Community | April 13, 2011 | 10 comments

HUFFINGTON POST & AOL SUED BY WRITER -- LET THE FUN BEGIN!!

Image
PoliticalAmazon
One of the best parts of a lawsuit (as long as you aren't being the one sued) is the DISCOVERY PROCESS!! This is when you get to find out all kinds of interesting hidden information.

Oh, I hope they don't settle out of court!

-----------------------

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2011/04/huffington-post-writer-sues-t...

Writer sues Huffington Post and AOL for piece of $315-million sale price"

April 12, 2011

Jonathan Tasini, a social activist and commentator, is suing AOL and its newest purchase, the Huffington Post, over claims that he and other writers weren't paid appropriately for their work.

Tasini-p1-smallTasini's suit, which is seeking class-action status and was filed on Tuesday in a New York U.S. District Court, argues that none of the $315 million AOL paid to buy the Huffington Post has gone to the writers and producers of the news and opinion website, while estimating that about $105 million should have.

DOCUMENT: Read the suit

Between December 2005 and February 2011, Tasini said in the suit that he contributed 216 "pieces of content" for the Huffington Post and was never paid for any of his work. Tasini also alleges in his complaint that as many as 9,000 other "content providers" have also worked for free for the Huffington Post.

"TheHuffingtonPost.com has been unjustly enriched by engaging in and continuing to engage in the practice of generating enormous profits by luring carefully-vetted contributors, with the prospect of 'exposure' (which TheHuffingtonPost.com deceptively fails to verify), to provide valuable content at no cost to TheHuffingtonPost.com, while reaping the entirety of the financial gain derived from such content," the complaint said.

The suit also alleges that, of the $315 million AOL paid for the Huffington Post, "the value
added by the content provided by Plaintiff and the Classes to TheHuffingtonPost.com's price
was at least $105 million, none of which was shared with Plaintiff and the Classes."

Mario Ruiz, a spokesman for the Huffington Post, said the suit was without merit.

"As we've said before, our bloggers use our platform -- as well as other unpaid group blogs across the Web -- to connect and help their work be seen by as many people as possible," Ruiz said. "It's the same reason hundreds of people go on TV shows to promote their views and ideas. HuffPost bloggers can cross-post their work on other sites, including their own. Aside from our group blog, to which thousands of people from around the world contribute, we operate a journalistic enterprise with hundreds of staff editors, writers, and reporters, all of whom have commensurate responsibilities -- and all of whom are paid."

In a post on his personal website, Tasini explained a bit more about why he filed the lawsuit.

"The Huffington Post was, is and will never be, anything without the thousands of people who create the content," Tasini wrote. "Ms. Huffington is acting like every Robber Baron CEO ... who believes that they, and only they, should pocket huge riches, while the rest of the peons struggle to survive. Ms. Huffington stance has been clear: only she deserves the fruits of the labor of the people who work for her.

"Actually, Arianna Huffington is worse than the CEOs of the banks, the Walton family of Wal-mart. At least, they pay their workers something -- even if those wages aren't enough to make ends meet.

"Huffington pays zero. Nothing. Nada."

Tasini's complaint against the Huffington Post isn't the first the writer has lobbed agianst a publication he's worked for.

In Tasini's Huffington Post biography, the writer is described as having been both a writer and activist in labor issues for more than 25 years.

"From 1990 to April 2003, he served as president of the National Writers Union (United Auto Workers Local 1981)," the bio reads. "He was the lead plaintiff in Tasini vs. The New York Times, the landmark electronic rights case that took on the corporate media's assault on the rights of thousands of freelance authors.

"For the last 25 years, he has written about labor and economics for a variety of newspapers and magazines."

In 2010, Tasini also made an unsuccessful bid for Congress.

-------------------------------------
  1. groups:
    Community,   Politics,   US Politics,   Huffington Post Alumni
  2. tags:
    Lawsuit Writer AOL huffington 2 more
  3.     
    |

10 comments // HUFFINGTON POST & AOL SUED BY WRITER -- LET THE FUN BEGIN!!

  • Mark701
    • +1
      Mark701  
    • "The Huffington Post was, is and will never be, anything without the thousands of people who create the content," Tasini wrote. "Ms. Huffington is acting like every Robber Baron CEO ... who believes that they, and only they, should pocket huge riches, while the rest of the peons struggle to survive."

      This is one of the most concise definitions of the American capitalism that I've read in a long time. Tasini's logic can easily be extended to include virtually every major corporation as well as many mid sized and small businesses in the country today. These people seem to believe that their success is solely of their own making. Nothing could be further from the truth. Maybe someday Americans will collectively gain enough self respect to go on a national strike against all these delusional people

    • 1 year ago
  • CitizenHill
  • PoliticalAmazon
  • simplecj
  • katsmetalarmy
    • +1
      katsmetalarmy  
    • CURRENT is and will never be, anything without the thousands of people who create the content!

      I explained to a friend about CURRENT.com they said they do the same thing on current site rip off our-postings reword them and use content for current TV? "KOOL-Aid NEWS"

      AND CURRENT is too one sided with POLITICAL VIEWS. supporting current.com agenda's?

      Beating down great writing and news links? WHAT ABOUT THE PODS PROMISE?

      WOULD THIS APPLY to CURRENT.com ALSO?

    • 1 year ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • 0
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • katsmetalarmy:

      Having been on both sides of the posting interface, IMO, "comments" by posters are a quid-pro-quo deal....the message-board system provides the software, costs of setting up, maintaining, and running the board system, etc.---and posters get a place to post and interact with each other.

      Some posts are beyond the normal posts, and obviously include a great deal of research. If the entire post is used by the website owner for promotional purposes, compensation should be given in some form--T-shirt, whatever. Recognition should, of course, always be given for anything from another source that is used.

      A formal website's blogger, who has a standing "column" which the website owners have had to either solicit the blogger to write (and created the "space" on the website where their articles are uploaded and displayed), or which the website owners had to vet and give permission for the blogger to use (and created it, etc., for the blogger)--that's a whole other deal.

      By the website soliciting--or vetting and then giving permission to-- someone to have a formal blog on the website, especially if the website staff create the space for them, how it looks, where the title goes, etc., implies the blogger's writings are a formal part of the website's content.

      In that case, it's pretty clear the website staff have invested resources to attract and apportion a part of their website for the blogger's use. That, IMO, would be a situation where the blogger would be actually paid.

      However, these arrangements should be made before the blogger accepts the formal blogging position with the website.

      In the case of Tasini and the other HP bloggers, payment wasn't available, and they were brought in with the indication that being on HP would greatly broaden their outreach to other media sources who might actually pay for content.

      In my experience (not on HP, but elsewhere), this is not true.

      Anyway, up until Arianna sold HP to AOL for $315million, there was no indication that the site was making a lot of money, and would have money to spare for paying bloggers.

      But when she sold HP, that all changed.

      That's how I see this situation. It will be interesting to see how it carries out in the courts.

    • 1 year ago
  • Leen61
  • kennymotown
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • +3
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • kennymotown:

      If this writer wins, it will set legal precedent for other writers to sue for payment from the websites for which they have been providing free content.

      There will be some really big guns going after Jonathan Tasini.

    • 1 year ago
more from Community:

top videos