Gitmo in the Heartland: Secret Prisons with New Rules
source: http://www.thenation.com/article/159161/gitmo-heartland?rel=emailNation
-
-
- ampersand
- added this
There was, in fact, little to be found; the Bush administration had quietly opened the CMUs in Terre Haute and Marion in December 2006 and March 2008, respectively, circumventing the usual process federal agencies normally follow that subjects them to public scrutiny and transparency. The first whisper of what the government was planning reached public ears in April 2006, when the BOP—in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)—published its proposed rule for “Limited Communication for Terrorist Inmates.” Under the APA, federal agencies like the BOP must publish notice of any new regulations and solicit public comments in order to operate legally. After a period of review, the agency publishes the finalized rule.
In the 2006 rule, the BOP proposed restricting the communications of inmates with a “link to terrorist-related activity” to one six-page letter per week, one fifteen-minute call per month and one one-hour visit per month, limited to immediate family members. The rule left it to the discretion of the warden whether visits would be contact or noncontact. (As a point of comparison, the BOP generally allows most prisoners 300 minutes of calls per month and places few caps on the number or duration of visits prisoners may receive. Even at the only federal Supermax, inmates are allowed thirty-five hours of visits a month.)
Several civil rights groups, led by the ACLU, submitted comments criticizing the proposed rule as flawed and potentially unconstitutional. The rule also appeared to be unnecessary, as the law already allowed monitoring and restricting inmates’ communications to detect and prevent criminal activity. After the period for comments closed in June 2006, observers waited for the BOP to publish its finalized rule.
Then in February 2007 came a stunning revelation: the BOP had not only abandoned the rule-making process; it had apparently bypassed it altogether by opening a prison unit in December 2006 in which all the inmates were subject to communications restrictions almost exactly like those described in the proposed rule. This secret unit came to light when supporters of an Iraqi-born American physician, Rafil Dhafir, made public a letter he had written describing his harrowing transfer to a new prison unit in Terre Haute. He called it “a nationwide operation to put Muslims/Arabs in one place so that we can be closely monitored regarding our communications.”
(In 2005 Dhafir had been sentenced to twenty-two years in prison for violating sanctions against Iraq by sending money to a charity he had founded there, as well as for fraud, money laundering, tax evasion and a variety of other nonviolent crimes. He had no terrorism convictions or charges.)
http://www.thenation.com/article/159161/gitmo-heartland?rel=emailNation
-
- groups:
- Community
-
-
extracrazykiwi2008
-
Great, more secret prisons!
- 1 year ago
-
extracrazykiwi2008
-
-
artemis6
-
This is what the concentration camps must have started out like . My country , my government is dead . Now , the people must start again .
- 1 year ago
-
artemis6
-
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
-
If we don't squash the mere possibility for this to be repeated, you will find your family, friends and neighbors disappearing into the depths of comparable detention facilities. It's a certain next step of Corporate Right.
- 1 year ago
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
-
-
ampersand
-
I like to think of myself as fairly imperturbable, but the more I read of this article the more uncomfortable, and then disturbed, I got.
Read it and weep, if you still have any illusions about the nature of this Administration, or the last one. - 1 year ago
-
ampersand
-
-
figgdimension
-
ampersand:
agreed its unsettling what has been happening in our own country around us all by the powers that be its disgusting we are being lied to and treated like cattle or worse
- 1 year ago
-
figgdimension
