Obama tarnishes Nobel Peace Prize with “indiscriminate” military action in Libya
-
-
- MotherForTruth
- added this
It has taken US President Barack Obama just over one year – and less than that if we consider that he earlier agreed to keep open the Guantanamo Bay detention facility – to damage his Nobel Peace Prize, awarded in Oslo, Norway in October 2009.
On Saturday, US warships unleashed a massive sea-based missile salvo against targets inside of Libya, where Col. Muammar Gaddafi has been engaged in a desperate showdown against anti-government forces. The battle is largely centered on the city of Benghazi, where oppositional forces have announced an “interim Libyan government.”
US warships and submarines fired more than 110 Tomahawk cruise missiles into Libyan territory to disable air-defense systems, allowing French and British fighter jets to more easily enforce a no-fly zone. The attack on Libya marks the third Muslim country that the United States is now engaged in military operations with.
So much for "sitting down and talking with enemies," as Obama promised to do during his political campaign for the US presidency.
It should be no surprise that Washington is going out of its way to disassociate itself from the Libyan military campaign, or at least the leadership part of it.
“We did not lead this,” Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton told a gaggle of reporters in Paris over the weekend. “We did not engage in unilateral actions in any way, but we strongly support the international community taking action against governments and leaders who behave as Gaddafi is unfortunately doing.”
Observers say Washington’s reluctance to advertize its hefty contribution in the military operation suggests that the Obama administration, already under attack inside of its own party for “towing the Bush line,” is an attempt to deflect hostility from the Muslim world, not to mention Main Street, U.S.A., which certainly cannot afford to foot the bill for yet another overseas adventure.
“They [the Obama administration] really want this to be a short, jolly operation,” remarked a senior British defense analyst, who asked not to be identified due to his position. “But all the bets are off on this one. Nobody is quite sure what the allied forces will be able to accomplish [in Libya] over the long haul.”
Incidentally, Saturday’s attack also marked the eighth anniversary of the start of the Iraq War, begun by Obama’s predecessor, George W. Bush.
Russian officials have slammed the US missile attack, while calling on the international coalition to stop the “indiscriminate use of force” it says has killed civilians.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich said the air strikes exceed the mandate of the UN Security Council resolution, which approved a no-fly zone and authorized all necessary measures to protect civilians.
"We are emphatically urging the coalition states to stop indiscriminate use of force," Lukashevich told reporters, according to Interfax.
"We are firmly convinced that the mandate deriving from Resolution 1973 of the UN Security Council, which was adopted as a rather controversial step, cannot be used for attaining goals going clearly beyond its provisions, spelling out measures solely intended to protect civilians," he said.
As “Operation Odyssey Dawn” kicked off on Saturday, missile strikes delivered on Libya also hit non-military facilities in the capital of Tripoli, as well as in Tarhuna, Maamur and Jmeil, Lukashevich said, before providing a grim picture of the attack’s collateral damage.
“As a result [of the missile strikes], 48 civilians have been killed and over 150 wounded,” Lukashevich revealed. “A medical center has been partially destroyed and roads and bridges have been damaged.”
Russia announced Sunday that it was evacuating some of its diplomatic staff and other citizens from Tripoli.
Meanwhile, Liberal-Democratic Party leader and State Duma Vice Speaker Vladimir Zhirinovsky has described the coalition forces' military operation against the Gaddafi regime as pure “aggression,” while calling for a “new Nuremburg.”
“Shame on NATO and all the murderers and barbarians,” the Russian firebrand told media on Sunday. “All of these rogues will be brought to account one day. The aggressors will get their due for the numerous crimes committed at an independent international tribunal, in a new Nuremberg trial.”
The UN Security Council voted on Thursday to impose a no-fly zone against pro-Gaddafi forces, which has been accused itself of using inordinate force against anti-government forces.
Russia and four other council members – China, Germany, Brazil and India – abstained from the vote.
According to Gaddafi, Tripoli regards the West's military operation against Libya "as an unlawful invasion of a sovereign state and sees it as nothing else but an act of terrorism."
Speaking on Libyan television, Gaddafi said that the United States and Europe had “proven to the world that you are not civilized, that you are terrorists – animals attacking a safe nation that did nothing against you.”
Libya is ranked as one of the top-ten biggest oil producers in the world.
http://rt.com/politics/libya-russia-military-force/
-
- groups:
- Community, Politics, US Politics, Progressive America, 2 more
-
-
CitizenHill
-
What should America do?
If nothing, then America is accused of unconcern for human rights.
If we initiate intervention, no matter the scale, purpose or intent, America is once again demonized for militant colonialism.
Damned no matter what is or is not done - - we lose. - 1 year ago
-
CitizenHill
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
CitizenHill:
Before even thinking of addressing human rights issues anywhere in the world America must resolve it's own human rights issues.
- 1 year ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
bambuu
-
That's why I don't read to much into what others say about about Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize.
If Obama hadn't done anything to help the Libyan people who asked him for help then we all would be sitting around saying how come he isn't doing anything etc etc etc...
Now that Obama has decided to protect the people now it's just the opposite.
As a liberal I stand with Obama on this matter because one he wasn't lied to about our what was going on in Libya and two, why is that only a "liberator of freedom and democracy" is only reserved for a Republican?
So if Obama's mission is to protect the people of Libya from a dictator like Gadffai at their request that is fine with me.
- 1 year ago
-
bambuu
-
-
pukemnukem
-
Considering that Kissinger got one for the Vietnam War, the Nobel Peace prize has long been a joke before Obama was given his.
- 1 year ago
-
pukemnukem
-
-
GildedAnonymouse
-
So, Obama was ridiculed for not enacting the no fly zone sooner. The united muslim nations very clearly said they thought SOMEONE should put up a no fly zone. The Obama administration goes ahead and says he wants to worth within the confines of the international community. You know, to not provoke hatred. The deal is that when the international community says we need to move, we will.
Well okay. The international community voted. The vote was to enact a no fly zone. The international community asks the U.S.A to strike from the sea so that some other countries can risk their planes. I fail to see how participating in an international resolution means that the united states is starting a war.
Also, way to be not smooth at all. Your very skewed perspective shows when you drop a single line about how oil-rich Libya happens to be without ever mentioning anything about why America might be interested in Libya anywhere in the article.
- 1 year ago
-
GildedAnonymouse
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
GildedAnonymouse:
That goes without saying, American leaders always have a reasons for invading other countries.
- 1 year ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
GildedAnonymouse
-
MotherForTruth:
... so, working in tandem with the international community to enact an international resolution in a way that ensures that the blame does not fall squarely on one nation does not make for an invasion. This president's actions =/= U.S. invasion.
Walking your entire army into several middle eastern countries and screaming that we will have revenge, that is an invasion. G.W. Bush's actions = invasion.
- 1 year ago
-
GildedAnonymouse
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
GildedAnonymouse:
It is my opinion that it is invasion, and many civilians are killed by American attack.
- 1 year ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
GildedAnonymouse
-
MotherForTruth:
Wikipedia definition of invasion: An invasion is a military offensive consisting of all, or large parts of the armed forces of one geopolitical entity aggressively entering territory controlled by another such entity, generally with the objective of either conquering, liberating or re-establishing control or authority over a territory, forcing the partition of a country, altering the established government or gaining concessions from said government, or a combination thereof.
I believe the no fly zone exists so that Gaddafi cannot use his own military to kill Libyan people, not so that one geopolitical entity can start conquering, liberating or re-establishing control or authority over a territory, forcing the partition of a country, altering the established government or gaining concessions from said government, or a combination thereof.
- 1 year ago
-
GildedAnonymouse
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
GildedAnonymouse:
You are concerned about civilians are killed in Libya but not if it is done by US forces.
- 1 year ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
samthesixth
-
GildedAnonymouse:
But Bush worked int tandem with the international community (and it was a bigger coalition) and he was backed by the UN and Congress.
- 1 year ago
-
samthesixth
-
-
cmc101
-
MotherForTruth:
collateral damage
- 1 year ago
-
cmc101
-
-
ujellybean
-
Obama did not "just" take a year to "tarnish" his peace prize; it was tarnished within DAYS of it being awarded to him with a step up of the drone strike program in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Sending cruise missiles against anti-aircraft batteries in hopes to mitigate Qaddaffi's mass slaughter of revolutionaries is in no way comparable to Obama personally authorizing drone strikes against civilian wedding parties. If the limit of American involvement in Libya consists of cruise missile strikes against fixed military positions and no ground troop involvement-- with the end goal being to allow the Libyan people to liberate and govern themselves free of the iron fist of a US-backed psychotic murderer or a Libyan psychotic murderer-- I wouldn't oppose this action.
- 1 year ago
-
ujellybean
-
-
oppressed1
-
Im not defending Obama here, but he never asked to be given this award without ever accomplishing anything. So to say he is tarnishing something he never deserved is a little harsh.
- 1 year ago
-
oppressed1
-
-
grammabet
-
American citizens losing their homes,jobs,lacking healthcare.Taxes steadily increasing,people losing their lives already in Iraq and how many more sent to Afghanastan? Getting involved in this war with Libya is not necessary. Take care of those that put you in the white house,enough American blood has been and still being spilled for oil.I don't miss Bush and his regime with Obama and his regime following in their footsteps.Shame on you.One time around for your presidential position,hopefully.Democrat acting like a repuglican.We're screwed without the kiss if some positive changes don't materialize very soon.
- 1 year ago
-
grammabet
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
grammabet:
Well said! I agree.
- 1 year ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
samthesixth
-
grammabet:
My idea is one 6 year term.
- 1 year ago
-
samthesixth
-
-
tlbuffin [removed]
-
samthesixth: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
tlbuffin [removed]
-
-
cmc101
-
grammabet:
Dam if he do dam if he don't so what option that would be better Geraldine?
- 1 year ago
-
cmc101
-
-
cmc101
-
tlbuffin:
where is that Parliamentary system we Parliamentary rules in our states and w t f up mess we have with buy-a-vote congress...
- 1 year ago
-
cmc101
