing, we have added very few jobs, and we've arguably had the largest transfer of wealth since the Gold Confiscation Act of 1933.
And we have been saddled with future debt payments on top of all that.
- 1 year ago
-
maasanova
-
-
ReMarker
-
2warsoffbooks:
Good post. Running the numbers has a way of helping the understanding.
- 1 year ago
-
ReMarker
-
-
JohnA
-
Gravity_Man:
Hell yes.
- 1 year ago
-
JohnA
-
-
Vierotchka
-
Iceland let its banks fail, not their banks fail. (yes, I know, grammar-nazi and all that!)
- 1 year ago
-
Vierotchka
-
-
remanns
-
Vierotchka:
YOU GOT THAT RIGHT !
Yep. Now I bet their really pissed off . ( heh )
[ I KNOW it should be "its" really pissed of ,....their you have it ]
- 1 year ago
-
remanns
-
-
2warsoffbooks
-
Vierotchka:
You are so singular minded.
- 1 year ago
-
2warsoffbooks
-
-
mitekillem
-
Vierotchka:
Were Nazi's really so infamous for their spelling? -The idea just seems funny to me.
Two gustopo on duty, talking to someone, and correcting his grammar at gun point. lol - 1 year ago
-
mitekillem
-
-
Vierotchka
-
2warsoffbooks:
Why, thanks for the compliment!
singular [ˈsɪŋgjʊlə]
adj
1. remarkable; exceptional; extraordinary a singular feat
2. unusual; odd a singular character
3. unique - 1 year ago
-
Vierotchka
-
-
Vierotchka
-
mitekillem:
No, not really, but semi-literate people systematically call those who correct their spelling and or grammatical mistakes "spelling nazi" and "grammar nazi" :D
- 1 year ago
-
Vierotchka
-
-
irie_ojo
-
accountability for one's actions....... who would of thought.
- 1 year ago
-
irie_ojo
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
Sorry folks, Iceland was able to do that because we didn't.
Economics is not a partisan talking point, it's a Science.
If some of those bailed out banks had not been bailed out, there would have been a major global meltdown like dominos. We came within 13 minutes of doomsday.
It's a house of cards. You can pull some cards (let some fail) move the wrong card and it's curtains. That is the reality. I'm not saying they did everything without ripping off the people, but no bailout was not an option.
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
Nephwrack
-
ZiggyStrange: This comment was removed by its owner.
-
Nephwrack
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
Nephwrack:
Thank you Nephwrack
I worked for one of those banks for 7 years, and I know exactly how the international flow of funds happens. We need to change it and fix it.
I quit and I told but it got nowhere.
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
remanns
-
ZiggyStrange:
That could WELL be true. The question then becomes,....AFTER the fallout, the cascade of dominoes,....what does the world look like, if all the banks were simply ALLOWED to break,....if braking is what they actually have coming ? Do we actually purge some parasites from the system ? In other words,....if you ACCEPT that you will "take a hit",personally and collectively,........before you screw the banks,....IS it "worth it",...when all is said and done,....long term ?
( I have a bias,....I sort of HATE the banks,.....and REALLY,....capitalism to begin with. I don't have a lot of assets to loose,....and I "bank" heh , on my autonomous resourcefulness to survive to begin with. )
- 1 year ago
-
remanns
-
-
remanns
-
ZiggyStrange:
uhm,.....no offense ex-banker ! ( hadn't read your latest post before I wrote mine ! )
- 1 year ago
-
remanns
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
remanns:
I hate the banks also. I was not excusing what happened just adding what I know to be the case. I don't know what would have happened after the collapse. But I know there would have been a collapse.
It's easy to shoot the messenger.
You have seen me post. My leanings are obvious.
Yes we need to purge the parasites. Yes the system is gamed. Yes we should change it all, but allowing a global financial meltdown would have left only one leverage tool to the super powers, War. Only one way to feed yourself, loot. Only one way to survive, kill.
I call that cutting off your nose to spite your face.
On this issue I have to go with what I saw with my own eyes.
I came here to state my opinion not be politically correct.
I know this is a touchy subject and I knew I would take hits for telling my take on it. That's ok but being called a payed operative hardly fits, and is patently unfair.
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
remanns:
BTW my position was not as a Banker, it was to develop a software system to track attribution.
Attribution follows the movement of funds, and issuance of financial instruments in the global economy. It gives you a pretty good overview of how things affect other things, and the reasons why commodities and holdings make or loose value..
What I saw freaked me out. That's why I left.
I talked my face off about what they were doing.
I wonder how many people here realize that due to the connections between these institutions the wrong small bank going down can start a domino effect.
I'm all for reform but I feel obligated to disambiguate what I can.
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
-
ZiggyStrange:
Right on Z...! You are in a good position to help now.
- 1 year ago
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
-
-
ThatCrazyLibertarian [removed]
-
ZiggyStrange: This comment was removed by its owner.
-
ThatCrazyLibertarian [removed]
-
-
neocongo
-
ZiggyStrange:
Correct.
- 1 year ago
-
neocongo
-
-
neocongo
-
ThatCrazyLibertarian:
Indeed they could have. Glad to see you support big government too!
- 1 year ago
-
neocongo
-
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
-
ZiggyStrange:
Where should we go from here, Ziggy, on that issue?
- 1 year ago
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
-
-
remanns
-
ZiggyStrange:
EVERYONE takes occasional flack for posts,.....but soon enough, you will come to be known as a "good alien" ! You can take THAT to the bank !
- 1 year ago
-
remanns
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
ThatCrazyLibertarian:
I agree that something like you suggest could have been done if people in the SEC and the GOV had not allowed things to get to where they did. But they did.
When the first bailout was agreed upon we were 13 minutes from a meltdown. There was no time to do anything but float at that moment. Once it starts there is no stopping it. I'm a Sailor if my boat starts to sink
I'm sure a lot of them knew what was happening and let it happen because it forced the issue, and they got their ill gotten gains.
I disagree with how it was handled, and how it is still being handled.
We are in no better position from a too big to fail point of view and we have to change that or we will go to the edge again.
Republicans / conservatives are making sure we stay as vulnerable as we have ever been to give them all the leverage they want to push their agenda.
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
remanns:
LOL!
I may have to put on my other Avatar
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM:
Vote out the Republican Tea Party crowd. Stop Banks like JP Morgan from being multi-headed monsters, and throw half of wall street in jail. Our economy is based on gambling.
Monopolies have to be broken. Fascism stopped.But I'm not claiming to know the answer dude. I'm just posting my opinions.
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
remanns:
It only stings when it comes from your side. I have no problem getting called every name in the book by a troll.
No sweat really.
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
wiccanwolfess
-
ZiggyStrange:
What's the difference between bailing out those banks (like we did) and simply taking them over (as in making them governmental entities)? I'm asking you this question because I honestly don't know, and based on your comment I figure you have the knowledge it takes to tell me how this works.
- 1 year ago
-
wiccanwolfess
-
-
wiccanwolfess
-
ZiggyStrange:
I may have to put on my other Avatar
How do you get the avatar to work? I've been asking this question for a week now and no one has answered it, and I can't get it to work for me :-( - 1 year ago
-
wiccanwolfess
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
wiccanwolfess:
In my opinion banks should not gamble with your money or steal it. A nationalization of banks would be called a socialist /Communist act.
But... As long as we let the wolves tend to the sheep, we are screwed.
I believe if the Bank fails, and is too big to fail it should have been taken over and owned by the people.
That is still not a guarantee. The GOV is not exactly the most competent or honest group out there.
We have to overhaul the entire system.
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
FoosMaster
-
ZiggyStrange:
Very smart answer and I do agree. I am just soo MAD at how the banks have behaved. We Desperately need Tough Banking and Corporate regulations and Any company that is "Too Big to Fail" should be busted up into smaller pieces.
- 1 year ago
-
FoosMaster
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
wiccanwolfess:
just make sure it's a 220 by 220 JPG file, and upload it using "Edit Setting" in the drop down menu in the upper right with your screen name.
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
ThatCrazyLibertarian [removed]
-
ZiggyStrange: This comment was removed by its owner.
-
ThatCrazyLibertarian [removed]
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
ThatCrazyLibertarian:
I will agree that the Dems are also culpable. I would agree that a take over to clean the slate would be better than what we have,
I don't want big Government any more than you do.
Daly on the other hand was not hired to give Obama economic counsel. He was hired to be a ramrod for the administration to push the President's agenda.
Obama, whom I support has given me high blood pressure for a couple of years. I do however shudder at where we might be today were it not for him getting elected.
I know for sure McCain Palin would have been a global disaster.I believe Obama is a socialist leading as a centrist. Sounds absurd right?
But consider this.
We are a really a Socialist Democratic Republic as much as people don't want to hear that. If we were just a Republic it would be complete Tyranny.
We have the GOV running Social programs. We need those Social programs to balance the type of Capitalism we currently have.
The Tea Parties have shown us how easy it is to pervert Liberty into fascism.
Obama is laying the foundation for a new era in America.If Obama were leading as a left wing Democrat there would have already been a right wing cluster&*()#.
Undoing the Reagan legacy will take a long time if it's even possible to do without a bloody revolt.
During a financial crisis you can't balance the budget, you have to spend your way out.
We need jobs for people that are not working. The wealthy are not spending, they are hoarding at our expense. We need tariffs and infrastructure. Not to mention tax reform.
Every day our money is worth less, if we cut spending and Social programs people will starve. Starving people revolt. Revolts devalue currency, and kill people.
We are not clueless people. We elect to stay dumb. We have to look at the reality of what we have created and start fixing it STAT. or we are all going to be looking at a civil war.
I don't think killing each other is the answer.
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
FoosMaster:
+^d
Thank you!
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
figgdimension
-
wiccanwolfess:
its kinda wonky make sure when adding your avatar under your profile that you go to bottom of page and save it before leaving profile there done!
- 1 year ago
-
figgdimension
-
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
-
ZiggyStrange:
You do have some of the answers man. All those suggestions are appropriate and doable, if we go after them. It's only getting past the inertia of going from knowing, to doing, that's holding back success.
- 1 year ago
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM:
Thanks. I'm ready to come out and do it, what we all need is to organize and show up. I was in it in the 60's and 70's, I think I have at least one more left in me.
People have to Vote and hold their representatives accountable. Be active, and learn from the past. - 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
maasanova
-
The citizens of Iceland and their representatives told the banks that they were only responsible for a certain portion of the debt, but not the debt that was incurred by the bank's dealing in the ponzi scheme casino economy.
They basically told the investment bankers to take their debt and go and take a running jump. To reinforce it they protested until they ran the bankers and their bought and paid for politicians out of the country.
- 1 year ago
-
maasanova
-
-
Nephwrack
-
maasanova:
sounds like fun.
- 1 year ago
-
Nephwrack
-
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
-
maasanova:
ONCE AGAIN CITIZENS! If Tunisia, Egypt, Iceland, and way back when, India could do it, why in God's name are we not doing it?
- 1 year ago
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
-
-
remanns
-
Good for THEM ! +^d !
- 1 year ago
-
remanns
-
-
ejs18119
-
History 101, back when carnegie steel and rockafeller oil were growing they saw competition as a major threat, so what did they do, integrate and expand. with a monopoly on their industry, they could fix prices and manipulate where the resources went and to who (highest bidder usually). we are seeing this again, and yet again, we need "trust busters" who will break apart these conglamerates.
- 1 year ago
-
ejs18119
-
-
remanns
-
ejs18119:
agreed. +^d
- 1 year ago
-
remanns
-
-
artemis6
-
Thank you Iceland , for showing , IT CAN BE DONE !
- 1 year ago
-
artemis6
-
-
remanns
-
artemis6:
hells yes ! +^d !
- 1 year ago
-
remanns
-
-
samthesixth
-
Wow! The laws of economics work.
- 1 year ago
-
samthesixth
-
-
neocongo
-
samthesixth:
If you are an irrelevant economy whose actions don't dictate the happenings of the Western World.
- 1 year ago
-
neocongo
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
neocongo:
Correct +^d
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
-
-
FoosMaster
-
Like I have been saying since the Savings and Loan Fiasco and the Airline Bailouts; "Let Them Fail, someone will take their place." and "If they are 'Too Big To Fail' then they are TOO BIG!"
We need to go back to the days when Big Corporations were broken up into smaller companies! The SEC has been granting FAR Too many companies the right to merge! - 1 year ago
-
FoosMaster
-
-
ZiggyStrange
-
FoosMaster:
+^d,
We need scalpel surgery to fix the economy. I agree we need a major operation, we just have to make sure the patient survives. I believe we can do that and breaking up too big to fail is a good start.
- 1 year ago
-
ZiggyStrange
