U.S. Congress moves wolves off of endangered species list- a legislative first
source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/13/us/politics/13wolves.html?_r=1&ref=politics
-
-
- JanforGore
- added this
A rider to the Congressional budget measure agreed to last weekend dictates that wolves in Montana and Idaho be taken off the endangered species list and managed instead by state wildlife agencies, which is in direct opposition to a federal judge’s recent decision forbidding the Interior Department to take such an action.
While the language on the Rocky Mountain wolves was a tiny item in budgetary terms, environmental groups said it set an unnerving precedent by letting Congress, rather than a science-based federal agency, remove endangered species protections.
The rider is the first known instance of Congress’ directly intervening in the list. While Congress overrode the protections extended to a tiny Tennessee fish called the snail darter about two decades ago, it did so by authorizing the construction of a dam that had originally been tabled to protect the fish. In that case, Congress did not overturn scientists’ findings about the fish’s viability.
There are myriad restrictions and budget cuts for environmental initiatives in the proposed budget. Most appeared modest compared to the more drastic cutbacks in the original House budget. Federal agencies were still working through the extensive and complex list provided by Congress on Tuesday, trying to determine what their impact might be.
Among the cuts were $49 million from programs relating to climate change, $438 million from programs supporting energy efficiency and renewable energy, $638 million from environmental cleanup efforts by the Defense Department and $997 million from revolving funds through which the Environmental Protection Agency provides money for local water treatment and pollution cleanup programs.
The budget rider on the wolves, backed by two Western legislators — Senator Jon Tester, Democrat of Montana, and Representative Mike Simpson, Republican of Idaho — requires the Interior Department to adopt its earlier plan, removing wolves from the endangered list in those two states because it deemed that the states’ management plans, which include hunts of the animals, were acceptable.
The rider also precluded judicial review of this provision.
cont.
-
- groups:
- Community, Green, Animal Videos and News, Earth Care, 6 more
-
- tags:
- Environment, Congress, Animals, Wolves, 1 more
-
-
Darevalo
-
*GRRRRRR* AhWOOOOOOOOO
- 1 year ago
-
Darevalo
-
-
LampShadeHat
-
Wolves are overpopulated in the Northern states (such as Minnesota) but are still endangered or (more often) completely extinct in the majority of their original North American range. They've been delisted from the federal endangered species act but states can still have them protected individually if they feel the need. I know they've caused a lot of problems for ranchers but I hope they don't "manage" them to extinction again.
Wolves killing for "sport" is a natural thing-human hunters do it too. They may not have the energy to bring the meat back to their pack after the hunt, or they may injure an animal but it still runs away from them, only for it do bleed to death out of sight. These types of killings were a main food source for many endangered scavengers such as (a personal favorite of mine) the California condor, which has a wingspan of 9.5feet on average. I know, irrelevant. Just nerding out a bit.
- 1 year ago
-
LampShadeHat
-
-
samthesixth
-
The reintroduced wolves have wreaked havoc on elk herds in Wyoming and Colorado. In Colorado some of the reintroduced wolves have engaged in sport killing leaving the elk carcasses to rot. It's good to get them off the list as they are not endangered anymore, but the way they went about it is wrong.
- 1 year ago
-
samthesixth
-
-
chasingame
-
I don't agree at all that congress should make this decision. That said, the environmentalist groups in this case are being extremely hypocritical. Where I live (northern MN) we have more than enough wolves to de-list them and there are few if any scientists that would disagree. Environmentalist groups keep intervening with the de-listing even though the "science based" decision would be to do so.
- 1 year ago
-
chasingame
-
-
JanforGore
-
chasingame:
That may or may not be true, but in this case we don't know that and the fact it was a stipulation on a budget is outrageous. But then, I suppose those who shoot wolves for sport will be delighted.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
Outrageous. Yes, this is SO essential to the budget. This Congress sickens me.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
