Community | March 07, 2011 | 80 comments

McCarthy's Ghost has returned to Washington...Islam is the new RED.

jubal
There's a well-known truism that those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it. Unwilling to give up his irrational hate of Muslims or the uncomfortable parallels to Senator Joe McCarthy's hearings of the 50s, Rep Peter King is holding hearings beginning Monday on the "threat" of terrorism stemming from Muslim-Americans.

Rep. Peter King of New York defended on Sunday a congressional hearing he will hold this week on the threat of homegrown Islamic terrorism that focuses on Muslim-Americans, calling it an issue "which is not being talked about publicly" and needs to be.

"People in this country are being self-radicalized, whether it's Major Hasan or whether it's Shahzad or whether it was Zazi in New York," King said on CNN's "State of the Union." "These were all people who were identifying, in one way or another, with al-Qaeda or al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. So it's an international movement with elements here in the United States."

King was referring to Army Major Nidal Malik Hassan, a military psychiatrist whose shooting rampage at Fort Hood, Texas, in November 2009 claimed 13 lives; Najibullah Zazi, an Afghan-born man living in Colorado charged in 2009 with conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction; and Faisal Shahzad, a Pakistani-born man living in suburban Connecticut, whose attempt to blow up a bomb in Times Square last June was foiled.

I have no problem whatsoever with the notion of having a hearing on the threats of domestic terrorism, but for cryin' out loud, how intellectually dishonest of King to focus on one religious group and ignore the fact that the vast majority of domestic terrorism comes not from radicalized Muslim-Americans but from radicalized right wingnuts.

Keith Ellison does a yeoman's job trying to temper King's hate-on for Muslims, but this kind of wingnuttery requires a statement from the White House too. So Sunday, we got it:

We have a choice. We can choose to send a message to certain Americans that they are somehow “less American” because of their faith or how they look; that we see their entire community as a potential threat—as we’ve seen in several inexcusable incidents in recent weeks across the country that were captured on video. Well, those incidents do not represent America. And if we make that choice, we risk feeding the very feelings of disenchantment that may push some members of that community to violent extremism.

Or, we can make another choice. We can send the message that we’re all Americans. That’s the message that the President conveyed last summer when he was discussing Muslim Americans serving in our military and the need to honor their service. “Part of honoring their service, he said, “is making sure that they understand that we don’t differentiate between them and us. It’s just us.”

Informed by what we know, several basic principles must guide us in what we do—as individuals, as communities and as a country. We must resolve not to label someone as an extremist simply because of their opposition to the policies of the U.S. government or their strong religious beliefs. Under our Constitution, we have the freedom to speak our minds. And we have the right to practice our faiths freely knowing that the government should neither promote nor hinder any one religion over the other.

As such, we must resolve to protect the rights and civil liberties of every American. That’s why, under President Obama, the civil rights division at the Justice Department is devoting new energy and effort to its founding mission—protecting civil rights. It’s why we are vigorously enforcing new hate crimes laws. And it’s why even as we do everything in our power to protect the American people from terrorist attacks, we’re also doing everything in our power to uphold civil liberties.

We must resolve that, in our determination to protect our nation, we will not stigmatize or demonize entire communities because of the actions of a few. In the United States of America, we don’t practice guilt by association. And let’s remember that just as violence and extremism are not unique to any one faith, the responsibility to oppose ignorance and violence rests with us all.

In the wake of terrorist attacks, instead of condemning whole communities, we need to join with those communities to help them protect themselves as well. And if one faith community faces intimidation, we need to come together across faiths, as happened several years ago here at the ADAMS Center, when Christian and Jewish leaders literally stood guard overnight to protect this center from vandalism. You showed us the true meaning of e pluribus unum—out of many, one.
  1. groups:
    Community,   US Politics,   Progressive America,   Educating America,   1 more
  2. tags:
    Islam peter king McCarthyism Congressional Hearings
  3.     
    |

80 comments // McCarthy's Ghost has returned to Washington...Islam is the new RED.

  • sageohio
    • 0
      sageohio  
    • That guy Ann Coulter prays to McCarthy every night. He does a pilgrimage every year to his tomb, He even has a picture of it on his website.

    • 1 year ago
  • Nancy_J_Powell
  • Malikskyy
    • 0
      Malikskyy  
    • NY rep King stated that the Americans of Islamic faith are the only group that are presently being recruited by foreign forces, unlike your traditional homegrown terrorist like right wing extremist, which include the Klan and skin heads, who have been here for quit some time. His matter of fact tone implied that the terror we know is better than the terror we do not know. If king truly wanted to be the Terrorist Emirate, he needs to address all homegrown terrorism. Terror is terror-- no matter the color of the skin of the terrorist, no matter what language the terrorist speaks, no matter what god or cause they evoked when carryout their deadly acts, their goal is to terrorize. If he truly wants to do a job, he may as well do it in its entirety. Otherwise, he will be viewed as being Biased and hypocritical, a politico who engaged in selective amnesia when he threw his full support by the once deemed terrorist group, the IRA—and now have found his McCarthyism mojo now that the perceived targets skin complex—and religion—are in contrast to his.

    • 1 year ago
  • Sarah_Honea
    • +3
      Sarah_Honea  
    • Could not have said it better. If there is anyone allergic to print. Watching Lawrence of Arabia may glean some historical truth in how we systemically screwed the region---I mean some. The war with The Nazis was more about control of the Middle East and its resources than it was for freedom. And Japan was also about access to Asia and their natural resources. We have been after them since the opium wars.

      The corporations and Rich Families of the 20th century saw a friend in the USA. In that we are Xenophobic to a fault. We have the tactical advantage to invade anyplace, with out reprisal. And the US citizens psyche has been molded by 'me first', and capitalist ideology. The Rockefellers and the Rothchilds would have a harder time coercing governments unless they had fascist tendencies to begin with.

      My country is nothing but a Rube in the employ of more cunning men.

    • 1 year ago
  • corderodedios
  • Nick19
    • +5
      Nick19  
    • Thats pretty much been the case since 9/11. Also, the fear of Socialism has been revived by a certain someone *cough Glenn Beck.

    • 1 year ago
  • maasanova
    • -1
      maasanova  
    • All of this nonesense about a Muslim threat hinges on the myth of what the mainstream media and the 9/11 Commission concluded about what happened on 9/11.

      9/11 Truth is the anti-war, anti-police state antidote. Without it, you get TSA and very dangerous people like Rep Peter King and Senator of Tel Aviv Joe Lieberman free reign to trump the US constitution.

      But that's where I my agreement with this article ends. McCarthy was right and the admitted historical facts have vindicated him. We can argue whether a "witch hunt" was the correct way to address the Communist threat, but there really was Communist infiltration in the US government, but there is no Muslim infiltration in the US government.

    • 1 year ago
  • corderodedios
    • +3
      corderodedios  
    • You're saying muslims are the new commies. Close, but not quite. Commies were idealogues with beliefs heretical to Capitalist dogma.

      The muslims we are worrying about also come from countries that the West (primarily Britain and the US, and earlier on France) has since the early 20th century invaded, installed puppet tyrants, and exploited to grow fat and sassy while most of the indigenous population lived in privation, slaving for the Corporate West while a chosen few elite in their countries became the uber-wealthy. It pretty much began when Churchill installed Faisal I on the throne of the newly-created Iraq in the 1920's, and used the RAF bomb and terrorize anyone who protested England's failure to keep its promise of independence if Persia/Mesopotamia allied with England against the Ottomans in World War I.

      The West has been after economic "lebensraum" to feed our need (addiction) for petroleum-based energy by political means where possible, and using war and terrorism (the lie machine and "shock and awe") when that doesn't work. It is only a coincidence that a huge part of the planet's oil reserves are in Islamic countries. These people represent the population of countries we have invaded, either with Capitalism's fifth columnists, Corporations, or, when that method goes awry, with Capitalism's armies and weapons. These people are fighting us to free their nations from an invader.

      So while there are ideological principles in Islam that conflict with Capitalism - for example, Islam forbids usury, one of the pillars of modern Capitalism - their ideology is secondary to their convenient use as a religious group by the lie machine.

      It's far less like Commies and McCarthy - it's far more like Jews and Nazis.

    • 1 year ago
  • Sarah_Honea
    • +1
      Sarah_Honea  
    • corderodedios:

      Could not have said it better. If there is anyone allergic to print. Watching Lawrence of Arabia may glean some historical truth in how we systemically screwed the region---I mean some. The war with The Nazis was more about control of the Middle East and its resources than it was for freedom. And Japan was also about access to Asia and their natural resources. We have been after them since the opium wars.

      The corporations and Rich Families of the 20th century saw a friend in the USA. In that we are Xenophobic to a fault. We have the tactical advantage to invade anyplace, with out reprisal. And the US citizens psyche has been molded by 'me first', and capitalist ideology. The Rockefellers and the Rothchilds would have a harder time coercing governments unless they had fascist tendencies to begin with.

      My country is nothing but a Rube in the employ of more cunning men.

    • 1 year ago
  • littlwarrior
    • +6
      littlwarrior  
    • Why must we allow fear to rule? Why must we sacrifice everything we stand for in the name of safety? If we cannot stand for liberty and justice no matter the test of our resolve do we really deserve it?

    • 1 year ago
  • SIBob
    • +3
      SIBob  
    • Image
    • The King hearings are just a diversion to take the media’s attention away from the main thrust of Republican actions, the destruction of unionism and the slicing of government programs. Of course, the new McCarthyism plays right into the hands of the right-wing fear machine. All the Republicans have is tax-cuts and the image of the great protector. (It doesn’t matter who the president is or what the party is in regards to the military. Just look at how Obama changed his tune when he got in. Gitmo is still open and we are still in both wars. The corrupting influence of power seems to change even the most dove-like candidate.)
      Finding enemies when they are not always there empowers the military/industrial complex. The enemies that are there should be dealt with by our 1 million home security employees, not Peter King. He is just thrusting himself into the national spotlight for political gain. http://sibob.org/wordpress/

    • 1 year ago
  • lazloman
  • August_K
    • 0
      August_K  
    • SIBob:

      Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't the GOP deny Obama the funds to close GITMO and transfer those people to prisons here?

      I see him blamed for a lot of stuff but in reality the GOP has Filibustered over 220 Bills
      in the last two years......and then they have Faux News say he's ineffective
      or that he's gone back on his word.

      They even Filibustered a couple of good Jobs Bills.......doesn't matter that people Need jobs.......they just did it for political gain. SOB's!!!!

    • 1 year ago
  • crunchynuts
    • -4
      crunchynuts  
    • so you guys are telling me that radical islam ideology is getting traction and is manifesting itself in the western world??

      honestly guys......muslims are being conditioned to hate you guys..so what are you guys saying?? we should allow certain people to condition the majority?? (and spare me the chrisitians did this and the christians did that because we are not talking about chrisitians here)

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UinYbBxPXDk

    • 1 year ago
  • lazloman
  • ReMarker
  • Leen61
    • +5
      Leen61  
    • McCarthy is alive and well, alright. That fool was from my state. Islam is the new RED. They always have to pick out one group. America never learns from it's past...it always repeats it. I like how these Reps make blanket statements that it's all Muslims. It's not. When it comes to domestic terrorism, just look at the tea baggers, the religious right, the anti-abortion groups, anti-gay groups, rascists etc. That's where the scariest stuff is. These are the groups that bring guns to town halls, blow up abortion clinics and kill abortion providers, kill or threaten gay people, etc. We have to some how come together in America. But I don't know how.

    • 1 year ago
  • tommic
    • +3
      tommic  
    • Before Peter King was a congressman he was a newsman for the New York Post a right wing rag of a newspaper in a city like New York, with the New York Times available to read or the Wall Street Journal, but Peter king is a race or in this case a religious baiter. Portraying all followers of Islam as evil. One sick Puppy

    • 1 year ago
  • samthesixth
  • August_K
  • ReMarker
    • +6
      ReMarker  
    • Republican jerks like King (and some of the commenters in this thread) seem to be scared of their own shadows. As with any social deviates, terrorists are a very small percentage of the population and we have hired help (law enforcement personnel) to deal with them.

      If King wanted to do good for our country and wanted to know more about what inspires terrorist types, he would investigate religion's influence on terrorism. Regardless of the religion, the thread that most runs through terrorism is religious fundamentalism.

    • 1 year ago
  • Leen61
  • lazloman
    • +2
      lazloman  
    • Unions have become a boogie man as well. Listen to the arguments Faux News puts out against them. You'd think this country was overrun with people who want to destroy it and only a hand full patriots to save it. Ironically, the folks on Faux News belong to a union. Think BillO will quit his union? How about Hannity or Limbaugh? Of course not, they understand the benefits a union provides.This would make a good SNL skit if people's lives didn't hang in the balance. And by the way, McCarthy's ghost never left.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
    • 0
      congoboy  
    • well i'm pretty sure he didnt mean all muslim americans. but with domestic terrorism being a continued threat it seems shaking down catholic nuns, hindu priests or the average american joe as we do in the airports would be a big waste of time and money. profile, profile, profile but in a sensitive trust but verifiable kind of way.

    • 1 year ago
  • lazloman
    • +3
      lazloman  
    • The first line of the article sums it all up: "There's a well-known truism that those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it." Before Muslims, it was the Red Scare, before that, Anarchists, before that new immigrants (I understand Peter King is of Irish decent), before that newly freed slaves, before that witches. I'm sure I've missed a few. You could listen to Peter King's arguments and substitute any one of the above targets and fit them nicely into the appropriate time period. I wonder who Peter King's "elderly black lady" will be? For those of you that don't understand the reference, McCarthy's downfall came not long after his inquisition of an elderly black cleaning lady whose obvious ignorance made a mockery of the whole Red Scare thing. Furthermore, Peter King himself has been accused of having ties to the IRA.

    • 1 year ago
  • chief_longhair
  • congoboy
  • samthesixth
    • -7
      samthesixth  
    • Given that a potential terrorist plot has been disrupted every two weeks since Sept 2009 in the US, something is going on. There is one thing that links all of these plots. Having hearing into it is the responsible thing to do. Having people like Ellison there will ensure that it does not devolve into a "McCarthyite" situation. Be not afraid of words.

    • 1 year ago
  • lazloman
  • lazloman
    • +2
      lazloman  
    • samthesixth:

      This also completely ignores the homegrown terrorists we already have. Supremacist groups regularly harass and kill minorities. Anti-abortion groups think they have God given authority to kill anyone associated with abortion. There is even a bill now in some state that will allow people to kill abortion providers under the guise of "Justifiable homicide". Ridiculous!.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
  • congoboy
  • samthesixth
  • samthesixth
  • samthesixth
  • Paratus
    • -7
      Paratus  
    • Charges of McCarthyism to stem this is interesting since most of what McCarthy said ultimately turned out to be true. Islam and sharia law is a true threat to our country. Ignoring it and using emotional terms such as "McCarthyism!!!" does not change that.

    • 1 year ago
  • lazloman
    • +7
      lazloman  
    • Paratus:

      No, although they did find some communists, most of the charges against many of those people were at best, tenuous. When they couldn't find enough communists, they went after others; homosexuals in particular. Since these "perverts" were by definition subversives. Anyone who could shown to be associated with communists or subversives became a target. Do you know any Muslims? If so, then your life may be ruined simply because your kids are on the same soccer team, or maybe he came to a barbecue you had a couple of summers ago. At one point, accusations were used simply for revenge and to settle scores. Don't believe me? Read a complete history of the Red Scare, its downright frightening where this could lead.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
  • littlwarrior
    • +4
      littlwarrior  
    • Paratus:

      Wait what? Did you take history, ever pick up a book by a verifiable source? Its time to go back to class man, and Glenn Beck does not count, he has no degrees or references that qualify him to educate anyone. Your comment makes me want to cry and just how bad our education system is failing.

    • 1 year ago
  • Paratus
    • 0
      Paratus  
    • lazloman:

      Read up on the Venona Papers. The history of the Red Scare, as you call it, IS frightening but it was so because of the penetration of our government by Communism. That is what McCarthy was hunting. The fact that homosexuals were, as you put it, labeled as "perverts" was not as bad as the potential blackmail targets they presented. Not a problem at lower levels but a real problem with higher security clearances. The same can be said of gambling & extensive debt. It wasn't the fact that they were gay per se but that possibly were closeted, perhaps family men/women, and could not stand for their homosexuality to get out. That was the problem. Actually coming out would have eliminated the blackmail potential. Consider also that it was a different world then. McCarthy was pretty much vindicated but political correctness and the myth needs to prevail so that McCarthyism can be used as a shield.

    • 1 year ago
  • Paratus
  • Paratus
    • -1
      Paratus  
    • littlwarrior:

      Point of fact, Beck has noting to do with what I wrote. I'm somewhat confused with how you made a nexus between Glenn and my post. Our education system IS failing which is demonstrated by this traditional, continuous lie about McCarthy and McCarthyism.

    • 1 year ago
  • samthesixth
    • 0
      samthesixth  
    • Paratus:

      Also the Mitrokin Archive documents the "reds" that were in high positions in American politics to include Dean Acheson who guaranteed the Soviet Communists and the Chinese Communists a veto power in the UN.

    • 1 year ago
  • Paratus
  • extracrazykiwi2008
  • congoboy
  • ozoneocean
    • +1
      ozoneocean  
    • congoboy:

      groups who happen to believe in everything under the sun are out to get you, the fact that you come back to Muslims all the time indicates some deep-seated personal issues.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
    • -1
      congoboy  
    • ozoneocean:

      not really, my issues are far from deep seated. and it isnt all groups under the sun its islamo-fascists who happen to be muslim that are our current threat. during ww2 it was the germans and japanese. ww1, again the germans. if one cant clearly profile and define the enemy then we are doomed. i never stated all muslims were a threat but what shall we do include and frisk catholic nuns, children and the average american at the airport just so we can feel goooood about ourselves? the ones with deep seated issues are the ones who refuse to look at the world realistically and in doing so put the entire nation at risk.

    • 1 year ago
  • Paratus
    • -1
      Paratus  
    • extracrazykiwi2008:

      Be sure to tell that to the families of 9/11, Maj. Hasans victims, Danny Pearls father and all the other relatives of victims of the radical followers of the bearded pedophile.
      Bacon sandwich anyone?

    • 1 year ago
  • ozoneocean
    • +5
      ozoneocean  
    • It's the law of bigotry... They can't lynch black people anymore, they're not allowed to gas Jews, Communists aren't the big bad enemy they once were, Only Muslims and Mexicans are left to harass and degrade.

      The solution is simple- deport the bigots. Strip the off their citizenship and move them on. Bigots make bad citizens, it is THEY who are truly responsible for most violence and criminal activity.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
  • ozoneocean
    • +2
      ozoneocean  
    • congoboy:

      To the bigots, ALL Mexicans and Muslims are guilty criminals until they prove themselves innocent.

      Rather than criminalise entire communities of innocent, productive people, it makes more sense to just get rid of the morons who're causing all the trouble to start with: Anti-Mexican and anti-Islamist bigots.

    • 1 year ago
  • congoboy
    • -2
      congoboy  
    • ozoneocean:

      then its a really good thing that most of us arent bigots. so how do you profile one of them there bigots anyway? what we really need to do is rid the country of mexican and islamic criminals. just gonna take a bit more profiling though. peace!

    • 1 year ago
  • samthesixth
  • Funky
    • Funky [removed]  
    • This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
  • Paratus
  • postlapsaria
    • 0
      postlapsaria  
    • i'm glad they're holding these hearings.

      i say things like acts of terrorism can never be investigated enough--
      i bet if we investigated Timothy Mcveigh we would have found some Yemenese flags hidden behind the stars & stripes of these here united states (excuse me while i say a pray for lady liberty) that muslim in non-pork eating wolves clothing carried out the biggest domestic terrorist attack, ever.

      remember Seung-Hui Cho? ya, you do. that mohamed-lover that was the shooter in the worst massacre on american soil (virginia tech) was south korean... hello! south korea has muslims. cha-ching! smoking gun!

      these domestic terrorist are going to bring america to her knees, so what if the last three muslim american citizens that tried to carry out bombings failed miserably, and if there's only been two major attacks on american soil, which were funded by a millionaire who lives on the other side of the planet-- so what i say.

      mericah is #1! so our domestic terrorists are the best too!
      forget the economy! the only people who need jobs are the poor slobs sucking on the entitlement teet i like to call 'unemployment benefits' the rest of us don't need the government to work on creating jobs, spend MORE time trying to root out secret muslims who will eventually hurt our nation. (i have a hint, look in 1600 Pennsylvania ave, ya might find one)

    • 1 year ago
  • lazloman
  • alexandrek
  • Nephwrack
  • congoboy
  • Nephwrack
  • Nephwrack
  • jubal
    • +7
      jubal  
    • @crunchynuts...you are countering the president's own words by saying that the words you offer from reporters without even sighting a source are more indicative of the presidents true position. Dude you are full of I misleading rants.

      Did you even read what Obama said?

    • 1 year ago
  • crunchynuts
    • -6
      crunchynuts  
    • *

      July 2009 Daniel Patrick Boyd of North Carolina, a U.S. citizen, drywall contractor, and Muslim convert, was charged with conspiring to provide material support to terrorists and to murder people overseas. The government alleges he and several other men, including his two sons, discussed waging jihad, possessed rifles, and had done military-style training. In September, a charge of conspiring to murder military personnel was added, with the government alleging Boyd had gotten maps of the Marine Corps Base Quantico in Virginia.
      *

      September 2009 Najubullah Zazi, an Afghan-born legal resident of the U.S. who lived in Denver, was charged in September, and pleaded guilty in February, to a plot to set off a bomb in the New York subway system. Zazi, who attended high school in Queens, said he got bomb training in Pakistan from al Qaeda operatives in 2008 and was persuaded to come back to the U.S. and "sacrifice myself to bring attention to what the United States military was doing to civilians in Afghanistan by sacrificing my soul for the sake of saving other souls."

      *

      October 2009 In charges brought in October and unsealed this March, the government alleges that Colleen LaRose, a middle-aged Philadelphia woman who converted to Islam and used the online handle JihadJane, agreed to kill a Swedish artist who had drawn an insulting picture of Mohammed. In a 2008 YouTube comment LaRose allegedly wrote she wanted to help "the suffering Muslim people." She allegedly traveled to Europe last year and tracked the artist online but never made an attempt on his life. She is charged with conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists.

    • 1 year ago
  • lazloman
    • +2
      lazloman  
    • crunchynuts:

      Dude, would it be wise investigate Christians because of the actions of the anti-abortion Christians? Or to defame all of white America because of the actions of supremacist groups? Think just a little harder, the gears will turn and you'll figure it all out. Trust me, I'm a real American.

    • 1 year ago
  • samthesixth
  • crunchynuts
    • -8
      crunchynuts  
    • Image
    • it seems like the obama administration might beg to differ..

      http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/06/obama_admin_worried_about_home...

      The White House last week declared a new focus on the threat of homegrown terrorism, warning that "several recent incidences of violent extremists in the United States who are committed to fighting here and abroad have underscored the threat to the United States and our interests posed by individuals radicalized at home."

      *

      November 2009 In court fillings charging eight Somali-American men with attending training camps in Somalia, prosecutors allege that roughly 20 men from Minnesota's Somali community traveled to Somalia and "trained with al-Shabaab against Ethiopian forces, African Union troops, and the internationally supported transitional federal government" Al-Shabaab is an Islamic group that controls large sections of Somalia and is classified as a terrorist organization by the U.S. (The man who was arrested Sunday in Montreal after a Paris-Mexico City flight was blocked from entering U.S. airspace is a suspected member of al-Shabaab.
      *

      November 2009 Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, an Army psychiatrist, allegedly opened fire at Fort Hood, Texas, killing 13 people. A Virginia-born man of Palestinian descent, Hasan reportedly exchanged emails in 2008 with extremist cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, an American citizen living in Yemen, inquiring about whether it would be justified for a Muslim to kill soldiers. He also was angered by the U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

      *

      December 2009 Five young men from northern Virginia -- including Howard University dental student Ramy Zamzam (pictured right) -- were arrested in Pakistan and charged in March with plotting attacks in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and the U.S. There have been reports that the men tried, but failed, to join terrorist groups. The men, who met at a Fairfax mosque, deny they are terrorists and say they wanted to help Afghans made homeless by the war.
      *

      May 2010 Faisal Shahzad, a Pakistani-born man who moved to the U.S. in 1999 and became a citizen a decade later, allegedly parked a Nissan pathfinder packed with a crude bomb in the middle of Times Square. The bomb failed. Shahzad and his wife had lived what appeared to be a conventional life in Shelton, Conn., where their house was foreclosed on last year. In the summer of 2009 he reportedly traveled to Pakistan, where, Shahzad told authorities, according to the criminal complaint against him "he had recently received bomb-making training in Waziristan." Attorney General Eric Holder has said the Pakistani Taliban facilitated the attack, but other officials have questioned that claim.

    • 1 year ago
  • lazloman
  • jubal
    • +8
      jubal  
    • America has for a very long time existed in opposition to a bogey man or menace or monster that unites Americans into a homogeneous whole. That is why WAR IS A FORCE THAT GIVES US MEANING. It is because our nation was constructed through war and it survives through war. America perfected and capitalized the brand of "US VS THEM".

      GWB epitomized this brand when he declared that "If you aren't with us than you are with the terrorists" while his administration engaged in heinous terror because for almost two centuries now, America has bought into the notion that only a State has the legitimate reason to use force, violence, to engage in war to accomplish a political end. All others are terrorists, rebels, riff raff.

      The time has come to put these notions aside and to strive for a higher ideal, one that binds us through peace rather than through war. Its time to beat our swords and crosses into plowshares and writing instruments.

      For the pen is mightier than the sword and the plowshare more noble than the cross.

    • 1 year ago
  • crunchynuts
    • -8
      crunchynuts  
    • how come socialists, liberals and terrorists seem to cover each other's bottom??

      an UNHOLY ALLIANCE INDEED..

      http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-martinez-latin-america-kada...

      Unholy alliance
      Leftist leaders in Latin America should be ashamed of embracing Moammar Kadafi.

      Hugo Chavez is trying to come to the rescue of his friend and fellow "colonel," Moammar Kadafi. The Venezuelan president has offered to mediate Libya's civil war, and warned against any foreign intervention in support of Libya's opposition, which now controls much of the east of the country, including the port of Benghazi, home of the Hugo Chavez soccer stadium. The Venezuelan government even railed against the move to oust Libya from the United Nations Human Rights Council because of Kadafi's violent crackdown on his own people.

      The attempt by Chavez (winner of the Kadafi International Prize for Human Rights in 2004) to play a role in Libya's future is unlikely to amount to more than a Quixotic gambit, though it remains a distinct possibility that Kadafi could find himself a comfortable retirement home in Venezuela (some reports in the British news media already have one of his sons hiding out on Venezuela's Margarita Island). But Chavez's solidarity with Kadafi (whom he has compared to Simon Bolivar) speaks volumes about the fate of democracy and human rights in the region — in Latin America, that is.

      Disturbingly, Chavez isn't Kadafi's sole ally in this hemisphere. Fidel Castro (Kadafi Prize, 1998) has long been a comrade in arms, and the Cuban Foreign Ministry has accused the United States and the Western news media of instigating the current violence in Libya........

      ******
      could it be that they all share a perverted sense of what is right??

    • 1 year ago
  • Nephwrack
  • madjik68
    • +2
      madjik68  
    • crunchynuts:

      The US government hates anyone who does not wish to abide by our rules. Our government has allied with some of the most brutal dictators in the world. Many of whom were trained at the School of the Americas.

    • 1 year ago
  • WeAreChangeKy
    • +1
      WeAreChangeKy  
    • crunchynuts:

      We gave Ghadafi, Mubarak and other dictators money and weapons. Could it be that we share a perverted sense of what is right? Why would you spin blame on Chavez and Castro for defending people that we have supported for years?

    • 1 year ago
  • samthesixth
  • WeAreChangeKy
  • WeAreChangeKy
    • +5
      WeAreChangeKy  
    • We are being programmed to hate the boogeyman. Radical Islam never hated Christianity anyway. Qutb founded the movement and the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Quaeda after that. The issue he was adamant about was that Western civilization was too self-centered, narcissistic and consumer oriented. He was right. He stressed that the two religions were not at odds, just the lifestyles. True Christianity does not mimic Western behavior. Western Christians are not Christians at all but actually more of a Masonic, Luciferan, self-centered people obsessed with consumerism by design starting with the influence of Freud and then Bernays. Islam was chosen as the enemy by politicians and the elite in order to get the 'Christians' to accept wars for profit.

    • 1 year ago
  • artemis6
    • +2
      artemis6  
    • WeAreChangeKy:

      For years i studied HOW Hitler came to power . He used the Boogeyman method as well . He actually tried to go after the Masons early on , that did not fly . He had to find the group that was just right , noticeable , but not too powerful or too well understood . "other" religions , political philosophies are easy targets . Great post .

    • 1 year ago
  • August_K
    • +3
      August_K  
    • Saw that story on the TV news earlier.
      I can only imagine the fear mongering spin Faux News will put on this.
      They did it with the WTC Mosque and the "mystery" Mosque funder who they claimed
      also funded "terrorists" .....but they conveniently left out the part that this Arab mystery funder also happened to be Murdoch's business partner in News Corp...
      basically this "bad guy" was really their boss.

      Thanks to Jon Stewart for exposing the way they use omission of facts (twist & spin) to further their fear mongering agenda.

      http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-august-23-2010/the-parent-company-trap

    • 1 year ago
  • WeAreChangeKy
    • +1
      WeAreChangeKy  
    • August_K:

      Don't get me started on Rupert Murdoch. His history of manipulation and propaganda goes back way before Faux News. What a despicable man, and btw, a Mason. It should be noted that Ghadafi, Mubarak and the Saudi Royals are also Masons.

    • 1 year ago
more from Community:

top videos