Arianna Huffington's AOL deal sparks accusations of a political sell-out
But no longer. Since she announced that the HuffPo was being sold to web giant AOL for $315m, Huffington has been accused of being a political sellout and someone who made a personal fortune from the labour of thousands of bloggers who write for no pay.
America's Newspaper Guild, the journalists' union, has started a campaign to target the Huffington Post as having a business model that has done great damage by not paying contributors. It has demanded that Huffington donate some of her AOL deal profits to investing in paid journalism. "After building a media empire based on unpaid writers and republishing the works of others... we are calling on Arianna Huffington to invest in quality journalism by sharing a portion of this fortune," said the guild's president, Bernie Lunzer.
That appeal is likely to fall on deaf ears. HuffPo spokesman Mario Ruiz denied the website was a problem for the industry, saying: "It's both wrong and offensive to insist that the HuffPo is exploiting journalists."
But since the AOL deal was announced this month, there has been an avalanche of criticism of the website and its smooth-talking founder. "To grasp its business model... you need to picture a galley rowed by slaves and commanded by pirates," blasted Los Angeles Times columnist Tim Rutten.
Blogger and cartoonist Matt Bors revealed that he refused a HuffPo offer to put his work on the website because it would not pay him. He called the HuffPo business model of offering publicity and exposure instead of money "abhorrent". David Carr, the New York Times media critic, mentioned the HuffPo's business practices in an article headlined "At media companies, a nation of serfs".
Even HuffPo bloggers joined the condemnation. One, RB Stuart, lamented posting content on HuffPo that she estimated was worth $25,000, writing: "Arianna not only sold her soul as well as her ship of slaves, but sowed the seeds of her demise with this act of greed and exploitation." Other bloggers said they would never write for her again and a Facebook page was set up to get the HuffPo to pay its bloggers. It was called "Hey Arianna, can you spare a dime?". Advertising Age columnist, and HuffPo critic, Simon Dumenco gleefully catalogued all the criticism in a piece entitled "Welcome aboard the anti-HuffPo bandwagon".
It is a remarkable turnaround for Huffington's image, which has long bathed in a glow of positive publicity. After founding the HuffPo in 2005, the former Republican and socialite rapidly turned it into one of the world's most influential websites and a self-declared liberal alternative to the conservative Fox News channel. It won her plaudits from new media evangelists and America's beleaguered Democrats. She became a regular pundit on cable news shows and a fixture of Democratic social circles.
But not so much now, especially after Huffington said she had always envisioned the HuffPo as more than just a politics website and said it had no overall ideology. To many observers that seemed like a deliberate rewriting of the past, and certainly a strong suggestion that AOL's corporate ownership would see it tone down the site's liberal campaigning.
"The backlash is well deserved," said Professor Jack Lule, a journalism teacher at Lehigh University, Pennsylvania. "She has made a fortune on the back of freelance writers working for nothing, but there is a political betrayal too. She betrayed the ideals of a lot of people who were happy to work for nothing because they thought it was for a cause."
Others agree, saying Huffington's history of changing her politics from Republican to liberal should have warned many that future shifts were likely."She has been a little disingenuous. That is no surprise, I guess," said Professor Chris Daly, who teaches journalism at Boston University. He added, however, that there was perhaps an inevitability about the backlash against Huffington that stemmed from envy at her success as much as the perception that she had misled and exploited people.
"There is a certain amount of sour grapes involved here. Some people look at her success and see that she turned a blog into a big mountain of cash. That is the dream for a lot of people, but they won't be able to do it to the same extent," he said.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/feb/27/arianna-huffington-post-aol-deal
-
- groups:
- Community, Politics, US Politics, Progressive America, 5 more
-
- tags:
- Huffington Post, Unions, Arianna Huffington
-
-
coolplanet
-
I guess once a republican always a republican.....
- 1 year ago
-
coolplanet
-
-
xhuffpo
-
Good for Arianna for making money, she has shed her skin before to change appearance and will do it again. It is not what I thought she was about but if money makes her happy okay then. AOL has bought a false representation. The views are falling, I as well as many others have left and aren't going back. The discussion that brought me there is already diminished and it is becoming an entertainment stories aggregator . This will not displace enough internet to keep it afloat. AOL will find it could have done by itself for a lot less money. Perhaps the good will be that AOL fails.
I do wonder what her next incarnation will be, conservative, pro business, American Patriot, I an sure liberal is out of the loop for a while. - 1 year ago
-
xhuffpo
-
-
bambuu
-
xhuffpo:
Well, she said that HuffPo was "95% entertainment and 5% political." One would be hard pressed to find any positive story on President Obama. But the way she used people is what gets me, but I really think her private investors was ready to cash out and she took the first bait that came along - AOL. I also believe that she was financially in debt.
I'm all for anyone making money but just be honest about it, she used good writers and didn't pay them, she used the left to boost HuffPo and then all of sudden, right after the Nov elections she just said "phuck you all."
- 1 year ago
-
bambuu
-
-
fjt805
-
I think that is to early to throw Arianna out of the bus she is a Progressive.And about the money the Huffington became an asset she deserves that and more.Lets see what she does .Ok look we got MSNBC,CURRENT(near to come Keith O.),........etc,lets give her a chance I hope we will benefit from this.For a much stronger PROGRESSIVE MEDIA "To early to judge" thats my opinion.And about the bloggers I think they will benefit too they already are they r angry bacause they did not get any money,(we can not look like the righties complaining about the public employes for having good benefits) so they want Arianna to send everybody a check? she will end up with nothing and thats unfair lets debate this with comon sense.If she is there for our movement than is all for the good.And by the way A POLITICAL SELL OUT? come on we know better than this,what about if CURRENT does something like this?
- 1 year ago
-
fjt805
-
-
MyronKeith
-
This is so unfortunate. While I've always loved Arianna, I can't say I feel good about this decision...
- 1 year ago
-
MyronKeith
-
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
-
Can we move on please? A sell out is a sell out by any other name we choose to call it. HuffPo is now a right wing controlled media commodity. She cashed out and bully for her. This gives others the opportunity to step in and benefit from taking HuffPo's original spot. End of case.
- 1 year ago
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
-
-
therealpixie
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM:
Like Current TV. Yay!
- 1 year ago
-
therealpixie
-
-
savroD
-
HuffPo advocates for and allows for pointless censorship. Though I appreciate Arianna using her pulpit to seemingly stick up for the working classes, I believe HuffPo has failed to live up to that standard. It's become a cesspool of infotainment!
- 1 year ago
-
savroD
-
-
ampersand
-
Arianna Huffington and AOL both wholly rely on the naivete of its contributors and customers as a business model.
The union of Huffington Post and AOL is a marriage of hollow souls made in hell.
Put succintly in a recent New Yorker article:
"The company (AOL) still gets eighty percent of its profits from subscribers, many of who are older people who have cable or DSL service but don't realize they need not pay an additional twenty-five dollars a month to get on-line and check their email."
"The dirty little secret" a former AOL executive says, is that 75% of the people who subscribe to AOL's dial-ups service don't need it."Tim Armstrong, the super salesman hired to turn the collapsing business of AOL around, made a rational grab at this shiny internet lifeline of HuPo, but it's not tethered to anything.
Circulate that.
Let them both disappear beneath the waves of real knowledge about their characters and practices. - 1 year ago
-
ampersand
-
-
twinite
-
Disingenuous to be sure !!
- 1 year ago
-
twinite
-
-
OrchidBlack
-
Arianna is a hypocrite. Straight up. Anyone who has followed her career or at the very least listened to her guest appearances on Bill Maher or MSNBC are familiar with her diatribe about the conservative elite and her so-called concern for the dwindling middle class. It seems that every couple of decades she switches allegiance when it’s suitable, financially, for her.
- 1 year ago
-
OrchidBlack
-
-
SAINTJULE
-
I've been one of the continuous chattering class on the Post. I was not a little upset with the sale. It has changed my opinion of Arianna, but I suppose she has the right to be opportunistic like the rest of that class level of people. I do feel deceived and sad about it, the sale, though.
- 1 year ago
-
SAINTJULE
-
-
ineedaname777777
-
why do people buy these web sites for 50 million, 500 million. Didn't everyone leave myspace as soon as Fox bought it for a billion bucks? Stop selling out!
- 1 year ago
-
ineedaname777777
-
-
BenjaminDover
-
Where does AOL come up with $315 mil?
There can't be that many morons out there paying for internet.
But then again there are republicans. - 1 year ago
-
BenjaminDover
-
-
OrchidBlack
-
BenjaminDover:
Actually, quite a few morons are paying for AOL. I don’t know why but they are out there.
- 1 year ago
-
OrchidBlack
-
-
therealpixie
-
OrchidBlack:
You would be amazed at the number of households who can get only dial up. I know several personally in various parts of rural NC.
- 1 year ago
-
therealpixie
-
-
artemis6
-
Queen of anything ? I really had not noticed her . I never visited the site . Will not miss her . Another inane celebrity .
- 1 year ago
-
artemis6
-
-
ecoalex
-
Obama did the same thing.
- 1 year ago
-
ecoalex
-
-
nevergiveup
-
HuffPo has become a right-wing tabloid,, filled with crap. Arianna is a whore who got her $315 million, and I hope she goes down as the hypocrite she has become. Everyone has their price to sell their soul, and I guess hers was $315 million.
This site is far more open, liberal, fact-filled and fun. I love it here. HP is DEAD to me. It's starting to read like Yahoo News–just more lies and corporate blather and propaganda, disguises as news. And the few bloggers who are paid, and their lame defense of Arianna's sale of HP is just, well, LAME!
- 1 year ago
-
nevergiveup
-
-
ineedaname777777
-
nevergiveup:
I loath yahoo news...
- 1 year ago
-
ineedaname777777
-
-
bambuu
-
Maybe Worianna can get some GOP to work for free over at HuffPo since they want to take away everyone else's right's and she doesn't like to pay anyone. That sounds like a typical conservative too me. She turned out to be nothing but complete BS she used the liberals to pump up her website and then turned on me. She deserves no respect. After all, this is the same women that told everyone to "Move their money" and yet she was taking corporate money in the other hand.
- 1 year ago
-
bambuu
-
-
therealpixie
-
bambuu:
I don't use the expression LOL very often, but Worianna. Worianna, lord, that's rich!
- 1 year ago
-
therealpixie
-
-
PeteLeS33
-
This should catch the eye of a lot of we ex-Huffpo users. AOL was allways shady and bised with their terms of condititions. This is true that she is a sellout and many of us will never go back. I have mentioned myself that anything from Huffpo is no longer reliable, and it isn't.
As far as paying for journalism, it will never happen. Now that she has an endless pool of corporate money and sponsers, Huffpo can safely degenerate to a gossip blog which is pretty much what it is now.
Another story about Palin or Brittney, Obamas dog or Lady GaGa's fashion secrets, and BLA BLA BLA,,,,.
Huffington no longer needs the ones that made her site so successful. She has $315m reasons not to.
- 1 year ago
-
PeteLeS33
-
-
nevergiveup
-
PeteLeS33:
The endless rounds of multiple Palin stories drove me away months ago. I guess HP's editors didn't here about the media's self-declared fast from all things Palin for the moth of February. Are Palin and Arianna so different? I don't think so.
- 1 year ago
-
nevergiveup
-
-
PeteLeS33
-
nevergiveup:
I agree!!
- 1 year ago
-
PeteLeS33
-
-
EmperorThan
-
"she announced that the HuffPo was being sold to web giant AOL for $315m"
To paraphrase The Social Network:
315 million dollars isn't cool Arianna you know what's cool? A billion dollars! - 1 year ago
-
EmperorThan
