Image
FLeggplant
Now here’s a Psychologist we can all turn to in our darkest hours, someone who will listen to your innermost thoughts and solve them with torture. After listening carefully to your troubles you can then look forward to a nice long, painful recovery.
Put your minds at ease, the White house has solved all your mental health problems.

One of the most intense scandals the field of psychology has faced over the last decade is the involvement of several of its members in enabling Bush's worldwide torture regime. Numerous health professionals worked for the U.S. government to help understand how best to mentally degrade and break down detainees. At the center of that controversy was -- and is -- Dr. Larry James. James, a retired Army colonel, was the Chief Psychologist at Guantanamo in 2003, at the height of the abuses at that camp, and then served in the same position at Abu Ghraib during 2004.
  1. groups:
    Community
  2. tags:
    News News and Politics WTF Government 7 more
  3.     
    |

106 comments // Whitehouse GITMO Torture Psychologist

  • letsliveinpeace
  • GENERALNATTY
    • -8
      GENERALNATTY  
    • Two realities about torture ,

      #1 its a horrible and its unlawful and disgusting
      #2 its extremely effective at extracting information

      Reality is that its wrong , but its probably saved a lot of lives.
      That psychiatrist is there to figure out the most efficient way to break a man down.

      I believe that during times of war , the idea of torture not being used is sort of a pipe dream.

      Of all the wars i can think of and i mean a real war not a silly incursion that lasted a few weeks , i have yet to see one where one or both sides have not engaged in some form of torture.

      Thats one thing id hate about being president , going on the campaign trail making a bunch of promises and then becoming the president and then becoming privy to a whole wealth of information that put's in perspective the seemingly irresponsible actions of your predecessor and not being able to share your reasons why for what you are doing with the public, in a way they would understand or not being able to share your reasons at all.

      Sometimes you do have to put a little faith in your leaders a worldwide terrorist organization with people willing to sacrifice their lives to kill now more than ever has spent the last 2 decades trying to organize devastating attacks on america and have been unsuccessful even though 100's of thousands of illegal immigrants pour in undocumented each year , thats a remarkable achievement , one that unfortunately does not get achieved by playing by the rules.

    • 1 year ago
  • maasanova
  • FLeggplant
    • +7
      FLeggplant  
    • GENERALNATTY:

      I agree with your #1.
      However, #2 is not completely correct.
      Torture has been used throughout history to extract false information.
      In reference to the remainder of your comment--
      one of the problems with Humanity is we have always been hypocrites.
      We torture because some believe it is an efficient way to get the answers we want.
      Torture has never been proven to be efficient. People will say anything to make the pain stop. How do we discern what is truthful and what is just what we want to hear or what we already know?
      We have to ask ourselves whether we believe in morality and the humane treatment of our fellow man (who ever that may be) or whether we are just as immoral and inhumane as the people who do us harm.

    • 1 year ago
  • GENERALNATTY
    • -5
      GENERALNATTY  
    • maasanova:

      it is 2011 , that torture in combination with the massive intelligence gathering capabilities currently available in combination with experience and psycho analysis , sure there is always the possibility that the guy is lying but the C.I.A don't just pick randoms and waterboard them.

    • 1 year ago
  • GENERALNATTY
    • -6
      GENERALNATTY  
    • FLeggplant:

      The C.I.A received more than 50 billion dollars in this years budget , yes we know that there is the possibility that a person is lying but the fact is that the techniques are far more complex in extracting the truth than in days of yore . with the large intelligence community with an excess amount of information psychologists , psychiatrists and new drugs so on and so forth , the techniques of information extraction are more advanced than ever , the C.I.A does not pick up random dudes from villages and start pulling out there toe nails with pliers , they get most of there targets after doing their homework.

      The jury is still out about the overall effectiveness of torture amongst experts , but the crucial thing is that we have not been made aware of is how effective has it been in getting crucial information during these last wars , common sense dictates that the resolve of different combatants from different countries are different some stronger some weaker , how fast did the al qaida and taliban soldiers crack under pressure.

      As a nation one thing that has been problematic is that as time progresses the morality of the nation changes as people's feelings do , without an established moral code for all by americans for all humanity whether they live with in the confines of american borders or not , whether they carry an american passport or not any decisions by the people on morals in time of war will only be temporary.

      As long as america is a superpower in times of fear and despair like 9/11 established beliefs can easily be altered and or comprimsed and because the nation is so powerful it literally does not have to answer to anyone such things shall continue in the future especially when you have a secret agency (CIA) who's activities are largely classified.

      I dont think its about asking ourselves whether or not we believe in morality , the question is what are our morals and what are the exceptions to the rules.

      The truth is if you went around america you'd get a lot of different answers.

    • 1 year ago
  • CaptSutter
    • +5
      CaptSutter  
    • GENERALNATTY:

      You are forgetting the interplay of political goals of the leaders and torture. You said get the information you want. Exactly not the truth but the information you want. You can tell all the truth you want but if that is not the answer they want the pain does not stop.

      Torture is a "very effective tool" but has nothing to do with with truth or justice. At least the Catholics thought that confession is good for the soul and that they were helping the tortured into paradise in the next life even if they had to lie to get there.

    • 1 year ago
  • letsliveinpeace
    • +4
      letsliveinpeace  
    • GENERALNATTY:

      So torture works? Well how about I torture you about your involvement in the JFK assassination? I bet after 3 or 4 weeks you will tell me how you helped the killer. And how sorry you are that you helped. I give you a rating of non compos mentis.

    • 1 year ago
  • letsliveinpeace
  • GENERALNATTY
    • -7
      GENERALNATTY  
    • letsliveinpeace:

      there is a difference in getting someone to confess something they didnt do and getting someone to give troop locations and weapons dumps and locations of key al-qaida/taliban members , if a tortured subject gives up the location of a al-qaida weapons dump and you go there and see surface to rocket missles than you know he was telling the truth.

      To act as if torture does not work any of the time is stupid , whether you like it or not it gets results , even if only 1/3 of subjects gave up any form of valuable information thats still results.

      The U.S knows that torture is illegal in the international realm , so they downplay there efforts or not report incidents at all , when was the last time you heard a C.I.A agent go down for torturing someone , they only throw a couple army officers to the wolves once in a while in that regard.

      You are strictly coming from the perspective that these the govt is looking of people to torture to confess to things for political reasons , but the problem with that theory is that if the govt was attempting to make that political move than they would not have those guys rotting away in guantanamo without trials quietly trying to see if countries would take them after guantanamo shuts down.

      You are also under the impression that the methodology is the same push till he cant take no more than push some more , which may not be necessarily true.

      Im not saying torture is right , im saying its wrong , but to act as if the possibility of it working to get results is just plain myth is foolish.

      "A statement made by Admiral Dennis Blair, president Barrack Obama's director of national intelligence, states that "[h]igh value information came from [CIA] interrogations in which [CIA interrogation] methods were used and provided a deeper understanding of the al Qaeda organization that was attacking this country" (Disaster). Interrogators at Guantanamo Bay are from the CIA and help stop terrorist activities against the United States. According to the current CIA director Leon Panetta, "[i]mportant information was gathered from these detainees. [The CIA program] provided information that was acted upon" (Disaster). This intelligence gathered at Guantanamo Bay has been used to help the United States combat terrorist organizations such as al-Qaeda in Iraq and Afghanistan and is needed to keep the United States safe. According to President Obama's homeland security advisor, John Brennan, "enhanced interrogation techniques ‘were necessary to keep America safe'." When asked, "[w]ould the U.S. be handicapped if the CIA was not, in fact, able to carry out these types of detention and debriefing activities? ‘[John Brennan replied] yes'." (Disaster)."

      http://www.debate.org/debates/Guantanamo-Bay-pro-argues-for-it-con-against-it/1/

    • 1 year ago
  • GENERALNATTY
  • dinm76
  • Vierotchka
    • +5
      Vierotchka  
    • GENERALNATTY:

      As a matter of fact, it is extremely ineffective at extracting information. The victims will say what the torturers want them to say and not give accurate information, if they have any. Torture has never saved lives.

    • 1 year ago
  • Vierotchka
  • Vierotchka
  • CaptSutter
    • +2
      CaptSutter  
    • GENERALNATTY:

      There is a reason that General George Washington refused to torture in spite of the what the British was doing at the time, and there is a reason that the Nazis lost in in World War II, that the Kmer Rouge is no longer in power, that Pinochet eventually was held accountable, that the Apartheid fell in South Africa. Torture is the strategy of a loser. I just never wanted to see the US lose that way. It is still my home, and I am proud of the times we stepped up to the edge of disaster and then stepped back. I am afraid that We/you/they cannot step back this time. Has the US lost its soul, will it collapse under the weight of its own guilt?

      There is another US that I want to believe in, not one that in desperation of its own failure descends into the same pit the the Kmer Rouge and Germany did. I am proud of many things about the US but this is not one of them.

      Are you proud of torture? Do you believe there are just some things which you cannot do with out losing everything you value and love? If torture isn't one of those things what is left?

    • 1 year ago
  • mapczar
    • +2
      mapczar  
    • Vierotchka:

      This is pure bullshit. These mean spirited people are always looking for rationalizing their inhumanity. Torture does not work and even if it did, it is not who we are. I would rather die in a terrorist attack than think that our country stands for unjust treatment of others.

      "When we adopt the tactics of our enemy in order to subdue him, he has already won" --attributed to James Madison

    • 1 year ago
  • mapczar
    • +3
      mapczar  
    • GENERALNATTY:

      Did you check your humanity at the door? Let's torture everyone and if we only get 1/3 to give us good information it was worth it! That is your opinion carried to its end conclusion but for the sake of argument -- let's do it. We start with YOU and all the people you care for.

      The very definition of evil is a lack of empathy for others. The good news for you is ... empathy is learnable.

    • 1 year ago
  • Vierotchka
    • +1
      Vierotchka  
    • mapczar:

      Somehow, I don't think you listened properly to that video - he is saying that torture does not work. Try to listen again, and pay close attention to what he says.

    • 1 year ago
  • mapczar
  • Incredulous
  • LivingPong
  • COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
  • Debra_
  • COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
  • Danny_Mcstotts
  • Debra_
  • letsliveinpeace
  • letsliveinpeace
  • dinm76
  • Leen61
  • Vierotchka
  • Vierotchka
  • mapczar
  • figgdimension
  • theknopfknows
    • +3
      theknopfknows  
    • Look at that Smile face, don´t see how kind he is. Remember room 101 George Orwell 1984, room 101 where we get to know you! Eichman or Joseph M.

    • 1 year ago
  • ReMarker
    • +4
      ReMarker  
    • Sorry all you Obama haters but Salon jumped the shark.

      The following is a copied and pasted update to the linked article in Salon.

      Salon update:
      "On its own website, HLS’s Human Rights Program reported that James sent this email "to colleagues and students of Wright State University, where Dr. James serves as Dean of the School of Professional Psychology.”

      The White House, however, now tells a much different story. In an email to me from the First Lady’s Communications Director, the White House claims:

      Several members of the White House staff are convening a meeting with multiple mental health professionals on Tuesday to discuss issues pertaining to the wellness of military families. SAMHSA and the American Psychological Association have both been asked to attend. We understand that Dr. James is involved with these groups and may have been indirectly invited to attend this meeting.

      She claims, however, that he now will not be at that meeting, and further states that "Dr. James has not been appointed to serve in any capacity with the White House."

      There’s obviously quite a discrepancy between the claims in the James email as provided by HLS' Human Rights Project and the White House’s claims. Calls to Dr. James regarding this matter have not been returned, but if I speak with him, I’ll post his response to the White House's denials."

    • 1 year ago
  • moodyblue
    • +14
      moodyblue  
    • ReMarker:

      Thanks for the update. It's good to know. I take exception to your "obama haters" remark. I do not hate the president. The fact that this was believable shows that the Obama administration has not lived up to its promises. I voted for Obama because I believed he would change the mistakes of the prior administration, not continue them.

      He has let me down but I do not hate him.

    • 1 year ago
  • Conniepae
  • FLeggplant
  • FLeggplant
    • +3
      FLeggplant  
    • moodyblue:

      Thanks Moodyblue.
      I agree. I definitely don't hate Obama.
      Some things he's done have let me down too.
      No one is perfect. Even those with the best of intentions tend to stray sometimes.
      It is our job as citizens to keep an eye on him and everyone else in Government.

    • 1 year ago
  • COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
  • mapczar
    • 0
      mapczar  
    • ReMarker:

      Being critical of Obama does not make one a "hater." I too voted for him but he has not lived up to his promise. I will not vote for him again but I do not hate him. He is just not courageous enough or bold enough, or determined enough. He manages from the shadows and does not lead from the front. Big difference. He lacks leadership skills that make people want to follow. He is the Poet President ... all talk, little action and has inspired few.

      Only the racist and bigots and birthers hate him and they have from the very beginning.

    • 1 year ago
  • Jeremy_Benson
  • Angeliron
  • Incredulous
  • samthesixth
  • treewolf39
  • ZiggyStrange
  • KB723
  • samthesixth
  • KB723
  • KB723
  • samthesixth
  • KB723
  • SIBob
    • +6
      SIBob  
    • Image
    • This guy should be stripped of his license to practice because he does not have the patient’s best interests at heart. This is a travesty. This is reminiscent of the Soviet method of sending political dissidents into psychiatric “hospitals” that were merely another form of gulag. But with the United States there was not even the pretension of really offering care. How this man is allowed to keep his credentials is beyond me. How our military functionaries who participated in this affair are allowed to keep their positions should also be called into question. You would think our “change” president would have looked into this matter. http://sibob.org/wordpress/?p=2605

    • 1 year ago
  • letsliveinpeace
    • +3
      letsliveinpeace  
    • A woman loses her mind and is confined to a mental institution." That's the usual TV-listing encapsulation of The Snake Pit -- and like most such encapsulations, it only scratches the film's surface. Olivia de Havilland stars as an outwardly normal young woman, married to loyal, kindly Mark Stevens. As de Havilland's behavior becomes more and more erratic, however, Stevens comes to the sad conclusion that she needs professional help. She is sent to an overcrowded state hospital for treatment -- a curious set-up, in that, while de Havilland is treated with compassion by soft-spoken psychiatrist Leo Genn, she is sorely abused by resentful matrons and profoundly disturbed patients. Throughout the film, she is threatened with being clapped into "the snake pit" -- an open room where the most severe cases are permitted to roam about and jabber incoherently -- if she doesn't realign her thinking. In retrospect, it seems that de Havilland's biggest "crime" is that she wants to do her own thinking, and that she isn't satisfied with merely being a loving wife. While this subtext may not have been intentional, it's worth noting that de Havilland escapes permanent confinement only when she agrees to march to everyone else's beat. Amazingly, Olivia de Havilland didn't win an Academy Award for her harrowing performance in The Snake Pit (the only Oscar won by the film was for sound recording). While some of the psychological verbiage in this adaptation of Mary Jane Ward's autobiographical novel seems antiquated and overly simplistic today, The Snake Pit was rightly hosannahed as a breakthrough film in 1948. ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

    • 1 year ago
  • Angeliron
  • BenjaminDover
  • letsliveinpeace
    • +4
      letsliveinpeace  
    • It just goes to show that Psychology is a QUACK science and only useful for idiots like Bush. Their theories are proved by their beliefs, which are proved by their ignorance. No one can prove it really serves any useful function. And really anyone can fool them. All they are good for is destruction by giving you more pills... and more pills with lies and lies.

    • 1 year ago
  • Leen61
    • +8
      Leen61  
    • This guy must of studied under Mengela. How can anyone who has recieved a doctorate degree violate the hippocratic oath in such heinous ways? This guy is on the level of the labotomy doctors of past times....like Dr. Walter Freeman. The infamous destroyer of so many lives. This is why I have bitched for years that Bush/Cheney and Co. be prosecuted for war crimes/human rights violations. Not be walking around free.

    • 1 year ago
  • SFirman
  • Vierotchka
  • Leen61
    • +1
      Leen61  
    • Vierotchka:

      Thanks for the clarification. I was probably more accurate about him taking the "hypocratic" oath. LOL! He certainly qualifies as that. I did go ahead and correct my spelling in my post. The very least these "professionals" should do is promise to do no harm.

    • 1 year ago
  • Vierotchka
  • Leen61
  • moodyblue
  • mapczar
    • +3
      mapczar  
    • moodyblue:

      Obama is the Poet President. He talks a good story but he has demonstrated time and again that he can not or will not walk the walk. I do not care who he runs against, he will not get my vote again and I have sent a note to the White House stating that very thing. If the Democrats had any balls/ovaries, they would put up a primary battle for 2012. But alas, they will not because winning is more important than the traditional values that democrats have stood for in the past 5 or 6 decades. They have sold the left out for what they think is power and look what it has gotten us.

      My vote will go to whomever stands for and ACTS in the best interest of the people, although I think we are past the point of any effectiveness at the ballot box. If there are no candidates that hold those values then I will not waste my time voting for a broken and unjust system.

      =======
      "Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost."-- John Quincy Adams, 6th President of the United States [Federalist]

    • 1 year ago
  • FLeggplant
  • SFirman
  • mapczar
    • +2
      mapczar  
    • SFirman:

      It always amazes me that we live in a world of 400 choices for breakfast cereals and 1000 Cable channels yet we MUST choose from only two political candidates. Doesn't that ever spark in your mind that the system is rigged to make us all think we are actually making a choice?

      Obama is for torturing people, for surveillance without warrants, for extraordinary rendition, for GITMO, for endless wars, for secrecy in government, for continued discrimination against gays and lesbians [DADT is still the law, not matter how much the media has ignored it or spin the White House has put on it] .... the list of betrayals goes on and on. I will not vote for anyone who supports these issues, and neither should anyone who believes in social and economic justice. It just gives credibility to a broken and corrupted system.

      I will write in Kucinich, or Bill Maher, or Nader, or Olbermann or Maddow or Bill Moyers but never again will Obama see my vote. He, like many in the Democratic Party, does not have the backbone to stand and fight these right wing money grubbing elitist bastards. They need to be sent the message of produce or perish. Hell I might even write in Stephen Colbert or Jon Stewart just for laughs. Obama had his chance; he blew it BIG TIME and now he can be relegated to the dustbin of history; a wannabe great president that did not have the courage of his spoken convictions.

    • 1 year ago
  • SFirman
    • +2
      SFirman  
    • mapczar:

      President Obama did not torture at Gitmo. That was George Bush. Obama ordered all torture ended at gitmo.Thanks to Obama DADT passed in congress . As soon as the military puts it in effect it is gone. Perhaps they have already done this. I will have to research. This was durning the Lame Duck. He did an executive order to close gitmo. It'a matter of where to put them and hold there trial. I could list you many things he did, but you probably wouldn't believe . All the republican filibusters kept from a lot. And it's only been two years. Give him time. Nothing gets done quickly in congress.If you just write in a name, you might as well not vote.

    • 1 year ago
  • mapczar
    • 0
      mapczar  
    • SFirman:

      Water boarding, wrong, still doing it as well as extraordinary rendition. DADT, wrong, smoke and mirrors, not yet certified and will not go into effect for 60 days beyond that -- no indication when that will happen. DoD dragging feet but the media is silent so many think it is in effect -- it is not. What are they waiting for? Close Gitmo, wrong, did another Exec order just last week and he will not be closing Gitmo. You missed that one because you do not want to hear any criticisms of your champion. Obama is not a bad man, just not strong enough or determined enough to get the job done. So you keep on holding your breathe but you will turn blue before this country does under Barry's watch.

      You are not reading what I said. I am not anti Obama like the right wingers who come in here. I voted for him in 2008. He has done some things but not the things that are important enough to make any real change. I will say this again, HE HAS NOT DONE ANYTHING THAT WILL MAKE ANY REAL DIFFERENCE. It is more of the same. GWBush's third term.

      The latest change in the wrong direction is they want to weaken the Miranda law for 'detainees" Do you understand what that means? Under the Patriot Act, recently extended under Obama, YOU or I can be detained, based on secret 'evidence', without charge, without habeas corpus, without Miranda warnings, INDEFINITELY. Do you understand the significance of that? Oh yeah, and they can put you in a room naked, without sheets, pillows, blankets and force you to sleep on a concrete block, with music blaring and lights on all night, all day, without any human contact except for guards who give you conflicting orders demanding that you follow them. This is happening right now to Bradley Manning under Obama's watch. Does this sound like justice to you?

      I don't care if he turns water into wine next year. As long as these injustices are continuing, he does not get my vote.

      You have this blind faith in voting every four years yet want to give him all four years to get anything done. You apparently want to believe -- so did I but not longer. Sounds to me like you are a confirmed Democrat. The Democrats offer no real hope -- addicted to the corporate money teat just like the Republican Party.

      You must be young. You need to open your eyes friend. Put your vote into principles not parties or poets presidents.

      And no vote is not the same as a proxy vote. Apathy is not the same as defiance. I understand that it will not count for much, but it will count as much as your single vote will make any change in the direction the country is going.

    • 1 year ago
  • SFirman
    • +1
      SFirman  
    • mapczar:

      Wrong, 1-29-09 excutive order to close gitmo which also prohibited end coercive interrogation. Requires CIA to follow same rules as military in interrogating terrorism suspects.Millitary book of rules. Congress refused funding for prison in Illinois, restricted funding for Military to bring immates to Us.
      Wrong, no executive order to keep at gitmo. Didn't know congress could do anything stop excutive order.
      Wrong, 12-22-10 signed bill to end DADT. On 2-11 Gates ordered Pentagon officials start training process. Don't know why need training. Bet troops knew they had gays with them.
      Wrong, When refering to Manning The Patriot act is not under mililitary law. They can detain as long as want. IF WHAT WE hear about Manning is true I agree. We do not know what is true or not, but the military does have harsher rules then state prisons.This was true before Patriot Act. Can you prove Manning is treated as bad as they say?

      He has done a lot in two years. No I don't exspect the president to get all done that was left him in that time. Yes, we voted him in for four yrs. I expect him to get much more done, if the new republican house would give a little. Can you name me a president that has kept all promises?

      Yes, I am a democrat that stands by the president I voted for. Republicans have always been for the wealthy, democrats for the middle class. I do believe. Did you ever think that in another term he could do great things? Especially if we regain the house.

      As Frank Sinatra sang, Young At Heart. I've been through a few presidents.

      My single vote will overcome your write in vote. Perhaps you will change your mind by 2012. I will hope so. Keep believing my friend, In the long run you may be proud of him!

    • 1 year ago
  • mapczar
    • 0
      mapczar  
    • SFirman:

      I think there is room to disagree on some issues but your vote will not overcome my write in. I have been disenfranchised for many years, living in South Carolina and now in Kansas, both hopelessly red states. I have no illusions that my vote will 'count' for nothing at the national level because all electoral votes will go Republican. The only statement that I can make is that I believe that neither Republicans or Democrats represent the people any longer. Both are bought and paid for by corporate interests. We are past the time when a vote counted and it is naive to think otherwise.

      Time will be the judge. As I stated --

      We are still water boarding, perhaps not at Gitmo, but we are still water boarding in dark secret corners under the rubric of extraordinary rendition -- an evil concept from the start. A step in the right direction would be for Obama to stop extraordinary rendition.

      We are not closing Gitmo. Watch and learn. I most sincerely hope I am wrong on this.

      A year from now, I hope DADT is in the past but I am not holding my breath while the DoD drags it's feet. I most sincerely hope I am wrong on this as well.

      I agree that the Patriot Act is not under military law. But I have done a few courts-martial myself and manning's pre-trial confinement is illegal. Under the UCMJ, you can not hold in pre-trial confinement without charges and once charges are brought [just this last week] you have only 120 days to bring to trial. Under what authority was Manning held for the past 8 months? Renewal of the Patriot Act itself is cause for non-support of Obama. A step toward supporting Constitutional civil liberties would be to repeal or non-enforcement of the Patriot Act. Let him be bold and not timid in this area and I might change my mind.

      Can I prove that Manning is being mistreated you ask. It has been reported by reputable sources. Can you say otherwise? Are you saying he is being treated justly?

      This is the second time you claim Obama has done many things good without listing them. My point is has he done anything that really changes anything? What are they? List them and explain why they make a difference now.

      I think you like others are blinded by your faith in the Democratic Party. You say ... a second term and marvelous things will happen, especially if we regain the House. We had Obama 2008-2010 with the House and Senate and what did we get? Does a truck have to run you over before you see that the Democrats caved in at every turn --especially in the Senate. Hats off to Pelosi for the number of legislative bills she got through but without the Senate, results are minimal. If Obama could not do it in the first two years with both house and Senate, you are dreaming that he will do it later, hoping against hope. Time for hoping is over.

      It will just be more of the same -- more time lost. Meanwhile the country moves to the right everyday and nothing Democrats are willing to do is stopping it. In fact, they want to compromise with the devil and meet them [Reps] half way, even though the half way mark has moved significantly into right wing territory.

      No sir, we can no longer hope for change. Voting is passive. We need to act for change. I think you are mistaken in your faith in the system but I also hope that I am dead wrong. In the meantime, I must work outside the system by protest, resistance, and refusal to support those things that my conscience tells me are unjust. Obama has not eliminate injustice but in fact continues to support it. There is no compromise with injustice and as long as the Democrats are willing to go along with such things, they do not have my support.

      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." --Martin Luther King, Jr.

    • 1 year ago
  • mapczar
  • SFirman
    • 0
      SFirman  
    • mapczar:

      It has not been acted on because congress will not fund a prison to keep them untill trial. I would rather they be tried in civilian court but this has not worked either. No one once to do this. So military court may have to be the answer. I know he doesn't want this but hopefully something will be done.

    • 1 year ago
  • SFirman
    • 0
      SFirman  
    • mapczar:

      I think you should not be disenfranchised. Even in a red state your vote could count, depending on other voters. Ohio has mostly been a red state but in 2008 Obama won the state, After what our new republican govenor has done he may win it again. I will not take a chance on putting a republican president in office. Obama has my vote.
      I believe democrates are more for the middle class, not as much for corporate interest, not that some will disapoint me.Yes, time will tell.

      If water boarding is in deep corners I am not aware of that. At this moment congress will not stop extraordinary rendition. I hope you are wrong about gitmo. If not in this term, perhaps in the next. I know he doesn't like to give up.I belive strongly that DADT will be gone by next year. It's the right thing to do.

      What the truth is about Manning I only know what I hear. The president talked to them and is assured he is being treated well. Even if he would go or send someone, I know how that works. When company comes you clean house.He will not be able to get the Patriot Act overturned.Repealing a law is an act of congress. At least not without the votes. I am saying I don't know how Manning is being treated.Hopefully not as bad as is reported. I cannot prove this and I don't believe you can. I do have faith in the democratic party.

      I say a second term with the house he may do great things. In the first year there is much to learn. Yes in the senate some dems let there president down. In a second term he won't need to worry about them and republicans or an other term. At the moment he is in Libya with some of his party against him, but he did what he believed without there support.

      Yes some democrates let him down in 2008--2010. This did not stop him from fighting. Pelosi is not well liked but she knew how to get the votes she needed. Perhaps I'm dreaming but I believe enough to give him my vote. I cannot change your mind but I only do this to try. I am not tired of fighting for him yet

      I will do the list you asked of me. At least a partial one. It will or may show up tonight if this sight is kept up by current. I keep it in favorites You speak quite well but my mind is made up .If this sight is gone, put in my inbox where to put it.

    • 1 year ago
  • SFirman
    • 0
      SFirman  
    • mapczar:

      1. Health care. Needed for millions that don't have it. Prefered Public Option, but not enough votes. Good things in bill.
      2. Tax cuts 3.5 million to small bussiness to help pay health care.
      3. Increased funding violence against women,
      4. Expended Hate Crime bill
      5. Cut perscription cost for seniors, Medicare.
      6. Signed Weapons Systems Acquisition Reform act. Stop wastefull spending in defense
      7. Executive Order on government contracting to fight waste.
      8. Signed American Recovery Reinvestment Act---Help families quality child care, Act boostsfamily income expending Child tax credit. broad range tax cut making tax code fair middle class.
      7. Stem Cell Research that may find cures for diease.
      8. The Recovery Act--improve services to Veterans and medical facilities.
      9. 95% working families got tax cut millions families out of poverty. more to spend for economy. 1 million jobs created or saved by these taxes. $250 to seniors.
      10. Executive Order commiting government to lead by example and reduce greenhouse gas, green house gas emission standards for cars and trucks.
      11. Save car Industry and all that depended on them. Car sales up. Cash for clunckers.Most of loan paid back.
      12. Invest in teachers rewards and incentive to keep talented teachers.Invest in education --importand for future.
      13. Payroll tax cut, renewed unemployment benifits.
      14. Signed Lilly Ledbetter Act. protection against discrimination of pay for women and other workers.
      15. Memortandum expending federal benifits for same sex partners.
      16. Expended access to employment by having federal government by hiring people with disabilities.
      17. SignedAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act. which responsibe for about 3 million jobs bringing economy back from brink of depression.
      18. Signed Wall Street Reform most sweeping since depression.
      19. Signed Small Bussiness Jobs Act providing tax breaks and better access tofor credit.
      20. Signed Hire Act providing payroll tax credit companies that hire people looking for work for 60 days or more.
      21. President Andrew Johnson was impeached but not convicted because of one vote.
      22. Thomas Jefferson elected by one vote in House of Rep. after tie in electoral college.
      23 100,000 troops out of Iraq. Combat done. Winding down by end year.

    • 1 year ago
  • mapczar
    • 0
      mapczar  
    • SFirman:

      Mostly a list of what Congress did, not what he pushed hard. The credit for the majority of this stuff goes to Pelosi not Obama. Many are one time things or will expire shortly and not be renewed. The health Care Bill doesn't even kick in until 2014 -- what the hell! Who knows what the country will look like then. Costs are going up daily - people are dying and going bankrupt now!

      Mostly small effect or none like #14 Lilly Ledbetter Act- so full of loop-holes that it will never get equal pay for most women.

      Some just fluff. like #18 Wall Street Reform. It will change nothing.

      Some are smoke and mirrors -- Such as #23. 50,000 still there and what is NEVER reported over 100,000 contractors! We now have a mercenary army in most of these foreign wars. In Afghanistan it is 2:1. Listen carefully to the words that are used -- military pull out vice Americans or contractors.

      Some may not be good at all like #13. Payroll Tax cut -- who is going to end this one. So now we pay LESS into Social Security and so do employers makes the future short fall come a little earlier than planned. This is a foothold to privatize Social Security. Once it is gone, it will never come back.

      I think we may have the same goals, just difference tactics and commitments. I am not devoted to any Democrat. I am committed to social and economic justice. Obama is not strong enough to get the real stuff done -- Cut the Defense Budget, Get out of war making, close down Gitmo, Stop Military Tribunals, Real Wall Street Reform, Real Tax Reform, Restore real civil liberties to all women and gays, No more rendition, no more torture, no more secrecy in government, hold the criminal Bush administration accountable, Stop corporations having personhood, Stop gerrymandering of congressional districts, get rid of the Electoral college, Real Health care Reform, [Public Option] not the give away to insurance companies that we got. etc.

      Saw him speak tonight -- same old military adventure garbage. There is a limit to the 'humanitarian militarism and the question why Libya was never answered. Why not Sudan, or the Congo, or ivory Coast -- all of them in the middle of wars of genocide as I type and we are not interested. No multinational corporation oil is the reason. He is being played like a $5 banjo or he is trying to distract us. We will NEVER cut the Defense budged playing this military solution game. It has got to stop!

      But we are on the same side. As I said, I hope I am wrong but my vote will not count to elect, only to send a message. The message is, Obama is NOT strong enough to get it done.

    • 1 year ago
  • mapczar
    • 0
      mapczar  
    • SFirman:

      We either have faith in our court system or we admit that justice is no longer a goal. The fact is we can't try some of them because we tortured them. But going to military tribunals is NOT the answer. Hell Germany didn't even do that! It gives the military power over civilians -- not in my constitution. It implies we are under a state of martial law my friend. Wake up and smell the jack boots on our necks. It is a bad decision, it is an unjust decision and I will not support it - ever. there is no justification for trying civilians in military courts unless we are under martial law. If so, they can put me in jail now for I will resist it, I will protest it and as Thoreau stated in "Civil Disobedience" ... Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also a prison.

      I see a trend in your answers. When something gets passed - it is all Obamas doing. When it fails, it is congress at fault. He makes policy in the Executive Branch and he could do more but he defers to others. Weak leadership. Frankly I don't trust anyone who can not show any passion for what he professes to believe in.

    • 1 year ago
  • SFirman
    • 0
      SFirman  
    • Image
    • mapczar:

      Everything I listed were what Obama wanted. Of coarse when a president has a bill he wants the Speaker of the House has to get the votes for the president. Pelosi was very good at that. the Senate is harder. The leader has to bring the bill to the fioor, then I admit if all dem. are not for it, much harder.

      I liked the public option, but i'm sure you remember not all of his party was on board. He did fight for it, even had leaders of both parties for meeting. What he got was on the 50 plus VP vote. Some of the good things have already took effect. More good things next year, Yes, it will be 2014 before the exchanges take effect. I like to think by then our country will be in better shape. Many people are dying for lack of health care, People going bankrupt do to health care costs This country should never have so many that can't get care. In the end, when all set up may work fine. The Rep. are trying a repeal. In a matter of time the Supreme Court will deside. I hope not for the people that need it.

      Then when Kennedy died he lost his 60 votes. Then the republicans started there filibusters started, requireing 60 vote. Some bills like Wall Street Reform got watered down, but better than none.I don't know how long any are in effect. They will be renewed if Obama is in office.

      Payroll tax cut is for one or two years,I iforget.It was to put extra money into the economy. Yes it comes from SS. I know the Rep want to privatize it. I dought if that gets through the senate. If so the president has his veto pen. Putting into the stock market BIG mistake.

      Some of the things you list I agree with,especially corporations being same as people,Get out of war making,(not in the history of man), electoral college, The rest I may agree with but it will not happen under any president. The defense budget will be cut.

      I don't like war but also I don't like a madman killing his own people.Except for the money I thought he spoke well and was strong since so many democrats were against him.I believe in our justice system., but agree about military tribunals. That's why Obama wanted to put gitmo prisoners on trial in NY.

      Yes when things get passed Obama should get credit. If congress can't Agree on anything I blame them.There has to be give and take.

      Anyway I'm not going to change your mind even though we agree on a little, but Obama gets my vote and I hope you are wrong and will before 2012 change your mind. I hope that very much, my friend and I do have a couple friends that argue politics with me.

      I hope you didn't mind all the mistakes I made yesterday. I am not a good speller any more, but i kept losing the page. I was not going to take a chance so hit submit I am going to list a couple sites that are where I got my information. I could not type all of it or it would have sounded better.

      www.whitehouse.gov Bottom of page under issues.

      cltr.co.douglas.nv.us/Elections/History-at-Work.htm

    • 1 year ago
  • SFirman
    • 0
      SFirman  
    • mapczar:

      I don't know how to add a website or picture. As I was finished there were 4 pictures of the president. I don't know where they came from, but clicked on one, hit submit and the picture was there. Thought it was neat. Where did they come from? If you click on picture whitehouse.gov comes up NEAT!

    • 1 year ago
  • mapczar
  • mapczar
    • 0
      mapczar  
    • SFirman:

      No problem on spelling sir. I make the same mistakes if I don't proof read carefully.

      I like the man personally but I just don't think he is a strong enough leader. Like Harry Reid, he caves in much too easy. I was hoping for a Harry Truman this time around. Fire in the belly President. Instead we got Mr. Rogers. Good man but the Reps. walk all over him.

    • 1 year ago
  • SFirman
    • 0
      SFirman  
    • mapczar:

      Yes, but Harry Truman is also the first and only president to drop a nuke. I guess time will tell how strong or weak he will be. On the news they said he would announce if he is running again in the next three weeks. That never crossed my mind. I hope he's not going to let me down. I do wish the republicans would stop the birther and muslim. If this dirt is the only way they can beat him I will really be disappointed.

    • 1 year ago
  • mapczar
    • +1
      mapczar  
    • SFirman:

      Excellent point on the Nuke. One has to wonder if he really understood the significance. Even some of the scientists did not know what would happen during the Alamogordo test...and they detonated it anyway! That kind of brilliance we don't need.

    • 1 year ago
  • SFirman
  • treewolf39
    • +4
      treewolf39  
    • The biggest crime of this administration is the failure to right the injustice of the last administration. E.G.Torture, Warrant-less wiretapping, Insider trading. What ever happened to all those white house E-mails? It looks as though the Torture program will be expanded to mainstream law enforcement now.

    • 1 year ago
  • Leen61
  • mapczar
    • +2
      mapczar  
    • treewolf39:

      Now the precedence has been set by two presidents. What do you think the chances are of ever going back to a non-torturing policy. Next will come torturing of criminal suspects ... then eventually the justification for torturing political prisoners. History will not be kind to Obama for failing to right this outrageous attack on civil liberties.

    • 1 year ago
  • treewolf39
    • +1
      treewolf39  
    • mapczar:

      It is not to late but alas the political will of the people is not there. Only when the law abiding middle class starts to loss their own to the criminal injustice system will the call to arms be great; and by that time the military will probably be deployed on domestic grounds.

    • 1 year ago
  • treewolf39
    • +1
      treewolf39  
    • Leen61:

      The people get the government they deserve. I am at a loss as to how to reverse this administrations acceptance of the status quo. It was not what they campaigned on.

    • 1 year ago
  • Leen61
  • Demonlogic
  • kennymotown
  • FLeggplant
  • kennymotown
  • Progresshiv
    • +6
      Progresshiv  
    • Today, Dr. James circulated an excited email announcing, "with great pride," that he has now been selected to serve on the "White House Task Force entitled Enhancing the Psychological Well-Being of The Military Family." In his new position, he will be meeting at the White House with Michelle Obama and other White House officials on Tuesday.

      For his work at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, Dr. James was the subject of two formal ethics complaints in the two states where he is licensed to practice: Louisiana and Ohio. Those complaints -- 50 pages long and full of detailed and well-documented allegations -- were filed by the International Human Rights Clinic of Harvard Law School's Human Rights Program, on behalf of veterans, mental health professionals and others. The complaints detailed how James "was the senior psychologist of the Guantánamo BSCT, a small but influential group of mental health professionals whose job it was to advise on and participate in the interrogations, and to help create an environment designed to break down prisoners." Specifically:

      During his tenure at the prison, boys and men were threatened with rape and death for themselves and their family members; sexually, culturally, and religiously humiliated; forced naked; deprived of sleep; subjected to sensory deprivation, over-stimulation, and extreme isolation; short-shackled into stress positions for hours; and physically assaulted. The evidence indicates that abuse of this kind was systemic, that BSCT health professionals played an integral role in its planning and practice. . . .

      Writing in 2009, Law Professor Bill Quigley and Deborah Popowski, a Fellow at the Harvard Law School Human Rights Program, described James' role in this particularly notorious incident:

      In 2003, Louisiana psychologist and retired Col. Larry James watched behind a one-way mirror in a US prison camp while an interrogator and three prison guards wrestled a screaming, near-naked man on the floor.

      The prisoner had been forced into pink women's panties, lipstick and a wig; the men then pinned the prisoner to the floor in an effort "to outfit him with the matching pink nightgown." As he recounts in his memoir, "Fixing Hell," Dr. James initially chose not to respond. He "opened [his] thermos, poured a cup of coffee, and watched the episode play out, hoping it would take a better turn and not wanting to interfere without good reason ..."

      Although he claims to eventually find "good reason" to intervene, the Army colonel never reported the incident or even so much as reprimanded men who had engaged in activities that constituted war crimes.

      James treated numerous detainees who were abused, degraded, and tortured, yet never took any steps to stop or even report these incidents. Last year, Steven Reisner -- senior faculty member and supervisor at the International Trauma Studies Program, who also teaches at New York University Medical School and Columbia University -- told Democracy Now: "there is a lot of evidence that has been made public showing that the torture programs in the CIA and at Guantánamo, the Department of Defense, were created and overseen by health professionals, particularly psychologists" and that psychologists were at these facilities "to use their professional expertise to break down the detainees." James, argued Dr. Reisner, was directly implicated because:

      Larry James was the chief BSCT starting in January 2003. And when you read the standard operating procedures for mental health, for how to -- behavior protocols for detainees during the time that Larry James was the chief psychologist, you find institutionalized abuse and torture -- isolation for thirty days at a time with absolutely no contact, prohibition of the International Committee of the Red Cross to see these detainees, no access even to religious articles, to the Qur’an, unless they cooperate with interrogations, not to mention frequent interrogation.

      For his part, Dr. James claims he attempted to protect the detainees under his care from abuse and psychological injury. Meanwhile, the Louisiana psychology board refused to review the merits of the complaint against James on the grounds that the alleged acts were too old (outside the statute of limitations), while the Ohio board issued a three-sentence, cursory letter which decreed, without any explanation whatsoever, that "it has been determined that we are unable to proceed to formal action in this matter." So while the charges against him have not been formally sustained by either board, neither have they been evaluated or rejected by any apparent consideration of the merits. Judicial review of the Ohio board's decision is still possible (a Louisiana federal court ruled it lacked jurisdiction to review the board's Statute of Limitations findings).

      Despite the overwhelming evidence against him, James should not be deemed guilty in the absence of a formal adjudication. But the White House's conduct in selecting him is nonetheless baffling, at best. Of all the psychologists to choose from, why would they possibly choose to honor and elevate the former chief psychologist of Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib at the height of the Bush abuses? More disturbing still, among those most damaged by detainee abuse are the service members forced to participate in it; why would the White House possibly want to put on a task force about the health of military families someone, such as Dr. James, who at the very least is directly associated with policies that so profoundly harmed numerous members of the military and their families?

      This isn't exactly a powerful Task Force, but what this appointment does is have the White House -- yet again -- signal that it does not really take very seriously the Bush torture regime. On appearance grounds alone, the Obama administration should not be embracing and legitimizing the Bush-era Chief Psychologist of Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib. Is there really nobody in the White House who was able to come to that realization on their own, or is this part of some twisted "reaching out" effort to show that they view bygones as bygones when it comes to the war crimes our leaders committed and whom the Obama administration continues to protect? Whatever the explanation, the symbolism here is as ugly as the mindset underlying it.

    • 1 year ago
  • FLeggplant
1 - 100 of 106
more from Community:

top videos