Japan to raise Fukushima crisis level to worst "7"
-
-
- cool0ne
- added this
http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/12_05.html
The Japanese government's nuclear safety agency has decided to raise the crisis level of the Fukushima Daiichi power plant accident from 5 to 7, the worst on the international scale.
-
- groups:
- Community, News and Politics, Health, World News, 4 more
-
-
ArchDruid [removed]
- This comment was removed by its owner.
-
ArchDruid [removed]
-
-
im1mjrpain
-
ArchDruid:
Knock off the chernobyl comparisons. It's getting old already. We won't know the true extent of the damage for awhile now. So put your crystal ball back in the closet.
- 1 year ago
-
im1mjrpain
-
-
Wetdog
-
im1mjrpain:
You can't know where you are going until you know where you have been.
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
Wetdog
-
So, what does all this mean? Increased cancers and birth defects.
Like this.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/02/Kiev-UkrainianNationalChernob...
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
Wetdog
-
----------" Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment is an English translation of the 2007 Russian publication Chernobyl. It was published online in 2009 by the New York Academy of Sciences in their Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. It presents an analysis of scientific literature and concludes that medical records between 1986, the year of the accident, and 2004 reflect 985,000 deaths as a result of the radioactivity released. The authors suggest that most of the deaths were in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, but others were spread through the many other countries the radiation from Chernobyl struck.[40] The literature analysis draws on over 1,000 published titles and over 5,000 internet and printed publications discussing the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster. The authors contend that those publications and papers were written by leading Eastern European authorities and have largely been downplayed or ignored by the IAEA and UNSCEAR.[41] Author Alexy V. Yablokov was also one of the general editors on the Greenpeace commissioned report also criticizing the Chernobyl Forum finds published one year prior to the Russian language version of this report."--------
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster_effects
985,000 deaths is a lot of deaths from one accident. And radiation levels continue at high levels over much of Europe today, 25 years later.
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
Schnookums
-
According to the photographs, the spent fuel pool at reactor 3 seems to be missing. That alone should have qualified this as a '7' from the start.
- 1 year ago
-
Schnookums
-
-
JanforGore
-
It's been a seven for weeks as far as I am concerned. My thoughts and prayers go out to the people of Japan. Where would they even go if they needed to be evacuated? How could this land possibly be inhabitable if it gets even worse? And once again, our oceans are also the victims as well as marinelife and all in the web of life that will be effected by this.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
Dagum
-

-
Context: The International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (INES) was introduced by International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) 1990.
Previously on the INES Fukushima was at Level 5: Accident with wider consequences
-Impact on people and environment
- Limited release of radioactive material likely to require implementation of some planned countermeasures.
- Several deaths from radiation.Impact on radiological barriers and control
- Severe damage to reactor core.
- Release of large quantities of radioactive material within an installation with a high probability of significant public exposure. This could arise from a major critically accident or fire.Now it's at a Maximum Level 7: Major accident
"Major release of radioactivematerial with widespread health and environmental effects requiring implementation of planned and extended countermeasures."
...And then it gives Cherynobal as an example...
And that's all the information the scale provides. It goes from 5 "Limited release of radioactive material several deaths from radiation" to a 7 "Release of large quantities of radioactive material widespread health and environmental effects."
Sounds Forebodingly vague.... like so bad "we don't even want to try and quantify the amount of deaths resulting from this nuclear holocaust."
- 1 year ago
-
Dagum
-
-
uppityprogressive
-
Maybe they should be shutting down all the rest of their nuclear power plants. They have many more, probably in the same outdated under-protected condition. I agree meg0321, it could get lots worse.
- 1 year ago
-
uppityprogressive
-
-
meg0321
-
Wow, something tells me this is going to get A LOT worse before it gets better... with all the radiation their pumping into the ocean we should be seeing 3 eyed fish at some point; no matter how big the ocean is, this is STILL a huge deal man... Oh yeah they just had another earthquake too, 6.1 is what I've read... man their getting beat up over there...
- 1 year ago
-
meg0321
-
-
KB723
-
Again I must ask why the media plays then downplays then comes back again with what has been the Truth all along.... Eeeesh!!!
- 1 year ago
-
KB723
-
-
NiceN
-
Really, this was a 7 before it was called a 5. My prayers go out to Japan, but there is no solution in the immediate future.
- 1 year ago
-
NiceN
-
-
HeroMAY
-
About that time to make peace with whatever God you believe in because the proverbial poopoo is sailing str8 towards the fan!
- 1 year ago
-
HeroMAY
-
-
SoCalFramer
-
I think the oceans are going to die. We as humans have used the ocean as a toilet bowl for are pesticides, oil spills, dumping all this nuclear waste directly into the ocean. The earth does not need humans, we need the earth and we treat her with very little respect. I feel really worried, when we were kids we knew that pollution was bad and would say I will never have kids because this world is fucked up. Now I have 2 daughters and what kind of world are we giving them?
- 1 year ago
-
SoCalFramer
-
-
littlelumpo
-
SoCalFramer:
On the idea that the world would be better off without people...
Sometimes I feel sad that humans really don't know of many role models when it comes to how to live in cooperation with the earth. I find that many, if not most, environmentalists say that the earth would be better off without humans. A lot of the time I think that too. But other times it worries me that we can't even think of a way that humans can be a force for good. Thus, we feel doomed to repeat a cycle of environmental destruction and desolation.
Can we picture a world in which humans work with the earth, not against it? What does the ideal human/earth interaction look like? What is the ideal role for a human being to play? A healer? A steward? Can we model ourselves after that vision?
Humans may have changed most of the world beyond recognition. But now many species are dependent upon us. I used to think this was a bad thing. But now I see that every species on the earth is dependent upon others; that is how an ecosystem works, and humans are part of that ecosystem. If humans disappeared tomorrow, lots of domestic animals and plants- especially agricultural ones- would disappear soon after. Like it or not, we are needed by *some* living things in order for them to survive.
Human beings are part of our ecosystem, and lots of other creatures depend upon us. So let's start acting like it. Let's start building positive roles for humans to play, working with other species and patterns of nature. What do you all think? Anyone with me?
- 1 year ago
-
littlelumpo
-
-
Angeliron
-
littlelumpo:
I'm in!
- 1 year ago
-
Angeliron
-
-
Jennifer_Guinn
-
littlelumpo:
With you.
- 1 year ago
-
Jennifer_Guinn
-
-
Vierotchka
-
Don't blame the reporters, they only reported what experts told them.
- 1 year ago
-
Vierotchka
-
-
FreetobeyoUandme7
-
Finally they are admitting the obvious. It only took them this long to publicly admit what most others realized 3 weeks ago.
- 1 year ago
-
FreetobeyoUandme7
-
-
Dagum
-
. 7 is the worst it can get on par with Chernobyl even though it is probably worse. They need to add an 8 or nine to the system.
- 1 year ago
-
Dagum
