IMF urges US to address debt now
source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110411/ts_alt_afp/imfeconomygrowthforecastusbudget_20110411170443
-
-
- JohnA
- added this
It said that slack domestic demand, high unemployment and still-depressed housing prices will continue to dog the world's largest economy, and that the huge government deficit will limit its ability to address those problems.
The IMF, echoing the ongoing battle in the US Congress over taxes and government spending, urged Washington not to try to borrow and spend its way back to economic health.
With a federal budget gap estimated at 10.8 percent this year, it said Washington will find it difficult to achieve its Group of 20 goal of halving the deficit between 2010 and 2013.
"The United States stands out as the only large advanced economy where the cyclically adjusted fiscal deficit is expected to increase in 2011 compared with 2010 despite the ongoing economic recovery," the Fund said in the World Economic Outlook.
Addressing this "urgently" is important to avoid excessive US borrowing destabilizing global bond markets, it said.
The Fund said now was the time to begin reducing the deficit, not let it grow.
"What we have observed is there has been a significant loosening of policies in 2011," Jorg Decressin, a senior researcher at the IMF, told reporters Monday.
"And that makes attainment of the objective for 2013 much more difficult, because it will require a large fiscal withdrawal over 2012-2013."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110411/ts_alt_afp/imfeconomygrowthforecastusbudget...
-
- groups:
- Community, News and Politics, US Politics, Greatest Depression, 7 more
-
- tags:
- IMF, national debt, Com. Schno, International Banking, 2 more
-
-
cdnathe
-
The whole debt situation is being tackled so poorly. There are some very obvious solutions that will help us balance our budgets. Of course military spending must be cut down. That is a cancer attacking the national budget. Secondly, for f*&ks sake please raise taxes. There is no way to balance the budget if we are going to continue to cut taxes for the rich, and even the middle class. America has the lowest tax rate out of any modernized country. Also, let us throw CAFTA and NAFTA out the door, bring back an import tax. This is how Japan created their economy, by realizing that they made nothing and supporting their car manufacturing by taxing imported cars. Sorry if i seem pissed, i just am pissed at both sides of the political debates for being ridiculous about ways to save our country.
- 1 year ago
-
cdnathe
-
-
JohnA
-
cdnathe:
I agree with you on military spending. But until they can prove they can put their fiscal house in order, raising taxes is just giving them more money to waste. Tell us a realistic number that the Federal government really needs to function, no waste, no earmarks, no pork, then we can talk about taxes being raised to meet that number. But if they are just going to continue to piss the money into the ocean with no accountability, fuck them. I am pissed too, don't be sorry about it.
- 1 year ago
-
JohnA
-
-
Wicks934
-
I have a different take on the IMF's urging. It's a "convenient" threat to make the people of the U.S. bow down to the cuts that the Republicans want....not true handling of our deficit. Just another piece in the game of global domination by the few.
- 1 year ago
-
Wicks934
-
-
Steamed_N_More
-
The IMF is world banking institution. I just scanned the following linked page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Monetary_Fund . Interesting history and structure. Didn't they fail in their part to prevent the world wide economic crises?
- 1 year ago
-
Steamed_N_More
-
-
coxian_armada
-
IMF's condition to South_east Asian crisis during the 1997 crisis:-
"We will provide the fund to help to rebuild your economy wit one condition, you must let our partners(i.e bankers and American corporations)into your country."
Look at Indonesia or Thailand now. - 1 year ago
-
coxian_armada
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
This is the deal with the IMF. They step in when a country's tanking economy threatens the economies of other countries.
For them to make such a "recommendation" to the U.S. is very, very, VERY bad. In effect, they are putting us on notice: put your house in order, or risk having the IMF take over your resources, budget, etc.
IMF will force sale of our natural resources to pay down our debts.
I hope you weren't attached to the Northern California redwoods and sequoias...or Yosemite; lots of minerals open for strip-mining in Yosemite.
Obama and his ED-compensating obsession with starting wars is going to bring us under the thumb of the IMF, and we won't like it at all. By the time the IMF is done with us, our country will be nothing like it was before. Society, national parks, types of grain we can grow, how we transport it to market---it will change if the IMF wants it to.
- 1 year ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
Straighttalker
-
When we were spending billions in Iraq, no one said that was a bad idea. Now they are talking. I do agree that we need to reduce the debt, but it must be done with intelligence.
- 1 year ago
-
Straighttalker
-
-
JohnA
-
Straighttalker:
I said it was a bad idea.
- 1 year ago
-
JohnA
-
-
August_K
-
Straighttalker:
I doubt anyone wanted us to attack Iraq. Bush and his media spin doctors kept repeating lies over and over and doing a LOT of fear mongering until they thought they could get away with it. The UN was opposed to it. Many other countries were opposed to it.
Bush ran around giving every little country that would side with him big bribes (cash).
That's how he build up his "alliance". It was truly disgusting to watch. - 1 year ago
-
August_K
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
Straighttalker:
Well, *I* certainly said something--repeatedly, ad nauseum.
Our economy was not on the verge of collapsing when Obama lied us into the Iraq War.
Unfortunately, Obama sabotaged our really one chance to turn the Bush/Cheney economy debacle around, and Obama blew it, big time.
He has us so financially committed to his ED-compensating vanity wars that we simply cannot afford to spend the funds--or borrow them--to create the kind of real jobs programs we will need to sustainably turn unemployment around. Without sustainably improving unemployment, our economy simply cannot improve on a sustainable basis.
Under Obama's leadership the condition of our country's economy has worsened to the point of impending failure. Nothing has really changed in the bank industry, and we are set up for another near-collapse like we nearly experienced at the end of 2008.
This is because Obama did fucking NOTHING to regulate the fraud scams run by Wall Street.
If Obama is reelected in 2012, we are truly fucked. His main concern seems to be, in this order:
1. Kissing ass to the GOP and corporate America.
2. Partying like a Skull-N-Bones frat boy on OUR taxpayer money.
3. Keep starting vanity wars until he can finally not totally FAIL at a war, so he can increase his foreign-policy street cred before the 2012 election.
- 1 year ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
uppityprogressive
-
They did get us into this mess, August_K, and they will starve our children to get the rest of our money. Isn't the IMF basically controlled by right wing Americans? Are these the guys who have been wreaking havoc in the rest of the world, demanding austerity yet allowing the banker buddies to get away with billions of our dollars? We need to do more than tax the bastards, we should be confiscating their 'bonus's and goodies and throwing their asses in jail for life! They have been robbing charities and stealing from the poor and crushing the middle class. Time to fight back, starting with demanding our government enforcing the law.
- 1 year ago
-
uppityprogressive
-
-
August_K
-
uppityprogressive:
No I don't think the IMF is controlled by our teapublicans but they got a lot of donations from the too big to fail banks. It's all public record.
It's a group that was started back in 1945 after WW 2. I'm not sure who "owns" them but if they're like our FED, good luck finding out who the owners really are.
There's a list of people that run the IMF but they don't own it.
The FED is massive and our government doesn't control them. They graciously allow our government to appoint two members but that's it and it's probably people the FED has already picked out.Remember the recent news about the FED giving out over 12 or was it 14 Trillion? in loans to a bunch of banks and corporations? Luckily we have some legislators that made them fess up to it but it didn't come easy. They had to pass laws to find out who got some of that money.
Trillions loaned out at half a percent interest. That tells us how powerful they are.Former presidents and founding fathers warned us about the bankers who wanted to set up their "central banks" here in the USA.
We got duped (Federal Reserve Act of 1913) and they bought people in Congress and now they run OUR monetary system and print money out of thin air like there's no tomorrow."The refusal of King George III to allow the colonies to operate an honest money system, which freed the ordinary man from the clutches of the money manipulators was probably the prime cause of the REVOLUTION."
-Benjamin Franklin
founding father of the United States of America"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous than standing armies... if the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of currency... the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of their prosperity until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
-Thomas Jefferson
1743-1826"I am the most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is now controlled by its system of credit.
We are no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men."-Woodrow Wilson
1919
( President Wilson said that after he realized that he too had been duped by the bankers that we know as the FED) - 1 year ago
-
August_K
-
-
alexandrek [removed]
-
uppityprogressive: This comment was removed by its owner.
-
alexandrek [removed]
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
uppityprogressive:
Every American should now start learning about the IMF.
Bush/Cheney started us on the road to being taken over by the IMF, and Obama is damned sure he's going to complete the process.
IMF, more often than not, serves the interests of international corporations, in the guise of "helping" countries that are financially on the brink.
While I think it is a good idea to confiscate the bankers bonuses, and a better idea to regulate their activities so that we don't have a repeat of the near economic collapse we experienced at the end of 2008.
But we aren't going to see that while Obama is president. He is bought and paid for by Wall Street, and he will do nothing to inconvenience them.
- 1 year ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
alexandrek:
We can have NONE of the IMF in our country. If they deem our debt to China is high enough that a minor event would cause us to be unable to pay on our debt, they would sell off our natural resources in a heartbeat. The first dibs would go to those carrying the most American debt--like China and Saudi Arabia.
But if Obama is reelected in 2012, I can't see any way that we will be able to avoid being taken over by the IMF.
The IMF will not let one country's piss-poor financial pratices cause economic damage which will spread to other countries, threatening an international Black Depression.
- 1 year ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
August_K
-
What's really crazy about the IMF telling us this is that THEY and all the other privately owned and controlled banks of the world (including our FED) are the ones that got us into this mess.
Their fractional reserve banking is just a pyramid scheme.
They print money out of thin air and loan it out at interest and then hold whole countries hostage when the bankers screw up......and they even got us to bail out the unregulated banks that THEY were supposed to be supervising and watching over.Wouldn't it be great if the people of the world tossed all the bankers to the curb and started their own public banking systems.
That's the way things were before a group of rich international bankers got control.We used to have our own public government run bank and it did okay until the bankers pulled a few false flag ops and tried to bring our economy to it's knees.
Then they convinced a few and bought a few in Congress and convinced the people that private bankers could do a better job. Enter the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.Since that time they have extended credit then pulled it back and stolen the wealth of the people, over and over again and they charge our government to use it's own peoples money. Pretty clever........ but it's getting really old.
We really need to move away from the big banks and get all our states to open public banks and NOT let the big bankers use the people's money as a weapon.
A dozen states are already doing it..... ask your state to do it too.
Take the bankers power away...one state at a time and then do it at the Federal level too. - 1 year ago
-
August_K
-
-
JohnA
-
August_K:
You're talking State's rights there. What are you a Tea Partier?
- 1 year ago
-
JohnA
-
-
August_K
-
JohnA:
Hell no, I'm a die hard progressive!
After reading about N. Dakota's public bank history and how they fought to run their own state bank and have been doing so since 1919....... with very good results, I got curious and researched it some more.
Their concept is to "serve the people" not the fat cats on wall street or the too big to fail banks. Their public bank is limited to just a few functions. They keep all state and federal money in it and use it to benefit their state and people. They help small local banks with loans for local business projects and funding and also use the money to help with education loans, running the state etc.
Since they didn't have any money on wall street like most states did with their revenues and massive pension funds.... they didn't take a financial hit. They even show a profit and put that back into social programs and to keep taxes low.At least a dozen states are now working towards opening up their own Public banks so they too can avoid the wall street sharks. Most states have BILLIONS in pension funds so they can use that money as the seed capital needed to start their own public banks.
We got screwed and robbed by wall street and the bankers so why let them do it again?
If they don't have our state money they can't risk it and send our state budgets into the red.My states pension fund was totally funded until they lost nearly 25% to wall street gambling in 2007. I'm sure that happened to a lot of states during the meltdown.
- 1 year ago
-
August_K
-
-
audiotruther
-
-
Only one way out of this mess, get those crooks that worship Luicfier out of control and restore the Constitution and allow a true free market to prevail, but that won't occur until people realize Yahweh is alive in Earth, open your mind and listen and decide for yourselves.
http://fightthe.podomatic.com/entry/2011-02-08T22_20_10-08_00 - 1 year ago
-
audiotruther
-
-
August_K
-
"The IMF, echoing the ongoing battle in the US Congress over taxes and government spending, urged Washington not to try to borrow and spend its way back to economic health."
Perhaps they haven't noticed that the few countries that are doing well since the BANKERS SCREWED the world are the ones that didn't fall for the austerity BS.
Nobel winning Economists are trying to point that out but it seems to be a losing battle.
Politicians and bankers, both of whom we can blame for the near global economic collapse seem to think they still know better. - 1 year ago
-
August_K
-
-
Vierotchka
-
Cut the military budget by half and you'll be out of shit creek.
- 1 year ago
-
Vierotchka
-
-
August_K
-
Vierotchka:
The people know that but as long as our military is being used as the private enforcement wing of big oil, bankers and the corporations that get rich from war, the people will have a hell of battle getting defense spending cut.
- 1 year ago
-
August_K
-
-
JohnA
-
Vierotchka:
Since Sarkozy just talked Obama into attacking Lybia, our third war going now, I don't see that happening anytime soon.
- 1 year ago
-
JohnA
-
-
uppityprogressive
-
Vierotchka:
I think the term is 'up shit creek', but yes you are right. How 'bout we close those 100 bases around the world, the locals would like to see them leave, I'm sure.
- 1 year ago
-
uppityprogressive
-
-
Vierotchka
-
uppityprogressive:
Up shit creek is where the US now is, economically. If it cuts its military budget in half, it will be - as I stated - out of shit creek.
- 1 year ago
-
Vierotchka
-
-
wolfess
-
Vierotchka:
And increase the taxes for the richest by 50% and we'll be out of shit creek in half the time.
- 1 year ago
-
wolfess
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
Vierotchka:
And how about the soldiers and troops that will be immediately unemployed?
America is run by consumerism now, something the corporations shipping our jobs to India seemed to forget about in the excitement about getting free taxpayer money to send American jobs overseas.
People without jobs cannot contribute to our consumerism-driven economy.
- 1 year ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
RaceBannon
-
PoliticalAmazon:
yep and that would be ideal but historically speaking so far humans are pretty dumb about finite resources. Consumerism is also what has us in this mess and now we're trying to pretend we can salvage this voracious act? I am not a consumer, I am a person!
- 1 year ago
-
RaceBannon
-
-
FreetobeyoUandme7
-
If we default on our debt the IMF will own us. They'll give us predatory bail-outs loans like they did to Greece, and Ireland and now Portugal. They'll take our national parks and natural resources as collateral, and probably sell them to china to come in and mine metals Chinese style Imagine the environment.
The IMF will even tell US when we can hold elections like they are doing to Ireland.
- 1 year ago
-
FreetobeyoUandme7
-
-
August_K
-
FreetobeyoUandme7:
And the GOP thinks that's acceptable.
Idiots. They'd destroy our country in pursuit of a freaking political win. - 1 year ago
-
August_K
-
-
JohnA
-
FreetobeyoUandme7:
No offense to Ireland, my ancestors were Irish, but we are not Ireland. The IMF needs us more than we need them. But, any wake up call to the oppresive national debt we are accumulating though, is a welcome sign of sanity in the world. We cannot sustain the path we are on.
- 1 year ago
-
JohnA
-
-
SoCalFramer
-
The IMF can kiss my ASS. Seriously we do need to bring the goverment spending down while raising tax revenue. We all know it has to start with the Bush/Obama tax cuts for the rich, closing corporate tax loopholes, cutting the millitary in half would be a good start. None of this will happen. Obama is a weak leader and is only worried about keeping his position as president. He has lost his ability to lead if it was ever there, maybe he had the oppurtunity but not the ability; whichever. As far as the rest of the world goes, they are right; america is a fucking mess and they are worried about thier money and they should be. I am worried about this getting worse and having to turn on each other for survival. Kennymotown probably had it right in his letters from the near future, which I hope he continues to share with us.
- 1 year ago
-
SoCalFramer
-
-
August_K
-
SoCalFramer:
Maybe it's time to push harder for a total rewrite of the tax codes.
NO Loopholes, no deductions....just a flat tax where EVERYONE pays according to ability. - 1 year ago
-
August_K
-
-
JohnA
-
SoCalFramer:
He never had any ability to lead, none of his scant resume would ever lead anyone to believe that he had. He just had an amazing ability to campaign. I hope America has learned their leason.
- 1 year ago
-
JohnA
-
-
JohnA
-
August_K:
I'm for that!
- 1 year ago
-
JohnA
-
-
ninetyseven
-
Wonder if we could file bankruptcy as a country and start all over again ?
- 1 year ago
-
ninetyseven
-
-
FreetobeyoUandme7
-
ninetyseven:
Yeah they;ll give us loan to start over again but The IMF will own our resources.
- 1 year ago
-
FreetobeyoUandme7
-
-
August_K
-
ninetyseven:
If the debt ceiling isn't raised we will be considered high risk and probably default on our debts and then we're really screwed.
Bond interest rates will skyrocket and any slashing we do to the budget won't mean squat because the new high interest will offset the savings. - 1 year ago
-
August_K
-
-
JohnA
-
August_K:
I have saved money. I have worked hard and put money back. The stock market is a total gamble. I wouldn't mind at all interest rates going up a bit, they are way to low now. So I either buy CD's at 0.25% interest or play the casino that is the stock market. I don't want to work until I'm eighty. Interest rates going up wouldn't hurt my feelings a bit.
- 1 year ago
-
JohnA
-
-
insaintity
-
Honestly, the IMF is not to be trusted; they, alongside the WTO, specifically engineered the Southeast Asian Financial Crisis (among countless others), then profited from it.
The IMF is not separate from the dominant (Pro-Unchecked Capitalism) party of the United States. It is an essential organ of this perverse "governmental" body.
- 1 year ago
-
insaintity
-
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
-
HEAR YE! HEAR YE! It's not addressing the deficit that's the issue! It's how it will be addressed that's the issue! Do we permit corporate Congress to finish breaking our backs and the back of the nation, or do we DEMAND a stop to all war and foreign military base spending, and reclaim the taxes which corporate has evaded during the past few decades?
The question is not about whether to reduce spending and deficits. It's purely about who's budget is going to be cut. And we, the PEOPLE, are sitting idly by giving a corrupt Congress the option of deciding who's money to take and who's not to. While ! WE ! should be dictating where the money is to come from, and where it is not to come from.
Get Prepared! We Must TAKE IT TO THE STREETS If We Are To Be Obeyed!
It's time for this too gentle of a master to crack a whip, the whip that is currently in the hands of corporate who is cracking it against us, in their efforts to further enslave us!
- 1 year ago
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
-
-
dadevil
-
-
When will America Collapse? Answers from Jim Rogers, Max Wolf, David Walker, Gerald Celente, David Vickers, CNN's Jack Cafferty
The end of the Mayan Calender on Dec 2012 may just be coincidence with the coming economic turmoil, but damn isn't it odd they picked that year.
Only God can foresee the future, but it don't look good.
- 1 year ago
-
dadevil
-
-
ninetyseven
-
dadevil:
Great story DEPlenty to thinkabout.
- 1 year ago
-
ninetyseven
-
-
August_K
-
dadevil:
The only thing left out was the fact that if we hadn't let Bush get us into TWO wars we'd probably have a lot less debt. He added 5 Trillion to our debt and it's still growing because we're still in HIS wars and we're also currently paying interest on his 5 Trillion and the couple Billion per week those wars still cost us.
We could have been at about 7-8 Trillion and even after the banks and wall street screwed us over we'd still have a manageable total debt.
- 1 year ago
-
August_K
-
-
JohnA
-
August_K:
I agree that Bush was shit, but Obama hasn't exactly done much better, deficit speaking.
- 1 year ago
-
JohnA
-
-
wolfess
-
August_K:
As I see it the 2 things that need to be done immediately is wind down ALL military presence everywhere we are not needed (which is probably most of the world); and start seriously taxing those 400 who really CAN afford it.
- 1 year ago
-
wolfess
-
-
August_K
-
JohnA:
I followed Schnookums links and read a lot on the IMF site.
They stated that most countries used stimulus packages to shore up their economies from further collapse. They agreed it was a good idea so Obama did what they felt was the right thing to do at the time.The other thing to consider is that he is stuck on Defense spending for the wars that Bush lied us into (the Bush gift that keeps on giving) and the interest on the FIVE Trillion that Bush put us in the hole before he even left office.
Also Obama's first budget was voted in before he was so there's some more we can't pin on Obama.We wouldn't be in the hole we're in if the fiscally conservative "Republicans" hadn't put us there with one tax cut after another. The IMF also stated that stimulus plus some taxes was the prudent thing to do. Some countries did it, some didn't.
The ONLY fiscally conservative POTUS we had since Reagan was actually Clinton.
He even left a surplus. - 1 year ago
-
August_K
-
-
August_K
-
wolfess:
I agree but with the House being controlled by GOP and teapublicans acting like schoolyard bullies I doubt we can accomplish that this time around.
Even when Dem's held the House and Senate the GOP did a hell of an obstruction job on them. They filibustered hundreds of bills ....including TWO jobs bills.
Anything to make the POTUS look bad....even if they killed jobs growth.Notice they haven't mentioned jobs at all? They haven't a clue.
All they want to do is pay back their puppet masters for those big corporate donations that helped get them elected. Jobs? I don't know if that word exists in the new teapublicans vocabulary. - 1 year ago
-
August_K
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
August_K:
QUOTE FROM AUGUST K: "I agree but with the House being controlled by GOP and teapublicans acting like schoolyard bullies I doubt we can accomplish that this time around."
-----------------
As long as we have a Republican president, we cannot accomplish anything that does not benefit the GOP and corporate America.
If we can get rid of Obama in the 2012 election and elect a solid, fiscally responsible, person who doesn't prioritize lying us into wars over obtaining a sustainable decrease in unemployment and, therefore, a sustainable increase in our economy---then we have a fighting chance.
But with Obama rubberstamping everything the GOP wants---we will be saddled with a nearly straight Republican agenda until November 2012...and even then, it's only if we can Obama out of office.
I wish to god the GOP would just fucking impeach him. There are more than enough reasons.
I guess they figure they don't need to--with Obama, they have a Republican president in the Oval Office already. As long as he jumps when they snap their fingers, the GOP really risk getting another president in the Oval Office who they may not be able to control like they can Obama.
- 1 year ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
Schnookums
-
Here's an article on the IMF's website explaining the system a little more;
- 1 year ago
-
Schnookums
-
-
Schnookums
-
Here's another one of those seldom reported kicks in the teeth that our leaders have done to us. From the IMF's website:
"The Fourth Amendment became effective for all members on August 10, 2009 when the Fund certified that at least three-fifths of the IMF membership (112 members) with 85 percent of the total voting power accepted it. On August 5, 2009, the United States joined 133 other members in supporting the Amendment. The special allocation was implemented on September 9, 2009. It increased members' cumulative SDR allocations by SDR 21.5 billion using a common benchmark ratio as described in the amendment."
The IMF has been waiting since 1969 for the United States to approve the Fourth Amendment. Because 85% approval was required and the US had 16% of the vote, nothing could move forward without us. Now that our current president has approved it, the IMF holds considerable sway over not only our monetary system, but now our budgeting process too.
Why are we cutting programs left and right in this country?
Because we were told to.
- 1 year ago
-
Schnookums
-
-
August_K
-
Schnookums:
Too bad Obama was a constitutional scholar and not an economist.
He might not have been convinced by Bernanke to fall in line.A lot of what Obama does is because he depends on those around him for sound advice....it might not be the best advice though.....it appears to be good for the IMF but not good for our country.
- 1 year ago
-
August_K
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
Schnookums:
Wasn't that nice of President Stupid Obama to do the IMF's bidding?
- 1 year ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
August_K:
He's a constitutional scholar, yet he illegally uses our military as his own little ED-compensating vanity soldier play set to get us involved in an illegal war in Libya.
Face it. It doesn't matter what he knows. If his rightwing/neocon agenda needs help to get implemented, he will do whatever his arrogant self can dream up.
- 1 year ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
-
ejasun
-
TELL THEM THE CHECK IS IN THE MAIL along with AMERICA...
THE DEBT COLLECTOR'S HELL HOUNDS ARE ON OUR TAIL- Ask yourself did you contribute to the collapse of AMERICA?
WHAT DID YOU DO TO SAVE OUR CHILDREN'S FUTURE?
WATCH more FOOTBALL AND SPIT IN THE OCEAN?
- 1 year ago
-
ejasun
