even with this, people still follow her... WTF!!!

Only the elimination of all conservative Christians will allow all Americans to be free and the world to no longer have to live in fear of the U.S.A.'s imperialist, terrorist holy war. The conservative ideology has never helped mankind in any way, it has not only never helped mankind in anyway, it has oppressed, murdered, raped and killed all those in it's way to gain power. History shows us this. Fact shows us this. James Madison, the "Father of the U.S. Constitution", along with many founders of this country, regardless of their religious or non-religious affiliations, knew keeping politics and religion separate not only preserves each, but helps them flourish: "The number, the industry, and the morality of the Priesthood and the devotion of the people have been manifestly increased by the total separation of the Church and the State."

It is no wonder why the only followers this woman has is the country's lowest class of people.

Put down the foster care checks woman, stop reading "Curious George-A Christians Translation" to the current crop of indictrinated ninnies you are trying to raise "the right way".

We have judiciaries to hear cases and come to decisions, for all of our benefit. If our courts are not allowed to make rulings on legislation in this country then we are lost, plain and simply lost! I do not have enough room here character-wise in this post to list all of the landmark decisions regarding legislations that have come out of our supreme courts.

Our judicial system is needed as an important piece of our system of checks and balances, and pulling even one wheel off that machine means it will lean in one direction quickly and run our entire nation straight into the walls on either the right or left of the path we should be taking. I may not agree with some of the people who are sitting on these court benches but by god damn I sure see the reasons we have that bench for them to sit on.

You pull one such moment of non-sensery over one of your "pet issues" and we are well on our way to becoming a single party fascist state. Judges are there to keep us all working within the framework of our own laws, you don't like something, you go after the laws, not the Bench! What next on the list of the "non-jurisdictual" rubbish heap? Anything to do with pregnancy/abortion I am sure, then gay rights, then womens rights? You have no idea the slippery slope you have ventured onto here young woman, and you're trying to play dirty pool in a world full of sharks used to swimming in murky waters.

The only remaining question on this issue is, who the hell does she think is going to get to make these rulings if our courts don't? Any court matter involving family, marriage, and "LIFE" can't be heard by our courts...well that should save a ton of money considering thats got to amount to 60%+ of all court trials in the country have something to do with family and/or marriage, and since "life" is all encompassing...so now you want to make our courts just as impotent as every other well intended government agency since the beginning of our nation because you can't bring yourself to seeing the truth they have shared?

EFFIN' INSANE JABBERWOCKY ANTHROPOPHOBIC COMPENSATIONALIST BITCH!

It amazes me how a certifiable lunatic continues to receive so much attention from the media. But the lunatic right provides so much comic relief, I guess it's tough for many to look away. When you are no longer considered the most bat shit of the GOP candidates since the arrival of The Donald, you have to work just a little harder to get your crown back.

This is the kind of legal mind you get when you study law at Oral Roberts university.

Michele Bachmann was in their final graduating class in 1986 before they shut down the ailing law school.

Michelle Bachman has a lower intellect than one would expect to find in a grilled cheese sandwich.

Here's a person with a law degree, and should at least sound intelligent, but just doesn't seem to understand that she live in the United States, not some third world dictatorship. You can't just arbitrarily decide which laws are worthy of the court's protection and which are not. And as soon as something like this is used against interests she favors, she'll scream bloody murder! Communists! Those people are out to destroy America!
What a joke, I really hope she runs for president.

god damned dirty ape!

She is as delusional in thinking the congress can control the courts as the mama grizzly was in thinking the VP controlled congress. The regressives hold up these attractive puppets and fill them with talking points but they lack any means of understanding the very nature of the jobs they are taking.

Umm ya so I just read article three of the constitution and I really dont see what gives congress the right to limit the cases that the supreme court can hear. Not one word about it. Am I missing something? Here you tell me,

Article III.

Section. 1.

The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.

Section. 2.

The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;--to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;--to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;--to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;--to Controversies between two or more States;-- between a State and Citizens of another State,--between Citizens of different States,--between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.

Section. 3.

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

You know, for a group that is "pro-marriage, pro-life, pro-family" they sure have no problem starving people to death, killing them with poverty, denying them health care, and starting wars.
HYPOCRITES

Bachman is Sarah Palin on steroids!

I would love to see Congress, regardless of who controls it, exercise it's Constitutionally granted powers instead of always being confused as to what lane is theirs.

Please run Michelle. For the love of God and all that is holy, I beg of you to run for President. Don't cancel one of my favorite comedy tours.

I want to apologize to America for the people of my state that voted her into office. They really live in their own little world and are very afraid of anything out side of their world. That is why she is able to win again and again. She keeps them all afraid of everything.

This is horrid.

List of things Michele Bachmann doesn't understand ---

The Constitution - CHECK

I believe Congress's power to decide jurisdiction only rests with federal courts under the Constitution. Congress does have formidable influence over juridiciton regarding federal courts, and without jurisdiction federal courts cannot decide cases. On the state level I don't think Congress has any power regarding jurisdiction, but I would still hope there would need to be much proof provided to back up that certain equal protection cases at the federal level do not fall under cases relaying to the Constitution.To think she could change this simply based on her own biases is ludicrous and myopic. The Constitution IS about equal protection. I think she is grasping at straws really, though Congress does have the power on the federal level to undertake this. However, to do so would surely reveal their true colors. But then, as we already know some don't care about that in doing anything to assuage their own personal intolerances and hatred.

I personally think the interpretation of Section two would limit her goals in the first 22 words:

Section 2:

The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;--to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public ministers and Consuls;--to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;--to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;--to Controversies between two or more States;--between a State and Citizens of another State;--between Citizens of different States;--between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

Oh, and just so you know "Ms." Bachman, this is not a Theocracy and never will be.

This is what is now one of main spokesperson for the GOP. A party that wants to move forward but back to the dsys of living in caves.

She needs to go crawl back in the cave she came from.

..there's three sixes there somewhere...

She is embarrassing , as a female , i just want to say "Eew " .

I apologize to women everywhere for using the c word however camouflaged it wasn't, but this woman IMHO embodies that word.

Michelle Bachmann probably wants to be able to eat unicorn steak for breakfast but she's never going to get to. If there is any representative of the backwardness and idiocy of the Republican Party it's Bachmann. She's not going to be on a ticket. Though, I do have a passport ready just in case.

by the way ,.. I think its just super classic cool its been posted to the Trash can its brought a tear of awesomeness to my dry eyes thanks Kb this is such a relief to have a direction for my mounting ANGER.. voted way up!... keep it up I wouldn't wanna lose first in "news" to any better of a Bitch as Battybachman-bitch awesomeness
In awe.....( :0)
Thanks again :)(hat tip)

We all "want" things.. I want her TARRED & FEATHERED i really won't be happy until I see that on the World News other than that i have no other request's at the moment...now away with you peon's (a dark sarcasm like a film noir detective has entered the room he's beastly!) add music here (dun dun dunnnnnnn_:()

Michelle Bachman is a cuntessa fist class fish monster....no offense intended to fish or royalty.

Michelle is quickly turning herself in the LGBT public enemy number one. Perhaps some crazy drag queen will send her on her way to meet her maker at the rate she is going.

i there was a law giving corporations the right the adopt children by force from
unwilling parents if necessary she would be all in favor of it. corporations is the
only citizens she listens too

How about this Bachmann, you cannot violate the CONSTITUTION!!! As a constitution worshiping(a fetish among tea partiers) moron, you should know you cannot impose your faith on others!!!

This woman is just full of surprises (shit). Every single day is something new and even more disturbing than the previous thing.

Gawd.....I wish these people would at least read the Constitution that they have vowed to uphold.

How about in 2012 ..... Trump and Bachmann! Or Bachmann and Trump?
Would that be a fun campaign or what?